Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-lrvh5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-14T19:21:13.426Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The problem of history in Thomas Torrance and Bernard Lonergan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2024

Stanley Maclean*
Affiliation:
Keimyung University, Daegu, Republic of Korea

Abstract

The essay compares the problem of history in the theological methods of the Reformed theologian Thomas Torrance and the Catholic theologian Bernard Lonergan. Lonergan works to incorporate historical science into theology, while Torrance argues for a revision of historical science. Lonergan's method is a synthesis of Catholic theology and history, but it is one constructed at the expense of eschatology and the full significance of Christ's resurrection. Torrance's method, on the contrary, includes a dogmatic understanding of history that is grounded solidly on the ‘Word-Act’ of God – the incarnation and resurrection of Christ. It gives full weight to eschatology but elides the contingencies of history.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable