Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-6bnxx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-27T02:29:58.357Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Oscillating flow in liquid metal vertical convection under the influence of a horizontal magnetic field

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 September 2025

Sylvie Su*
Affiliation:
Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden 01328, Germany CORIA-UMR 6614 - Normandie Université, CNRS, INSA de Rouen, Saint Etienne du Rouvray 76800, France
Sanjay Singh
Affiliation:
Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden 01328, Germany
Sven Eckert
Affiliation:
Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden 01328, Germany
Tobias Vogt
Affiliation:
Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden 01328, Germany
*
Corresponding author: Sylvie Su, sylvie.su@coria.fr

Abstract

The effect of a horizontal magnetic field on heat transport and flow structures in vertical liquid metal convection (Prandtl number $Pr \approx 0.03$) is investigated experimentally. The experiments are carried out for Rayleigh numbers in the range of $1.48 \times 10^6 \leqslant Ra \leqslant 3.54 \times 10^{7}$ and Chandrasekhar numbers in the range of $2 \times 10^2 \leqslant Q \leqslant 1.86 \times 10^6$, as well as for the non-magnetic case ($Q=0$). Measurements of the heat transport show a rise in the Nusselt number at low and moderate magnetic field strengths up to an optimum value of $Q$, before a further increase in the magnetic field leads to a decrease in the transport properties. By applying simultaneous velocity and temperature measurements, we are able to identify three different oscillatory flow regimes for $10^{-5}\lt Q/Ra \lt 0.5$ and assign them to the respective heat transfer characteristics. In the range $10^{-5}\gt Q/Ra\gt 10^{-3}$, first evidence of a transition to anisotropic flow structures caused by the magnetic field is visible. Two strongly oscillatory regimes are identified, where the energy is either distributed around a dominant frequency ($10^{-3}\gt Q/Ra\gt 10^{-2}$), or strongly concentrated on a single frequency ($10^{-2}\gt Q/Ra\gt 0.5$). The dominating frequency increases with the Rayleigh number according to $Ra^{0.71\pm 0.02}$. This flow structure based regime separation correspond to changes of both the heat transfer through the Nusselt number and mass transfer through the Reynolds number.

Information

Type
JFM Papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Schematic of the experimental set-up with UDV sensor positions.

Figure 1

Figure 2. (a) Nusselt number $Nu_0$ against Rayleigh number $Ra$ for $Q=0$. Dashed line fit $f = (0.19\pm 0.03) Ra^{0.19\pm 0.01}$. (b) Vertical Reynolds number $Re$ against Rayleigh number $Ra$ for $Q=0$. Dashed line fit $ (12.3\pm 0.03) Ra^{0.31\pm 0.03}$.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Left: spatio-temporal evolution of the velocity at $Ra=7\times 10^6$, $Q=0$. (a) vertical velocity $w$ from sensor 1 (cold plate, centre), (b) horizontal velocity $v$ from sensor 2 (cold plate, centre), (c) horizontal velocity $v$ from sensor 3 (hot plate, corner). Corresponding measuring lines are shown in figure 1. Velocity follows the direction of the respective y- and z-axes, as drawn in figure 1. Right: depth-averaged velocity spectra of sensor 2. Decay at higher frequency corresponds to the turbulent dissipation.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Normalised Nusselt number vs. $Q/Ra$. The diagram is divided into zones for different flow regimes by dashed lines. The respective flow regimes are determined from the flow measurements (see figure 6) and are presented later in § 3. Data from Tagawa & Ozoe (1998) are reported as open circles.

Figure 4

Figure 5. (a) Horizontal Reynolds number scaled by $Q/Ra^{1/2}$ for increasing $Q/Ra$ based on maximum velocity measured by sensor 2. Inset shows horizontal $Re$ against $Q$, where the data collapse, indicating that the magnetic field is the relevant forcing parameter. (b) Vertical Reynolds number for increasing $Q/Ra$ based on maximum velocity measured by sensor 1.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Spatio-temporal evolution of the velocity (UDV) at $Ra=7\times 10^6$ for $Q=1.2\times 10^4$ (a–d), $1.1\times 10^5$ (e–h), $1.5\times 10^6$ (i–l). Vertical velocities measured by sensor 1, (a, e, i), horizontal velocities measured at half-height of the plate by sensor 2 (b, f, j) and near the bottom corner by sensor 3 (c, g, k). Corresponding measuring lines are shown in figure 1. The direction of the velocity corresponds to the orientation of the respective y- or z-axis as drawn in figure 1. Depth-averaged velocity spectra of sensor 2 (d, h, l), the dominant frequency $f_0\times t_{\textit{ff}}=0.71$ measured from panel (l) is reported for comparison as vertical dashed line across all bottom panels.

Figure 6

Figure 7. (a) Regime diagram of the measurements performed in the $Ra-Q$ parameter space. Dashed lines $Q\sim Ra^{0.7}$ mark the approximate transition between the flow regimes. Flow structures are characterised by a dominant oscillation in the white areas, and no clear frequency is detected in the grey areas. (b) Dominant frequency $f_0$ normalised by viscous time $L^2/\kappa$ against Rayleigh number $Ra$.

Supplementary material: File

Su et al. supplementary material

Su et al. supplementary material
Download Su et al. supplementary material(File)
File 68.2 KB