Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-r8qmj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-23T21:45:45.349Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mediterranean diet for cardiovascular disease: an evidence mapping study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2024

Zi-ling Cai ,
Liao-yao Wang ,
Bing-yue Zhang  and
Ai-song Zhu
Zi-ling Cai
Affiliation:
Basic Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310053, People’s Republic of China
Liao-yao Wang
Affiliation:
Basic Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310053, People’s Republic of China
Bing-yue Zhang
Affiliation:
Section of Integrative Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Hangzhou 310053, People’s Republic of China
Ai-song Zhu*
Affiliation:
Basic Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310053, People’s Republic of China Key Laboratory of Blood-stasis-toxin syndrome of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou 310053, People’s Republic of China Zhejiang Engineering Research Center for ‘Preventive Treatment’ Smart Health of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou 310053, People’s Republic of China
*
*Corresponding author: Email liaoningzhongyi@hotmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

This study aimed to evaluate the methodological quality of existing meta-analyses (MA) and the quality of evidence for outcome indicators to provide an updated overview of the evidence concerning the therapeutic efficacy of the Mediterranean diet (MD) for various types of CVD.

Design:

We conducted comprehensive searches of PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. The quality of the MA was assessed using the A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2) checklist, while the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) evidence evaluation system was employed to evaluate the quality of evidence for significant outcomes.

Setting:

The CVD remains a significant contributor to global mortality. Multiple MA have consistently demonstrated the efficacy of medical interventions in managing CVD. However, due to variations in the scope, quality and outcomes of these reviews, definitive conclusions are yet to be established.

Participants:

This study included five randomized trials and twelve non-randomized studies, with a combined participant population of 716 318.

Results:

The AMSTAR 2 checklist revealed that 54·55 % of the studies demonstrated high quality, while 9·09 % exhibited low quality, and 36·36 % were deemed critically low quality. Additionally, there was moderate evidence supporting a positive correlation between MD and CHD/acute myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, cardiovascular events, coronary events and major adverse cardiovascular events.

Conclusions:

This study indicates that although recognizing the potential efficacy of MD in managing CVD, the quality of the methodology and the evidence for the outcome indicators remain unsatisfactory.

Keywords

Mediterranean dietCVDA Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and EvaluationSystematic review

Information

Type
Systematic Review
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , 2024 , e118
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society

The prevalence of CVD continues to rise globally, making it a leading cause of death and attracting significant global attention(Reference Masaebi, Salehi and Kazemi1–Reference Roth, Mensah and Johnson3). According to the Global Burden of Disease study(Reference Roth, Mensah and Johnson3), CVD imposes a substantial economic burden on the world. Therefore, it is imperative to explore effective strategies for preventing and managing CVD, reducing its incidence and improving prognosis. In recent years, there has been a growing focus on the potential CVD benefits of the Mediterranean diet (MD). The MD is widely acknowledged as a healthy dietary pattern in countries such as Portugal, Spain and Greece within the Mediterranean region. It emphasizes consuming high amounts of monounsaturated fats, primarily derived from virgin and extra virgin olive oil, along with fruits, vegetables, nuts/legumes and grains as primary sources of fats. Additionally, it promotes moderate intake of dairy products, fish, poultry and alcohol while limiting red and processed meat consumption(Reference Widmer, Flammer and Lerman4). This dietary pattern is characterized by low saturated fat intake while providing essential vitamins and minerals through increased consumption of fruits, vegetables and olive oil(Reference Martínez-González, Gea and Ruiz-Canela5).

Recent research suggests that adhering to the MD significantly reduces the risk of CVD compared with other structured diets(Reference Karam, Agarwal and Sadeghirad6). For instance, the low-fat diet focuses on reducing overall fat intake to achieve lower daily energy consumption. However, when compared with the MD approach which includes essential fatty acids in its composition, this low-fat diet may lack certain nutrients leading to an increased incidence of chronic diseases like hyperlipidaemia and CHD(Reference Delgado-Lista, Alcala-Diaz and Torres-Peña7,Reference Lichtenstein, Appel and Vadiveloo8) . Additionally, two randomized controlled trials(Reference Delgado-Lista, Alcala-Diaz and Torres-Peña7,Reference Murff9) and several observational studies(Reference Waldeyer, Brunner and Braetz10–Reference Kouvari, Boutari and Chrysohoou13) have demonstrated that a higher adherence to MD is associated with reduced mortality and morbidity from CVD. However, several meta-analyses (MA) of randomized control trials (RCT) have indicated uncertainty regarding the potential beneficial effects of the MD on cardiovascular mortality. Inconsistent conclusions may be attributed to unrecorded variations in saturated fat intake as well as other factors such as unsaturated fat content or methodological biases(Reference Hooper, Martin and Jimoh14–Reference Horton16).

MA have been conducted to evaluate the efficacy of MD in preventing CVD; however, inconsistent conclusions have been drawn due to variations in scope, quality and outcomes. Some studies(Reference Tang, Wang and Qin17) suggest that the MD significantly prevents CVD deterioration, while others(Reference Rees, Takeda and Martin18) argue that its role in risk reduction remains uncertain. To overcome limitations of individual systematic reviews, a comprehensive overview of existing evidence is necessary. Therefore, this study aims to comprehensively summarize the available evidence on the effectiveness of the MD for CVD.

Methods

This review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023416139) and followed the guidance from the Preferred Reporting Items for Overviews of Reviews (PRIOR) statement(Reference Gates, Gates and Pieper19).

Data sources and searches

We searched PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library from inception to 3 March 2023. The search strategy was as follows: (‘Diet, Mediterranean’ [Mesh] OR (Diet, Mediterranean [Title/Abstract]) OR Mediterranean*) AND (‘Meta-Analysis’ [Publication Type] OR ‘Meta-Analysis as Topic’ [Mesh] OR (Meta analys* [Title/Abstract]) OR Systematic review* [Title/Abstract]). In addition, the reference lists of related literatures were also examined to ensure the comprehensiveness of the search. Online supplementary material, Supplemental Table S1, provides details of the search strategy.

Inclusion criteria

The inclusion criteria are as follows:

  1. (1) Population: participants diagnosed with CVD

  2. (2) Intervention: MD, including, but not limited to, fruits, vegetables, legumes, cereals, meat, dairy products, fish, alcohol and healthy fats

  3. (3) Control: a diet corresponding to the intervention applied as a comparison, such as a low-fat diet, dietary advice according to National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) guidelines or prudent western diet advice provided by attending physicians

  4. (4) Outcome: report at least one of the following outcomes – CVD incidence, mortality, major cardiovascular events (MACE) or other CVD-related outcomes

  5. (5) Study design: MA of RCT, case–control and cohort studies

Exclusion criteria

The exclusion criteria included the following:

  1. (1) Protocols, meeting abstracts and MA without full text

  2. (2) Literature written in a language other than English

  3. (3) Diet patterns did that were not explicitly identified as the MD

Study selection

The retrieved literature was imported into Endnote X9 software, and duplicate results were eliminated. Following the selection criteria, two independent researchers (Z.C. and L.W.) screened titles and abstracts to select relevant studies. The full text of all articles was obtained for a detailed evaluation based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Finally, we shortlisted the relevant studies that we obtained. Any disagreements were resolved through discussion between the two researchers or by reaching a consensus within the group.

Data extraction

A standardized form was utilized for data extraction from all included MA, encompassing the subsequent details: primary author, publication year, research type, number of incorporated literature sources, participants’ characteristics, treatment and control interventions or exposures, outcome measures, quality assessment tools employed, primary or secondary prevention focus areas, and key findings obtained. Data were independently extracted by two researchers (Z.C. and L.W.), with any discrepancies resolved through consensus after thorough re-evaluation by all authors.

Assessment of the methodological quality

We utilized the A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR 2)(Reference Shea, Reeves and Wells20) to evaluate the methodological quality of the included MA. AMSTAR 2 comprises a total of sixteen items, with seven critical domains (items 2, 4, 7, 9, 11, 13 and 15) that significantly impact the review’s validity and conclusions. The overall confidence in the review’s findings was categorized as ‘high’, ‘moderate’, ‘low’ or ‘critically low’. The assessment process involved independent evaluation by two authors with any discrepancies resolved through consensus among all authors.

Assessment of the evidence quality

The Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system(Reference Guyatt, Oxman and Vist21) was utilized by two independent authors (L.W. and Z.C) to evaluate the quality of evidence for each outcome across four levels: high, moderate, low and very low quality. We assessed the evidence based on five key aspects: risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision and publication bias. Any discrepancies between the two authors were resolved through a final consensus among all contributors. Reviewer disagreements were addressed through thorough discussion.

Results

Study selection

We identified a total of 2866 published studies and subsequently screened their titles to remove citations. After this process, we selected twenty potentially eligible studies for closer scrutiny by retrieving the full text. Ultimately, our analysis included eleven MA(Reference Tang, Wang and Qin17,Reference Al-Ghamdi22–Reference Sofi, Cesari and Abbate31) . The study selection process is shown in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram. The figure depicts the screening process of the studies.

Characteristics of the included studies

We conducted a comprehensive search of 2866 relevant articles and, after removing duplicates and reviewing the title and abstract, selected a final set of twenty articles. Ultimately, we included eleven articles that encompassed a total of 7987–1 175 416 patients with CVD. Based on the original outcomes of the included literature, the MA included in this study were published between 2008 and 2023 and focused on the associations between MD and various cardiovascular outcomes: cardiovascular events (n 1)(Reference Al-Ghamdi22), CVD (n 7)(Reference Becerra-Tomás, Blanco Mejía and Viguiliouk23,Reference Martínez-González, Sayón-Orea and Bullón-Vela26–Reference Sofi, Cesari and Abbate31) , CHD (n 3)(Reference Becerra-Tomás, Blanco Mejía and Viguiliouk23,Reference Mendes, Niforou and Kasdagli27,Reference Pant, Gribbin and McIntyre28) , stroke (n 4)(Reference Becerra-Tomás, Blanco Mejía and Viguiliouk23,Reference Liyanage, Ninomiya and Wang25,Reference Martínez-González, Sayón-Orea and Bullón-Vela26,Reference Rosato, Temple and La Vecchia29) , myocardial infarction (MI) (n 1)(Reference Becerra-Tomás, Blanco Mejía and Viguiliouk23), CHD/acute myocardial infarction (n 1)(Reference Rosato, Temple and La Vecchia29), heart failure (n 1)(Reference Liyanage, Ninomiya and Wang25) and MACE (n 2)(Reference Bloomfield, Koeller and Greer24,Reference Liyanage, Ninomiya and Wang25) . The primary studies originated from Spain, Australia and Italy, and most studies included both male and female participants. Detailed information about the included MA can be found in Table 1, Fig. 2 and online supplementary material, Supplemental Figs. S1–S2.

Table 1

Characteristics of the included meta-analyses

RCT, randomized controlled trial; MD, Mediterranean diet; NCEP, national cholesterol education program; EVOO, extra virgin olive oil; AHA, American Heart Association; RR, Relative risk; HR, Hazard ratio; ①, all-cause death; ②, cerebrovascular disease; ③, CHD; ④, myocardial infarction; ⑤, stroke; ⑥, heart failure; ⑦, major adverse cardiovascular events; ⑧, acute myocardial infarction; ⑨, CVD mortality; ⑩, CHD mortality.

Fig. 2

Evaluation outcomes of the included meta-analyses. Abbreviations: HF, heart failure; AMI, acute myocardial infarction; MI, myocardial infarction; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events.

Assessment of the methodological quality

According to the AMSTAR 2 checklist, we assessed the methodological quality of eleven MA, and six of MA(Reference Rees, Takeda and Martin18,Reference Bloomfield, Koeller and Greer24,Reference Martínez-González, Sayón-Orea and Bullón-Vela26–Reference Rosato, Temple and La Vecchia29) were rated as high, while the others were rated as low or extremely low. All included MA specified their inclusion and exclusion criteria, including population, interventions, comparators and outcomes, and used appropriate MA methods to analyse the results. In low-quality or critically low-quality MA, critical flaws included a lack of protocol registered before the commencement of the review (n 5), a lack of comprehensive literature search (n 1), insufficient technique for assessing and explaining the risk of bias (n 3) and lack of assessment of the presence and likely impact of publication bias (n 1). The rating of the overall confidence in the results of the evaluation by AMSTAR 2 is shown in Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Evaluation results of the included meta-analyses by A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2.

Evidence quality

This overview focused on three outcomes: the effect of the MD on CVD incidence compared with other diets, the effect of the MD on CVD mortality compared with other diets and the effect of the MD on the recurrence rates of CVD compared with other diets. The evidence synthesis for each outcome according to the GRADE system is summarized below and in Fig. 4. There were twenty (60·60 %) moderate-quality evidences, eleven (33·33 %) pieces of low-quality evidences and two (6·06 %) very low-quality evidences.

Fig. 4

Evidence mapping of availability and appraisal of certainty of the evidence. Abbreviations: HF, heart failure; AMI, acute myocardial infarction; MI, myocardial infarction; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events.

Effect of the MD on the incidence of CVD

Total CVD incidence

Six MA(Reference Becerra-Tomás, Blanco Mejía and Viguiliouk23,Reference Martínez-González, Sayón-Orea and Bullón-Vela26–Reference Rosato, Temple and La Vecchia29,Reference Sofi, Cesari and Abbate31) reported total CVD morbidity. The MA published by Becerra-Tomás et al.(Reference Becerra-Tomás, Blanco Mejía and Viguiliouk23) included three RCT studies that showed that MD was associated with lower total CVD morbidity (Relative risk (RR) = 0·62, 95 % CI: 0·50, 0·78; moderate quality). The MA published by Martínez-González et al.(Reference Martínez-González, Sayón-Orea and Bullón-Vela26) included one RCT study (RR = 0·73, 95 % CI: 0·58, 0·92; moderate quality) and nine prospective cohort studies (RR = 0·83, 95 % CI: 0·74, 0·94; moderate quality) showing that MD was associated with a lower incidence of CVD when compared with a low-fat diet. The MA published by Mendes et al.(Reference Mendes, Niforou and Kasdagli27) included five case–control studies showing that MD was associated with a reduced risk of CVD (RR = 0·72, 95 % CI: 0·60, 0·87; low quality). Pant et al.(Reference Pant, Gribbin and McIntyre28) published a MA that included four prospective cohort studies showing that MD was associated with a reduced incidence of CVD (Hazard ratio (HR) (F) = 0·76, 95 % CI: 0·72, 0·81; low quality; HR (M) = 0·78, 95 % CI: 0·72, 0·83; low quality). The MA published by Rosato et al.(Reference Rosato, Temple and La Vecchia29) included five case–control studies, which demonstrated a protective effect of MD on the risk of CVD development (RR = 0·81, 95 % CI: 0·74, 0·88; low quality). Another MA published by Sofi et al.(Reference Sofi, Cesari and Abbate31) included three observational studies that demonstrated a protective effect of MD on total CVD incidence (RR = 0·90, 95 % CI: 0·87, 0·93; low quality).

CHD incidence

Three MA(Reference Becerra-Tomás, Blanco Mejía and Viguiliouk23,Reference Mendes, Niforou and Kasdagli27,Reference Pant, Gribbin and McIntyre28) reported on the incidence of CHD. The MA published by Becerra-Tomás et al.(Reference Becerra-Tomás, Blanco Mejía and Viguiliouk23) included one RCT study (RR = 0·48, 95 % CI: 0·33, 0·71; low quality) and seven observational studies (RR = 0·73, 95 % CI: 0·62, 0·86; moderate quality) reporting that MD was associated with a reduced incidence of CHD. The MA published by Mendes et al.(Reference Mendes, Niforou and Kasdagli27) included twenty-one prospective cohort studies (RR = 0·92, 95 % CI: 0·87, 0·98; low quality) and five case–control studies (RR = 0·72, 95 % CI: 0·60, 0·87; low quality), which demonstrated that MD reduced the incidence of CHD. Another MA published by Pant et al.(Reference Pant, Gribbin and McIntyre28) included four prospective cohort studies (HR = 0·75, 95 % CI: 0·65, 0·87; low quality) showing that MD was associated with a reduced incidence of CHD.

Stroke incidence

Four MA(Reference Becerra-Tomás, Blanco Mejía and Viguiliouk23,Reference Liyanage, Ninomiya and Wang25,Reference Martínez-González, Sayón-Orea and Bullón-Vela26,Reference Rosato, Temple and La Vecchia29) reported on stroke incidence. The MA published by Becerra-Tomás et al.(Reference Becerra-Tomás, Blanco Mejía and Viguiliouk23) included one RCT study (RR = 0·58, 95 % CI: 0·42, 0·81; moderate quality) and five observational studies (RR = 0·80, 95 % CI: 0·71, 0·90; moderate quality), which demonstrated that MD was superior to the American Heart Association/low-fat diet of the step I diet in reducing the incidence of stroke. Liyanage et al.(Reference Liyanage, Ninomiya and Wang25) showed that MD reduced the incidence of stroke compared with a cautious western diet/NCEP guideline diet/rational diet/low-fat diet (RR = 0·65, 95 % CI: 0·48, 0·88; moderate quality). In addition, Martínez-González et al.(Reference Martínez-González, Sayón-Orea and Bullón-Vela26) showed that consumption of MD and olive oil had a reducing effect on the risk of stroke (RR = 0·74, 95 % CI: 0·61, 0·91; moderate quality). Rosato et al.(Reference Rosato, Temple and La Vecchia29) published the MA including twenty-four cohort studies (RR = 0·77, 95 % CI: 0·67, 0·90; moderate quality) and five case–control studies (RR = 0·12, 95 % CI: 0·03, 0·46; moderate quality) and demonstrated a protective effect of MD on the risk of stroke.

MI incidence

One MA(Reference Becerra-Tomás, Blanco Mejía and Viguiliouk23) reported the incidence of myocardial infarction. The MA published by Becerra-Tomás et al.(Reference Becerra-Tomás, Blanco Mejía and Viguiliouk23) included two RCT studies (RR = 0·65, 95 % CI: 0·49, 0·88; moderate quality) and two observational studies (RR = 0·73, 95 % CI: 0·61, 0·88; very low quality) demonstrating that MD reduced the incidence of MI compared with the American Heart Association step I diet or low-fat diet.

CHD/acute myocardial infarction incidence

One MA(Reference Rosato, Temple and La Vecchia29) reported CHD/acute myocardial infarction incidence. The MA published by Rosato et al.(Reference Rosato, Temple and La Vecchia29) included twenty-four cohort studies (RR = 0·74, 95 % CI: 0·66, 0·83; moderate quality) and five case–control studies (RR = 0·41, 95 % CI: 0·18, 0·98; moderate quality), which showed that MD reduced the incidence of CHD/acute myocardial infarction.

HF incidence

One MA(Reference Liyanage, Ninomiya and Wang25) reported on heart failure incidence. The MA published by Liyanage et al.(Reference Liyanage, Ninomiya and Wang25) included two RCT studies that demonstrated that MD reduced the incidence of heart failure (RR = 0·30, 95 % CI: 0·17, 0·56; moderate quality).

Effect of the MD on mortality of CVD

Total CVD mortality

Three MA(Reference Becerra-Tomás, Blanco Mejía and Viguiliouk23,Reference Sofi, Abbate and Gensini30,Reference Sofi, Cesari and Abbate31) reported total CVD mortality. The MA published by Becerra-Tomás et al.(Reference Becerra-Tomás, Blanco Mejía and Viguiliouk23) included twenty-one observational studies (RR = 0·79, 95 % CI: 0·77, 0·82; moderate quality) suggested that MD reduced total CVD mortality. Sofi et al.(Reference Sofi, Abbate and Gensini30,Reference Sofi, Cesari and Abbate31) published two MA supporting the conclusion that MD reduced total mortality from CVD (RR = 0·90, 95 % CI: 0·87, 0·93; low quality (2008); RR = 0·91, 95 % CI: 0·87, 0·95; moderate quality (2010)).

CHD mortality

One MA(Reference Becerra-Tomás, Blanco Mejía and Viguiliouk23) reported on CHD mortality. The MA published by Becerra-Tomás et al.(Reference Becerra-Tomás, Blanco Mejía and Viguiliouk23) included one RCT study (RR = 0·33, 95 % CI: 0·13, 0·86; low quality) and six observational studies (RR = 0·73, 95 % CI: 0·59, 0·89; low quality), which demonstrated that MD was superior to American Heart Association/low-fat diet class I in lowering CHD mortality.

Stroke mortality

One MA(Reference Becerra-Tomás, Blanco Mejía and Viguiliouk23) reported stroke mortality. The MA published by Becerra-Tomás et al.(Reference Becerra-Tomás, Blanco Mejía and Viguiliouk23) included four observational studies showing that MD improved stroke mortality (RR = 0·87, 95 % CI: 0·80, 0·96; very low quality).

Effect of the MD on the recurrence rates of CVD

Recurrence rates of cardiovascular events

One MA(Reference Al-Ghamdi22) reported recurrence rates of cardiovascular events. A medical review published by Al-Ghamdi et al.(Reference Al-Ghamdi22) included two RCT studies that demonstrated a superior effect of the MD on recurrence rates of cardiovascular events compared with a low-fat diet/NCEP guideline diet (RR = 0·83, 95 % CI: 0·72, 0·97; moderate quality).

Recurrence rates of MAC

Two MA(Reference Bloomfield, Koeller and Greer24,Reference Liyanage, Ninomiya and Wang25) reported recurrence rates of MACE. The MA published by Bloomfield et al.(Reference Bloomfield, Koeller and Greer24) included one RCT study showing that MD significantly improved recurrence rates of MACE (HR = 0·71, 95 % CI: 0·56, 0·90; moderate quality). Another MA published by Liyanage et al.(Reference Liyanage, Ninomiya and Wang25) included three RCT studies, also showing that MD significantly improved the recurrence rates of MACE compared with prudent western diet/NCEP guidelines dietary/sensible eating/low-fat diet (RR = 0·69, 95 % CI: 0·55, 0·86; moderate quality).

Recurrence rates of coronary events

One MA(Reference Liyanage, Ninomiya and Wang25) reported the recurrence rates of coronary events. The MA published by Liyanage et al.(Reference Liyanage, Ninomiya and Wang25) included three RCT studies, which showed that MD reduced the recurrence rates of coronary events (RR = 0·65, 95 % CI: 0·50, 0·85; moderate quality).

Discussion

Overall findings

This review presents a comprehensive overview of the current body of systematic reviews investigating the association between MD and CVD, encompassing incidence, mortality and recurrence rates. A total of eleven systematic reviews were identified, including MA that examined the relationship between MD and CVD incidence, mortality or cardiovascular outcomes.

These systematic reviews were published between 2008 and 2023, addressing various research questions related to the topic at hand. The methodological quality and evidence quality of eleven MA on MD for CVD were assessed using AMSTAR 2 and the GRADE system, respectively. The assessment conducted by AMSTAR 2 revealed that the evidence quality was categorized as high in 54·55 % of cases, moderate in 9·09 % of cases and critically low in 36·36 % of cases. Additionally, six studies(Reference Kivelä15,Reference Guyatt, Oxman and Vist21,Reference Al-Ghamdi22,Reference Bloomfield, Koeller and Greer24–Reference Martínez-González, Sayón-Orea and Bullón-Vela26) provided a protocol and had been registered prior to their execution. Failure to register may lead to significant deviations from the expected research process.

Only one study(Reference Becerra-Tomás, Blanco Mejía and Viguiliouk23) reported the sources of funding, and the absence of this standard may compromise the credibility of research results due to potential conflicts of interest. Therefore, it is essential to register MA of MD for the treatment of CVD and report their treatment regimens prior to study commencement. The GRADE system resulted in a downgrade of the evidence quality for all included outcomes. This comprehensive overview, consisting of eleven studies and encompassing thirty-three outcomes, revealed that the overall quality of evidence was deemed moderate (60·60 %), with low and very low levels accounting for 39·4 %, while no high-quality evidence was identified. Notably, significant evidence predominantly focused on CVD, CHD and stroke. Despite recognizing the potential efficacy of MD in managing CVD, it is important to acknowledge that the strength of evidence across all outcomes remains unsatisfactory.

Comparison with previous studies

Although our overview represents the first comparative assessment of the effectiveness of MD in treating CVD, a recent Cochrane review conducted by Rees et al.(Reference Rees, Takeda and Martin18) further investigated the impact of the MD on MACE, both in terms of randomized trials and cardiac metabolism outcomes. While aligning with our own findings, the Cochrane review did not observe any effects of the MD on CVD outcomes in non-randomized observational studies. In contrast, our study incorporates various research designs and evaluates their efficacy in managing CVD. Additionally, supporting healthy lifestyle behaviours, the 2020 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) guideline(Reference Krist, Davidson and Mangione32) provides recommendations for interventions targeting individuals with cardiovascular risk factors, emphasizing a nutritious diet and regular exercise. Our overview strengthens these recommendations by providing robust evidence that supports the preventive role of the MD against CVD within this population.

Suggestions for future research

The primary objective of CVD treatment is to achieve clinically significant reduction in symptoms experienced by patients. Current research has demonstrated that adherence to a healthy diet, as supported by studies conducted by Martinez-Gonzalez et al.(Reference Martinez-Gonzalez and Bes-Rastrollo33), Du et al.(Reference Du, Li and Bennett34) and Qin et al.(Reference Qin, Lv and Guo35), can effectively prevent numerous cases of CVD within general populations. Recognizing the crucial role of diet in determining disease risk, the WHO recommends dietary modifications that involve maintaining energy balance, limiting the intake of saturated and trans fats while increasing consumption of unsaturated fats, incorporating more fruits and vegetables into one’s diet, and reducing sugar and salt intake – such as following the MD(Reference Bach-Faig, Berry and Lairon36). The efficacy of MD in managing CVD among patients has been confirmed through studies like Rees et al.’s investigation(Reference Rees, Takeda and Martin18). Arguably, MD stands out as the most extensively researched and evidence-based dietary approach not only for preventing CVD but also other chronic diseases. It serves as a benchmark for healthy eating habits with particular value.

The primary advantage attributed to MD lies in its synergistic effects on various cardioprotective nutrients and foods, as observed by Jacobs et al.(Reference Jacobs, Gross and Tapsell37). Consequently, MD presents itself as a potentially significant adjunctive treatment option for individuals with CVD. However, future research should focus on carefully standardizing MD protocols to explore its effects across different stages of CVD. Preliminary data suggest potential benefits related to incidence rates and mortality associated with CVD along with cardiovascular events. Furthermore, methodologically rigorous studies with sufficient sample sizes are necessary for each MD program while consistently reporting on defined core outcomes among patients diagnosed with CVD.

Strengths and limitations

A comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness of MD in patients with CVD is currently lacking. Therefore, we have synthesized and compared the efficacy of MD programs evaluated in eleven MA. To our knowledge, this overview of MA represents the first comprehensive summary of available evidence on MD for CVD. We assessed the quality of reviews against all sixteen domains of AMSTAR 2 checklist, which offers a wider range of applications and more rigorous evaluation methods than its predecessor(Reference Shea, Reeves and Wells20,Reference Shea, Grimshaw and Wells38) . To determine the strength of evidence, we evaluated significant outcomes using the GRADE system. Most evidence from included studies was considered moderate quality. Thus, our results confirmed moderate-certainty evidence for the efficacy of MD program. These findings are crucial to patients who may be sceptical about potential benefits from MD to improve CVD outcomes.

However, there are certain limitations in this study. Firstly, included studies were limited in number, and some effects on CVD outcomes such as hypertension(Reference Nissensohn, Román-Viñas and Sánchez-Villegas39), inflammatory markers with CVD(Reference Mayr, Tierney and Thomas40) and cardiovascular risk factors(Reference Nordmann, Suter-Zimmermann and Bucher41) did not meet inclusion criteria. Although not evaluated in this study, potential effects cannot be fully ruled out. Furthermore, the inclusion of RCT, non-RCT and observational studies may increase bias risks. Lastly, the results suggested possible benefits for CVD among those on a MD; however, evidence certainty for these outcomes was found to be very low or moderate leading us to conclude that overall evidence is currently insufficient to convincingly support the effects of MD on CVD. Future research should focus on designing more scientific standardized studies.

Conclusions

Despite the existing gaps in the literature and limited availability of high-quality evidence, the findings of this overview underscore the significance of adopting a MD for individuals with CVD. To establish the true benefits of MD for CVD patients, future research should not only adhere to rigorous methodological requirements but also prioritize enhancing the quality of primary studies and conducting patient-centred MA. The inclusion of higher-quality trials is crucial in providing a more comprehensive understanding of the advantages associated with MD for individuals affected by CVD.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Xuan-lin Li, for the assistance with the search strategy.

Financial suport

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology of China Key Special Program for ‘Modernization Research of Traditional Chinese Medicine’ (grant number 2019YFC1708701) and Zhejiang Chinese Medical University’s 2022 School-level Scientific Research Project Talent Project (grant number 2022RCZXZK19).

Conflict of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Authorship

Z.C. developed the research question. Z.C., L.W. and B.Z. assisted with screening, data extraction and analysis and drafted the manuscript. A.Z. modified the manuscript. All authors contributed to the editing and formatting of the final manuscript.

Ethics of human subject participation

Not applicable.

This review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023416139).

Supplementary material

For supplementary material accompanying this paper, visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S1368980024000776.

References

Masaebi, F, Salehi, M, Kazemi, M et al. (2021) Trend analysis of disability adjusted life years due to cardiovascular diseases: results from the global burden of disease study 2019. BMC Public Health 21, 1268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, S, Ding, Y, Yu, C et al. (2023) WHO cardiovascular disease risk prediction model performance in 10 regions, China. Bull World Health Organ 101, 238–247.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roth, GA, Mensah, GA, Johnson, CO et al. (2020) Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, 1990–2019: update from the GBD 2019 study. J Am Coll Cardiol 76, 2982–3021.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Widmer, RJ, Flammer, AJ, Lerman, LO et al. (2015) The Mediterranean diet, its components, and cardiovascular disease. Am J Med 128, 229–238.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martínez-González, MA, Gea, A & Ruiz-Canela, M (2019) The Mediterranean diet and cardiovascular health. Circ Res 124, 779–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karam, G, Agarwal, A, Sadeghirad, B et al. (2023) Comparison of seven popular structured dietary programmes and risk of mortality and major cardiovascular events in patients at increased cardiovascular risk: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ 380, e072003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delgado-Lista, J, Alcala-Diaz, JF, Torres-Peña, JD et al. (2022) Long-term secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease with a Mediterranean diet and a low-fat diet (CORDIOPREV): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 399, 1876–1885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lichtenstein, AH, Appel, LJ, Vadiveloo, M et al. (2021) 2021 dietary guidance to improve cardiovascular health: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 144, e472–e487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murff, HJ (2022) In patients with CHD, a Mediterranean v. low-fat diet reduced major CV events at 7 years. Ann Intern Med 175, Jc100.Google Scholar
Waldeyer, C, Brunner, FJ, Braetz, J et al. (2018) Adherence to Mediterranean diet, high-sensitive C-reactive protein, and severity of coronary artery disease: contemporary data from the INTERCATH cohort. Atherosclerosis 275, 256–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trébuchet, A, Julia, C, Fézeu, L et al. (2019) Prospective association between several dietary scores and risk of cardiovascular diseases: is the Mediterranean diet equally associated to cardiovascular diseases compared to National Nutritional Scores? Am Heart J 217, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Di Renzo, L, Cinelli, G, Dri, M et al. (2020) Mediterranean personalized diet combined with physical activity therapy for the prevention of cardiovascular diseases in Italian women. Nutrients 12, 3456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kouvari, M, Boutari, C, Chrysohoou, C et al. (2021) Mediterranean diet is inversely associated with steatosis and fibrosis and decreases ten-year diabetes and cardiovascular risk in NAFLD subjects: results from the ATTICA prospective cohort study. Clin Nutr 40, 3314–3324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hooper, L, Martin, N, Jimoh, OF et al. (2020) Reduction in saturated fat intake for cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev issue 5, CD011737.Google Scholar
Kivelä, JM (2020) Effects of nutritional supplements and dietary interventions on cardiovascular outcomes. Ann Intern Med 172, 73–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horton, R (2005) Expression of concern: indo-Mediterranean Diet Heart Study. Lancet 5, 354–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, C, Wang, X, Qin, LQ et al. (2021) Mediterranean diet and mortality in people with cardiovascular disease: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. Nutrients 13, 2623.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rees, K, Takeda, A, Martin, N et al. (2019) Mediterranean-style diet for the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev issue 3, CD009825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gates, M, Gates, A, Pieper, D et al. (2022) Reporting guideline for overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions: development of the PRIOR statement. BMJ 378, e070849.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shea, BJ, Reeves, BC, Wells, G et al. (2017) AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. BMJ 358, j4008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guyatt, GH, Oxman, AD, Vist, GE et al. (2008) GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336, 924–926.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Al-Ghamdi, S (2018) The association between olive oil consumption and primary prevention of cardiovascular diseases. J Fam Med Prim Care 7, 859–864.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becerra-Tomás, N, Blanco Mejía, S, Viguiliouk, E et al. (2020) Mediterranean diet, cardiovascular disease and mortality in diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies and randomized clinical trials. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 60, 1207–1227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloomfield, HE, Koeller, E, Greer, N et al. (2016) Effects on health outcomes of a Mediterranean diet with no restriction on fat intake: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 165, 491–500.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liyanage, T, Ninomiya, T, Wang, A et al. (2016) Effects of the Mediterranean diet on cardiovascular outcomes-a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 11, e0159252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martínez-González, MA, Sayón-Orea, C, Bullón-Vela, V et al. (2022) Effect of olive oil consumption on cardiovascular disease, cancer, type 2 diabetes, and all-cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Nutr 41, 2659–2682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mendes, V, Niforou, A, Kasdagli, MI et al. (2023) Intake of legumes and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and dose–response meta-analysis. Nutr, Metab Cardiovasc Dis 33, 22–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pant, A, Gribbin, S, McIntyre, D et al. (2023) Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women with a Mediterranean diet: systematic review and meta-analysis. Heart 109, 1208–1215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosato, V, Temple, NJ, La Vecchia, C et al. (2017) Mediterranean diet and cardiovascular disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Eur J Nutr 58, 173–191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sofi, F, Abbate, R, Gensini, GF et al. (2010) Accruing evidence on benefits of adherence to the Mediterranean diet on health: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 92, 1189–1196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sofi, F, Cesari, F, Abbate, R et al. (2008) Adherence to Mediterranean diet and health status: meta-analysis. BMJ 337, 673–675.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krist, AH, Davidson, KW, Mangione, CM et al. (2020) Behavioral counseling interventions to promote a healthy diet and physical activity for cardiovascular disease prevention in adults with cardiovascular risk factors: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Jama 324, 2069–2075.Google ScholarPubMed
Martinez-Gonzalez, MA & Bes-Rastrollo, M (2014) Dietary patterns, Mediterranean diet, and cardiovascular disease. Curr Opin Lipidol 25, 20–26.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Du, H, Li, L, Bennett, D et al. (2016) Fresh fruit consumption and major cardiovascular disease in China. N Engl J Med 374, 1332–1343.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qin, C, Lv, J, Guo, Y et al. (2018) Associations of egg consumption with cardiovascular disease in a cohort study of 0·5 million Chinese adults. Heart 104, 1756–1763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bach-Faig, A, Berry, EM, Lairon, D et al. (2011) Mediterranean diet pyramid today. Science and cultural updates. Public Health Nutr 14, 2274–2284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobs, DR Jr, Gross, MD & Tapsell, LC (2009) Food synergy: an operational concept for understanding nutrition. Am J Clin Nutr 89, 1543s–1548s.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shea, BJ, Grimshaw, JM, Wells, GA et al. (2007) Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol 7, 10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nissensohn, M, Román-Viñas, B, Sánchez-Villegas, A et al. (2016) The effect of the Mediterranean diet on hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Nutr Educ Behav 48, 42–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayr, HL, Tierney, AC, Thomas, CJ et al. (2018) Mediterranean-type diets and inflammatory markers in patients with coronary heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutr Res 50, 10–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nordmann, AJ, Suter-Zimmermann, K, Bucher, HC et al. (2011) Meta-analysis comparing Mediterranean to low-fat diets for modification of cardiovascular risk factors. Am J Med 124, 841–851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flow diagram. The figure depicts the screening process of the studies.

Figure 1

Table 1 Characteristics of the included meta-analyses

Figure 2

Fig. 2 Evaluation outcomes of the included meta-analyses. Abbreviations: HF, heart failure; AMI, acute myocardial infarction; MI, myocardial infarction; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events.

Figure 3

Fig. 3 Evaluation results of the included meta-analyses by A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews 2.

Figure 4

Fig. 4 Evidence mapping of availability and appraisal of certainty of the evidence. Abbreviations: HF, heart failure; AMI, acute myocardial infarction; MI, myocardial infarction; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular events.

Supplementary material: File

Cai et al. supplementary material

Cai et al. supplementary material
Download Cai et al. supplementary material(File)
File 136.4 KB