Assisted death for prisoners and forensic patients: Complexity and controversy illustrated by four recent cases – CORRIGENDUM

Roland M. Jones; Alexander I. F. Simpson

doi:10.1192/bjb.2026.10226

Assisted death for prisoners and forensic patients: Complexity and controversy illustrated by four recent cases – CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 February 2026

Roland M. Jones

and

Alexander I. F. Simpson

Article contents

Abstract
References

Rights & Permissions

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Keywords

Euthanasia assisted suicide psychiatry and law prison correctional centre corrigendum

Information

Type: Corrigendum
Information: BJPsych Bulletin , First View , pp. 1

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2026.10226 [Opens in a new window]
Creative Commons: This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright: © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Royal College of Psychiatrists

In the original publication of this article, it was claimed that Peter Vogt received euthanasia on 28 February 2023 (p. 302). The authors have since realised that this is incorrect, and this has now been removed from the article.

The authors apologise for this error.

References

Jones, RM, Simpson, AIF. Assisted death for prisoners and forensic patients: complexity and controversy illustrated by four recent cases. BJPsych Bulletin 2024; 48: 300–5. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2024.23.CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed