Implications
Growth rates of dairy heifers influence their health and lifetime productivity. Many farms restrict milk rations for dairy calves, encouraging solid feed intake and early weaning, but this risks reducing growth. We found that 70% of pre-weaned calves on 11 commercial farms had growth rates below the recommended 0.7 kg/day and of these 20% grew <0.5 kg/day. Milk offered correlated positively with growth. Early growth restriction can affect the long-term performance of the adult cow. Farmers should be encouraged to feed more physiologically normal levels of milk to replacement heifers and to monitor growth rates, to improve health and welfare.
Introduction
Maintaining a first-calving age of 23 to 25 months is important to minimise rearing costs (Boulton et al., Reference Boulton, Rushton and Wathes2017), improve longevity and increase lifetime productivity (Wathes et al. Reference Wathes, Pollott, Johnson, Richardson and Cooke2014). However, dairy heifers in the UK do not have their first live calf birth registered until a median age of 31.9 months (Gates, Reference Gates2013). Dairy cows generally have a productive life of about three lactations (Wathes et al., Reference Wathes, Pollott, Johnson, Richardson and Cooke2014), so one-third of a milking herd needs replacing annually to maintain herd size. Accordingly, underperformance in the heifers can have a large impact on farm productivity and finances.
Only 28% of 101 representative UK dairy farms routinely recorded heifer growth rates, with only a quarter using objective weight measurements rather than subjective visual assessments (Boulton et al., Reference Boulton, Rushton and Wathes2015). Yet growth rate is a key determinant of whether a heifer is ready to breed at 13 to 15 months (Brickell et al., Reference Brickell, Bourne, McGowan and Wathes2009a). Both BW and age influence the timing of puberty (Wathes et al., Reference Wathes, Pollott, Johnson, Richardson and Cooke2014). To reach puberty in good time for breeding, a Holstein heifer requires an average growth rate of 0.7 to 0.8 kg/day (Brickell et al., Reference Brickell, Bourne, McGowan and Wathes2009a; Soberon et al., Reference Soberon, Raffrenato, Everett and van Amburgh2012). Low growth rates in early life delay age at first calving (Correa et al., Reference Correa, Curtis, Erb and White1988; Wathes et al., Reference Wathes, Pollott, Johnson, Richardson and Cooke2014) and are often associated with reduced productivity in the milking herd (Bach and Ahedo, Reference Bach and Ahedo2008; Soberon et al., Reference Soberon, Raffrenato, Everett and van Amburgh2012; Cooke et al., Reference Cooke, Cheng, Bourne and Wathes2013).
The milk feeding phase of calf development is a critical period, with the highest rates of mortality and contagious disease (Bach, Reference Bach2011; Khan et al., Reference Khan, Weary and von Keyserlingk2011) and the highest costs (Boulton et al., Reference Boulton, Rushton and Wathes2017). Typically dairy heifers are separated from the dam within 24 h of birth and then fed either saleable milk, waste milk or milk replacer for 6 to 8 weeks (Lorenz et al., Reference Lorenz, Mee, Earley and More2011; Boulton et al., Reference Boulton, Rushton and Wathes2015). The industry standard has been to provide milk at 10% of calf BW/day in two feed portions (Quigley et al., Reference Quigley, Wolfe and Elsasser2006; Terré et al., Reference Terré, Tejero and Bach2009). Jasper and Weary (Reference Jasper and Weary2002) reported negligible solid feed intake in the first 2 weeks: calves on conventional ×2 daily bucket feeding then consumed 6.1 kg starter pellets and 0.98 kg hay by 35 days. Early growth is therefore heavily dependent on the milk ration. A recent UK study demonstrated that calves grew very little in their first few weeks, with a median growth rate of only 0.12 kg/day between 8 and 30 days old (Bazeley et al., Reference Bazeley, Barrett, Williams and Reyher2015). Growth rates of pre-weaned calves generally increase from about week 3 onwards (Bazeley KJ and Wathes DC, unpublished observations) and can exceed 1 kg/day in calves kept with their dam or on ad libitum milk (Appleby et al., Reference Appleby, Weary and Chua2001; Khan et al., Reference Khan, Weary and von Keyserlingk2011; Bach et al., Reference Bach, Terré and Pinto2013). There is little evidence on the acceptable minimum growth rates for calves, but substantially reduced growth rates clearly compromise welfare (Scientific Veterinary Committee, 1995). This report suggested that calves in which the average growth rate was reduced by 50% were likely to have compromised welfare due to feed restriction. To prevent this occurring, Lorenz et al. (Reference Lorenz, Mee, Earley and More2011) therefore proposed feeding calves at least 15% of BW in daily milk ration in the early period when calves eat little concentrate.
In a thermoneutral environment, a 40 kg calf consuming 4 l/day whole milk should grow at 0.35 kg/day (National Research Council (NRC) 2001) but the environmental temperature affects feed conversion efficiency. The lower critical temperature is 20°C for calves up to 3 weeks old (NRC, 2001) but the mean UK temperature in 2014 was only 9.9°C (Met Office, 2014). Even though the internal calf house temperature is generally somewhat higher, energy expenditure is also required for thermoregulation as well as growth. Clinical disease, in particular diarrhoea and bovine respiratory disease (BRD) are both common in young calves (McGuirk, Reference McGuirk2008), and are also known to reduce early growth rates and compromise long-term performance (Bach, Reference Bach2011). The predominant dairy breed is the Holstein, but other purebred (e.g. Jersey) and crossbred cows are becoming increasingly popular, and these have differing nutrient requirements and growth rates (Ware et al., Reference Ware, Franklin, Jackson, McAllister and Cassell2015).
Monitoring heifer growth rate is therefore a valuable tool for farmers, but they need targets against which to benchmark performance. Most reported values are from data collected on Holstein heifers on research farms. Information is therefore lacking as to current practice on commercial farms. This study was designed to determine the feeding strategies and other potentially relevant management factors for pre-weaned heifers on commercial dairy farms in England, and to monitor and compare the associated calf growth rates with targets. Our hypotheses were (a) that sub-optimal growth rates for some animals were due to an insufficient milk supply and (b) that growth variations between calves on the same farm were influenced by differing amounts of milk fed and disease.
Material and methods
Cohort design and recruitment, herd profiles and management
A convenience sample of 11 dairy herds (designated A to K) in South East England were recruited between October 2011 and November 2012. Farmers needed to expect to have 30 to 50 heifers born during a 4-month recruitment period. Herd size ranged from 200 to 550 adult cows. Each farm was first visited to complete a consent form. All newly born heifer calves were recruited at subsequent weekly visits. The final cohort size was 492 heifers. Information on calf rearing practices was collected at an initial interview with the herdsmen using a standardised data capture template (Brickell et al. Reference Brickell, McGowan and Wathes2009b). These farm records were updated with additional information on individual calves obtained during the weekly data collection visits. Protocols for calf housing were recorded, including group sizes and any transfers between pens, the age at which this occurred and whether or not it involved mixing calves from different groups.
Collection of morphometric data
It was not possible to obtain birth weights due to limited staff time availability on commercial farms. Calves were first measured at recruitment (week 1, 4.1±2.2 days), in week 5 (37±6.0 days) and week 9 (60±4.0 days) and at a single follow-up visit to each farm at ~7.5 months (227±37.7 days). Dimensions were measured in centimetres using a standard measuring tape: girth behind the forelimb, height at withers and trunk length (diagonal distance from shoulder to the tuber ischium). All heifers were weighed at 6 to 9 months and the first 300 calves recruited were also weighed at recruitment and in week 9 using a crush placed on two calibrated weigh bars (EziWeigh5; Tru-Test Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand). As girth and weight in pre-weaned heifers were found to be highly correlated (r 2=0.89, P<0.001), the weights of the remaining 192 calves were estimated from girth measurements at weeks 1, 5 and 9 after analysis by linear regression. This showed a relationship of Weight=(Girth×1.96)−113. The agreement between girth and weight was confirmed using a Bland–Altman plot, which showed a mean difference between the calculated and actual weight of 0.06 kg. For consistency, subsequent analyses of data for pre-weaned calves used estimated weights, whereas actual weights were used at 7.5 months. The ponderal index was also calculated as follows: ponderal index (kg/m3)=weight (kg)/(height (m)+length (m))3. This determines the relationship between mass and skeletal size, providing a measure of leanness (Swali and Wathes, Reference Swali and Wathes2007).
Actual growth rates for each calf were calculated by subtracting the starting from the end dimension and dividing by the exact number of days between the two measurements. Growth rates were calculated over four periods: 1 to 5 weeks, 5 to 9 weeks, the overall rate from 1 to 9 weeks and 9 weeks to 7.5 months. Adjusted sizes were also calculated for each animal using their individual growth rate to give an estimated size at each of 35, 63 and 229 days. This allowed for compatible comparisons between all calves, regardless of the exact age at each measurement. No adjustments were made for recruitment size because many calves either maintain a steady weight or even lose weight in their 1st week (Bazeley et al., Reference Bazeley, Barrett, Williams and Reyher2015), meaning that a linear growth rate could not be assumed.
Calf nutrition
Details of the milk feeding and weaning strategy on each farm were recorded. Milk feeding was classified as bucket, teat or automated and frequency was recorded as once, twice or thrice daily or continuously available. The type of milk was either waste milk from the herd or milk replacer (Table 1). For milk replacer, the brand details and mixing rate were noted (Supplementary Table S1). All farms fed warm milk in the approximate range 35°C to 40°C. To ensure that the actual feeding process agreed with stated farm policy, feeding was observed twice on each farm at unannounced visits to check milk replacer weights, mixing rates and calibration of automated feeders. One farm (H) had a calibration problem, so a mixing rate of 9% was used rather than the intended rate of 12.5% until the machine was serviced. This affected 30 calves for 4 weeks. Information was also obtained on concentrate feeding (which was always ad libitum) and availability of roughage (hay, silage, straw in feeder or straw as bedding). Age at weaning was recorded on an individual calf basis. All farms used a step-down process. The criteria used to define weaning were classified as being based on a fixed plan, or on calf age and/or condition.
Summary of pre-weaned feeding practices for dairy heifer calves for the 11 farms included in the study
NA=not applicable; H=Holstein; F=Friesian; SRX=Viking Red cross; A=Ayrshire; TF, teat feeder.
1 Feeding policies are summarised over an initial period (1) when all calves were fed 4 l/day transition milk and subsequently (2) when the amounts and types of feed provided are as described.
2 Mixed, included Jersey and Jersey crosses alongside Friesian cross heifers.
3 All herds were fed milk replacer except C and E which provided acidified waste milk in a drum. Mixing rate defined as proportional weight of milk powder in final volume of reconstituted milk replacer.
4 Straw only provided as bedding, rather than in a feeder.
5 Age/cond: weaned on a combination of calf age and condition; plan, programmed by automatic feeder.
All farms offered a commercial concentrate feed ad libitum during the weaning period. The same feed was subsequently fed at a fixed rate in older heifers. After weaning, all heifers continued to receive fibrous feed (straw, hay or silage) depending on farm and season. All post-weaned calves were initially housed on deep straw. All farms subsequently reared at least some heifers outside depending on age and season. Most calves (on 6/11 farms) were at pasture at the follow-up check but some calves on one of these six farms and all on the remainder were considered too young for turnout and were housed throughout the study period.
Calculation of milk solids fed
Determination of an average daily feed rate was precluded as the amount of milk fed to calves always changed at least once pre-weaning (Table 1). Consequently, the most reliable comparison of total milk allocation in each time period was based on milk solids rather than volume. Several brands of milk powder were used across the 11 farms as well as transitional and antibiotic waste milk. Details of their respective nutritional contents are provided in the Supplementary Table S1. The initial feed of colostrum was assumed to be taken from the dam for 319 calves. The remaining 173 calves were initially fed colostrum by bottle or oesophageal tube. After separation from the dam all farms fed transitional waste milk when available, with all farms allocating each calf 2 l twice daily. Calves were then transferred to pens where feeding rates varied depending on the farm (Table 1). Estimates of actual milk consumed in the first 5 weeks (1 to 35 days) and subsequently (35 to 63 days) for each individual calf were calculated based on the number of days the calf was fed colostrum/transitional milk, calf feeding volume on farm, the mixing rate used, any changes in calf feeding on an individual basis (e.g. age moved to automated feeder or day changed to once daily feeding) and the actual weaning age. For calves fed from drums the milk consumption was averaged across the group.
Calf health monitoring
Each individual calf underwent a weekly clinical examination by the same veterinarian from 1 to 9 weeks of age. The scoring system for calf health was developed by the University of Wisconsin-Madison and used a systematic approach to assess signs of BRD and faecal consistency according to McGuirk (Reference McGuirk2008) with minor modifications. Temperature scoring used cut-off values of 38.5°C, 39.0°C and 39.5°C to generate scores between 0 and 3. Ocular and nasal discharges and the presence of induced or spontaneous cough were also scored on a scale from 0 to 3. Animals with a total respiratory score ⩾5 (combined scores for temperature, cough, ocular and nasal discharges) were classified as having BRD. Faecal consistency was given a score of 0, normal; 1, pasty, 2, loose and 3, watery and calves with a faecal score ⩾2 were classified as having diarrhoea. Notes were also taken at each visit to record any other health problems, most commonly umbilical infection. Head tilt, a sign of inner ear infection, was excluded because it was not seen in any calf.
Measurement of passive transfer and circulating IGF1
Three jugular vein blood samples per calf were collected under the UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 under a project licence approved by the RVC Ethical Review Process. A week 1 recruitment sample was taken into a plain vacutainer (BD, Oxford, UK), centrifuged after clotting and the serum stored at −18°C for later analysis. A refractometer (RHC-200; Huake Instrument Co. Ltd., Shenzhen, China) was calibrated with distilled water then used to assess serum total protein (TP). Immunoglobulin G (IgG) was also measured using a radial immuno-diffusion assay kit (VMRD, Pullman, WA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Heparinised samples were collected at weeks 1, 5 and 9, centrifuged to collect plasma and IGF1 was measured using a commercial ELISA kit (IDS, Tyne and Wear, UK) as described previously (Brickell et al., Reference Brickell, McGowan and Wathes2009b).
Data analysis and univariate statistics
Data were stored in Excel and arranged into a relational database using Access to allow for further analysis (Microsoft Office; Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA). All analysis was completed in R using the lattice package for graphics (http://www.r-project.org). For each variable, normality was assessed by plotting a q/q plot and using the Shapiro–Wilk test. The morphometric measurements and growth rates were normally distributed and are presented as mean ± SD. Differences between farm and breed groups were assessed by ANOVA, using the ‘aov’ function. Post hoc testing was completed using the Tukey honest significant difference method in the R package ‘agricolae’ to correct for multiple testing. Linear regression was used to assess the relationships between continuous variables using the ‘lm’ function in R.
Multivariable statistics
The four growth-related outcomes examined were weight and height at 63 and 229 days and weight and height increases between 1 and 63 and 63 and 229 days. Candidate variables which might influence these outcomes are described in the Supplementary Table S2. Each variable was initially tested for normality and transformed if necessary. Variables were then plotted against the outcome in turn and tested in univariate analysis. For binary outcomes, generalised linear models were used with the formula: binary outcome=constant+β(variable of interest). For continuous outcomes, linear models were fitted with the formula: Continuous outcome=constant+β(variable of interest). The results were recorded with the effect estimate and SD, the z (binary) or t (continuous) values for each intercept and variable and the P values.
All multivariable models included farm as a random factor, using a hierarchical model with calf nested within farm. An identity covariance structure was used, as farms were assumed to be independent from each other. Models were fitted using the lmer function in the package lme4 with the lmerTest package used to calculate P values for each variable (https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lmerTest/index.html). Variables were initially considered for inclusion in the multivariate linear mixed effects models if P<0.2. To remove covariance between fixed effects recording related information (e.g. serum TP and serum IgG), only the variable with the highest model r 2 was included. All remaining candidate variables were tested in a multivariate model with a backwards stepwise approach using the ‘anova(model1, model2)’ function in R. This uses likelihood ratio tests to assess differences between two nested models and displays the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and the Baysian Information Criterion (BIC), providing measures of relative model quality. The significantly best model was taken forward. Where there was no significant difference, the model with the lower AIC and BIC was selected. All variables that did not improve the model were excluded to give a final model. The effect estimate, the 95% confidence intervals (using the Wald procedure) and the P-value were calculated.
Results
Farms, calf recruitment and breeds
Three farms used autumn block calving, with the remaining eight having an all-year-round calving pattern. On the 11 farms the breeds of calves kept were as follows (Table 1): pure Holstein (n=5), Holstein with some Viking Red crosses (n=3), and one farm each with both Holsteins and Ayrshires, New Zealand type Friesians with some Viking Red cross Friesian, and mixed breed cattle with many Jersey and Jersey crosses alongside Friesian cross heifers. From these farms 492 calves were recruited, with a range of 26 to 56 sequentially born dairy heifer calves per farm. In total, 351/492 (71%) of the calves were Holsteins followed by black and white cross Viking Red (43/492, 8.7%) and Friesians (37/492, 7.5%).
Pre-weaning feeding and housing management
Table 1 provides a summary of farm management information relevant to calf feeding. One farm (F) removed calves from dams shortly after birth. On the remaining farms, calves usually stayed with their dams for 12 to 24 h, although on two farms (G, J) calves were left with dams for several days. Four farms subsequently fed groups of 18 to 30 calves using automated feeders. On three of these four farms calves were moved from the farm of origin to a nearby rearing unit as soon as their passports were issued (typically 1 week old). On the fourth farm, calves were bucket-fed twice daily on the farm of origin for ~3 weeks until a batch was moved to the rearing unit. Four farms fed milk twice daily, two using buckets and keeping calves in single pens and two using feeders with teats and keeping calves in groups of 12. A further two farms fed milk to calves twice daily for ~2 weeks and then switched to once daily feeding. Finally, two farms kept calves in small groups where there was a single teat per pen of four to six calves supplied by a mixed drum of acidified waste milk. No calves received milk ad libitum. No farms weighed milk replacer powder: consequently, feeding rates were approximate. Farms fed between 4 and 6 l milk/day and aimed for a mixing rate of between 10% and 15% milk powder/l, providing 400 to 900 g/day milk solids (Table 1). The milk powders had a DM protein content between 20.6% and 27.1% and a DM fat content between 16.7% and 18.8% (Supplementary Table S1). The protein content of whole milk is similar to that in milk powder. Whole milk DM fat in Holstein milk is higher than in powder at about 28% but contains less lactose (41% v. about 52%).
All farms provided concentrate feed ad libitum once calves were in the main housing, typically at <1 week old. Only two farms gave access to concentrate later than 1 week: calves in farm G were housed with the dam for up to 10 days and calves at farm F were not moved to the rearing unit until they were ~3 weeks old. Forage was provided on all farms as hay, silage, straw in feeder or straw as bedding (Table 1). All farms used gradual step-down weaning, typically over 1 week, either by limiting milk availability on computerised feeders, cutting bucket feeds to once per day, or providing watered down waste milk only in the mornings. The age at which weaning began was variable: most farms based their decisions on a combination of calf age, calf or group appearance and farm convenience. On the farms that used automated feeders, calves were always programmed to receive milk for a certain number of days, so their age at arrival at the rearing unit determined their weaning age. Amounts of milk fed from 1 to 35 days were fairly consistent within farm, but large differences in weaning age meant that the milk solids fed from 35 to 63 days were highly variable, even within farm (Table 2).
Ranges of estimated colostrum and milk solids fed and weaning age for calves on each farmFootnote 1
1 All calves experienced changes in feeding policy at variable ages, so total figures per period (rather than per unit time) are provided. Data were calculated on an individual calf level.
2 Some calves (e.g. on Farm G) were weaned early so received very little milk during Period 2.
3 These farms moved calves onto automatic feeders at variable ages.
4 No variation because all calves were weaned at >63 days.
Calf size and growth rates
Plots of individual calf size data against age in days are illustrated in Figure 1. Summary data (mean ± SD) of size measurements at each age and their range between farms are presented in the Supplementary Figure S1. At recruitment in week 1 calf weights were 39.6±8.8 kg (n=492), increasing to 74.6±10.9 kg at 9 weeks. At the final follow-up visit at 227±37.7 days, the median weight was 213 kg. Both skeletal growth rates and average daily weight gain (ADG) were higher between 35 and 63 days than between 1 and 35 days of age (Figure 2): height growth increased from 0.17±0.14 to 0.25±0.16 cm/day, length growth increased from 0.16±0.1 to 0.22±0.1 cm/day and ADG increased from 0.48±0.25 to 0.71±0.28 kg/day. Post-weaning, heifers had slower skeletal height and length growth rates of 0.16±0.04 cm/day and 0.2±0.04 cm/day, respectively, whereas ADG increased further to 0.83±0.16 kg/day. Calf weight and height by breed are shown in the Supplementary Table S3. Jersey calves were lighter than the other pure bred calves at recruitment, with intermediate weights in the crossbred calves. No weight differences remained significant at 229 days, due to the large variability within breeds. Jersey calves were 6.5 cm shorter that Holsteins at recruitment and this height difference remained similar at 7.4 cm at 229 days.
Plots of the size measurements (a, height; b, trunk length; c, weight) for 492 individual calves at each of the four time points, recruitment in weeks 1, 5, 9 and the follow-up visit at a mean age of 227±37.7 days.
Box and whisker plots showing the average daily weight gain for calves on each of the 11 farms in the study, ranked according to the median value. Two time periods are shown (a) from 1 to 63 days, and (b) from 63 to 229 days. There were between 26 and 56 calves recruited per farm (see Table 1 for details).
The mean ADG up to 63 days varied from 0.52±0.3 to 0.75±0.2 kg/day between farms, compared with a range from 0.66±0.1 to 0.94±0.1 kg/day between 63 and 229 days (Figure 2). There was a wide range of growth rates even on the best performing farms, despite a single farm feeding policy (Figure 2). Neither individual animal nor farm mean growth rates were correlated between the two time periods of 1 to 63 and 63 to 229 days. For example, the three farms with the lowest initial ADG (D, E, G) all had higher rankings subsequently, whereas Farm A had the second highest ADG before 63 days but the lowest subsequently. Across all farms, the mean growth rate per farm over the first 9 weeks was positively correlated with the total amount of milk solids fed (R 2=0.687, P=0.02, Figure 3).
Mean total milk solids±SEM fed on each of the 11 farms plotted against actual average daily weight gain from 1 to 63 days. There was a significant correlation, P=0.02.
Calves were also classified according to the distribution of growth rates in different ADG ranges (Figure 4). Overall 19.6% of calves grew <0.5 kg/day between 1 and 63 days. Subsequently, calves gained weight more quickly, with 81.9% of calves growing at or above the target rate of 0.7 to 0.8 kg/day and only 2.7% falling below the threshold of 0.5 kg/day. On all farms except B the majority of calves gained <0.7 kg/day during the period before 63 days, with 69.6% below this figure. On farms D, E and G, >80% of calves were below this figure (Figure 2).
Histograms showing the proportions of calves according to differing average daily weight gain (ADG) (a) from 1 to 63 days and (b) from 63 to 229 days (7.5 months). Data in (a) are for 463 calves (22 had died, seven missing values). Data in (b) are for 447 calves (27 had died, 18 missing values). The target ADG of 0.7 to 0.8 kg/day as suggested by Cooke et al. (Reference Cooke, Cheng, Bourne and Wathes2013) is shaded.
Predictors of growth from 1 to 63 days of age
The same variables were retained in the final models for both estimated weight at 63 days and ADG between 1 and 63 days, so only the latter model is described in Table 3 . Increasing milk solids fed during this period from 20.4 to 46.3 kg (the 10th to 90th percentile observed) was associated with an increase of 0.11 kg/day ADG. Calf weight at recruitment was inversely correlated with subsequent weight gain. Increasing weight in week 1 from 28.7 to 48.4 kg (10th to 90th percentile) predicted a 0.093 kg/day fall in ADG. There was a predicted increase of 0.044 kg/day ADG when serum IgG at recruitment increased from 2.9 to 31.5 mg/ml (10th to 90th percentile), indicative of better passive transfer. Higher circulating IGF1 at 35 days was associated with a higher ADG: an increase in IGF1 from 16.3 to 107.6 ng/ml (10th to 90th percentile) was associated with a 0.059 kg/day increase. Pre-weaning disease was associated with a reduced ADG: 10% of calves had at least 2 weeks of diarrhoea, which was associated with a reduction in ADG of 0.067 kg/day. The 10% of calves most severely affected with BRD, which experienced over 4 weeks of disease, had a 0.039 kg/day reduction in ADG. Finally, calves that moved to a rearing unit in this period were predicted to be 4.82 kg larger at 63 days than those staying on the same holding.
Variables associated with calf average daily weight gain (ADG) (kg/day) between 1 and 63 days of age for 492 dairy heifer calves on 11 commercial farms
CI=confidence intervals; WT=weight; BRD=bovine respiratory disease.
1 CI for parameter estimate: * P<0.05, ** P<0.01, *** P<0.001.
2 Data were log transformed.
The model determining effects on the height increase between 1 and 63 days is described in Table 4. There was a small breed influence, with breeds other than Holstein growing at 0.002 cm/day less. Mean environmental temperature in the month a calf was born was also associated with a lower growth rate. Decreasing temperature from 16.6°C to 5.5°C (90th to 10th percentile) was associated with a decrease of 0.04 cm/day in height growth. Increasing height at recruitment from 71 to 81 cm (10th to 90th percentile) was associated with a 0.08 cm/day decrease in height growth. Bovine respiratory disease and umbilical infections were also associated with decreased height growth. In both cases calves on the 90th percentile for disease score grew at 0.02 cm/day less throughout this period. Increasing total milk solids fed during this period from 20.4 kg to 46.2 kg (10th to 90th percentile) was associated with a 0.05 cm/day increase in height growth. Similar variables were retained in the final model for estimated height at 63 days, with the following exceptions (data not shown). Breed was not significant and this was the only model generated that was significantly improved by the addition of exact calf age at recruitment. Increasing ponderal index at recruitment and IGF1 at day 35 from the 10th to the 90th percentile increased the height at 63 days by 5.6 and 0.97 cm, respectively.
Variables associated with calf height increase between 1 and 63 days of age for 492 dairy heifer calves on 11 commercial farms
CI=confidence intervals; HT=height at withers; BRD=bovine respiratory disease.
1 CI for parameter estimate: ** P<0.01, *** P<0.001.
2 Data were log transformed.
Predictors of growth from 63 to 229 days of age
Variables associated with both weight at 229 days and the ADG from 63 to 229 days are given in Table 5. The response to milk solids fed was greater after than before 63 days: calves were predicted to be 13.4 kg heavier if fed 46.3 rather than 20.4 kg milk pre-weaning (90th and 10th percentiles). Both weight at recruitment and ADG from 1 to 63 days were positively correlated with weight at 229 days. Finally, IGF1 at 63 days was positively associated with greater weight at 229 days, Calves at the 90th centile for IGF1 were expected to be 7.5 kg heavier than those of the 10th centile.
Variables associated with size at 229 days and average growth rates from 63 to 229 days of age for 492 dairy heifer calves on 11 commercial farms
CI=confidence intervals; WT=weight; HT=height at withers; BRD=bovine respiratory disease.
1 CI for parameter estimate: * P<0.05, ** P<0.01, *** P<0.001.
2 Data were log transformed.
The ADG from 63 to 229 days was also associated with milk solids fed to younger calves and with IGF1. A calf fed 46.3 kg of milk solids was predicted to grow 0.075 kg/day faster than one fed 20.4 kg. Length, height and weight at recruitment were all associated with higher weight gain in this period: length provided the largest improvement, so was retained in the final model. Increasing length at recruitment from 56 to 67.3 cm (10th to 90th percentile) was associated with a 0.042 kg/day increase in ADG. An increase from the 10th to the 90th percentile in IGF1 at 63 days was associated with an increase of 0.041 kg/day compared with calves on the 10th percentile. Finally, temperature in the month of birth was influential. The 10% of calves born in the warmest months grew 0.047 kg/day faster than those born in the coldest months. As February was the coldest month, calves born at this time therefore grew more slowly between the ages of 63 and 229 days despite the warmer weather experienced post weaning.
The linear mixed effects model for estimated calf height at 229 days is presented in Table 5. Increasing recruitment height from 71 to 81 cm and pre-weaning height growth from 0.125 to 0.317 cm/day (10th to 90th percentile) was associated with taller calves at 229 days, by 6.2 and 3.6 cm, respectively. The only pre-weaning variable that significantly improved the multivariate model was again total milk solids fed. An increase from 20.4 to 46.3 kg (10th to 90th percentile) was associated with a 3.1 cm increase in height. Milk solids fed was also significant in the model for height growth from 63 to 229 days. However, the taller calves that were at the 90th height percentile at 63 days (96 cm) subsequently grew 0.04 cm/day more slowly than those at the 10th percentile (83.7 cm).
Discussion
Most previous studies into calf nutrition and growth rates have followed prescribed protocols on research farms. This study measured the amounts of milk supplied to calves and their resulting growth rates on commercial farms applying their normal management practices. Both the milk rations offered and growth rates were below optimal for many pre-weaned calves, with 20% growing at <0.5 kg/day. Given that an ADG of 1 kg/day is achievable on an ad libitum milk supply (Khan et al., Reference Khan, Weary and von Keyserlingk2011) this could be considered as a level of growth restriction that would be expected to reduce calf welfare (Scientific Veterinary Committee, 1995; Lorenz et al., Reference Lorenz, Mee, Earley and More2011). Furthermore, 70% grew at <0.7 kg/day. This is the rate required to reach growth targets for first calving at 24 months, which is associated with increased productivity and longevity (Cooke et al., Reference Cooke, Cheng, Bourne and Wathes2013). The management practices observed here on the 11 farms studied were similar to those recorded in a stratified sample of 101 commercial dairy herds (Boulton et al., Reference Boulton, Rushton and Wathes2017). It is possible that the results were influenced by farm selection, but we believe that the herds in the study were representative of typical UK farms.
Advice to farmers for over 80 years has been to restrict the milk ration for young calves, to encourage early intakes of calf starter feed and so facilitate weaning from about 6 weeks of age (Khan et al., Reference Khan, Weary and von Keyserlingk2011). In their 1st month calves are, however, unable to eat sufficient solid feed to meet their energy requirements and are therefore dependent on the milk ration (Khan et al., Reference Khan, Weary and von Keyserlingk2011). Calf rearing systems have typically fed liquid milk at 10% of BW, supplying 400 to 500 g milk solids/day to achieve growth rates of around 0.4 to 0.6 kg/day under thermoneutral conditions (Quigley et al., Reference Quigley, Wolfe and Elsasser2006; Morrison et al., Reference Morrison, Wicks, Fallon, Twigge, Dawson, Wylie and Carson2009). All 11 farms in this study limited milk availability. Two farms used waste milk with added acidifiers. This reduces palatability (Hepola, Reference Hepola2003) and the amount fed was also limited by daily availability. Overall ADG in the first 5 weeks was 0.48 kg/day. This exceeded the 0.12 kg/day previously recorded by Bazeley et al. (Reference Bazeley, Barrett, Williams and Reyher2015) on UK farms but was similar to growth rates of 0.35 to 0.56 kg/day reported in a review of 19 research studies (Morrison et al., Reference Morrison, Wicks, Fallon, Twigge, Dawson, Wylie and Carson2009). These restrictions in milk supply occurred even though numerous studies have shown that calves fed more milk at a young age have higher feed conversion efficiencies and better growth rates (e.g. Raeth-Knight et al., Reference Raeth-Knight, Chester-Jones, Hayes, Linn, Larson, Ziegler and Broadwater2009; Khan et al., Reference Khan, Weary and von Keyserlingk2011; Soberon et al., Reference Soberon, Raffrenato, Everett and van Amburgh2012).
Little information is currently provided to farmers and veterinary surgeons as to what constitutes a physiologically normal milk intake as most educational materials reflect industry standards. Calves provided with higher volumes of milk in early life can consume 20% of their BW daily and gain weight by up to 1 kg/day (Khan et al., Reference Khan, Weary and von Keyserlingk2011). Calves will choose to drink about 8 l/day whole milk in the 1st month of life (Appleby et al., Reference Appleby, Weary and Chua2001; Jasper and Weary, Reference Jasper and Weary2002; Moallem et al., Reference Moallem, Werner, Lehrer, Zachut, Livshitz, Yakoby and Shamay2010). This is equivalent to the metabolisable energy (ME) from about 1.1 kg/day of a typical milk replacer (22% protein, 18% fat, 7% ash, therefore ME=19.7 megajoules/kg dry matter (DM)). For a 50 kg calf in a thermoneutral environment this would result in a growth rate of 0.95 kg/day (NRC, 2001).
Growth rates in older calves in this study (from 9 weeks to 7.5 months) were higher than in early life. As a consequence, mean growth rates over the whole study period were often within the target range of 0.7 to 0.8 kg/day. However, this disguised the extremely high variation observed between individual calves. Even on the best performing farm a third of their pre-weaned calves grew at <0.7 kg/day, and the bottom 5% grew at <0.16 kg/day. Such variability has consistently been reported in previous studies (Virtala et al., Reference Virtala, Mechor, Gröhn and Erb1996; Brickell et al., Reference Brickell, McGowan and Wathes2009b; Bach et al., Reference Bach, Terré and Pinto2013). It suggests uneven rates of milk intake even though all animals on the same farm were, in theory, on the same feeding regime. This variability may in part be due to competition for feed between group housed calves (O’Driscoll et al., Reference O’Driscoll, von Keyserlingk and Weary2006). There was, however, also high variability on the two farms that housed calves individually, suggesting that additional factors were involved.
The total amount of milk solids fed was the main variable consistently associated with a greater weight and height at both 63 and 229 days and the ADG and height increases from 1 to 63 and 63 to 229 days. The beneficial effect of a good milk supply on growth therefore continued long after weaning. There was a positive influence of IGF1 on both weight and ADG, confirming results of an earlier study (Brickell et al., Reference Brickell, McGowan and Wathes2009b). IGF1 production is in part controlled by nutrient intake and IGF1 is a known regulator of muscle development (Bass et al., Reference Bass, Oldham, Sharma and Kambadur1999; Smith et al., Reference Smith, Van Amburgh, Díaz, Lucy and Bauman2002). IgG at recruitment also had a small positive effect on growth, implying that calves benefited from a high initial intake of colostrum. Colostrum is itself highly nutritious. It is also associated with improved gut maturity (Blum, Reference Blum2006) and improved health (McGuirk, Reference McGuirk2008). Calves moved to a separate rearing unit also had a higher ADG from 1 to 63 days. These animals were all kept in larger groups and fed three times daily from automatic feeders. Calves left with their dams suckle between 6 and 12 kg milk/day, spread between several meals each lasting about 10 min (Khan et al., Reference Khan, Weary and von Keyserlingk2011), so more frequent feeding is closer to the natural situation. Compared with individual penning, calves housed with an older companion were found to ingest more starter pre-weaning and experience a lesser growth check post weaning (De Paula Vieira et al., Reference De Paula Vieira, von Keyserlingk and Weary2012).
Not surprisingly, there was a negative influence of disease. Diarrhoea, BRD and umbilical disease were recorded in 48.2%, 45.9% and 28.7% of the pre-weaned calves in this study, respectively. Calves with more weeks of either diarrhoea or BRD had a lower ADG from 1 to 63 days whereas the total scores for both BRD and umbilical disease were associated with a reduced height increase. A good immune response requires adequate nutrition (Galyean et al., Reference Galyean, Perino and Duff1999). Sick animals have a reduced feed intake (Johnson, Reference Johnson2002) and differences in immune function of calves on a low plane of nutrition may predispose them to clinical disease (Ballou, Reference Ballou2012).
Calves which were heavier or taller at recruitment had a lower ADG or height increase from 1 to 63 days but were again heavier and taller at 229 days. It may be that smaller birth size was associated with in utero growth restriction followed by post natal catch-up growth, as suggested by Swali and Wathes (Reference Swali and Wathes2007). A more likely explanation is that larger calves experienced some growth restriction pre-weaning. Growth rate depends on the ME available after maintenance and temperature regulation, which in turn depend on BW (NRC, 2001). Thus, a higher growth rate would be expected for a smaller than for a larger calf if both received the same restricted amount of milk. For example, a 30 kg calf offered 0.36 kg milk powder per day, in environmental temperatures of 15°C, should grow at 0.21 kg/day, whereas a 50 kg calf under similar conditions would have no ME available for growth. This may in part explain why breed was not significant in any of the weight-associated models, as the Jersey calves were lighter at birth, but were fed similar amounts of milk to the larger breeds. Breed was, however, a significant factor in height increase from 1 to 63 days, which was greater for Holsteins than other breeds. Holsteins have been selected for stature, which has positive genetic correlations with milk yield and feed efficiency (Lin et al., Reference Lin, Lee, McAllister, Batra, Roy, Vesely, Wauthy and Winter1987; Manafiazar et al., Reference Manafiazar, Goonewardene, Miglior, Crews, Basarab, Okine and Wang2016).
One strategy to help maximise the amount of energy available for growth is to avoid exposing calves to low environmental temperatures. Thermoneutral conditions for calves below 3 weeks of age are above 20°C but this temperature is increased with higher air speeds or wet bedding (NRC, 2001). Experiencing a low environmental temperature in the month of birth was associated with a reduced height increase from 1 to 63 days and was also significant in the model for ADG from 63 to 229 days. Housing calves in groups on dry, deep straw with shelter allows calves to huddle and provides a warmer local environment, reducing their need to use energy to stay warm and so improving feed conversion efficiency (Relic and Bojkovski, Reference Relic and Bojkovski2010; Lorenz et al., Reference Lorenz, Mee, Earley and More2011). The mean UK monthly temperatures during the study period ranged from 4.4°C to 16.6°C with a median of 9.5°C (Met Office, 2014). The temperature within a calf house is generally higher than externally; nevertheless many calves within the UK are kept below their thermoneutral environment, so achieving adequate growth rates may require additional feed, a strategy often used in colder regions (Quigley et al., Reference Quigley, Wolfe and Elsasser2006). Moving pens away from external barn walls (Lundborg et al., Reference Lundborg, Svensson and Oltenacu2005) and providing calf jackets (Rawson et al., Reference Rawson, Dziuk, Good, Anderson, Bates and Ruth1989) also reduces heat loss.
There is mounting evidence that early growth restriction affects the long-term performance of that animal in the adult milking herd (Khan et al., Reference Khan, Weary and von Keyserlingk2011; Soberon et al., Reference Soberon, Raffrenato, Everett and van Amburgh2012). Conversely, increasing the ADG to >0.8 kg/day for the first 6 weeks (Bar-Peled et al., Reference Bar-Peled, Robinzon, Maltz, Tagari, Folman, Bruckental, Voet, Gacitua and Lehrer1997) or 6 months of life (Brickell et al., Reference Brickell, Bourne, McGowan and Wathes2009a) can reduce the age at conception and calving by at least 1 month. This produces an economic saving to set against the higher early costs (Boulton et al., Reference Boulton, Rushton and Wathes2017). Farmers should therefore be encouraged to feed more physiologically normal amounts of milk. Consistent with our hypotheses, growth rates of calves within the same farm were affected by quantity of milk fed, air temperature and disease and sub-optimal growth rates were strongly associated with an insufficient milk supply.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank all the farmers who participated in the study and their associated veterinary practices. RVC manuscript no.: PPS_01513. The work was co-funded by the BBSRC (grant code BB/F016891/1) and Volac International Ltd.
Supplementary material
To view supplementary material for this article, please visit https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117003160
Open access
