Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-vgfm9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-17T12:46:16.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Overweight induced by high-fat diet delays rat cutaneous wound healing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 March 2007

Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Prolonged wound healing is a complication that contributes to morbidity and mortality. Overweight people regularly undergo surgery and trauma, and often develop chronic wounds, but the effects of the adipose tissue excess on cutaneous wound healing are not well understood. This study tested the hypothesis that overweight induced by a high-fat diet impairs rat cutaneous wound healing. Male Wistar rats were fed with either a high-fat or a standard (control) diet. After 15 weeks, an excisional lesion was done and the animals were killed 21 d later. Wound contraction and re-epithelialization, blood pressure, glucose and retroperitoneal fat were evaluated. After killing, lesion and adjacent normal skin were formol-fixed and paraffin-embedded. Inflammatory infiltrate, myofibroblasts, collagen fibres and cellular proliferation were analysed and blood vessels were evaluated using stereological methods. There was no difference in blood pressure and glucose, but retroperitoneal fat increased in the high-fat diet group. Animals fed with the high-fat diet presented delayed wound contraction and re-epithelialization. It was found that 21 d after wounding, overweight induced by a high-fat diet increased the inflammatory infiltrate and delayed myofibroblastic differentiation, collagen deposition, epithelial and connective tissue cell proliferation, and angiogenesis. These findings support the hypothesis that a high-fat diet exerts negative effects on rat cutaneous wound healing, due mainly to the prolongation of the inflammatory phase.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2006
Figure 0

Table 1 Experimental high-fat diet composition*

Figure 1

Fig. 1 Evaluation of wound contraction and re-epithelialization. (a) Original photo of wound area; (b) — shows total wound area; (c) ––- shows non re-epithelialized wound area (still uncovered by a neo-epidermis). The difference between the two areas represents the re-epithelialized wound area.

Figure 2

Fig. 2 Evaluation of body and of retroperitoneal fat mass. Mean values and standard deviations for five animals in the control group and ten animals in the diet group. For details of diets and procedures, see p. 1070. (a) Changes in body weight over 18 weeks on diets (–♦–, control; - - -□- - -, diet group). Mean values were significantly higher than those for the control group after 3 weeks of diet: *P < 0·05; **P < 0·001. (one-way ANOVA with Tukey post test). (b) Retroperitoneal fat mass after 18 weeks of diet. The high-fat diet promoted an increase in retroperitoneal fat depot. Mean value was significantly different from that of the control group: ***P < 0·0001. (unpaired t test Welch corrected). (c) Comparison of obesity index. The diet group (- - -□- - -) presented an increased index after 4, 15 and 18 weeks of diet. Mean values were significantly higher than those for the control group: *P < 0·05, **P < 0·01, ***P < 0·001. (–♦–, control group). (one-way ANOVA with Tukey post test).

Figure 3

Fig. 3 Evaluation of wound contraction and formation of neo-epidermis in control (□) and diet (■) groups. Mean values and standard deviations for five animals in the control group and ten animals in the diet group. For details of diets and procedures, see p. 1070. (a) Animals fed the high-fat diet presented delayed wound contraction. Mean values were significantly different from that of control: *P < 0·05, **P < 0·01. (b) animals fed the high-fat diet presented delayed re-epithelialization. Mean values were significantly different from that of control: *P < 0·05, ***P < 0·0001 (unpaired t test Welch corrected).

Figure 4

Fig. 4 (a) Percentage of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)-positive basal epithelial cells in wound area of control and diet groups. Values are means and standard deviations. Bar 10 μm. For details of diets and procedures, see p. 1070. Mean value was significantly different from that of control: **P < 0·01 (unpaired t test Welch corrected). Diet group (c) presented a larger number of proliferating cells in epidermal basal layer 21 d after wounding compared with control group (b).

Figure 5

Fig. 5 Granulation tissue in (a) control and (b) diet groups 21 d after wounding. Distribution of inflammatory infiltrate in wound area. (a) Control group presented a high amount of fibroblastic cells in granulation tissue; (b) in diet group an increase in inflammatory infiltrated was observed. Bar 10 μm. (c) Quantification of polymorphonuclear (PMN) leukocytes/field in granulation tissue of control and diet groups. Mean values and standard deviations for five animals in the control group and ten animals in the diet group, ten fields were analysed in each animal. For details of diets and procedures, see p. 1070. Mean value was significantly different from that of the control group: ***P < 0·0001 (unpaired t test Welch corrected).

Figure 6

Fig. 6 Stereological analysis of α-smooth muscle actin expressing cells in wound area of control and diet groups. (a) Volume density (Vv) of myofibroblasts in granulation tissue. Mean values and standard deviations for five animals in the control group and ten animals in the diet group. For details of diets and procedures, see p. 1070. Mean value was significantly different from that of the control group: ***P < 0·0001 (Mann-Whitney test). Diet group (c) still presented a larger amount of myofibroblasts 21 d after wounding compared with control group (b). Bar 10 μm.

Figure 7

Fig. 7 (a) Number of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)-positive connective tissue cells/mm2 in wound area. Mean values and standard deviations for five animals in the control group and ten animals in the diet group, ten fields were analysed in each animal. For details of diets and procedures, see p. 1070. Mean value was significantly different from that of the control group: ***P < 0·0001 (unpaired t test Welch corrected). Control group (b) presented smaller amount of proliferating cells in granulation tissue than diet group (c). Bar 10 μm.

Figure 8

Fig. 8 Stereological analysis of blood vessels 21 d after wounding in control and diet groups. Mean values and standard deviations for five animals in the control group and ten animals in the diet group, sixteen fields were analysed in each animal (eight in superficial region and eight in deep region). For details of animals and procedures, see p. 1070. (a) Volume density (Vv). Mean value was significantly different from that of control in superficial region: *P < 0·05. Mean value was significantly different from that of control in deep region: **P < 0·01. (b) Surface density (Sv). Mean value was significantly different from that of control in superficial region: **P < 0·01. Mean value was significantly different from that of control in deep region: ***P < 0·001. (c) Length density (Lv). Mean values were significantly different from those of the control group in superficial and deep region: ***P < 0·0001 (Mann-Whitney test).