Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-wvcvf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-22T10:36:52.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The stability of stratified horizontal flows of carbon dioxide at supercritical pressures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2025

Marko Draskic*
Affiliation:
Department of Process & Energy, ME, Delft University of Technology, Leeghwaterstraat 39, Delft 2628 CB, The Netherlands
Jerry Westerweel
Affiliation:
Department of Process & Energy, ME, Delft University of Technology, Leeghwaterstraat 39, Delft 2628 CB, The Netherlands
Rene Pecnik*
Affiliation:
Department of Process & Energy, ME, Delft University of Technology, Leeghwaterstraat 39, Delft 2628 CB, The Netherlands
*
Corresponding author: Marko Draskic, m.draskic@tudelft.nl; Rene Pecnik, r.pecnik@tudelft.nl
Corresponding author: Marko Draskic, m.draskic@tudelft.nl; Rene Pecnik, r.pecnik@tudelft.nl

Abstract

Fluids at supercritical pressures exhibit large variations in density near the pseudo-critical line, such that buoyancy plays a crucial role in their fluid dynamics. Here, we experimentally investigate heat transfer and turbulence in horizontal hydrodynamically developed channel flows of carbon dioxide at $88.5$ bar and $32.6\,^{\circ }\rm C$, heated at either the top or bottom surface to induce a strong vertical density gradient. In order to visualise the flow and evaluate its heat transfer, shadowgraphy is used concurrently with surface temperature measurements. With moderate heating, the flow is found to strongly stratify for both heating configurations, with bulk Richardson numbers $Ri$ reaching up to 100. When the carbon dioxide is heated from the bottom upwards, the resulting unstably stratified flow is found to be dominated by the increasingly prevalent secondary motion of thermal plumes, enhancing vertical mixing and progressively improving heat transfer compared with a neutrally buoyant setting. Conversely, stable stratification, induced by heating from the top, suppresses the vertical motion, leading to deteriorated heat transfer that becomes invariant to the Reynolds number. The optical results provide novel insights into the complex dynamics of the directionally dependent heat transfer in the near-pseudo-critical region. These insights contribute to the reliable design of heat exchangers with highly property-variant fluids, which are critical for the decarbonisation of power and industrial heat. However, the results also highlight the need for further progress in the development of experimental techniques to generate reliable reference data for a broader range of non-ideal supercritical conditions.

Information

Type
JFM Papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Thermodynamic properties of carbon dioxide at supercritical pressures, for which the critical temperature and pressure are at $T_{{c}}=31.0\,^{\circ}\rm C$ and $p_{{c}}=73.8$ bar, respectively. Panel (a) shows normalised profiles of the isobaric heat capacity $c_{{p}}$ along several isobars, the pressure of which is indicated in red. The pseudo-critical (p-c) curve is defined at the local maxima of $c_{{p}}$ along an isobar (Banuti 2015). Distributions of density $\rho$ and viscosity $\mu$ near the p-c line are shown for several supercritical pressures in (b) and (c), respectively.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Schematic of the current experimental facility, in which carbon dioxide at supercritical pressures is naturally circulated to a test section that is bi-laterally optically accessible. An image of the test section is outlined in blue. In the image, any usually present thermal insulation (30 mm polyethylene foam) has been removed. A schematic of lateral cross-section A is outlined in orange. In order to change the direction of the heating with respect to the schematic, the test section is inverted. The current optical configuration is shown alongside green-outlined cross-section B, which also indicates the additional components used for the background-oriented schlieren (BOS) measurements. Any symbols in the figure are explained in the main text, and in table 1.

Figure 2

Table 1. Description of the experimental facility. The table gives the values of the parameters indicated in figure 2.

Figure 3

Figure 3. Range of thermodynamic conditions of carbon dioxide at the test section inlet for the current study. Any presented results are evaluated at a nominal density and a nominal pressure of $\rho =700\text{ kg m}^{-3}$ and $p=1.2$$p_{{c}}$, respectively. Here, $p_{{c}}$ is the critical pressure.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Instantaneous shadowgrams of bottom-heated channel flows of carbon dioxide at the thermodynamic conditions indicated in figure 3. The relevant nominal Reynolds numbers ${\textit {Re}}_{Dh}$ and the nominal imposed heating rates $\dot {q}$ are displayed on the vertical and the horizontal axes, respectively. The cases, e.g. R2 : bh1, are labelled by an indicator of the nominal Reynolds number (R) and an indicator of the applied heating ($\textbf {n}$ or $\textbf {bh}$). Here, $\textbf {n}$ represents an unheated flow, whereas $\textbf {bh}$ implies that bottom-upward heating is applied. In all cases, the flow is from left to right. Supplementary movie 2 (available at https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2025.10162) provides the dynamic evolution of the current figure in time by showing 300 consecutive shadowgrams.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Instantaneous shadowgrams of top-heated channel flows of carbon dioxide at the thermodynamic conditions indicated in figure 3. The relevant nominal Reynolds numbers ${\textit {Re}}_{Dh}$ and the nominal imposed heating rates $\dot {q}$ are displayed on the vertical and the horizontal axes, respectively, and the cases, e.g. R6 : th1, are labelled by an indicator of the nominal Reynolds number (R) and an indicator of the applied heating ($\textbf {n}$ or $\textbf {th}$). Here, $\textbf {n}$ represents an unheated flow, whereas $\textbf {th}$ implies that top-downward heating is applied. In all cases, the flow is from left to right. Supplementary movie 2 (available at https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2025.10162) provides the dynamic evolution of the current figure in time by showing 300 consecutive shadowgrams.

Figure 6

Table 2. Values of $Ri$ for the non-neutrally buoyant snapshots shown in figures 4 and 5. The cases, e.g. R1 : bh1, are labelled by an indicator of the nominal Reynolds number (R) and an indicator of the applied heating ($\textbf {bh}$ or $\textbf {th}$). Here, $\textbf {bh}$ represents a flow to which bottom-upward heating is applied, whereas $\textbf {th}$ indicates that top-downward heating is applied. The data are shown with intervals of $\pm 2\sigma$.

Figure 7

Figure 6. Range of $Ri$ considered in this work for the nominal Reynolds numbers $Re_{{Dh}}$ indicated in figures 4 and 5. The carbon dioxide is heated in the unstably stratified configuration on the left, whereas a stably stratified configuration is considered for the data on the right. The error bars correspond to $\pm 2\sigma _{Ri}$ of the time series with the largest value of $Ri$.

Figure 8

Figure 7. Space–time (b) representation of the optical signal at the horizontal line that is indicated in the instantaneous shadowgram shown in (a). The value of ${\textit {Re}}_{Dh}$ is progressively increased by increasing the mass flow rate for the cases shown in (b).

Figure 9

Figure 8. Comparison of the correlated velocity with the imposed velocity. Panel (a) shows the correlated mean velocity $\bar {U}_{C}$ with respect to the measured velocity. Panel (b) shows the mean value of the vertical component $\bar {V}_{C}$. A comparison of several instantaneous profiles of $U_{C}$ with the measured bulk velocity is shown in (c). The data in (a) and (b) are shown with error bars of $\pm 2\sigma /\sqrt {N}$, where $N$ is the number of frame pairs. The data in (c) contain error bars of $\pm \sigma$.

Figure 10

Figure 9. Space–time (b) representation of the optical signal at the vertical line that is indicated in the instantaneous shadowgrams shown in (a). The value of ${\textit {Re}}_{Dh}$ is progressively increased by increasing the mass flow rate for the cases shown in (b).

Figure 11

Figure 10. Spacetime (b) representation of the optical signal at the vertical line that is indicated in the instantaneous shadowgram shown in (a). The bottom-up heating rate is progressively increased for the consecutive cases shown in (b).

Figure 12

Figure 11. Series of shadowgrams that show the evolution of the flow after an instantaneous step in bottom-upwards heating from cases R1 : n to R1 : bh5. For R1 : bh5, a heat flux of $\dot {q}=12.0\text{ kWm}^{-2}$ is applied. At time $t_0$, the heating is commenced.

Figure 13

Figure 12. Mean perceived horizontal displacement rates $\overline {\Delta x}/t$ for cases R1–R3, with progressively increased bottom-up heating rates in the consecutive panels.

Figure 14

Figure 13. Mean perceived vertical displacements $\overline {\Delta y}/t$ for cases R1–R3, with progressively increased bottom-up heating rates in the consecutive panels.

Figure 15

Figure 14. Image brightness $I$ over time. In (a) the carbon dioxide is heated from the bottom upwards from an initial state R2 : n. In (b) the carbon dioxide is heated from the top downwards from an initial state R5 : n.

Figure 16

Figure 15. Space–time (b) representation of the optical signal at the vertical line that is indicated in the instantaneous shadowgram shown in (a). The top-down heating rate is progressively increased for the consecutive cases shown in (b).

Figure 17

Figure 16. Thermal structure orientation as a function of the applied top-down heating rate. The edges (b) within any instantaneous shadowgraph (a) are detected as per Lefauve & Couchman (2024), and their local angle $\theta$ with the x-axis is evaluated. In (c), the mean absolute angles $|\bar {\theta }|$ of 300 snapshots are superimposed for each increment in $\dot {q}$ for case R7.

Figure 18

Figure 17. The displaced state of an in-focus pattern that is imaged through carbon dioxide at supercritical pressure is shown for various top-down heating rates for case R1 in (a). The original pattern is shown in black. The mean, interpolated local displacement for each point is used to shift the black pattern, yielding the pattern shown in red. Profiles of the path-integrated vertical gradients in refractive index are shown in (b). The data in (b) are shown with error bars of $\pm 2\sigma$.

Figure 19

Figure 18. Maximum instantaneous vertical displacements in the negative $y$-direction for cases R4–R6, with progressively increased top-down heating rates in the consecutive panels.

Figure 20

Figure 19. Wall temperature (a) and deducted wall density data (b) for a selection of cases with different nominal Reynolds numbers from figures 4 and 5. Bottom-up (bh) heating data points are shown with black-outlined markers, whereas top-down (th) heating data points are shown with homogenous markers. The data are shown with error bars of $\pm 2\sigma$.

Figure 21

Figure 20. Nusselt number (main figure) and heat transfer coefficient data (top right corner) for a selection of cases from figures 4 and 5, as a function of the deducted value for $Ri$. Bottom-up (bh) heating data points are shown with black-outlined markers, whereas top-down (th) heating data points are shown with homogenous markers. The data are shown with error bars of $\pm 2\sigma$.

Figure 22

Figure 21. Assessment of effectiveness of current optical filter. The filter removes the background patterns cast by surface finish imperfections of the visors. Optical filter image pairs are shown for case R1 in (a) and (b), case R3 in (c) and (d) and for case R5 in (e) and (f).

Figure 23

Figure 22. Isocontours of correlation-averaged image-pair correlations (for the current 128 x 128 windows) for the cases shown in figure 4. For bh5, a bottom-upwards heat flux of $\dot {q}=12.0\text{ kWm}^{-2}$ is applied. The figure denotes the correlation strength $r$ of the shown isocontours, and the standard deviations of the Gaussian fitted to the averaged correlation (Oldenziel, Sridharan & Westerweel 2023) in the two principal directions, $\sigma _{{r,1}}$ and $\sigma _{{r,2}}$, respectively. The positions of the symbols in the correlation profiles indicate the positions of their maxima along the x-axis.

Figure 24

Figure 23. Isocontours of correlation-averaged image-pair correlations (for the current 128 x 128 windows) for a selection of the cases shown in figure 5. The figure denotes the correlation strength $r$ of the shown isocontours, and the standard deviations of the Gaussian fitted to the averaged correlation (Oldenziel et al.2023) in the two principal directions, $\sigma _{{r,1}}$ and $\sigma _{{r,2}}$, respectively. The positions of the symbols in the correlation profiles indicate the positions of their maxima along the x-axis.

Supplementary material: File

Draskic et al. supplementary material movie 1

(https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-fluid-mechanics) provides the dynamic evolution of the current figure in time by showing 300 consecutive shadowgrams.
Download Draskic et al. supplementary material movie 1(File)
File 51.7 MB
Supplementary material: File

Draskic et al. supplementary material movie 2

(https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/journal-of-fluid-mechanics) provides the dynamic evolution of the current figure in time by showing 300 consecutive shadowgrams.
Download Draskic et al. supplementary material movie 2(File)
File 49.9 MB