Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-l4t7p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-15T09:06:25.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Greatest Holocene advance of Glaciar Pio XI, Chilean Patagonia: possible causes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Charles R. Warren
Affiliation:
School of Geography and Geology, University of St. Andrews, St Andrews, Fife KY16 9ST, Scotland
Andrés Rivera
Affiliation:
Departamento de Geografía, Universidad de Chile, Marcoleta 250, Santiago, Chile
Austin Post
Affiliation:
(10275 SW 127th Street, Vashon, WA 98070, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Glaciar Pio XI (or Glaciar Brüggen) may be the only glacier in the world currently at its Neoglacial maximum. During the 20th century, most glaciers in Patagonia have consistently retreated, whereas Glaciar Pio XI has advanced almost 10 km, most recently at rates of ≤ 1.5 m d−1. This advance cannot be explained with reference to climate alone. An explanatory model combining calving dynamics, sediment budget and fjord topography explains the main features of recent behaviour. This case-study exemplifies the climatically out-of-phase behaviour so typical of calving glaciers, and illustrates the spatial and temporal scale over which they may behave asynchronously in the southern Andes.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 1997 
Figure 0

Fig. 1. 20th-century fluctuations of Glaciar Pio XI. (a) The northern half of Hielo Patagónico Sur, showing the main glaciers, primary drainage divides and ELAs (dashed lines) in the Pio XI region (after Aniya and others, in press). G.P.X., Glaciar Pio XI: G.G., Glaciar Greve; G.H., Glaciar Hammick; G.O., Glaciar O’Higgins; G.V., Glaciar Viedma. (b) Dated positions of the glacier termini since 1925. All undated ice margins are shown as at 14 January 1986. (c) Dated positions of the Lago Greve terminus since 1975. (d) Dated positions of the Fiordo Eyre terminus since 1975. (e) Location of the study area.

Figure 1

Table 1. Surface area of Glaciar Pio XI in 1945 and 1994. Areas are based on the Chilean 1: 250 000 Carta Preliminar series (“Isla Angamos”) and digital analysis of 1986 Land-sat imagery (Aniya and others, in press), adjusted to incorporate subsequent advance. They assume an ELA of 1000 m, and no significant change in the accumulation area. The thickening ablation area is likely to have intersected the ELA, thus enlarging the accumulation area and maintaining a high AAR (cf. Mercer, 196l), but this cannot he demonstrated with available data.