Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-r6c6k Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-06T17:04:24.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Core handling, transportation and processing for the South Pole ice core (SPICEcore) project

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2020

Joseph M. Souney*
Affiliation:
Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA
Mark S. Twickler
Affiliation:
Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and Space, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, USA
Murat Aydin
Affiliation:
Department of Earth System Science, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
Eric J. Steig
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
T. J. Fudge
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Leah V. Street
Affiliation:
Antarctic Support Contract, U.S. Antarctic Program, Denver, CO, USA
Melinda R. Nicewonger
Affiliation:
Department of Earth System Science, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
Emma C. Kahle
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Jay A. Johnson
Affiliation:
U.S. Ice Drilling Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
Tanner W. Kuhl
Affiliation:
U.S. Ice Drilling Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA
Kimberly A. Casey
Affiliation:
National Land Imaging Program, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, USA Earth Sciences Division, NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
John M. Fegyveresi
Affiliation:
School of Earth and Sustainability, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ, USA
Richard M. Nunn
Affiliation:
NSF-Ice Core Facility, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO, USA
Geoffrey M. Hargreaves
Affiliation:
NSF-Ice Core Facility, U.S. Geological Survey, Denver, CO, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Joseph M. Souney, E-mail: joseph.souney@unh.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An intermediate-depth (1751 m) ice core was drilled at the South Pole between 2014 and 2016 using the newly designed US Intermediate Depth Drill. The South Pole ice core is the highest-resolution interior East Antarctic ice core record that extends into the glacial period. The methods used at the South Pole to handle and log the drilled ice, the procedures used to safely retrograde the ice back to the National Science Foundation Ice Core Facility (NSF-ICF), and the methods used to process and sample the ice at the NSF-ICF are described. The South Pole ice core exhibited minimal brittle ice, which was likely due to site characteristics and, to a lesser extent, to drill technology and core handling procedures.

Information

Type
Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Map of Antarctica with deep ice core locations labeled: South Pole (SP), Berkner Island (BI), Byrd (BY), EPICA Dome C (DC), Dome Fuji (DF), Dronning Maud Land (DML), Fletcher Promontory (FP), Law Dome (LD), Roosevelt Island (RI), Siple Dome (SD), Talos Dome (TA), Taylor Dome (TR), Vostok (V), WAIS Divide (WD). The SPICEcore is the highest-resolution interior East Antarctic ice core that extends into the last glacial period and is the first record longer than 3000 years collected south of 82° latitude.

Figure 1

Table 1. Summary of drilling and core handling activities at the South Pole

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Aerial view of the drill site showing the four main structures at the site: an outhouse (bottom left corner), a warming hut and mechanical repair space (rectangular white building with red center stripe), a dedicated hut to hang and dry drill fluid-covered clothes (orange rectangular building), and the drill tent (long white and red arch).

Figure 3

Fig. 3. Layout of the drill tent and the adjacent underground core storage trench in (a) plan view and (b) isometric projection. For details of the IDD, see Johnson and others (2014). For details of the SPICEcore drilling operation, see Johnson and others (2020).

Figure 4

Fig. 4. (a) Layout of the core handling line inside the drill tent at the South Pole. (1) Core push-out station; (2) FED; (3) Vacuum pump, fluid containment drum and hand-vacuum; (4) Logging station; (5) Chop saw; (6) Packing. (b) Photograph of the core handling line at the South Pole.

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Removing drill fluid from the core using the hand-vacuum.

Figure 6

Fig. 6. A 2 m long run of brittle ice contained in elastic netting. A shipping tag is affixed to the top of the run (foreground) noting its measured top depth and a shipping tag is affixed to the bottom of the run (background) noting its bottom depth. Official depths were assigned to the brittle ice runs after they were removed from their netting and re-logged precisely during core processing at the NSF-ICF.

Figure 7

Fig. 7. In-field qualitative assessment of ice core quality vs depth in the (a) SPICEcore and (b) the WAIS Divide ice core (Souney and others, 2014) for comparison. A change in ice quality is not clearly seen in the SPICEcore, whereas a change in ice quality is clearly seen in the WAIS Divide ice core. Excellent: 0–1 breaks/no fractures; very good: 0–2 breaks/90% no fractures; good: 0–3 breaks/50% no fractures; fair: >10 cm without fractures; poor: >10 cm without through fractures; very poor: <10 cm without through fractures. The thin red line is a ten-period moving average and the thick black line is a sixth-order polynomial of the core quality rating (blue circles).

Figure 8

Fig. 8. (a) A Caterpillar 953 track loader moves the roof of the underground core storage trench into place. (b) Computer-aided design model of the core storage trench. (c) View of the core storage trench during the 2016/17 field season. The white core boxes contain non-brittle ice ready for shipment back to the USA. The brown tubes on the shelves contain 2 m long sections of brittle ice that were drilled the previous season and left onsite to relax over the winter. Also shown is the ladder lift system (right foreground) used to lift the core boxes out of the storage trench. (d) An ice core box is lifted out of the core storage trench and onto the surface outside of the drill tent with the ladder lift system.

Figure 9

Fig. 9. (a) A fork-equipped skid-steer loader moves a wood skid containing eight core boxes onto an AFP. (b) A fork-equipped track loader lifts an AFP containing 32 core boxes (four wood skids, with eight core boxes per wood skid) onto a cargo sled. (c) The fork-equipped track loader pulls the cargo sled of ice core boxes back to South Pole Station. (d) The cargo sleds are stored in the shade under arches until being shipped to McMurdo on a cold-deck LC-130.

Figure 10

Fig. 10. At the conclusion of the project, the drill trench, drill slot and core storage trench were backfilled with snow. The borehole casing (image center) was extended ~1.22 m (4 ft) above the snow surface and the drill fluid was left in the borehole to facilitate future borehole logging or sampling.

Figure 11

Fig. 11. The retrograded ice cores from the 2014/15 field season sit safely inside the main archive freezer at the NSF-ICF in Denver, Colorado. The temperature inside the main archive freezer is −36°C. Each white box contains five 1 m long sections of the ice core.

Figure 12

Fig. 12. Cross-section of the 98 mm diameter ice core showing the generalized cut plan used at the NSF-ICF during the (a) 2015 CPL (5–555 m depth) and the (b) 2016 and 2017 CPLs (555–1751 m depth). After the 2015 CPL, the cut plan was modified to provide two equal-area sticks for water stable-isotope analysis (Iso). Over 10 300 samples have been cut to date and distributed to 16 individually funded investigators from 13 US institutions for analysis. The thick red line represents the ice removed by the planer before the electrical properties are measured on the core. Chem = chemistry; Iso = water stable isotopes; Be10 = beryllium-10; Phys Prop = physical properties.

Figure 13

Fig. 13. Generalized flow chart for the 2016 and 2017 CPLs at the NSF-ICF.

Figure 14

Table 2. Summary of CPL activities at the NSF-ICF