The challenge of evaluating an evolving intellectual legacy presents particular complexities in African political scholarship, where foundational theoretical frameworks must continuously adapt to rapidly changing empirical realities. This volume, dedicated to Crawford Young’s five-decade contribution to understanding African politics, confronts this challenge by assembling twelve chapters from his former students and colleagues who both celebrate and critically examine his legacy.
Straus and Tripp position Young as a transformative figure whose influence extended beyond scholarship to shape a generation of Africanist scholars through mentoring at Wisconsin-Madison. Their narrative constructs Young’s intellectual approach around meticulous empirical observation combined with comparative theorizing, exemplified in his trilogy—The Politics of Cultural Pluralism, The African Colonial State in Comparative Perspective, and The Postcolonial State in Africa. The editors deserve credit for balancing commemorative and critical approaches in a collection where achieving such balance is inherently challenging.
The first section analyzes Young’s colonial and postcolonial state theories through contemporary lenses, revealing enduring strengths and emerging limitations. William Reno’s opening chapter addresses what has emerged as a central theoretical debate in African political scholarship: whether Young’s foundational concept of the “crisis of the African state” retains its relevance three decades on. Drawing on empirical evidence across the continent, Reno demonstrates dramatic divergence: while Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso face cascading instability, Ghana transformed from a failed state to a democratic model, and Rwanda maintained impressive growth despite its conflict legacies. To explain this variation, Reno identifies three consolidation-enabling factors: “durable elite accommodations, social transformations producing independent commercial classes, and technological leapfrogging that enhances administrative capacity” (p. 39). His discussion of mobile money systems and digital taxation demonstrates how some African states bypassed traditional bureaucratic limitations. However, his analysis treats these factors as causes rather than consequences of improved governance, while his tech-optimism underplays how digital systems can strengthen authoritarian control.
If state capacity shows divergent patterns, democratic trajectories reveal a more uniform decline. John Harbeson’s systematic analysis yields pessimistic conclusions, documenting a decline in democracy across sub-Saharan Africa since 2005. His quantitative evidence reveals declining citizen trust: “presidential trust declined from 61.4 percent in 2013 to 50.6 percent in 2021” (69) alongside weakening national identity. Most striking, “citizen identification with nation-states over ethnic communities dropped from 47.8 percent in 2013 to 39.8 percent in 2021” (73). These patterns raise fundamental questions about political liberalization and state capacity and democratic legitimacy, questions that demand closer examination of how citizens understand the political community itself.
This question of political community and belonging–animating the volume’s treatment of identity politics–highlights the strengths and boundaries of Young’s framework when applied to contemporary conflicts. Timothy Longman’s nuanced reevaluation of Young’s instrumentalist ethnicity theory, through Congolese case studies, demonstrates analytical sophistication, confirming Young’s insights about the contextual flexibility of ethnic identities while identifying crucial limitations. His extensive fieldwork reveals that most Congolese ethnic politics remain contextual and manipulable, validating Young’s core insights.
Longman’s most crucial contribution identifies the point at which Young’s framework fails: “when group identities become racialized—that is, viewed as biological rather than cultural—differences become less malleable and more rigid” (145–46). His ethnographic evidence reveals how Congolese describe the Mbuti as “somewhere between animals and men” (164), demonstrating how racialization creates essentialized categories resisting contextual flexibility, as Young emphasized. This insight impacts understanding the ongoing exclusion of Banyamulenge, Tutsi, and Twa groups, illuminating both the power and limits of instrumentalist frameworks in explaining entrenched marginalization.
If ethnicity tests the boundaries of Young’s instrumentalism, gender reveals its deeper theoretical gaps. The gender politics section reveals Young’s intellectual generosity in encouraging diverse research and limitations of extending his frameworks to intersecting identities. Melinda Adams’ Cameroonian analysis effectively demonstrates Young’s frameworks’ continued relevance while exposing his gender-blind approach’s limitations. Adams documents how elite Anglophone women construct “distinctive gendered Anglophone identity” through cultural activities, providing concrete evidence of women’s active role in shaping national identity (264). Her analysis reveals how “authorities silence larger, male-led civil organisations…allowing [women’s groups] to thrive, at least for a period” (268).
Ladan Affi’s examination of Somali women’s political participation reveals that clan-based power-sharing systematically undermines the implementation of gender quotas. She shows that women achieved “only 14 percent of parliamentary seats in 2012 despite a 30 percent quota, rising to 24 percent in 2016 and 20 percent in 2021” (251). Affi’s ethnographic evidence of the “Maxiis” system, where “some men would pay a woman to run for a parliamentary seat, understanding that the woman would vacate the seat after the election” (250), illuminates mechanisms of exclusion. Affi’s framework treats gender as equivalent to ethnic categories rather than recognizing that gender cuts across clan boundaries, requiring different analytical approaches.
This volume demonstrates Young’s lasting influence while confronting his boundaries. His emphasis on empirical grounding, contextual sensitivity, and institutional analysis offers insights, particularly regarding how colonial legacies shape contemporary political competition and how supposedly primordial identities are constructed through political processes. Nevertheless, the volume reveals significant limitations. Young’s frameworks struggle with racialized identities that resist political manipulation, while gender dynamics cut across ethnic categories in ways that his cultural pluralism theory cannot adequately accommodate. His colonial inheritance thesis, while explanatorily powerful for understanding institutional continuities, cannot fully account for contemporary variations in state performance.
Despite these analytical limitations, the volume makes an important methodological contribution. The collection’s strength demonstrates how intellectual legacies advance through critical rather than reverential engagement. However, it reveals troubling gaps in contemporary Africanist scholarship, where Young’s frameworks are often treated as starting points rather than historical artifacts. The volume opens up space for future scholarship to build upon Young’s influential work. Young has been honored through his mentorship, which has been characterized by rigor and respect, while also leaving space for future scholars to imagine new directions, thereby building upon his intellectual foundations.
