Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-z2ts4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T10:58:29.585Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Iron deficiency and high-intensity running interval training do not impact femoral or tibial bone in young female rats

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 November 2021

Jonathan M. Scott*
Affiliation:
Department of Military and Emergency Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA
Elizabeth A. Swallow
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
Corinne E. Metzger
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
Rachel Kohler
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Indiana University Purdue University of Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA
Joseph M. Wallace
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Indiana University Purdue University of Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA
Alexander J. Stacy
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
Matthew R. Allen
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA Department of Biomedical Engineering, Indiana University Purdue University of Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, USA Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN, USA
Heath G. Gasier
Affiliation:
Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
*
*Corresponding author: Jonathan M. Scott, email jonathan.scott@usuhs.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the USA, as many as 20 % of recruits sustain stress fractures during basic training. In addition, approximately one-third of female recruits develop Fe deficiency upon completion of training. Fe is a cofactor in bone collagen formation and vitamin D activation, thus we hypothesised Fe deficiency may be contributing to altered bone microarchitecture and mechanics during 12-weeks of increased mechanical loading. Three-week old female Sprague Dawley rats were assigned to one of four groups: Fe-adequate sedentary, Fe-deficient sedentary, Fe-adequate exercise and Fe-deficient exercise. Exercise consisted of high-intensity treadmill running (54 min 3×/week). After 12-weeks, serum bone turnover markers, femoral geometry and microarchitecture, mechanical properties and fracture toughness and tibiae mineral composition and morphometry were measured. Fe deficiency increased the bone resorption markers C-terminal telopeptide type I collagen and tartate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRAcP 5b). In exercised rats, Fe deficiency further increased bone TRAcP 5b, while in Fe-adequate rats, exercise increased the bone formation marker procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide. In the femur, exercise increased cortical thickness and maximum load. In the tibia, Fe deficiency increased the rate of bone formation, mineral apposition and Zn content. These data show that the femur and tibia structure and mechanical properties are not negatively impacted by Fe deficiency despite a decrease in tibiae Fe content and increase in serum bone resorption markers during 12-weeks of high-intensity running in young growing female rats.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society
Figure 0

Fig. 1. (a) Weekly food intake. Values are means ± sd per cage, 2 rats per cage, n 20-21 per group. IA, iron adquate; ID iron deficient. , IA, , ID. (b) Weekly body mass response to exercise and iron intake. Values are means ± sd, n 10–11 per group. IAS, iron-adequate sedentary; IAE, iron-adequate exercise; IDS, iron-deficient sedentary; IDE, iron-deficient exercise. , IAS, , IAE, , IDS, , IDE.

Figure 1

Table 1. Haematological response to exercise and iron intake

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Serum biomarkers of bone formation and resorption. Values are means ± sd, n 9–10 per group. (a) Procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP); (b) C-terminal telopeptide type I collagen (CTx-1); (c) osteocalcin; (d) tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRAcP 5b). , Sedentary, , exercise for figures 2-6.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Dynamic histomorphometry analyses determine at the proximal tibia metaphysis. Values are means ± sd, n 8–11 per group. (a) Mineral apposition rate (MAR); (b) mineralized surface (MS/BS); (c) bone formation rate (BFR).

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Femur cortical geometric properties and cancellous microarchitecture determined by micro-CT. Cortical properties were determined at the mid-diaphysis. Values are means ± sd, n 9–11 per group. (a) Bone volume/total volume (BV/TV); (b) trabecular thickness (Tb. Th); (c) trabecular separation (Tb. Sp); (d) trabecular number (Tb.N); (e) mean total cross-sectional tissue area (T.Ar); (f) mean total cross-sectional bone area (B.Ar); (g) mean polar moment of inertia (MMI-polar); (h) cortical thickness (Ct. Th).

Figure 5

Table 2. Biomechanical properties of the femur determined by three-point bending tests

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Fracture toughness analyses determine at the femur. Values are means ± sd, n 7–10 per group.

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Bone mineral composition of the tibia. Values are means ± sd, n 9–11 per group.