Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-t6st2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-19T15:40:27.636Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Program Approaches to Control Herbicide-Resistant Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in Midsouthern United States Rice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2017

Michael J. Wilson ,
Jason K. Norsworthy ,
Robert C. Scott  and
Edward E. Gbur
Michael J. Wilson
Affiliation:
University of Arkansas, Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, 1366 West Altheimer Drive, Fayetteville, AR 72704
Jason K. Norsworthy*
Affiliation:
University of Arkansas, Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, 1366 West Altheimer Drive, Fayetteville, AR 72704
Robert C. Scott
Affiliation:
University of Arkansas, Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, 1366 West Altheimer Drive, Fayetteville, AR 72704
Edward E. Gbur
Affiliation:
Agricultural Statistics Laboratory, University of Arkansas, 101 Agricultural Annex Building, Fayetteville, AR 72701
*
Corresponding author's E-mail: jnorswor@uark.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The goal of this research was to develop herbicide programs for controlling acetolactate synthase (ALS)–, propanil-, quinclorac-, and clomazone-resistant barnyardgrass. Two applications of imazethapyr alone at 70 g ai ha−1 failed to control the ALS-resistant biotype more than 36%; however, when imazethapyr at 70 g ha−1 was applied early POST (EPOST) followed by imazethapyr at 70 g ha−1 plus fenoxaprop at 120 g ai ha−1 immediately prior to flooding (PREFLD), barnyardgrass control improved to 78% at 10 wk after planting. When imazethapyr was applied twice following PRE or delayed PRE applications of clomazone at 336 g ai ha−1, quinclorac at 560 g ai ha−1, pendimethalin at 1,120 g ai ha−1, or thiobencarb at 4,480 g ai ha−1 control was 92 to 100%. A single-pass program consisting of a delayed PRE application of clomazone at 336 g ha−1 plus quinclorac at 560 g ha−1 plus pendimethalin at 1,120 g ha−1 plus thiobencarb at 4,480 g ha−1 controlled all herbicide-resistant barnyardgrass biotypes at the same level as a standard multiple application program.

El objetivo de esta investigación fue desarrollar programas de herbicidas para el control de Echinochloa crus-galli resistente a acetolactate synthase (ALS), propanil, quinclorac, y clomazone. Dos aplicaciones de imazethapyr solo a 70 g ai ha−1 fallaron en controlar en más de 36% el biotipo resistente a ALS. Sin embargo, cuando se aplicó imazethapyr POST temprano (EPOST) a 70 g ha−1 seguido de imazethapyr a 70 g ha−1 más fenoxaprop a 120 g ai ha−1 inmediatamente antes de la inundación (PREFLD), el control de E. crus-galli mejoró a 78% a 10 semanas después de la siembra. Cuando se aplicó imazethapyr dos veces después de aplicaciones PRE o PRE retrasadas de clomazone a 336 g ai ha−1, quinclorac a 560 g ai ha−1, pendimethalin a 1,120 g ai ha−1, o thiobencarb a 4,480 g ai ha−1, el control fue 92 a 100%. Un programa de un solo pase consistiendo de una aplicación PRE retrasada de clomazone a 336 g ha−1 más quinclorac a 560 g ha−1 más pendimethalin a 1,120 g ha−1 más thiobencarb a 4,480 g ha−1 controló todos los biotipos de E. crus-galli resistente a herbicidas al mismo nivel que el programa estándar de aplicaciones múltiples.

Keywords

Clomazonefenoxapropimazethapyrpendimethalinpropanilquincloracthiobencarbbarnyardgrass, Echinochloa crus-galli (L.) Beauvrice, Oryza sativa L. ‘CL151’Herbicide-resistant weedsmultiple resistanceweed control

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 28 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 39 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Baltazar, AM, Smith, RJ Jr. (1994) Propanil-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) control in rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 8:576–581 Google Scholar
Carey, VF III (1994) Propanil-Resistant Barnyardgrass in Arkansas: Competitive Ability, Distribution, and Mechanism of Resistance. Ph.D Dissertation. Fayetteville, AR: University of Arkansas. P. 113 Google Scholar
Carey, VF III, Hoagland, RE, Talbert, RE (1995) Verification and distribution of propanil-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in Arkansas. Weed Technol 9:366–372 Google Scholar
Lovelace, ML, Talbert, RE, Schmidt, RE, Scherder, EF, Reaper, JR (2007) Quinclorac absorption and translocation characteristics in quinclorac- and propanil-resistant and -susceptible barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) biotypes. Weed Technol 21:683–687 Google Scholar
Malik, MS, Burgos, NR, Talbert, RE (2010) Confirmation and control of propanil-resistant and quinclorac-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in rice. Weed Technol 24:226–233 Google Scholar
Masson, JA, Webster, EP, Williams, BJ (2001) Flood depth, application timing, and imazethapyr activity in imidazolinone-tolerant rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 15:315–319 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Bond, J, Scott, RC (2013) Weed management practices and needs in Arkansas and Mississippi rice. Weed Technol 27:623–630 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Burgos, NR, Scott, RC, Smith, KL (2007) Consultant perspectives on weed management needs in Arkansas rice. Weed Technol 21:832–839 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Scott, RC, Bangarwa, S, Griffith, GM, Wilson, MJ, Still, JA (2008) Control of clomazone-resistant barnyardgrass in rice with preemergence herbicides. Pages 190–193 in B.R. Wells Rice Research Studies 2008. Arkansas Agriculture Experiment Station Research Ser. 571 Google Scholar
Norsworthy, JK, Ward, S, Shaw, D, Llewellyn, R, Nichols, R, Webster, TM, Bradley, K, Frisvold, G, Powles, S, Burgos, N, Witt, W, Barrett, M (2012) Reducing the risks of herbicide resistance: best management practices and recommendations. Weed Sci (Special Issue) 60:31–62 Google Scholar
Ottis, BV, Chandler, JM, McCauley, GN (2003) Imazethapyr application methods and sequences for imidazolinone-tolerant rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Technol 17:526–533 Google Scholar
Riar, DS, Norsworthy, JK, Bond, JA, Bararpour, MT, Wilson, MJ, Scott, RC (2012) Resistance of Echinochloa crus-galli populations to acetolactate synthase-inhibiting herbicides. Int J Agron DOI: Google Scholar
Slaton, NA, ed. (2001) Rice Production Handbook. Little Rock, AR: Arkansas Coop. Ext. Serv., Univ. of Arkansas, Misc. Publ. 192Google Scholar
Smith, RJ Jr. (1974) Competition of barnyardgrass with rice cultivars. Weed Sci 22:423–426 Google Scholar
Smith, RJ Jr. (1988) Weed thresholds in southern U.S. rice, Oryza sativa . Weed Technol 2:232–241 Google Scholar
Stauber, LG, Smith, RJ Jr., Talbert, RE (1991) Density and spatial interference of barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) with rice (Oryza sativa). Weed Sci 39:163–168 Google Scholar
Talbert, RE, Burgos, NR (2007) History and management of herbicide-resistant barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli) in Arkansas rice. Weed Technol. 21:324–331 Google Scholar
Taylor, MC, Pegg, I, Grassick, PV (1996) Clomazone—A New Herbicide for Barnyardgrass. (Echinochloa crus galli) Control in Water-Seeded Rice http://www.caws.org.au/awc/1996/awc199611821.pdf. Accessed July 19, 2013Google Scholar
Wilson, CE Jr., Branson, JW (2005) Trends in Arkansas rice production. Pages 17–26 in B.R. Wells Rice Research Studies 2004. Arkansas Agriculture Experiment Station Research Ser. 529 Google Scholar
Wilson, MJ, Norsworthy, JK, Johnson, DB, Scott, RC, DeVore, JD (2011) Response of an Arkansas barnyardgrass population to ALS-inhibiting herbicides. Proc South Weed Sci Soc 64:258 Google Scholar