Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-jkvpf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-28T20:40:49.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The diagnostic conundrum of late-onset developmental regression in child psychiatry: case series

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2025

Shalu Elizabeth Abraham
Affiliation:
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India
Sakhardande Kasturi Atmaram
Affiliation:
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India
Poornima Khadanga
Affiliation:
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India
Nirmalya Mukherjee
Affiliation:
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India
Rajendra Kiragasur Madegowda
Affiliation:
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India
Harshini Manohar*
Affiliation:
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, National Institute of Mental Health and Neurosciences, Bangalore, India
*
Correspondence: Harshini Manohar. Email: harshinimanohar1990@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background

Developmental regression in children, in the absence of neurological damage or trauma, presents a significant diagnostic challenge. The complexity is further compounded when it is associated with psychotic symptoms.

Method

We discuss a case series of ten children aged 6–10 years, with neurotypical development, presenting with late-onset developmental regression (>6 years of age), their clinical course and outcome at 1 year. A comprehensive clinical evaluation, laboratory investigations and neuroimaging ruled out any identifiable neurological cause.

Results

Mean age at regression was 7.65 (s.d. 1.5) years and mean illness duration was 10.1 (s.d. 8.5) months. The symptom domains included regression (in more than two domains – cognitive, socio-emotional, language, bowel and bladder incontinence), emotional disturbances, and hallucinatory and repetitive behaviours. Response to treatment was gradual over 6 months to 1 year. At 1-year follow-up, nine children did not attain pre-regression functioning, and residual symptoms included not attaining age-appropriate speech and language, socio-emotional reciprocity and cognitive abilities.

Conclusions

These cases demonstrate a unique pattern of regression with psychiatric manifestations, distinct from autism spectrum disorder and childhood-onset schizophrenia. The diagnostic dilemma arises from the overlap of symptoms with childhood disintegrative disorder (CDD), childhood-onset schizophrenia and autism. This study underscores the diagnostic intricacies of this clinical presentation and highlights the need for longitudinal follow-up to unravel the transitions in phenomenology, course and outcome. For severe manifestations such as developmental regression, where the illness is still evolving, considering CDD as a non-aetiological and transitory/tentative diagnosis would aid against premature diagnostic categorisation and provide scope for ongoing aetiological search.

Information

Type
Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists
Figure 0

Table 1 Comparison of phenomenology and symptom dimensions of the ten cases

Figure 1

Fig. 1 Diagnostic conundrum of developmental regression in children. CDD, childhood disintegrative disorder.

Figure 2

Table 2 Clinical profile, biochemical and neuroimaging investigations, course and outcome

Supplementary material: File

Abraham et al. supplementary material 1

Abraham et al. supplementary material
Download Abraham et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 16.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Abraham et al. supplementary material 2

Abraham et al. supplementary material
Download Abraham et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 40.6 KB
Supplementary material: File

Abraham et al. supplementary material 3

Abraham et al. supplementary material
Download Abraham et al. supplementary material 3(File)
File 9.1 MB
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.