Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-76mfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-18T14:03:47.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Differential effects of habitual chow-based and semi-purified diets on lipid metabolism in lactating rats and their offspring

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2015

Josep Maria del Bas
Affiliation:
Centre Tecnològic de Nutrició i Salut (CTNS), TECNIO, CEICS, Avinguda Universitat, 1, 43204 Reus, Spain
Antoni Caimari*
Affiliation:
Centre Tecnològic de Nutrició i Salut (CTNS), TECNIO, CEICS, Avinguda Universitat, 1, 43204 Reus, Spain
Enzo Ceresi
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Nutrition and Biotechnology, Universitat de les Illes Balears and CIBER de Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERobn), Palma de Mallorca, Spain
Anna Arola-Arnal
Affiliation:
Departament de Bioquímica i Biotecnologia, Nutrigenomics Research Group, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain
Andreu Palou
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Nutrition and Biotechnology, Universitat de les Illes Balears and CIBER de Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBERobn), Palma de Mallorca, Spain
Lluís Arola
Affiliation:
Centre Tecnològic de Nutrició i Salut (CTNS), TECNIO, CEICS, Avinguda Universitat, 1, 43204 Reus, Spain Departament de Bioquímica i Biotecnologia, Nutrigenomics Research Group, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Tarragona, Spain
Anna Crescenti
Affiliation:
Centre Tecnològic de Nutrició i Salut (CTNS), TECNIO, CEICS, Avinguda Universitat, 1, 43204 Reus, Spain
*
* Corresponding author: Dr A. Caimari, fax +34 977558232, email antoni.caimari@ctns.cat
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Diet during pregnancy and lactation is a critical factor in relation to the health of dams and their offspring. Currently, control diets used in metabolic imprinting studies differ in composition and type, i.e. semi-purified diets (SD) or chow-based diets (ND). The aim of the present study was to determine whether two widely used control diets, a SD and a ND, that mainly differ in fat content (5·08 and 3·26 %, respectively) and its sources (soyabean oil for the SD and cereals and fish for the ND), fibre (6 and 15 %, respectively), and cholesterol (26 and 69 mg/kg diet, respectively) can influence the lipid metabolism of dams and their offspring. Wistar rats were fed either the SD or the ND during pregnancy and lactation. At weaning, SD-fed dams presented severe hepatic steatosis and increased levels of circulating TAG, NEFA and insulin. Importantly, the offspring presented an altered plasma lipid profile. In contrast, the ND allowed for a normal gestation and lactation process, and did not affect the metabolism of offspring. In parallel, virgin rats fed the SD showed no metabolic alterations. A higher intake of SFA and MUFA and a lower consumption of PUFA observed in SD-fed dams during the lactation period could contribute to explaining the observed effects. In conclusion, two different control diets produced very different outcomes in the lipid metabolism of lactating rats and their offspring. The present results highlight the importance of the assessment of the metabolic state of dams when interpreting the results of metabolic programming studies.

Information

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2015 
Figure 0

Table 1 Composition of the chow-based diet (ND) and semi-purified diet (SD)

Figure 1

Fig. 1 (A) Body weight, (B) food intake and (C) energy intake of dams fed either a chow-based diet (ND) (ND-L group, ) or a semi-purified diet (SD) (SD-L group, ) during pregnancy and lactation. P refers to pregnancy and L refers to lactation. Both the periods are delimited by vertical dotted lines. To calculate the energy intake, we assumed the energy content of the standard ND to be 1213 kJ (290 kcal)/100 g and that of the normal-fat SD to be 1536 kJ (367 kcal)/100 g. 1 kcal = 4·184 kJ. Values are means (n 9), with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. Results of repeated-measures ANOVA: D, the effect of the type of diet; T, the effect of the time; D × T, the interaction between the type of diet and time (P< 0·05).

Figure 2

Fig. 2 (A) Lipid intake, (B) cholesterol intake, (C) SFA, (D) MUFA, (E) PUFA consumption and (F) fibre intake of lactating dams fed either a chow-based diet (ND) (ND-L group, ) or a semi-purified diet (SD) (SD-L group, ) during pregnancy and lactation. To calculate these parameters, we used the data about the composition of both diets shown in Table 1. P refers to pregnancy and L refers to lactation. Both the periods are delimited by vertical dotted lines. Values are means (n 9), with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. Results of repeated-measures ANOVA: D, effect of the type of diet; T, effect of time; D × T, interaction between the type of diet and time (P< 0·05).

Figure 3

Table 2 Liver and plasma parameters of control or lactating rats fed the chow-based diet (ND) or the semi-purified diet (SD)* (Mean values with their standard errors, n 6–9)

Figure 4

Fig. 3 Liver histology (haematoxylin and eosin staining, 10 × ) of lactating dams fed (A) a chow-based diet (ND) (ND-L group) or (B) a semi-purified diet (SD) (SD-L group) during pregnancy and lactation and killed on day 21 of lactation. Liver tissue sections from virgin rats used for the control non-lactating groups and assigned to a (C) control non-lactating ND group (ND-C group) or a (D) control non-lactating SD group (SD-C group), depending on the type of diet received during the 43 d period. V, central vein; P, portal triad. (B) The triangle shows the lipid droplets present in the liver of rats in the SD-L group, and these animals developed macrovesicular steatosis. Scale bar, 50 μm.

Figure 5

Table 3 Body weight and plasma parameters of 21-d-old male and female offspring from lactating rats fed the chow-based diet (ND) or the semi-purified diet (SD) for 43 d (Mean values with their standard errors, n 9)

Figure 6

Fig. 4 mRNA expression levels of genes related to inflammation, macrophage infiltration, detoxification and oxidative stress responses, fibrosis and apoptosis in the liver of lactating and non-lactating rats. Lactating dams were fed a chow-based diet (ND) (ND-L group, ) or a semi-purified diet (SD) (SD-L group, ) during gestation and lactation, and killed on day 21 of lactation. Virgin rats were used for the control non-lactating groups and assigned to a control non-lactating ND group (ND-C group, ) or a control non-lactating SD group (SD-C group, ) depending on the type of diet received during the 43 d period. Values are means (n 6–9), with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. Results of two-way ANOVA: D, effect of the type of diet; P, effect of physiological status; D × P, interaction between the type of diet and physiological status (P< 0·05). a,b,cMean values with unlike letters were significantly different among the groups (P< 0·05; one-way ANOVA and Tukey's post hoc comparison). Casp3, caspase 3; Crp, C-reactive protein; Emr1, egf-like module containing mucin-like, hormone receptor-like 1; Gstp1, glutathione S-transferase pi 1; Hmox1, haem oxygenase (decycling); Mcp1, monocyte chemoattractant protein 1; Mmp2, matrix metallopeptidase 2; Mmp9, matrix metallopeptidase 9; Mt1, metallothionein 1; Pon1, paraoxonase 1.

Supplementary material: File

del Bas supplementary material

Table S1

Download del Bas supplementary material(File)
File 15.9 KB