Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-zlvph Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-19T04:26:06.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The thermal response of downhill skis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

S. C. Colbeck
Affiliation:
U.S. Army Cold Regions Research and Engineering Laboratory, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755-1290, U.S.A.
G. C. Warren
Affiliation:
Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The temperatures in downhill skies were measured with thermocouples to investigate the heat generation associated with the sliding of skis on snow. In these tests we investigated the effects on ski temperature of the ambient snow temperature, snow type, speed, load and thermal conductivity. A significant temperature rise at the base of the ski was found at the onset of motion in all runs. The temperature rise increased for heavier loads and at lower ambient temperatures. Some ski runs lasted long enough to observe a steady-state temperature at the ski base; it increased with ambient temperature. Longitudinal and transverse temperature variations occurred and were sensitive to snow hardness and skiing technique.

We also investigated heat flow through the cross-section of the ski with a finite-element model to determine the effects of ski structure on heat retention at the base. We found that the thermal characteristics as determined by the structure of the ski had a significant effect on the temperature at the ski base. At lower temperatures we expect that friction will be greater in skis which have a large aluminum plate across their base. Steel edges have a lesser effect.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Glaciological Society 1991
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Locations of thermocouples in the plastic ski in a cross-section under the skier’s foot

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Basal temperature on left side of plastic ski during parallel runs down gentle slopes. (a) load N/2 on soft, fresh snow. (b) ;load N on hard-packed snow. (c) ;load N on hard-packed snow. A indicates starting of motion and B indicates stopping in all graphs.

Figure 2

Fig. 3. Steady-state temperature and temperature rise versus ambient temperature for basal thermocouples of the plastic ski. Other titan ambient temperature, the other conditions were similar during the various runs. The steady-state temperature is less than 0C because it is averaged over the actual contacts at 0C and the colder non-contacting areas of the ski base.

Figure 3

Fig. 4. versus ambient temperature. Other than ambient temperature, the conditions were similar during the various runs.

Figure 4

Fig. 5. Basal temperature on right side of plastic ski. (a) Constant-speed ride up Poma lift while cycling the weight on the ski between N and N/2 with a period of 20 s; ;hard-packed snow. (b) Three periods of start and stop during a parallel run on a gentle slope.; ;load of N on hard-packed snow.

Figure 5

Fig. 6. Basal temperature rise versus load in plastic ski. The 0,0 data point is assumed.

Figure 6

Fig. 7. Basal temperatures on left and right sides of plastic ski during many turns, 1 is the inside and 5 is the outside of the ski. ;wide, smooth turns with load of N/2 on soft, fresh snow.

Figure 7

Fig. 8. Basal temperatures from inside to outside of DH skis. ; parallel run down gentle slope with load of N/2 on soft, fresh snow

Figure 8

Fig. 9. Basal temperatu rise versus position in DH ski runs on days with hard and soft snows. (a) Transverse position, two runs. (b) Longitudinal position, four runs.

Figure 9

Fig. 10. Temperatures in plastic ski. 1, 3 and 5 are on base in left, middle and right side. 2 is 3.8 mm above and 4, is 9.7 mm above, base.parallel run down gentle, slope with load N on hard-packed snow then up Poma lift at.

Figure 10

Fig. 11. Vertical temperature profile of DH ski showing basal, 3.5 and 8,5 mm responses. parallel run down gentle slope with load N/2 on soft, fresh snow.

Figure 11

Fig. 12. Relative temperature rise versus vertical position for both skis.

Figure 12

Fig. 13. Computed heat flux versus time for jour transverse positions and four cases of different materials as described in the text.load N/2. (a) 3 mm from edge; (b) 100 mm from edge; (c) 25 mm from edge; (d) on center line, 37 mm from edge