Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-ktprf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T04:06:12.659Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thermophysical properties of SnO2-based transparent conductive films: Effect of dopant species and structure compared with In2O3-, ZnO-, and TiO2-based films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2014

Nobuto Oka*
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Aoyama Gakuin University, Chuo, Sagamihara 252-5258, Japan
Saori Yamada
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Aoyama Gakuin University, Chuo, Sagamihara 252-5258, Japan
Takashi Yagi
Affiliation:
National Metrology Institute of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8563, Japan
Naoyuki Taketoshi
Affiliation:
National Metrology Institute of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8563, Japan
Junjun Jia
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Aoyama Gakuin University, Chuo, Sagamihara 252-5258, Japan
Yuzo Shigesato*
Affiliation:
Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Aoyama Gakuin University, Chuo, Sagamihara 252-5258, Japan
*
a) Address all correspondence to these authors. e-mail: n.oka@tagen.tohoku.ac.jp

Abstract

We investigate the effect of dopant species and structure on the thermal conductivity of Sb-doped SnO2 (ATO) and Ta-doped SnO2 (TTO) films and compare the results with those of In2O3-, ZnO-, and TiO2-based transparent conductive films. The thermal conductivities (λ) of polycrystalline ATO and TTO films are 4.4–4.9 and 4.7 W m−1 K−1, respectively. The thermal conductivities via phonons (λph) are almost identical for both dopant species (Sb and Ta): 4.3 and 4.5 W m−1 K−1 for Sb and Ta, respectively, on average. These results for λph are larger than that for Sn-doped In2O3 films (3.8 W m−1 K−1) and considerably larger than that for amorphous ATO films (1.0 W m−1 K−1). These facts lead us to conclude that the base-material species (SnO2 or In2O3) and structure (polycrystalline or amorphous) affect the thermophysical properties of ATO and TTO much more than the dopant species.

Information

Type
Invited Feature Paper
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 
Figure 0

FIG. 1. Electrical resistivity, Hall mobility, and carrier density as a function of GFR [given either by O2/(Ar + O2) or H2/(Ar + H2)] during film deposition for polycrystalline (a) ATO film and (b) TTO film.

Figure 1

FIG. 2. Transmittance and reflectance spectra of (a) ATO film and (b) TTO film for several O2 or H2 GFRs [given either by O2/(Ar + O2) or by H2/(Ar + H2)].

Figure 2

FIG. 3. Schematic of the pulsed light heating thermoreflectance system.

Figure 3

FIG. 4. Temporal thermoreflectance of trilayer Mo/(ATO or TTO)/Mo films. Inner layer is (a) ATO and (b) TTO.

Figure 4

FIG. 5. Thermal conductivity as a function of electrical conductivity for ATO film (solid red circles) and TTO film (open red circles). Dotted line shows thermal conductivity calculated by the Wiedemann–Franz law. For comparison, the thermal conductivity of a polycrystalline ITO film (solid black circles) and an amorphous ITO and IZO film (open black circles)12 is also plotted.

Figure 5

TABLE I. Atomic mass ratio of metal and oxygen, and lattice structure for SnO2-, In2O3-, ZnO-, and TiO2-based TCO films.

Figure 6

TABLE II. Thermophysical and electrical properties of SnO2-, In2O3-, ZnO-, and TiO2-based TCO films.