Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-9prln Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-12T07:25:57.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dietary patterns in Greenland and their relationship with type 2 diabetes mellitus and glucose intolerance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2013

Charlotte Jeppesen*
Affiliation:
The National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Øster Farimagsgade 5A, 2nd floor, 1353 Copenhagen K, Denmark
Peter Bjerregaard
Affiliation:
The National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Øster Farimagsgade 5A, 2nd floor, 1353 Copenhagen K, Denmark
Marit E Jørgensen
Affiliation:
Steno Diabetes Centre, Gentofte, Denmark
*
*Corresponding author: Email charl.jeppesen@gmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective

Traditional Inuit dietary patterns have been found to be beneficial for CVD but have not been investigated in relation to glucose intolerance. We examined the association between dietary patterns and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and impaired fasting glucose (IFG).

Design

Cross-sectional design with a priori derived dietary patterns from an FFQ resulted in five patterns: imported meat (n 196), traditional food (n 601), balanced diet (n 126), unhealthy diet (n 652) and standard diet (n 799).

Setting

Associations between dietary patterns and glucose-related outcomes were tested by linear and logistic regression analyses. Data included: dietary intake by FFQ, waist circumference, ethnicity, frequency of alcohol intake and smoking, physical activity, and oral glucose tolerance test results. Fasting participants and those without diagnosed T2DM were classified into normal glucose tolerance, IGT, IFG or T2DM. HOMA-IR (homeostatic model assessment–insulin resistance index) and HOMA-β (homeostatic model assessment of β-cell function) were calculated.

Subjects

Data included 2374 Inuit, aged 18+ years.

Results

Participants with a traditional dietary pattern had higher fasting plasma glucose (mean 5·73 (95 % CI 5·68, 5·78) mmol/l, P < 0·0001) and lowest HOMA-β (48·66 (95 % CI 46·86, 50·40), P < 0·0001). The traditional diet gave significantly higher odds for IFG and T2DM than the balanced diet, imported meat diet, standard diet and unhealthy diet.

Conclusions

Traditional food was positively associated with T2DM, IFG and fasting plasma glucose, and negatively associated with β-cell function, compared with a standard diet. The imported meat diet seemed the best in relation to glucose intolerance, with lowest fasting plasma glucose and lowest odds for IFG and T2DM.

Information

Type
Special groups
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2013 
Figure 0

Fig. 1 The ten food-based dietary guidelines outlined by the Greenland Nutrition Board and the criteria upon which the a priori derived dietary patterns were based (*traditional food is defined as seal, whale, walrus, fish caught in open water, polar bear, musk ox, reindeer, wild fowls and berries; n/a, not applicable; E%, energy percentage)

Figure 1

Table 1 Behavioural and clinical characteristics of the five dietary patterns among Inuit men (n 987) aged 18+ years, Greenland, 2005–2010

Figure 2

Table 2 Behavioural and clinical characteristics of the five dietary patterns among Inuit women (n 1387) aged 18+ years, Greenland, 2005–2010

Figure 3

Table 3 Mean values (and 95 % confidence intervals) of clinical parameters for the five dietary patterns among adult Inuit (n 2327, missing 47), Greenland, 2005–2010

Figure 4

Fig. 2 Odds ratios (with 95 % confidence intervals represented by horizontal lines) for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) and impaired fasting glucose (IFG), according to dietary pattern (⧫, imported meat; ▴, traditional food; ▪, balanced diet; ●, unhealthy diet), among 2374 Inuit aged 18+ years, Greenland, 2005–2010. The standard diet was set as reference (OR = 1·0); NGT, normal glucose tolerance. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, waist circumference, ethnicity, physical activity, smoking and total energy intake. Number of participants included in each analysis: T2DM, n 1806; IGT, n 1703; IFG, n 1901; NGT, n 1581