Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-b5k59 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-12T09:43:26.547Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cropping systems alter plant volatile emissions in the field through soil legacy effects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2022

Shealyn C. Malone Open the ORCID record for Shealyn C. Malone [Opens in a new window] ,
Fabian D. Menalled Open the ORCID record for Fabian D. Menalled [Opens in a new window] ,
David K. Weaver Open the ORCID record for David K. Weaver [Opens in a new window] ,
Tim F. Seipel Open the ORCID record for Tim F. Seipel [Opens in a new window] ,
Megan L. Hofland ,
Justin B. Runyon Open the ORCID record for Justin B. Runyon [Opens in a new window] ,
Maryse Bourgault Open the ORCID record for Maryse Bourgault [Opens in a new window] ,
Darrin L. Boss  and
Amy M. Trowbridge Open the ORCID record for Amy M. Trowbridge [Opens in a new window]
Shealyn C. Malone*
Affiliation:
Department of Land Resources & Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA Department of Forestry and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
Fabian D. Menalled
Affiliation:
Department of Land Resources & Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA
David K. Weaver
Affiliation:
Department of Land Resources & Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA
Tim F. Seipel
Affiliation:
Department of Land Resources & Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA
Megan L. Hofland
Affiliation:
Department of Land Resources & Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA
Justin B. Runyon
Affiliation:
USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Forest Sciences Laboratory, Bozeman, MT, USA
Maryse Bourgault
Affiliation:
Department of Research Centers, Northern Agricultural Research Center, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA College of Agriculture and Bioresources, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
Darrin L. Boss
Affiliation:
Department of Research Centers, Northern Agricultural Research Center, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA
Amy M. Trowbridge
Affiliation:
Department of Land Resources & Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, USA Department of Forestry and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Shealyn C. Malone, E-mail: scmalone2@wisc.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Crops emit a variety of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that serve as attractants or repellents for pests and their natural enemies. Crop rotations, off-farm chemical inputs, and mechanical and cultural tactics – collectively called cropping systems – alter soil nutrients, moisture content, and microbial communities, all of which have the potential to alter crop VOC emissions. Soil legacy effects of diversified cropping systems have been shown to enhance crop VOC emissions in greenhouse studies, but how they influence emissions under field conditions remains virtually unknown. To determine the effect of cropping systems on plant VOC emissions in the field, air samples were collected from the headspace of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. Judee) grown in simplified wheat-fallow rotations or diversified wheat-cover crop rotations where cover crops were terminated by grazing cattle. Across two growing seasons, wheat grown in rotation with fallow emitted greater amounts of Z-3-hexenyl acetate and β-ocimene, key attractants for wheat stem sawfly (Cephus cinctus Norton), a major pest of wheat. While overall VOC blends were relatively similar among cropping system during the first growing season, emissions varied substantially in the second year of this study where wheat grown in rotation with cover crops emitted substantially greater quantities of volatile compounds characteristic of abiotic stress. Below-average precipitation in the second growing season, in addition to reduced soil water content in cover crop rotations, suggests that cropping system effects on wheat VOCs may have been driven primarily by water availability, a major factor limiting crop growth in dryland agriculture. While the specific mechanisms driving changes in VOC emissions were not explicitly tested, this work shows that agricultural practices applied in one growing season can differentially influence crop VOC emissions in the next through soil legacy effects, illustrating additional avenues through which cropping systems may be leveraged to enhance pest management.

Keywords

Cover cropsdiversified managementpest managementsaturated aldehydesTriticum aestivum LVOCs

Information

Type
Preliminary Report
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 37 , Issue 5 , October 2022 , pp. 375 - 381
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

Plants produce an array of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that mediate a variety of plant-insect interactions (Metcalf and Metcalf, Reference Metcalf and Metcalf1992) including the attraction or repulsion of pollinators, pests and predators (Kessler and Kalske, Reference Kessler and Kalske2018; Bouwmeester et al., Reference Bouwmeester, Schuurink, Bleeker and Schiestl2019). Plant volatile emissions are affected by a suite of soil abiotic and biotic properties such as temperature, moisture, nutrients, allelochemicals, and microbes (Gouinguené and Turlings, Reference Gouinguené and Turlings2002; Pineda et al., Reference Pineda, Zheng, van Loon, Pieterse and Dicke2010; Sharifi et al., Reference Sharifi, Lee and Ryu2018), all of which can result in the altered attraction of pests and their natural enemies (Pineda et al., Reference Pineda, Soler, Weldegergis, Shimwela, VAN Loon and Dicke2013; Pangesti et al., Reference Pangesti, Weldegergis, Langendorf, van Loon and Pineda2015; Mariotte et al., Reference Mariotte, Mehrabi, Bezemer, De Deyn, Kulmatiski, Drigo, Veen (Ciska), van der Heijden and Kardol2018). Agricultural practices alter many – if not all – of the aforementioned soil properties known to alter crop VOC emissions, and as such, may result in unintended consequences for crop pest management.

By developing soils that yield more favorable crop VOC blends, producers could leverage agricultural practices to increase pest management efficiency (Shrivastava et al., Reference Shrivastava, Rogers, Wszelaki, Panthee and Chen2010; Kaplan et al., Reference Kaplan, Pineda, Bezemer, Ohgushi, Wurst and Johnson2018). It is well-established that crop rotation complexity reduces insect pest and pathogen incidence by disrupting their life cycles (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Sipes and Schmitt2002; Huang et al., Reference Huang, Song, Xia, Mao, Shi, Zhou and Yu2013); however, crop rotation complexity can also confer pest resistance indirectly through soil effects that alter plant defense metabolism (Hu et al., Reference Hu, Robert, Cadot, Xhang, Ye, Li, Manzo, Chervet, Steinger, van der Heijden, Sclaeppi and Erb2018; Pineda et al., Reference Pineda, Kaplan, Hannula, Ghanem and Bezemer2020; Davidson-Lowe et al., Reference Davidson-Lowe, Ray, Murrell, Kaye and Ali2021). Studies have shown that the soil legacy effects of organic systems and cover crop rotations increase foliar defenses important for pest resistance (Murrell et al., Reference Murrell, Ray, Lemmon, Luthe and Kaye2019; Blundell et al., Reference Blundell, Schmidt, Igwe, Cheung, Vannette, Gaudin and Casteel2020), and these responses are driven by changes in soil nutrients and microbial communities. Not only can diversified agricultural practices enhance foliar defense, they can also alter crop VOC emissions. Compared to monocultures, crops grown in polyculture with a companion crop emit altered VOCs and experience reduced herbivory (Mutyambai et al., Reference Mutyambai, Bass, Luttermoser, Poveda, Midega, Khan and Kessler2019), and in greenhouse studies, plants grown in soil from diversified crop rotations emit altered constitutive and herbivore-induced VOC emissions (Malone et al., Reference Malone, Weaver, Seipel, Menalled, Hofland, Runyon and Trowbridge2020; Davidson-Lowe et al., Reference Davidson-Lowe, Ray, Murrell, Kaye and Ali2021). Still, the extent to which cropping system diversification through the inclusion of cover crops influences in situ VOCs emissions is virtually unknown.

Abiotic and biotic soil properties can alter VOC synthesis and emission (Gouinguené and Turlings, Reference Gouinguené and Turlings2002; Pineda et al., Reference Pineda, Zheng, van Loon, Pieterse and Dicke2010; Sharifi et al., Reference Sharifi, Lee and Ryu2018). For example, greater nutrient availability and soil water content tend to increase VOC emissions (Gouinguené and Turlings, Reference Gouinguené and Turlings2002; Timmusk et al., Reference Timmusk, Abd El-Daim, Copolovici, Tanilas, Kännaste, Behers, Eviatar, Seisenbaeva, Stenstrom and Niinemets2014), while microbial colonization of plants may increase (Fontana et al., Reference Fontana, Reichelt, Hempel, Gershenzon and Unsicker2009) or decrease (Babikova et al., Reference Babikova, Gilbert, Bruce, Dewhirst, Pickett and Johnson2014) emissions of VOCs, which can enhance (Ballhorn et al., Reference Ballhorn, Kautz and Schadler2013; Babikova et al., Reference Babikova, Gilbert, Bruce, Dewhirst, Pickett and Johnson2014) or reduce (Brock et al., Reference Brock, Berger, Schreiner, Ruppel and Mewis2018) their attraction to herbivores. While many studies have demonstrated effects of individual soil properties and biological variables on the emissions of volatiles, how these properties interact in field conditions is less clear, limiting our ability to understand the practical implications of soil-modified VOC emissions in agricultural settings (Brilli et al., Reference Brilli, Francesco and Baccelli2019).

Crop rotations, off-farm chemical inputs, and mechanical and cultural tactics – collectively called cropping systems – drive biotic and abiotic soil properties (Navarro-Noya et al., Reference Navarro-Noya, Gómez-Acata, Montoya-Ciriaco, Rojas-Valdez, Suárez-Arriaga, Valenzuela-Encinas, Jimenez-Bueno, Verhulst, Govaerts and Dendooven2013; Lapsansky et al., Reference Lapsansky, Milroy, Andales and Vivanco2016; Ishaq et al., Reference Ishaq, Seipel, Yeoman and Menalled2020), and thus, may influence VOC emissions indirectly through soil legacy effects (Kaplan et al., Reference Kaplan, Pineda, Bezemer, Ohgushi, Wurst and Johnson2018). Compared to fallowing practices, cover crops enhance soil organic matter enrichment and nutrient availability, while reducing soil compaction and species-specific autotoxins (Fageria et al., Reference Fageria, Baligar and Bailey2005; Huang et al., Reference Huang, Song, Xia, Mao, Shi, Zhou and Yu2013). Cover crops also increase the abundance and diversity of soil microbes important to plant growth and productivity (Fageria et al., Reference Fageria, Baligar and Bailey2005; Kim et al., Reference Kim, Zabaloy, Guan and Villamil2020). However, cover crops may pose trade-offs, particularly in dryland agroecosystems where water is a primary driver of crop productivity. Cover crops may deplete deep-soil water stores and reduce cash crop growth in the following season (Robinson and Nielsen, Reference Robinson and Nielsen2015; Ghimire et al., Reference Ghimire, Ghimire, Mesbah, Idowu, O'Neill, Angadi and Shukla2018; Bourgault et al., Reference Bourgault, Wyffels, Dafoe, Lamb and Boss2021).

Crop production in the semi-arid Northern Great Plains (NGP) is dominated by monocultures of drought-resistant crops, especially wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), that are grown in rotation with a fallow growing season, a period when the land is left unsown to replenish soil moisture (Padbury et al., Reference Padbury, Waltman, Caprio, Coen, McGinn, Mortensen, Nielsen and Sinclair2002). In this region, wheat production is largely limited by low precipitation and a highly specialized pest complex that includes the wheat stem sawfly (WSS; Cephus cinctus Norton), which is the most economically important insect pest of wheat (Beres et al., Reference Beres, Dosdall, Weaver, Cárcamo and Spaner2011). Female WSS use volatile cues from wheat, including (Z)-3-hexenyl acetate and β-ocimene, to locate appropriate hosts for oviposition (Weaver et al., Reference Weaver, Buteler, Hofland, Runyon, Nansen, Talbert, Lamb and Carlson2009; Buteler and Weaver, Reference Buteler and Weaver2012). Other insect pests and beneficial species, including wheat grain aphid (Sitobion avenae), cereal leaf beetle (Oulema melanopus), and two species of braconid parasitoids (Bracon cephi and B. lissogaster) (Pérez, Reference Pérez2009; Delaney et al., Reference Delaney, Wawrzyniak, Lemanczyk, Wrzesinska and Piesik2013; Drakulic et al., Reference Drakulic, Caulfield, Woodcock, Jones, Linforth, Brue and Ray2015) also exhibit preferential attraction to wheat plants based on the composition and quantity of the volatile compounds they emit.

Given the importance of VOCs in mediating wheat–pest–parasitoid interactions, it is possible that wheat plants emitting unattractive, unrecognizable, or reduced amounts of VOC blends could experience enhanced pest resistance directly or indirectly by altering the attraction of pests or their natural enemies, respectively. To assess whether cropping systems might be leveraged to increase resistance of crops through shifts in their volatile emissions, we measured wheat VOCs across two growing seasons from wheat grown in rotation with fallow and paired with wheat grown in rotation with a seven-species cover crop mixture that was terminated by grazing cattle.

Materials and methods

Study site and cropping systems

The study was conducted at the Montana State University (MSU) Northern Agriculture Research Center located south of Havre, MT (48°29′48.8″N, 109°48′10.4″W). The site is a representative water-limited agroecosystem of the NGP with an average annual precipitation of 305 mm. Average annual high and low temperatures at the site are 13.6 and 0.0°C, respectively (Western Regional Climate Center, 2020). The present study is part of a larger long-term study established in 2012 to assess cover crops in the NGP (Bourgault et al., Reference Bourgault, Wyffels, Dafoe, Lamb and Boss2021). Using a randomized complete block design, two replicate fields (40  × 360 m each) were divided into 8  × 14 m plots to which cropping systems were assigned in replicates of three (Fig. 1). The location of each cropping system was randomized in 2012 and has been maintained through time. For a comprehensive description of crop rotations and management methods, see Bourgault et al. (Reference Bourgault, Wyffels, Dafoe, Lamb and Boss2021).

Fig. 1.

Sample design used to determine the effect of diversified cropping systems on VOC emissions through soil legacy effects. Two replicate fields divided into 8  × 14 m plots were randomly assigned cropping systems in replicates of three. VOCs were measured from wheat grown in wheat-fallow and wheat-cover crop rotations where the cover crops were terminated by grazing cattle. VOC emissions were collected twice each season in 2018 and 2019. For each collection period, four VOCs samples were collected and averaged within a plot (n fallow = 3, n cover = 3).

VOCs were collected from wheat grown in two cropping systems: (1) wheat rotated with a fallow season, hereafter called ‘fallow’, and (2) wheat rotated with a seven-species mixture of cover crops that was terminated with grazing cattle, hereafter called ‘cover crop’. Species in the cover crop mixture included radish (Raphanus raphanistrum L.), lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus), field pea (Pisum sativum L.), oat (Avena sativa L.), turnip (Brassica rapa L.), sorghum-sudangrass (Sorghum × drummondii (Steud.) Millsp. & Chase), and soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.). Species were selected based on United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS) recommendations for the NGP and represent a range of functional groups with potential for the provision of various ecosystem services. Cover crops were planted on 14 May 2018, and 9 May 2019. At peak development, cover crop was dominated by oat which represented ~70% of the total biomass (Dupre et al., Reference Dupre, Weaver, Seipel and Menalled2021). Termination by targeted cattle grazing, an ecologically based management approach used to enhance the economic and environmental sustainability of farm diversification (McKenzie et al., Reference McKenzie, Goosey, O'Neill and Menalled2017), occurred from 26 to 28 July 2018, and from 14 to 16 August 2019. Cropping systems were treated with a glyphosate application prior to planting, and fallow plots were treated with an additional application of glyphosate during the season to control weeds. Wheat was visually monitored for pathogens and herbivores throughout the course of the study and no notable pest or pathogen damage was observed. Specifically, stem cutting by mature wheat stem sawfly larvae was less than <5% during the experiment. Total precipitation was 343 and 287 mm in 2018 and 2019, respectively, and mean annual temperatures were 4.6 and 4.7°C (Table 1).

Table 1.

Summary of climatic data for crop years 2018 and 2019 at the Northern Agricultural Research center in Harve, MT (Northern Agricultural Research Center, 2019)

Crop year 2018 and 2019 include September 2017–August 2018 September 2018–August 2019, respectively. Deviation from the historical averages (1916-current year) are in parentheses.

Volatile organic compound (VOC) collections

To characterize the effect of cropping systems on VOC emissions, wheat VOCs were collected during two days over two growing seasons: 2018 (20 June and 4 July) and 2019 (11 June and 25 June). These sample dates overlap with the host searching periods of WSS adults (June) and of their natural enemy parasitoids (July). The average developmental stage of plants at the time of sampling was Zadoks 75, 86, 55 and 77, respectively (Zadoks et al., Reference Zadoks, Chang and Konzak1974). VOCs were collected from four ~10 cm sections of a row within each plot and the four samples were averaged to determine the mean emission rate within each plot (n cover = 3, n fallow = 3). We used a push-pull sampling technique in which VOCs were collected from the headspace of chambers constructed from Teflon bags (48.26 × 54.61 cm; ClearBags, El Dorado Hills, CA) placed over the row and secured at the base of the plants with twist ties. VOC-free air was delivered into the chamber at 225 ml min−1 for at least 10 min prior to sample collection to flush ambient air from the chamber. Sample air including wheat VOCs was then collected over single HayeSep Q solid-phase adsorbent traps (Sigma Scientific, Gainesville, FL) at a flow rate of 225 ml min−1. Wheat VOC emissions were collected for 2 to 3.5 h between the hours of 9:00 and 14:00 on mostly sunny days to avoid excessive afternoon heat and correspond to times when WSS and their natural enemies are most actively ovipositing (Beres et al., Reference Beres, Dosdall, Weaver, Cárcamo and Spaner2011).

After collection of VOCs, sampled wheat plants were immediately harvested to standardize the emission rate by aboveground fresh weight. Adsorbent traps were wrapped in aluminum foil and stored on ice for transport and eluted within 24 h. Identities and relative amounts of VOCs were determined using GC-MS and are reported as nonyl acetate equivalents (Text S1). To account for day-to-day variability of temperature and light, chamber temperature and PAR were measured (Text S2) and used to calculate basal VOC emission rates standardized to 30°C according to Guenther (Reference Guenther1997). Basal emission rates are reported as emissions standardized by aboveground fresh weight and for the number of hours collected (ng nonyl acetate equivalents g−1 h−1).

Biomass and volumetric water content

To assess variation in plant growth among rotation and season, we quantified the end-of-season wheat biomass by harvesting aboveground tissue from one quadrat (0.75 × 0.75 m) within each plot from which we had collected VOC emissions earlier in the growing season. End-of-season biomass was sampled immediately before wheat harvest in mid-July. Plants were cut at the soil surface and dried at 50°C for 48 h before being weighed.

Volumetric soil water content was measured during the 2018 growing season from field 2 only when the field was planted with cover crops or laid follow (see Fig. 1). Because these rotations preceded the wheat from which we sampled VOCs in 2019, 2018 soil water content measurements serve as a proxy for understanding how the cropping system may have influenced the soil water stores available to wheat crops subsequently planted. We measured volumetric soil water content (%) at six depths – 10, 20, 30, 40, 60 and 100 cm – using a PR2/6 Profile Probe (Delta-T Devices Ltd, Burwell, Cambridge, UK) on 25 May, 4 June, 20 June and 2 July. Probes were removed prior to grazing.

Data analysis

To determine the effect of cropping system and year on the composition of VOCs, we calculated dissimilarity in VOC composition using the Bray-Curtis metric and by applying the ‘vegdist’ function in the ‘vegan’ package (Oksanen et al., Reference Oksanen, Guillaume, Friendly, Kindt, Legendre, McGlinn, Minchin, O'Hara, Simpson, Solymos, Stevens, Szoecs and Wagner2019). We used the permutational multivariate ANOVA (perMANOVA) and the ‘adonis’ algorithm to evaluate whether a significant proportion of the variation in VOC composition was accounted for by cropping system, year, and their interaction; however, the interaction term was insignificant and not included in the final model (Anderson, Reference Anderson2014). To visualize differences in VOC composition across cropping system and year, we used ‘metaMDS’ to perform non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis and we plotted the first two axes.

To compare the effect of cropping system on the quantity of VOC emissions for individual compounds, families of compounds (ketones, aldehydes, etc.), and the sum of all measured compounds, hereafter called ‘total’, we fit linear mixed models using the ‘lmer’ function in the ‘lm4’ package (Bates et al., Reference Bates, Mächler, Bolker and Walker2015). Measures of individual, family, or total VOCs were the dependent variables, cropping system, year, and their interaction were the fixed effects, and sample day was the random effect. When the interaction term was not significant for a given family or compound, it was not included in the model. Prior to the analysis, response variables were log-transformed to meet assumptions of normality and homoscedasticity, except when volatile compounds were not detected (i.e., when emission rates for a given compound were zero), in which case, square root transformations were used. To assess whether cropping system, year, and their interaction accounted for variation in VOCs, we performed Type III ANOVA using the ‘Anova’ function in the ‘lmerTest’ package (Kuznetsova et al., Reference Kuznetsova, Brockhoff and Christensen2017) and when the interaction term was not included in the final model, we used Type II ANOVA. To assess post hoc pairwise comparisons among treatments, we used Tukey's HSD test using the ‘emmeans’ package.

We modeled the effect of cropping system on end-of-season biomass by fitting a linear model with cropping system and year as the predictors. To determine the relationship between cropping system and soil water content, we fit linear mixed models with soil water content as the response variable, cropping system, depth, and their interaction as fixed effects and sample day as the random effect. We performed all analyses in R version 3.5.2 (R Core Team, 2018).

Results

VOC emissions

A total of 33 volatile compounds were quantified from wheat plants grown in rotation with fallow or cover crops including five ketones, nine aldehydes, seven terpenes, eleven alkanes/alkenes and one green leaf volatile (Table S1). Wheat VOC composition varied in response to cropping system and year (Fig. 2; cropping system: F 1,23 = 3.13, P = 0.03, year: F 1,23 = 19.87, P < 0.0001), with year explaining considerably more variation in VOC composition (R2 = 0.45) than cropping system (R2 = 0.07). The total VOC emission rate varied in response to the interaction of cropping system and year (cropping system × year: F 1,18 = 14.65, P = 0.001). In 2018, wheat grown in rotation with fallow emitted VOCs at rates 1.6 times greater than wheat grown in rotation with cover crops (P = 0.02; Fig. 3 and Table S1). However, in 2019, the opposite was observed: wheat grown in rotation with cover crops emitted VOCs at rates 1.7 times greater than wheat grown in rotation with fallow (P = 0.01). VOC emissions showed day-to-day variability (Fig. 3) with the interaction of cropping system and year explaining 11% of the variation while sample day – a random effect in our model – explained an additional 88%. Though sample day impacted the magnitude of emissions, likely due to plant ontogeny and seasonality, the overall pattern of VOC emissions remained consistent among sample days within a growing season (Fig. 3).

Fig. 2.

Variation of VOC composition in response to cropping system and year. Large symbols represent the centroid of each grouping.

Fig. 3.

VOC emissions by wheat grown in wheat-fallow (Fallow) or wheat-cover crop (Cover) rotations. Year is shown when emissions varied by sampling year. ‘Total VOCs’ represents the sum of all families of compounds (ketones, aldehydes, terpenes, alkanes and alkenes, and green leaf volatiles (GVLs)). Shapes represent individual sampling day.

Across both growing seasons, wheat grown in rotation with fallow emitted more terpenes, alkanes and alkenes, and GLVs (Fig. 3 and Table S1). In 2019, however, wheat grown in rotation with cover crops emitted more 4.7 more ketone and 3.2 more aldehyde compounds (Fig. 3 and Table S1) than wheat grown in rotation with fallow, and these compound families drove the observed increase in total VOC emissions by cover crop rotations in 2019. Across both growing seasons, wheat grown in rotation with fallow emitted greater amounts of compounds known to attract WSS adults: β-ocimene and Z-3-hexenyl acetate were emitted at rates 3.9 and 2.6 times greater compared to wheat grown in rotation with cover crops (Table S1).

Biomass and volumetric water content

End-of-season biomass varied by cropping system (Fig. 4; F 1,9 = 5.13, P = 0.05). Wheat grown in rotation with cover crops had reduced biomass, particularly in 2019 when the total annual precipitation was ~20 mm below average (Table 1). Soil water content in 2018 varied in response to the interaction of rotation and depth (Fig. 5; F 5 = 9.52, P < 0.0001), and there was minimal variation among sample day (R2marginal = 0.51, R2conditional = 0.52). Fallow plots exhibited higher percentages of soil water content at 30, 40 and 60 cm (Fig. 5), though soil water content was greater in cover crop rotations at 100 cm.

Fig. 4.

Mean wheat aboveground biomass in response to cropping system and year. Significance between treatments is expressed using different lower-case letters (95% CI).

Fig. 5.

Mean water content (%) (95% CI) of soil during fallow and cover crop rotations at six soil depths: 10, 20, 30, 40, 60 and 100 cm. Water content was measured during the 2018 growing season on 25 May, 4 June, 20 June and 2 July when the plots were fallow or planted with cover crops.

Discussion

Understanding whether cropping systems influence crop volatile emissions through soil legacy effects can provide critical insights into how and when to implement best management practices aimed at enhancing pest resistance. Using a two-year field study, we demonstrated that cropping systems influence the quantity and quality VOCs via soil legacy effects. Specifically, we showed that wheat crops emit varied VOCs depending on the rotation and management practices that proceed their growth. Importantly, we demonstrate strong interannual effects of cropping system on VOC emission, suggesting that annual climatic variation may dictate the extent to which cropping systems could influence crop pest-resistance.

In agroecosystems, shifts in crop VOC emissions can alter pest attraction and crop resistance (Shrivastava et al., Reference Shrivastava, Rogers, Wszelaki, Panthee and Chen2010; Mutyambai et al., Reference Mutyambai, Bass, Luttermoser, Poveda, Midega, Khan and Kessler2019). In 2018, VOC emission rates were greater from wheat grown in rotation with fallow, even though VOC composition was relatively similar among cropping systems. In contrast, during 2019, VOC emission rates were greater from wheat grown in rotation with cover crops, and the composition of VOCs varied markedly among cropping systems. Though we did not measure insect behavior in the present study, the observed VOC differences among cropping systems suggest that cropping systems may differentially attract or repel insect pests and their natural enemies. For example, across both growing seasons wheat-cover crop rotations emitted lower amounts of terpene compounds. Greater terpene emissions by wheat have been shown to effectively repel adult cereal leaf beetles (Delaney et al., Reference Delaney, Wawrzyniak, Lemanczyk, Wrzesinska and Piesik2013), suggesting that wheat-cover crop rotations may be less resistant to herbivore damage by cereal leaf beetles. However, in the case of WSS, wheat grown in rotation with cover crops may be less conspicuous to host-searching females. Wheat grown in rotation with cover crops emitted lower amounts of β-ocimene and Z-3-hexenyl acetate, both of which have been shown to act as important host-location cues for ovipositing WSS females (Weaver et al., Reference Weaver, Buteler, Hofland, Runyon, Nansen, Talbert, Lamb and Carlson2009; Buteler and Weaver, Reference Buteler and Weaver2012). Additionally, smaller wheat plants, like those observed in the cover crop rotation, are less attractive to ovipositing WSS (Perez-Mendoza et al., Reference Perez-Mendoza, Weaver and Morrill2006; Buteler and Weaver, Reference Buteler and Weaver2012), suggesting that wheat grown in rotation with cover crops may experience reduced WSS herbivore pressure through olfactory and visual modalities. Given these observations, future research is required to determine whether the observed shifts in VOCs emissions translate to the altered attraction of pests and natural enemies. Finally, it is important to note that significant reductions in wheat yields were detected in wheat-cover crop rotations in 2019 (Bourgault et al., Reference Bourgault, Wyffels, Dafoe, Lamb and Boss2021). While cropping systems may improve pest resistance through altered volatile emissions, reductions in crop biomass and yield will likely be the key factors that drive cropping management decisions.

We observed interannual variability in VOC emissions among cropping systems. While our experimental design precludes us from testing specific mechanisms driving the observed emissions, we posit that annual differences in VOC emissions were driven by the interaction of cropping system and annual precipitation. Total precipitation was nearly 30 mm above average in 2018, but ~20 mm below average in 2019 when we observed lower wheat biomass. Given that cover crops can reduce water stores (Fageria et al., Reference Fageria, Baligar and Bailey2005; Robinson and Nielsen, Reference Robinson and Nielsen2015), timely cover crop termination is vital to maintain subsequent cash crop productivity, especially in dryland agriculture where precipitation is the primary constraint of wheat production (Padbury et al., Reference Padbury, Waltman, Caprio, Coen, McGinn, Mortensen, Nielsen and Sinclair2002; Bourgault et al., Reference Bourgault, Wyffels, Dafoe, Lamb and Boss2021). In 2018, we observed reduced soil water content in cover crop plots compared to those that remained fallow, which – compounded by below-average precipitation in 2019 – may have created drought-like conditions for wheat grown in rotation with cover crops during 2019. Indeed, these plants emitted unusually high amounts of C9-C14 aldehydes, natural oxidation products of lipid peroxides (Shahidi, Reference Shahidi, Rouseff and Cadwallader2001) that occur concomitantly with environmental stressors such as drought (Wildt et al., Reference Wildt, Kobel, Schuh-Thomas and Heiden2003; Giron-Calva et al., Reference Giron-Calva, Li and Blande2017). To understand how cropping systems will impact crop emissions in a given growing season, future research should seek to understand the mechanisms driving crop emissions in the field where multiple abiotic and biotic factors are likely to interact in contrasting ways to influence net VOC emissions (Gadhave et al., Reference Gadhave, Hourston and Gange2018; Heinen et al., Reference Heinen, Biere, Harvey and Bezemer2018).

Our work explored the role of cropping system on plant VOCs through soil legacy effects. While our study suggests that soil water availability is vitally important in predicting shifts in VOC emissions, our goal was not to identify specific mechanisms, and future studies should work towards disentangling the abiotic and biotic drivers responsible for the observations made here. Our results indicate that crop management strategies have the potential to modify plant volatile emissions of cash crops through soil legacy effects, illustrating the importance of considering the temporal role of cropping systems and soils on pest resistance.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S174217052200014X.

Acknowledgements

We thank Paul Stoy and Michael Friedman for comments on previous versions of this manuscript, and Chris Larson, Mary Ellyn Dupre, Austin Simonpietri, Justin Gay, Bryce Currey, Daniel Chickinsky, and others at MSU for assistance with data and sample collection. We thank the anonymous reviewers for helpful comments.

Financial support

This research was supported by a grant from the U.S. Department of Agriculture and National Institute of Food and Agriculture (USDA-NIFA2018-67013-27919) with additional funding from the Montana Wheat and Barley Committee (DKW 2018–2020; TFS 2018).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Data availability

Data available from the Dryad Digital Repository.

References

Anderson, MJ (2014) Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance (PERMANOVA). In: Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Available at https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118445112.stat07841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babikova, Z, Gilbert, L, Bruce, T, Dewhirst, SY, Pickett, JA and Johnson, D (2014) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and aphids interact by changing host plant quality and volatile emission. Functional Ecology 2, 375–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballhorn, DJ, Kautz, S and Schadler, M (2013) Induced plant defense via volatile production is dependent on rhizobial symbiosis. Oecologia 172, 833–846.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, D, Mächler, M, Bolker, B and Walker, S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 1, 1–48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01Google Scholar
Beres, BL, Dosdall, LM, Weaver, DK, Cárcamo, HA and Spaner, DM (2011) Biology and integrated management of wheat stem sawfly and the need for continuing research. Canadian Entomologist 2, 105–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blundell, R, Schmidt, JE, Igwe, A, Cheung, AL, Vannette, RL, Gaudin, ACM and Casteel, CL (2020) Organic management promotes natural pest control through altered plant resistance to insects. Nature Plants 6, 483–491.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bourgault, M, Wyffels, SA, Dafoe, JM, Lamb, PF and Boss, DL (2021) Introducing cover crops as fallow replacement in the Northern Great Plains: II. Impact on following wheat crops. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170521000508.Google Scholar
Bouwmeester, H, Schuurink, RC, Bleeker, PM and Schiestl, F (2019) The role of volatiles in plant communication. Plant Journal 5, 892–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brilli, F, Francesco, L and Baccelli, I (2019) Exploiting plant volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in agriculture to improve sustainable defense strategies and productivity of crops. Frontiers in Plant Science 10, 264.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brock, AK, Berger, B, Schreiner, M, Ruppel, S and Mewis, I (2018) Plant growth-promoting bacteria Kosakonia radicincitans mediate anti-herbivore defense in Arabidopsis thaliana. Planta 6, 1383–1392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buteler, M and Weaver, DK (2012) Host selection by the wheat stem sawfly in winter wheat and the role of semiochemicals mediating oviposition preference. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 2, 138–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson-Lowe, E, Ray, S, Murrell, E, Kaye, J and Ali, JG (2021) Cover crop soil legacies alter phytochemistry and resistance to fall armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in maize. Environmental Entomology 50, 958–967.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Delaney, KJ, Wawrzyniak, M, Lemanczyk, G, Wrzesinska, D and Piesik, D (2013) Synthetic cis-jasmone exposure induces wheat and barley volatiles that repel the pest cereal leaf beetle, Oulema melanopus L. Journal of Chemical Ecology 39, 620–629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drakulic, J, Caulfield, J, Woodcock, C, Jones, SPT, Linforth, R, Brue, TJA and Ray, RV (2015) Sharing host plant (Triticum aestivum) increases the fitness of Fusarium graminearum and the severity of fusarium head blight but reduces the fitness of grain aphids (Sitobion avenae). Applied and Environmental Microbiology 10, 3492–3501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupre, ME, Weaver, DK, Seipel, TF and Menalled, FD (2021) Impacts of dryland cropping systems on ground beetle communities (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in the Northern Great Plains. Journal of Insect Science (Online) 1, 1–8.Google Scholar
Fageria, NK, Baligar, VC and Bailey, BA (2005) Role of cover crops in improving soil and row crop productivity. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 19–20, 2733–2757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fontana, A, Reichelt, M, Hempel, S, Gershenzon, J and Unsicker, SB (2009) The effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on direct and indirect defense metabolites of Plantago lanceolata L. Journal of Chemical Ecology 7, 833–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gadhave, KR, Hourston, JE and Gange, AC (2018) Developing soil microbial inoculants for pest management: can one have too much of a good thing? Journal of Chemical Ecology 42, 348–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghimire, R, Ghimire, B, Mesbah, AO, Idowu, OJ, O'Neill, MK, Angadi, SV and Shukla, MK (2018) Current status, opportunities and challenges of cover cropping for sustainably dryland farming in the Southern Great Plains. Journal of Crop Improvement 32, 579–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giron-Calva, PS, Li, T and Blande, JD (2017) Volatile-mediated interactions between cabbage plants in the field and the impact of ozone pollution. Journal of Chemical Ecology 43, 339–350.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gouinguené, SP and Turlings, TCJ (2002) The effects of abiotic factors on induced volatile emissions in corn plants. Plant Physiology 3, 1296–1307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guenther, A (1997) Season and spatial variations in natural volatile organic compound emissions. Ecological Applications 1, 34–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinen, R, Biere, A, Harvey, JA and Bezemer, TM (2018) Effects of soil organisms on aboveground plant-insect interactions in the field: patterns, mechanisms and the role of methodology. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 6, 106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, L, Robert, CAM, Cadot, S, Xhang, X, Ye, M, Li, B, Manzo, D, Chervet, N, Steinger, T, van der Heijden, MGA, Sclaeppi, K and Erb, M (2018) Root exudate metabolites drive plant-soil feedbacks on growth and defense by shaping the rhizospehere microbiota. Nature Communications 9, 2738.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, LF, Song, LX, Xia, XJ, Mao, WH, Shi, K, Zhou, YH and Yu, JQ (2013) Plant-soil feedbacks and soil sickness: from mechanisms to application in agriculture. Journal of Chemical Ecology 2, 232–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ishaq, SL, Seipel, T, Yeoman, CJ and Menalled, FD (2020) Soil bacterial communities of wheat vary across the growing season and among dryland farming systems. Geoderma 358, 113989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, I, Pineda, A and Bezemer, M (2018) Application and theory of plant–soil feedbacks on aboveground herbivores. In Ohgushi, T, Wurst, S and Johnson, SN (eds), Aboveground-Belowground Community Ecology. Berlin: Springer Int Publ, pp. 319–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, A and Kalske, A (2018) Plant secondary metabolite diversity and species interactions. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 49, 115–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, N, Zabaloy, MC, Guan, K and Villamil, MB (2020) Do cover crops benefit soil microbiome? A meta-analysis of current research. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 142, 107701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuznetsova, A, Brockhoff, PB and Christensen, RHB (2017) lmerTest package: tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software 13, 1–26. Available at https://orbit.dtu.dk/en/publications/lmertest-package-tests-in-linear-mixed-effects-models.Google Scholar
Lapsansky, ER, Milroy, AM, Andales, MJ and Vivanco, JM (2016) Soil memory as a potential mechanism for encouraging sustainable plant health and productivity. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 38, 137–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malone, SC, Weaver, DK, Seipel, TF, Menalled, FD, Hofland, ML, Runyon, JB and Trowbridge, AM (2020) Herbivore-induced volatile emissions are altered by soil legacy effects in cereal cropping systems. Plant and Soil 455, 171–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mariotte, P, Mehrabi, Z, Bezemer, TM, De Deyn, GB, Kulmatiski, A, Drigo, B, Veen (Ciska), GF, van der Heijden, MGA and Kardol, P (2018) Plant–soil feedback: bridging natural and agricultural sciences. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 2, 129–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie, SC, Goosey, HB, O'Neill, KM and Menalled, FD (2017) Integration of sheep grazing for cover crop termination into market gardens: agronomic consequences of an ecologically based management strategy. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 5, 389–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metcalf, RL and Metcalf, ER (1992) Plant Kairomones in Insect Ecology and Control. New York, NY, USA: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Murrell, EG, Ray, S, Lemmon, ME, Luthe, DS and Kaye, JP (2019) Cover crop species affect mycorrhizae-mediated nutrient uptake and pest resistance in maize. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 3, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1742170519000061Google Scholar
Mutyambai, DM, Bass, E, Luttermoser, T, Poveda, K, Midega, CAO, Khan, ZR and Kessler, A (2019) More than “push” and “pull”? Plant-soil feedbacks of maize companion cropping increase chemical plant defence against herbivores. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 7, 217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro-Noya, YE, Gómez-Acata, S, Montoya-Ciriaco, N, Rojas-Valdez, A, Suárez-Arriaga, MC, Valenzuela-Encinas, C, Jimenez-Bueno, N, Verhulst, N, Govaerts, B and Dendooven, L (2013) Relative impacts of tillage, residue management and crop-rotation on soil bacterial communities in a semi-arid agroecosystem. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 65, 86–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Northern Agricultural Research Center (2019) September 1. Weather Data. Available at https://agresearch.montana.edu/narc/weather_data/index.html.Google Scholar
Oksanen, J, Guillaume, F, Friendly, M, Kindt, R, Legendre, P, McGlinn, D, Minchin, PR, O'Hara, RB, Simpson, L, Solymos, P, Stevens, MHH, Szoecs, E and Wagner, H (2019) vegan: community ecology package. R package version 2.5–6. Available at https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.Google Scholar
Padbury, G, Waltman, S, Caprio, J, Coen, G, McGinn, S, Mortensen, D, Nielsen, G and Sinclair, R (2002) Agroecosystems and land resources of the Northern Great Plains. Agronomy Journal 94, 251–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pangesti, N, Weldegergis, BT, Langendorf, B, van Loon, JJA and Pineda, A (2015) Rhizobacterial colonization of roots modulates plant volatile emission and enhances the attraction of a parasitoid wasp to host-infested plants. Oecologia 4, 1169–1180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez-Mendoza, J, Weaver, DK and Morrill, WL (2006) Infestation of wheat and downy brome grass by wheat stem sawfly and subsequent larval performance. Environmental Entomology 35, 1279–1285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pérez, OG (2009) Behavioral and sensory responses of endemic braconid parasitoids to changes in volatile emissions induced by wheat stem sawfly, Cephus cinctus herbivory (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ScholarWorks (Accession No. 2013-06-25T18:42:34Z). Available at https://scholarworks.montana.edu/xmlui/handle/1/2041.Google Scholar
Pineda, A, Zheng, SJ, van Loon, JJA, Pieterse, CMJ and Dicke, M (2010) Helping plants to deal with insects: the role of beneficial soil-borne microbes. Trends in Plant Science 15, 507–514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pineda, A, Soler, R, Weldegergis, BT, Shimwela, MM, VAN Loon, JJA and Dicke, M (2013) Non-pathogenic rhizobacteria interfere with the attraction of parasitoids to aphid-induced plant volatiles via jasmonic acid signaling. Plant Cell and Environment 2, 393–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pineda, A, Kaplan, I, Hannula, SE, Ghanem, W and Bezemer, TM (2020) Conditioning the soil microbiome through plant-soil feedbacks suppress an aboveground insect pest. New Phytologist 226, 595–608. doi: 10.111/nph.16385CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
R Core Team (2018) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Available online at https://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Robinson, C and Nielsen, D (2015) The water conundrum of planting cover crops in the Great Plain: when is an inch not an inch? Crops & Soils 48, 24–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shahidi, F (2001) Headspace volatile aldehydes as indicators of lipid oxidation in foods. In Rouseff, RL and Cadwallader, KR (eds), Headspace Analysis of Foods and Flavors: Theory and Practice. Boston, MA: Springer Int Publ, pp. 113–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharifi, R, Lee, S-M and Ryu, C-M (2018) Microbe-induced plant volatiles. New Phytologist 3, 684–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shrivastava, G, Rogers, M, Wszelaki, A, Panthee, DR and Chen, F (2010) Plant volatiles-based insect pest management in organic farming. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 2, 123–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmusk, S, Abd El-Daim, IA, Copolovici, L, Tanilas, T, Kännaste, A, Behers, L, Eviatar, N, Seisenbaeva, G, Stenstrom, E and Niinemets, U (2014) Drought-tolerance of wheat improved by rhizosphere bacteria from harsh environments: enhanced biomass production and reduced emissions of stress volatiles. PLoS One 5, e96086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, KH, Sipes, BS and Schmitt, DP (2002) Crotalaria as a cover crop for nematode management: a review. Nematropica 32, 35–57.Google Scholar
Weaver, DK, Buteler, M, Hofland, ML, Runyon, JB, Nansen, C, Talbert, LE, Lamb, P and Carlson, GR (2009) Cultivar preferences of ovipositing wheat stem sawflies as influenced by the amount of volatile attractant. Journal of Economic Entomology 3, 1009–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Western Regional Climate Center (2020) Available from: https://wrcc.dri.edu.Google Scholar
Wildt, J, Kobel, K, Schuh-Thomas, G and Heiden, AC (2003) Emissions of oxygenated volatile organic compounds from plants part II: emissions of saturated aldehydes. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry 45, 173–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zadoks, JC, Chang, TT and Konzak, CF (1974) A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals. Res 6, 415–421.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Sample design used to determine the effect of diversified cropping systems on VOC emissions through soil legacy effects. Two replicate fields divided into 8  × 14 m plots were randomly assigned cropping systems in replicates of three. VOCs were measured from wheat grown in wheat-fallow and wheat-cover crop rotations where the cover crops were terminated by grazing cattle. VOC emissions were collected twice each season in 2018 and 2019. For each collection period, four VOCs samples were collected and averaged within a plot (nfallow = 3, ncover = 3).

Figure 1

Table 1. Summary of climatic data for crop years 2018 and 2019 at the Northern Agricultural Research center in Harve, MT (Northern Agricultural Research Center, 2019)

Figure 2

Fig. 2. Variation of VOC composition in response to cropping system and year. Large symbols represent the centroid of each grouping.

Figure 3

Fig. 3. VOC emissions by wheat grown in wheat-fallow (Fallow) or wheat-cover crop (Cover) rotations. Year is shown when emissions varied by sampling year. ‘Total VOCs’ represents the sum of all families of compounds (ketones, aldehydes, terpenes, alkanes and alkenes, and green leaf volatiles (GVLs)). Shapes represent individual sampling day.

Figure 4

Fig. 4. Mean wheat aboveground biomass in response to cropping system and year. Significance between treatments is expressed using different lower-case letters (95% CI).

Figure 5

Fig. 5. Mean water content (%) (95% CI) of soil during fallow and cover crop rotations at six soil depths: 10, 20, 30, 40, 60 and 100 cm. Water content was measured during the 2018 growing season on 25 May, 4 June, 20 June and 2 July when the plots were fallow or planted with cover crops.

Supplementary material: File

Malone et al. supplementary material

Malone et al. supplementary material

Download Malone et al. supplementary material(File)
File 24.5 KB