Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-jkvpf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-18T01:12:58.466Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Kunstbibuotheken (AKB) and its members

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2016

Thomas Lersch
Thomas Lersch*
Affiliation:
Library, Zentralinstitut für Kunstgeschichte, Meiserstr. 10, D-80333 München, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Bekanntlich ist die Kulturpolitik in Deutschland, anders als in Frankreich und England, über weite Strecken föderalistisch organisiert. So existiert denn auch in der Bundesrepublik weder eine Nationalbibliothek noch eine nationale bzw. zentrale Kunstbibliothek. In Anbetracht dieser Situation haben sich 1964 die sechs großen (west) deutschen Kunstbibliotheken von überregionaler Bedeutung zu einer Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Kunstbibliotheken (AKB) zusammengeschlossen, die durch enge Kooperation ihrer Mitglieder eine optimale Literaturversorgung und -erschließung sicherstellen soil. Im Rahmen eines von der DFG gefÖrderten Programms, das 1972 angelaufen ist, wurden die Sammelschwerpunkte der teilnehmenden Bibliotheken aufeinander abgestimmt. Durch ihre kooperative Erwerbungspolitik erfüllen die (inzwischen sieben) Mitgliedsbibliotheken der AKB heute in gewisser Hinsicht die Funktion einer dezentralen Nationalbibliothek für Kunstgeschichte.

Unlike France and the United Kingdom, the organization of cultural affairs in Germany is strongly determined by federalism. So there is no national library, nor is there a particular national art library. In 1964, the six bigger (West) German art libraries of supra-regional importance formed a loose association called Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Kunstbibliotheken (AKB). The purpose of the AKB is to foster co-operation on different levels (acquisition, cataloguing, etc). A co-operative acquisitions programme has been operated by the participating libraries since 1972; it is mainly financed by the German Research Society (Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft). Thanks to this co-operation the member institutions of the AKB function in some way as a decentralized national art library.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Art Libraries Journal , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , 1996 , pp. 5 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © The Art Libraries Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Major parts of this article have already been published in French in 1993 (see the article quoted in note 12) and were part of a talk that I gave in March 1996 at the invitation of the National Museum of Modern Art, Tokyo, and the Japan Art Documentation Society. Dates and facts have been brought up-to-date.Google Scholar
2. World Guide to Libraries. München, New York et al.: 12th ed., vol. 1, 1995, p. 174 Google Scholar
3. Buzas, Ladislaus. Deutsche Bibliotheksgeschichte der neuesten Zeit (1800-1945). Wiesbaden: 1978, p.16–28.Google Scholar
4. Zentrale Fachbibliotheken are located in Cologne (for medicine), Hanover (for engineering), Kiel (for global economics), and Bonn (for agriculture).Google Scholar
5. Busse, Ernestus and Plassmann, op. cit. (note 3), p.76–80.Google Scholar
6. Köttelwesch, op. cit. (note 3) uses the term ‘decentralized special library’ (‘dezentralisierte Fachbibliothek’, p.71).Google Scholar
7. In other countries a network of equal libraries also seems to be preferred to just one single national art library. ‘The ideal of a single, national art library is no more practicable than that of a single national library. The alternative is to regard all of a nation’s art libraries as comprising the national art library, …’, says Phillpot, Clive. (‘National art libraries: monoliths or artels?’, Art Libraries Journal vol. 13 no. 1 1988, p.4–8. See also: Walker, William B. ‘National art libraries? in New York?’. Art documentation vol. 9 1990, p.76–78.; Fern, Alan, ‘Qu’est-ce qu’une bibliothèque nationale d’art?’, Bulletin des Bibliothèques de France vol. 38 no. 1 1993, p.8–10; Wateren, Jan van der. ‘Vers une bibliothèque nationale d’art’, Bulletin des Bibliothèques de France vol. 38 no. 1 1993, p. 11–15).Google Scholar
8. The compilation in World Guide to Special Libraries. München, New York et al.: 3rd ed., 1995 is confusing, as the respective libraries have entries unter three different headings (architecture, art history, fine arts) and partly have been listed under several entries.Google Scholar
9. Among the German art libraries of regional relevance the following are the most important: Bibliothek der Staatlichen Kunstsammlungen Karlsruhe (172,000 vols, 651 current periodicals) Bibliothek des Museums fur Kunst und Gewerbe, Hamburg (136,000 vols, 479 current periodicals) Bibliothek des Kunsthistorischen Instituts der Universität Bonn (135,000 vols, 320 current periodicals) For some short remarks on the history of German art libraries see: Lersch, Thomas. ‘Art libraries in the Federal Republic of Germany’, Art Libraries Journal vol. 9 no. 3 1984, p.8–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. By the way, the rather opulent name of the institute should not be misunderstood. The Zentralinstitut has no official function in terms of a co-ordination centre for the research on art history in Germany. Neither can one compare its library’s size nor its service with the above mentioned ‘Zentrale Fachbibliotheken’.Google Scholar
11. Bibliothekarische Arbeitsgemeinschaften in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Spezialbibliotheken. Berlin: 1983.Google Scholar
12. Tümmers, Horst-Johannes (ed.). Deutsche Kunstbibliotheken. German Art Libraries. Berlin, Florenz, Köln, München, Nürnberg, Rom. Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Kunstbibliotheken. München: 1975, p. 11. Recent literature on the AKB and its member libraries is cited in: Lersch, Thomas. ‘Les grandes bibliothèques d’art allemandes’, Bulletin des Bibliothèques de France vol. 38 no. 1 1993, p. 44–52.Google Scholar
13. Tümmers, Horst-Johannes, op. cit. (note 12), p.14.Google Scholar
14. Kataloge und Führer der Berliner Museen. Bearbeitet von Horst-Johannes Tümmers. Berlin: 1975; Kataloge und Führer der Münchner Museen. Bearbeitet von Horst-Johannes Tümmers, mit Vorarbeiten von Ingrid Franzl. Berlin: 1979. The VKFM was, as the VZK, subsidized by the Fritz Thyssen Foundation.Google Scholar
15. Thanks to the generous equipment of budget through its body responsible the Bibliotheca Hertziana has taken part in the programme since 1978 without the sponsorship of the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.Google Scholar
16. The DFG-Programme is limited to literature on European art; the literature on non-European art that is indeed collected in some big art libraries, for instance at the National Art Library, London, is not covered.Google Scholar
17. As far as I can see, a programme for the co-operative acquisition by art libraries exists in other countries only on a local or a regional level.Google Scholar
18. See: Scheurmann, Konrad. ‘Spurensuche. Archive fur moderne Kunst.’ Jahresring 36 1989, p.62–77; for a wider context, see: Lemke, Antje B.: ‘Art archives. A common concern of archivists, librarians, and museum professionals’, Art Libraries Journal vol. 14 no. 2 1989, p.5–11.Google Scholar
19. See: Busse, Gisela v. Struktur und Organisation des wissenschaftlichen Bibliothekswesens in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Entwicklungen 1945-1975. Wiesbaden: 1977, p.531–549.Google Scholar
20. Cf. Huemer, Christina. ‘Resources in medieval art: automation of libraries in Rome’. ICMA Newsletter 3 (winter) 1995, p.3.Google Scholar
21. See: Lersch, Thomas. ‘Amerikas Art Librarians — eine wohlorganisierte Zunft. Eindrücke von der 18th Annual Conference of the Art Libraries Society of North America (ARLIS/NA)’, Bibliotheksdienst vol. 24 1990 (p.1077–1081), p.1080.Google Scholar
22. ‘Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Kunst- und Museums-bibliotheken (AKMB)’, Kunstchronik vol. 48 1995, p.443.Google Scholar
23. This subject is discussed more thoroughly by Ulrike Schäme, who reflects in her article on the particular situation of art libraries in the New Lander.Google Scholar