Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-m58mf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-27T07:52:08.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Utilization of proteins for growth and egg production

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2007

H. Erbersdobler ,
J. Gropp  and
H. Beck
H. Erbersdobler
Affiliation:
Institut für Tierphysiologie der Universität München, 22 Veterinirstr. 13, 8 Miinchen, West Germany
J. Gropp
Affiliation:
Institut für Tierphysiologie der Universität München, 22 Veterinirstr. 13, 8 Miinchen, West Germany
H. Beck
Affiliation:
Institut für Tierphysiologie der Universität München, 22 Veterinirstr. 13, 8 Miinchen, West Germany
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Meeting Report
Information
Proceedings of the Nutrition Society , Volume 34 , Issue 1 , May 1975 , pp. 21 - 28
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1975

References

REFERENCES

Austic, R. E. & Nesheim, M. C. (1970). J. Nutr. 100, 855.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, H. (1974). Studien über den Einsatz von Alkan-Hefen in der Geflügelernährung. Thesis, D. Vet. Sci., University of Munich.Google Scholar
Cavalieri, L. F., Tinker, J. F. & Brown, G. B. (1947). J. Am. chem. Soc. 71, 3973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chi, M. S. & Speers, G. M. (1973). Poult. Sci. 52, 1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erbersdobler, H. (1967). Untersuchungen zur analytischen und physiologischen Charakterisierungder Aminosäurenschädigung bei Hitzbehandlung von Nahrungs- und Futtermitteln. Habilitationsschrift Thesis, University of Munich.Google Scholar
Erbersdobler, H. (1971). Z. Tierphysiol. Tierernähr. Futtermittelk. 27, 217.Google Scholar
Erbersdobler, H. (1973 a). U.N. Publ. No. EFR 73 II.E, Mimeo. 8, vol. 1, p. 114.Google Scholar
Erbersdobler, H. (1973 b). Kraftfutter 56, 274.Google Scholar
Erbersdobler, H. & Gropp, J. (1971). Arch. Geflügelk. 35, 36.Google Scholar
Erbersdobler, H. & Riedel, G. (1972). Arch. Geflügelk. 36, 218.Google Scholar
Erbersdobler, H. & Riedel, G. (1973). Proc. int. Amino Acid Symp., Brno A29.Google Scholar
Graber, G., Allen, N. K. & Scott, H. M. (1970). Poult. Sci. 49, 692.Google Scholar
Graber, G. & Baker, D. H. (1973). Poult. Sci. 52, 892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, D. E., Scott, H. M. & Johnson, B. C. (1960). Poult. Sci. 39, 512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gropp, J., Beck, H. & Erbersdobler, H. (1975 a) Z. Tierphysiol. Tierernähr. Futtermittelk. 34, 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gropp, J., Beck, H. & Erbersdobler, H. (1975 b). Z. Tierphysiol. Tierernähr. Futtermittelk. 34, 181.Google Scholar
Gropp, J. & König, K. (1973). Naturwissenschaften 60, 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gropp, J., Schulz, V. & Beck, H. (1972). Z. Tierphysiol. Tierernähr. Futtermittelk. 30, 155.Google Scholar
Gruhn, K. (1973). Proc. int. Amino Acid Symp., Brno A 27.Google Scholar
Hewitt, D. & Lewis, D. (1972 a). Br. Poult. Sci. 13, 387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hewitt, D. & Lewis, D. (1972 b). Br. Poult. Sci. 13, 449.Google Scholar
Huston, R. L. & Scott, H. M. (1968). Fedn Proc. Fedn Am. Socs exp. Biol. 27, 1204.Google Scholar
König, K., Erbersdobler, H. & Gropp, J. (1973). Z. Tierphysiol. Tierernähr. Futtermittelk. 32, 7.Google Scholar
Kristen, H. S., Poppe, S. & Wiesemüller, W. (1966). Arch. Geflügelz. Kleintierk. 15, 317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuiken, A. & Lyman, C. M. (1948). J. Nutr. 36, 359.Google Scholar
Lee, D. J. W. & Blair, R. (1974). Br. Poult. Sci. 15, 17.Google Scholar
Maruyama, K., Harper, A. E. & Sunde, M. L. (1973). Poult. Sci. 52, 2060.Google Scholar
Miller, W. S. (1967). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 26, x.Google Scholar
Nesheim, M. C. & Carpenter, K. J. (1967). Br. J. Nutr. 21, 399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poppe, S. & Meier, H. (1971). Arch. Tierernähr. 21, 447.Google Scholar
Salter, D. N. & Coates, M. E. (1969). Proc. 8th int. Congr. Nutr., Prague p. 425.Google Scholar
Salter, D. N. & Coates, M. E. (1971). Br. J. Nutr. 26, 55.Google Scholar
Salter, D. N., Coates, M. E. & Hewitt, D. (1974). Br. J. Nutr. 31, 307.Google Scholar
Sasse, C. E. & Baker, D. H. (1973). Poult. Sci. 52, 1970.Google Scholar
Shaklady, C. A. (1969). 8th int. Congr. Nutr., Prague.Google Scholar
Shannon, D. W. F. & McNab, J. M. (1972). Br. Poult. Sci. 13, 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soares, J. H. Jr & Kifer, R. R. (1971). Poult. Sci. 50, 41.Google Scholar
Soares, J. H. Jr, Miller, D., Fitz, N. & Sanders, M. (1971). Poult. Sci. 50, 1134.Google Scholar
Soeder, C. J. & Pabst, W. (1970). Ber. dt. bot. Ges. 83, 607.Google Scholar
Varnish, S. A. & Carpenter, K. J. (1971). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 30, 70A.Google Scholar
Wang, S.-H., Crosby, L. O. & Nesheim, M. C. (1973). J. Nutr. 103, 384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodham, A. A. & Deans, P. S. (1971). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 30, 59A.Google Scholar
Zebrowska, T. (1973). Proc. int. Amino Acid Symp., Brno A 34.Google Scholar
Zucker, H., Erbersdobler, H. & Gropp, J. (1968). Z. Tierphysiol. Tierernähr. Futtermittelk. 23, 193.Google Scholar