Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-46n74 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-10T04:11:06.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Maternal dietary linoleic acid altered intestinal barrier function in domestic pigeons (Columba livia)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 December 2020

Qianqian Xu
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory for Molecular Animal Nutrition of the Ministry of Education, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University (Zijingang Campus), Hangzhou 310058, People’s Republic of China Key Laboratory of Animal Feed and Nutrition of Zhejiang Province, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University (Zijingang Campus), Hangzhou 310058, People’s Republic of China
Jiashu Wen
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory for Molecular Animal Nutrition of the Ministry of Education, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University (Zijingang Campus), Hangzhou 310058, People’s Republic of China Key Laboratory of Animal Feed and Nutrition of Zhejiang Province, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University (Zijingang Campus), Hangzhou 310058, People’s Republic of China
Xiaoming Wang
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory for Molecular Animal Nutrition of the Ministry of Education, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University (Zijingang Campus), Hangzhou 310058, People’s Republic of China Key Laboratory of Animal Feed and Nutrition of Zhejiang Province, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University (Zijingang Campus), Hangzhou 310058, People’s Republic of China
Xiaoting Zou
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory for Molecular Animal Nutrition of the Ministry of Education, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University (Zijingang Campus), Hangzhou 310058, People’s Republic of China Key Laboratory of Animal Feed and Nutrition of Zhejiang Province, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University (Zijingang Campus), Hangzhou 310058, People’s Republic of China
Xinyang Dong*
Affiliation:
Key Laboratory for Molecular Animal Nutrition of the Ministry of Education, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University (Zijingang Campus), Hangzhou 310058, People’s Republic of China Key Laboratory of Animal Feed and Nutrition of Zhejiang Province, College of Animal Sciences, Zhejiang University (Zijingang Campus), Hangzhou 310058, People’s Republic of China
*
*Corresponding author: Xinyang Dong, fax +86 571 88982119, email sophiedxy@zju.edu.cn
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Linoleic acid (LA) is predominantly essential for poultry. Poultry lacking LA show retarded growth and reduced disease resistance. Intestinal barrier function plays an important role in pigeon squab growth, whereas research on the effects of LA on intestinal health in altrices is scant. Considering that squabs are fed by their parents, the study aimed to explore the effects of maternal dietary LA on intestinal morphology, tight junction proteins, immune cytokines and microbial flora in squabs. A completely randomised design with a control group, 1 % LA supplementation group, 2 % LA supplementation group and 4 % LA supplementation group was used. Six squabs from each treatment were randomly sampled at 21 d post-hatching. The results indicated that LA supplementation improved intestinal morphology, as reflected by increased villus height, villus area and the ratio of villi to crypts. Also, 1 % LA supplementation elevated the density of goblet cells in the intestine and strengthened tight junctions by up-regulating claudin-3 and occludin gene expression but down-regulating claudin-2 gene expression. Moreover, 1 % LA supplementation reduced the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines and partly increased anti-inflammatory cytokines. The intestinal microbial diversity in the 1 % LA supplementation group was higher than that in the other groups. As beneficial bacteria, Butyrivibrio was the biomarker of 1 % LA supplementation. However, excessive (4 %) LA supplementation led to adverse impacts on intestinal immunity and microbiota. In conclusion, maternal dietary LA might alter intestinal barrier function in pigeon squabs in a dose-dependent manner. Supplementation with 1 % LA was suggested in parental pigeons.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society
Figure 0

Table 1. Ingredient compositions and nutrient levels of experimental diets for parental pigeons* (on as-fed basis)

Figure 1

Table 2. Primers used for quantitative real-time PCR analysis of gene expression in domestic pigeons

Figure 2

Fig. 1. Effects of maternal dietary linoleic acid (LA) on intestinal morphometric trait in domestic pigeon squabs. (A) Villus height, (B) crypt depth, (C) villus area, (D) ratio of villus height to crypt depth (VCR), (E) density of enterocytes (intestinal epithelial cells; IEC), (F) haematoxylin and eosin staining of intestine (duodenum, jejunum and ileum) in the four treatment groups. The arrow points to enterocyte. Bar = 100 μm. Control = control group; LA1 % = 1 % linoleic acid supplementation group; LA2 % = 2 % linoleic acid supplementation group; LA4 % = 4 % linoleic acid supplementation group. Values are means with their standard errors of six squabs, n 6. a,b,c Means with unlike letters are significantly different (Tukey test, P < 0·05). (A–E) , Control; , LA1 %; , LA2 %; , LA4 %.

Figure 3

Fig. 2. Effects of maternal dietary linoleic acid on mRNA expression of tight junction proteins in domestic pigeon squabs. (A) mRNA expression of claudin-2 (CLDN2), (B) mRNA expression of claudin-3 (CLDN3), (C) mRNA expression of occludin (OCLN). Control = control group; LA1 % = 1 % linoleic acid supplementation group; LA2 % = 2 % linoleic acid supplementation group; LA4 % = 4 % linoleic acid supplementation group. Values are means with their standard errors of six squabs, n 6. a,b,c Means with unlike letters are significantly different (Tukey test, P < 0·05). (A–C) , Control; , LA1 %; , LA2 %; , LA4 %.

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Effects of maternal dietary linoleic acid on the density of intestinal goblet cells (GC) in domestic pigeon squabs. (A) Density of GC (per 100 intestinal epithelial cells; IEC), (B) periodic acid–Schiff staining of intestine (duodenum, jejunum and ileum) in the four treatment groups. The arrow points to GC. Bar = 50 μm. Control = control group; LA1 % = 1 % linoleic acid supplementation group; LA2 % = 2 % linoleic acid supplementation group; LA4 % = 4 % linoleic acid supplementation group. Values are means with their standard errors of six squabs, n 6. a,b Means with unlike letters are significantly different (Tukey test, P < 0·05). (A) , Control; , LA1 %; , LA2 %; , LA4 %.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Effects of maternal dietary linoleic acid on intestinal secretory IgA (sIgA) and cytokine concentrations in domestic pigeon squabs. (A) sIgA, (B) TNF-α, (C) IL-4, (D) IL-6, (E) IL-10, (F) IL-1β. Control = control group; LA1 % = 1 % linoleic acid supplementation group; LA2 % = 2 % linoleic acid supplementation group; LA4 % = 4 % linoleic acid supplementation group. Values are means with their standard errors of six squabs, n 6. a,b Means with unlike letters are significantly different (Tukey test, P < 0·05). (A–F) , Duodenum; , jejunum; , ileum.

Figure 6

Fig. 5. Effects of maternal dietary linoleic acid on the α-diversity of ileal microbiota in domestic pigeon squabs among groups. (A) Rarefaction curves, (B) operational taxonomic unit (OTU) distribution, (C) α-diversity index: Chao1, (D) α-diversity index: Shannon. Control = control group; LA1 % = 1 % linoleic acid supplementation group; LA2 % = 2 % linoleic acid supplementation group; LA4 % = 4 % linoleic acid supplementation group. Values are means with their standard errors of six squabs, n 6. a,b Means with unlike letters are significantly different (Kruskal–Wallis test and Duncan’s test, P < 0·05). (A) , Control; , LA1; , LA2; , LA4. (C and D) , Control; , LA1 %; , LA2 %; , LA4 %.

Figure 7

Fig. 6. Effects of maternal dietary linoleic acid on the β-diversity of ileal microbiota in domestic pigeon squabs among groups (n 6). (A) Principal coordinates analysis, (B) clustering analysis at phylum level, (C) clustering analysis at genus level. Control = control group; LA1 % = 1 % linoleic acid supplementation group; LA2 % = 2 % linoleic acid supplementation group; LA4 % = 4 % linoleic acid supplementation group. (A) , Control; , LA1 %; , LA2 %; , LA4 %. (B) , p_Firmicutes; , p_Proteobacteria; , p_Actinobacteria; , p_Cyanobacteria; , p_unclassified; , p_Acidobacteria; , p_Bacteroidetes; , p_Deinococcus_Thermus; , p_Tenericutes; , p_Verrucomicrobia. (C) , g_Lactobacillus; , g_Ralstonia; , others; , g_Streptophyta; , g_Sphingomons; , g_Candidatus_Arthromitus; , g_Streptococcus; , g_Escherichia; , g_Enterococcus; , g_Acinetobacter; , g_Veillonella; , g_Aeriscardovia; , g_Lachnospiraceae_unclassified; , g_Ruminococcaceae_unclassified; , g_Butyrivibrio; , g_Clostridium_sensu_stricto; , g_Enterobacteriaceae_unclassified; , g_Lactococcus; , g_Oscillibacter; , g_Porphyromonadaceae_unclassified; , g_Turicibacter.

Figure 8

Fig. 7. Effects of maternal dietary linoleic acid on the microbial biomarkers of ileum in domestic pigeon squabs (n 6). Control = control group; LA1 % = 1 % linoleic acid supplementation group; LA2 % = 2 % linoleic acid supplementation group; LA4 % = 4 % linoleic acid supplementation group. Linear discriminant analysis effect size analysis shows differentially abundant genera as biomarkers determined using the Kruskal–Wallis test (P < 0·05) with the logarithmic linear discriminant analysis score > 2·0. , Control; , LA1 %; , LA2 %; , LA4 %; , a: f_Microbacteriaceae; , b: o_ Actinomycetales; , c: g_Aeriscardovia; , d: f_Bifidobacteriaceae; , e: o_Bifidobacteriales; , f: g_Chlorophyta; , g: g_Deinococcus; , h: f_Deinococcaceae; , i: o_Deinococcales; , j: g_Enterococcus; , k: f_Enterococcaceae; , l: g_Lactobacillus; , m: f_Lactobacillaceae; , n: g_Streptococcus; , o: o_Lactobacillales; , p: g_Butyrivibrio; , q: g_Rhodopseudomonas; , r: f_Bradyrhizobiaceae; , s: g_Methylobacterium; , t: f_Methylobacteriaceae; , u: o_Rhizobiales; , v: g_Sphingomonas; , w: f_Sphingomonadaceae; , x: o_Sphingomonadales; , y: g_Ralstonia; , z: f_Burkholderiaceae; , a0: o_Burkholderiales; , a1: g_Escherichia; , a2: f_Enterobacteriaceae; , a3: o_Enterobacteriales; , a4: g_Pseudomonas; , a5: f_Pseudomonadaceae; , a6: o_Pseudomonadales.

Supplementary material: File

Xu et al. supplementary material

Tables S1-S2

Download Xu et al. supplementary material(File)
File 15.8 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Xu et al. supplementary material

Xu et al. supplementary material 2

Download Xu et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 79.7 KB