Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-dqfph Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-11T12:46:38.982Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Key considerations for bio-welding of mycelium composites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2026

Marcello Nussbaumer*
Affiliation:
TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
Kerem Yılmaz
Affiliation:
TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
J. Philipp Benz
Affiliation:
TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany
*
Corresponding author: Marcello Nussbaumer; Email: marcello.nussbaumer@tum.de
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mycelium composites are intended to replace plastics in different applications as lightweight, sustainable alternatives. One major limitation is the exchange of oxygen and heat in the core of the material. Bio-welding allows the stacking of thinner layers that are then connected by fungal mycelium. We screened six different fungi for their growth rate, binding strength and gap-bridging capability before fabricating bio-welded composites from beech sawdust with two of the fungi, using two different particle sizes and growth durations. The influence of these parameters, as well as the number of layers and their orientation in the material, on internal bond strength and thermal conductivity was assessed. We found that the maximum gap-bridging distance of a fungus is less essential than the strength of the mycelium connection. Most importantly, the surface roughness of the layers must be minimized to ensure that the bio-welded interface is stronger than the individual layers.

Information

Type
Full Paper: Biodesign Conference
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Figure 1 long description.3D model of the gap-bridging setup (a). SH bridging a gap of 10 mm from both sides (top) and PS bridging 4 mm from one side (bottom) (b).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Placement of the inoculated wood cubes (a) and tensile testing after incubation and drying (b).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Schematic of the fabrication process of bio-welded mycelium composites. Pictograms were generated using Microsoft Copilot GPT-5 (accessed in February 2026) by uploading each element of the fabrication process as a photograph and asking for conversion into a black and white pictogram.

Figure 3

Table 1. The maximum distance that the tested fungi could bridge from one or two sides, including the duration until all three replicates bridgedTable 1 long description.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Figure 4 long description.Picture of the six white rot fungi used for the screening, displaying different growth after 3 days on PDA.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Figure 5 long description.Hyphal extension rates of the six different fungi on beech sawdust (a) and tensile strength of the mycelium connecting two beech wood cubes over a distance of 2 mm (b). All data points (n = 5 for the extension rate and n = 6 for the tensile strength) are plotted (black circles) together with the arithmetic mean (white squares), the median (black line) and the interquartile range (grey boxes). Different letters above the data indicate statistically significant differences between the groups of each graph (Dunn, p ≤ 0.05).

Figure 6

Figure 6. SEM images from the center of wood cubes colonized by the different fungi showing hyphae in the wood vessels.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Figure 7 long description.Interlayer failure of a TV2F_TT specimen that resulted in a perfect separation of the layers (a) and intralayer failure of a TV2F_BB specimen (b).

Figure 8

Figure 8. Figure 8 long description.Internal bond strength (IBS) of mycelium composites made from two different fungi and substrate particle sizes and consisting of 1, 2 or 4 layers. The growth duration was reduced by 7 days for samples ending with an “R”. For 2-layer composites, all layer orientations (TT = top to top; BT = bottom to top; BB = bottom to bottom) were analyzed. All data points (n = 5, except SH4F: n = 4) are plotted (black circles) together with the arithmetic mean (white squares), the median (black line) and the interquartile range (grey boxes). Different letters above the data indicate statistically significant differences between the groups (Dunn, p ≤ 0.05).

Figure 9

Figure 9. Figure 9 long description.Thermal conductivity of mycelium composites made from TV and fine or coarse particles, consisting of 1 or 4 layers. The measurement results of the three replicates are plotted.

Supplementary material: File

Nussbaumer et al. supplementary material 1

Nussbaumer et al. supplementary material
Download Nussbaumer et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 2.6 MB
Supplementary material: File

Nussbaumer et al. supplementary material 2

Nussbaumer et al. supplementary material
Download Nussbaumer et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 30.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Nussbaumer et al. supplementary material 3

Nussbaumer et al. supplementary material
Download Nussbaumer et al. supplementary material 3(File)
File 2.4 MB
Supplementary material: File

Nussbaumer et al. supplementary material 4

Nussbaumer et al. supplementary material
Download Nussbaumer et al. supplementary material 4(File)
File 14.4 MB
Supplementary material: File

Nussbaumer et al. supplementary material 5

Nussbaumer et al. supplementary material
Download Nussbaumer et al. supplementary material 5(File)
File 5 MB
Supplementary material: File

Nussbaumer et al. supplementary material 6

Nussbaumer et al. supplementary material
Download Nussbaumer et al. supplementary material 6(File)
File 10.9 KB