Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-rbxfs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T12:39:03.934Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How reliable and robust are current biomarkers for copper status?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2007

Ruth Danzeisen*
Affiliation:
International Copper Association, 260 Madison Avenue (FL 16), New York, NY 10016, USA
Magdalena Araya
Affiliation:
Institute of Nutrition and Food Technology, University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
Brenda Harrison
Affiliation:
Copper Research Information Flow Project, Department of Earth and Ocean Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Carl Keen
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition, One Shields Avenue, University of California-Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA
Marc Solioz
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Berne, Murtenstrasse 35, CH, 3010, Berne, Switzerland
Dennis Thiele
Affiliation:
Department of Pharmacology and Cancer Biology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA
Harry J. McArdle
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Green Road, Aberdeen AB21 9SB, UK
*
*Corresponding author: Dr Ruth Danzeisen, fax +1 212 251 7245, email rdanzeisen@copper.org
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cu is an essential nutrient for man, but can be toxic if intakes are too high. In sensitive populations, marginal over- or under-exposure can have detrimental effects. Malnourished children, the elderly, and pregnant or lactating females may be susceptible for Cu deficiency. Cu status and exposure in the population can currently not be easily measured, as neither plasma Cu nor plasma cuproenzymes reflect Cu status precisely. Some blood markers (such as ceruloplasmin) indicate severe Cu depletion, but do not inversely respond to Cu excess, and are not suitable to indicate marginal states. A biomarker of Cu is needed that is sensitive to small changes in Cu status, and that responds to Cu excess as well as deficiency. Such a marker will aid in monitoring Cu status in large populations, and will help to avoid chronic health effects (for example, liver damage in chronic toxicity, osteoporosis, loss of collagen stability, or increased susceptibility to infections in deficiency). The advent of high-throughput technologies has enabled us to screen for potential biomarkers in the whole proteome of a cell, not excluding markers that have no direct link to Cu. Further, this screening allows us to search for a whole group of proteins that, in combination, reflect Cu status. The present review emphasises the need to find sensitive biomarkers for Cu, examines potential markers of Cu status already available, and discusses methods to identify a novel suite of biomarkers.

Information

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2007
Figure 0

Table 1 Overview of copper-binding proteins