Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-j4x9h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T15:46:28.899Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A 38-GHz demodulator with high image rejection in 65 nm-CMOS process

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 April 2023

Tian-Wei Huang*
Affiliation:
Graduate Institute of Communication Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
Yi-Cheng Huang
Affiliation:
Graduate Institute of Communication Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
Chen Chien
Affiliation:
Institute of Astronomy and Astrophysics, Academia Sinica, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
Kun-Chan Chiang
Affiliation:
Graduate Institute of Communication Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei 10617, Taiwan
Jeng-Han Tsai
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei 10610, Taiwan
*
Corresponding author: Tian-Wei Huang, E-mail: tihuang@ntu.edu.tw
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A high image rejection 38 GHz demodulator in TSMC 65-nm CMOS process is presented. To achieve better than −40 dBc image rejection ratio (IRR), a low I/Q mismatch 45° LO power splitter of sub-harmonic mixer is proposed. In this design, the 45° LO power splitter is composed of a Wilkinson divider, a series delay line with electrical length of 45° on one side of the divider, and a shunt 90° transmission line on the other side. This configuration is attractive because of its design simplicity and easy fabrication. Compared with the conventional techniques that utilize capacitors and inductors instead of the shunt 90° transmission line, the proposed LO power splitter can alleviate the issue of process variation. The demodulator demonstrates an IRR lower than −40 dBc from 37.5 to 41.5 GHz. In addition, conversion gain is 1.3 ± 0.9 dB from 33 to 41 GHz with 6 dBm LO power. The total direct current power consumption is 78 mW from 1.0 V supply voltage. At the modulation scheme of 4096-QAM, the proposed demodulator demonstrates 1.7% (−35.1 dB) error vector magnitude (EVM), which is very close to the EVM measurement floor 1.6% (−36 dB) of our millimeter-wave signal analyzer.

Information

Type
Frequency Mixers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the European Microwave Association.
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Schematic of the proposed demodulator, which is composed of a 45° LO power splitter, two quadrature dividers, two doubly balanced sub-harmonic mixers, LO/IF buffers and Marchand baluns at the RF port. Phase of LO signal is labeled using red numbers.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Simulated conversion gain versus LO input power. (a) different finger number (transistor width of 2 μm and Vg = 0.2 V is chosen for an initial selection); (b) different gate bias (transistor size of 2 μm × 14 fingers is decided).

Figure 2

Fig. 3. (a) Schematic of IF buffer amplifier; (b) Schematic of LO buffer amplifier.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. Simulated conversion gain vs LO power with and without LO buffers.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. 45° LO power splitter. (a) the conventional configuration, which utilizes two capacitors and one inductor; (b) proposed configuration, which replaces the capacitors and inductors with a 90° shunt transmission line at 19 GHz.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Phase difference between the output ports of the 45° LO power splitter versus LO frequency. (a) When the capacitance value of the conventional configuration is affected by process variation; (b) When the width of the 90° shunt transmission line in the proposed configuration is affected by process variation.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. (a) The measurement setup for the demodulator; (b) Chip photo of the proposed demodulator. The chip area is 1.27 × 1.2 mm2. The 45° LO power splitter, the four-way quadrature divider (which composes of a coupler and two baluns), the LO buffer, the IF buffer, the mixer core, and the RF balun are indicated.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Measured CG vs LO power. The RF input power is set to be −10 dBm. The conversion gain saturates at 6 dBm LO input power.

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Simulated and measured CG and IRR versus RF frequency. The image rejection ratio is lower than −30 dBc from 33 to 42.5 GHz, and is lower than −40 dBc from 37.5 to 41.5 GHz. Combining 3 dB-criterion with IRR performance, we define the measured RF bandwidth as 33 to 41 GHz for IRR better than −30 dB. Measured CG is 1.3 ± 0.9 dB within the RF bandwidth. The measurement results were obtained with LO input power of 6 dBm and RF input power of −10 dBm.

Figure 9

Fig. 10. Conversion gain (CG) and IF output power vs RF input power. The 1 dB compression point (IP1 dB) is at 0 dBm RF power.

Figure 10

Fig. 11. The proposed demodulator demonstrates a measured EVM of 1.7% (−35 dB) at the modulation scheme of 4096-QAM. This result is close to the EVM measurement floor (1.6%/−36 dB) of millimeter-wave frequency band. The measurement results were obtained with LO input power of 6 dBm and RF input power of −10 dBm, which is 10 dB below the IP1 dB point. (a) Constellation diagram; (b) Output spectrum.

Figure 11

Table 1. Performance summary and comparison.