Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-76mfw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-20T08:11:03.837Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Eurypterids from the Price Formation of Virginia: First Eurypterids from the Mississippian of North America

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 October 2022

Roy E. Plotnick Open the ORCID record for Roy E. Plotnick [Opens in a new window]  and
James C. Lamsdell Open the ORCID record for James C. Lamsdell [Opens in a new window]
Roy E. Plotnick*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, 845 West Taylor Street, Chicago, Illinois 60607, USA
James C. Lamsdell*
Affiliation:
Department of Geology & Geography, West Virginia University, 98 Beechurst Avenue, Brooks Hall, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA
*
*Corresponding author.
*Corresponding author.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new hibbertopterid eurypterid, Cyrtoctenus bambachi n. sp., is described from the Early Mississippian (Tournaisian) Price Formation of western Virginia. The same unit yields an unidentifiable stylonurine eurypterid. These are the first eurypterids documented from the Mississippian of North America, and only the fourth locality of this age anywhere in the world to yield eurypterids.

UUID: http://zoobank.org/5c84d3a2-ea5a-402c-970d-9b0d867f52c7

Information

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Paleontology , Volume 97 , Issue 1 , January 2023 , pp. 167 - 171
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Paleontological Society

Introduction

Eurypterids are rare components of Mississippian faunal assemblages. Only three families are known, although they belong to both suborders, the Eurypterina and the Stylonurina (Table 1). These same higher taxa persist until the final extinction of the eurypterids during the Permian, with overall diversity remaining low (Lamsdell et al., Reference Lamsdell, Braddy and Tetlie2010; Lamsdell and Selden, Reference Lamsdell and Selden2017). In late Paleozoic strata, eurypterids are found only in freshwater environments (Lamsdell and Selden, Reference Lamsdell and Selden2017).

Table 1.

Mississippian Eurypterids. Classification of Dunlop et al. (Reference Dunlop, Penney and Jekel2020). Within genera, given in stratigraphic order (oldest to youngest). Note: Hibbertopterus(?) hibernicus from Kiltorcan, Ireland, may be latest Upper Devonian, rather than Tournaisian in age (Jarvis, Reference Jarvis1990).

The geographic range of Mississippian eurypterids is also limited (Tetlie, Reference Tetlie2007). More than half of the Mississippian eurypterids come from Visean and Serpukhovian units in Scotland and were described in detail by Charles Waterston (Waterston, Reference Waterston1957, Reference Waterston1968; Størmer and Waterston, Reference Waterston1968). Additional early Carboniferous eurypterid localities in Scotland were mentioned but not described by Smithson et al. (Reference Smithson, Wood, Marshall and Clack2012). Outside of Scotland, only Cyrtoctenus wittebergensis Waterston, Oelofsen, and Oosthuizen, Reference Waterston, Oelofsen and Oosthuizen1985, from the Tournaisian of South Africa is well known. Here, we describe the first Mississippian eurypterids from North America and only the fourth eurypterid occurrence known from the Tournaisian.

Geological setting

The Price Formation is a Lower Mississippian unit exposed in a narrow outcrop belt in the Appalachians from Virginia northeast into Pennsylvania (Kammer and Bjerstedt, Reference Kammer and Bjerstedt1986; Bjerstedt and Kammer, Reference Bjerstedt and Kammer1988; Nolde, Reference Nolde1994). It is interpreted as a southwest-prograding deltaic complex, comprising a complex of marine, delta front, and coastal alluvial facies, including coal-producing swamp deposits (Kreisa and Bambach, Reference Kreisa and Bambach1973; Bjerstedt and Kammer, Reference Bjerstedt and Kammer1988). In Virginia, the upper part of the Price, which contains the deltaic sequence, is dated as Kinderhookian to lower Osagean (Kammer and Bjerstedt, Reference Kammer and Bjerstedt1986; Bjerstedt and Kammer, Reference Bjerstedt and Kammer1988; Gensel, Reference Gensel1988; Gensel and Pigg, Reference Gensel and Pigg2010) or solely Osagean (Nolde, Reference Nolde1994), which corresponds to Tournaisian. Two localities in the Virginia portion of the outcrop belt (Brush Mountain-Little Walker Mountain outcrop belt; Bjerstedt and Kammer, 1998, fig. 2) have yielded specimens of eurypterids from shales.

Locality 1: Coal Bank Hollow

About 100 m of the Price Formation is exposed along U.S. 460, between Coal Bank Hollow Road and County Route 648 (Brown, Reference Brown1983), Brush Mountain, 3.2 km north of Blacksburg, Montgomery County, Virginia (37.27571°N, 80.418900°W; WGS84). This is locality 11 of Kreisa and Bambach (Reference Kreisa and Bambach1973). A detailed section of this site (with lithologies including sandstone, siltstone, claystone, and mudstone) was given by Brown (Reference Brown1983), who placed it in the upper part of the Price Formation. The fine-grained intervals are near the base of the section; a coal layer is near the top. Plants from the site listed by Jennings (Reference Jennings1975) and Scheckler (Reference Scheckler1978, cited in Brown, Reference Brown1983) consist of: Lepidodendropsis scobiniformes (Meek, Reference Meek1880); L. vandergrachtii Jongmans, Gothan, and Darrah, Reference Jongmans, Gothan and Darrah1937; Lepidophylloides sp., Protostigmaria eggertiana Jennings, Reference Jennings1975 (miscopied by Brown, Reference Brown1983, as Protostigmaria essetiema); and Rhodea sp. The exact horizons yielding the eurypterid specimens are not known. The eurypterids from Coal Bank Hollow were briefly discussed in Briggs and Rolfe (Reference Briggs and Rolfe1983), based on preliminary observations by Plotnick.

Locality 2: Pond Lick Hollow

An exposure along County Route 674 (Pond Lick Hollow Road), west of Pulaski, Pulaski County, Virginia (37.054°N, 80.800°W; WGS84). This is near to locality 6 of Kreisa and Bambach (Reference Kreisa and Bambach1973) and is probably section C of Brown (Reference Brown1983, p. 54). This is also a coarsening upward sequence, with claystone at base and sandstone at the top. The specimens come from a gray/mottled white fine-grained shale with abundant iron stains, with a diverse associated flora including Triphyllopteris, Rhodeopteridium (Rhodea), Neuropteris, Lagenospermum, and Gnetopsis (P. Gensel, personal communication, 1981). Neuropteris antiqua (Stur, Reference Stur1877) and Rhodeopteridium sp. occur on the slab (P. Gensel, personal communication, 2018) that includes the eurypterid (Gensel, Reference Gensel1988). Again, the exact horizon of the eurypterid specimen is not known.

The two localities are non-marine strata, associated directly with the Price Formation delta complex. They are either delta plain (Facies 7 of Kreisa and Bambach, Reference Kreisa and Bambach1973) or swamp (Facies 8 of Kreisa and Bambach, Reference Kreisa and Bambach1973). Gensel (personal communication, 1981) favored either a levee or channel area of a delta plain deposit for the Pond Lick Hollow Road specimen.

Materials and methods

Specimens from Coal Bank Hollow were collected by faculty and students at Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, including Chauncey G. Tillman, Frank Whitten, and David Goodman, and deposited in the collections of the Department of Geological Sciences. In 2021 they were transferred to the Virginia Museum of Natural History and given specimen numbers. The specimen from Pond Lick Hollow was collected by Patricia Gensel.

Specimens were photographed with a Canon PowerShot Pro Series S5 IS digital camera. Figure 1.1 was drawn with a camera lucida attached to a Wild M5 binocular microscope.

Figure 1.

Cyrtoctenus bambachi n. sp. Price Formation, Lower Mississippian, Coal Bank Hollow, Virginia. (1, 2) VMNH 129166, opisthosomal tergite (paratype, part and counterpart). (3) Holotype: VMNH 129168, isolated free finger of prosomal appendage armature. (4) Camera lucida drawing of VMNH 129168. (5) VMNH 129169, cuticle and ornamentation (paratype). All scales 10 mm.

Repositories and institutional abbreviations

Type and figured specimens examined in this study are deposited in the following institutions: Virginia Museum of Natural History (VMNH), Martinsville, Virginia, USA, and the paleontology collections of the University of North Carolina (NCUPC), Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

Systematic paleontology

Order Eurypterida Burmeister, Reference Burmeister1843
Suborder Stylonurina Diener, Reference Diener and Diener1924
Family Hibbertopteridae Kjellesvig-Waering, Reference Kjellesvig-Waering1959
Genus Cyrtoctenus Størmer and Waterston, Reference Størmer and Waterston1968

Type species

Cyrtoctenus peachi Størmer and Waterston, Reference Waterston1968.

Cyrtoctenus bambachi new species
Figure 1

Holotype

VMNH 129168. Mississippian (Tournaisian), Price Formation, Coal Bank Hollow, near Blacksburg, Virginia, USA. Paratypes: VMNH 129166 and VMNH 129169.

Diagnosis

Cyrtoctenus with cuticular ornamentation comprised of both acicular and lunate scales; prosomal appendage podomeres lacking distal crenulations; moveable fingers of prosomal appendage armature straight, expanding slightly distally, with rounded termination.

Occurrence

Price Formation, Tournaisian (Kinderhookian–Osagean), at Coal Bank Hollow, Blacksburg, Virginia (37.27571°N, 80.418900°W), preserved in black shale.

Description

Each type specimen is described individually below.

Holotype VMNH 129168

Specimen comprises a moveable finger or blade with a length of 60 mm and a width of 10 mm proximally, expanding to 13 mm wide distally. The anterior (or dorsal) margin is straight, demarcated by a thickened ridge of imbricate scales. The posterior (or ventral margin) is slightly curved and is also ornamented with a ridge of imbricate scales. The distal termination of the finger is rounded, with four scales from the posterior margin projecting out to form blunt spines.

Paratype VMNH 129166

Fragment of opisthosomal tergite in part and counterpart, preserved width 92 mm, preserved length 53 mm. No natural edge of the tergite is preserved except for the posterior margin, which is crenulated. Tergite strongly ornamented. Ornamentation grades from dense, small acicular scales anteriorly to larger, increasingly spread-out lunate scales posteriorly. The crenulation along the posterior margin is formed from a dense accumulation massively enlarged lunate scales that show significant relief, forming longitudinal ridges and furrows.

Paratype VMNH 129169

Fragment of cuticle, most likely part of a prosomal appendage. The specimen has a length of 91 mm and is 21 mm wide proximally, expanding to 50 mm wide distally, with a recurved distal margin. The podomere is densely ornamented with acicular and semilunate scales that increase in size distally. An indentation running down the center of the podomere for 66 mm may represent a ventral groove.

Etymology

Named for Richard K. Bambach, in honor of his many contributions to paleontology and the education of generations of paleontologists.

Materials

Holotype VMNH 129168 and paratypes VMNH 129166 and VMNH 129169.

Remarks

Braddy et al. (Reference Braddy, Lerner and Lucas2022) synonymized the hibbertopterid genera Hibbertopterus, Dunsopterus, and Vernonopterus, but considered Cyrtoctenus to be distinct due to the presence of combs on the prosomal appendages. The Coal Bank Hollow material exhibits a tergite ornamentation more typical of Hibbertopterus (illustrated as Campylocephalus by Waterston, Reference Waterston1957) with dense acicular scales, and the enlarged acicular scales forming crenulations along the tergite posterior in VMNH 129166 specimens are also observed in specimens of Hibbertopterus formerly assigned to Dunsopterus (Waterston, Reference Waterston1968). The morphology of the podomere preserved at Coal Bank Hollow, VMNH 129169, closely matches podomeres of Hibbertopterus stevensoni (Etheridge, Reference Etheridge1877) in ornamentation and overall morphology (Waterston, Reference Waterston1968). However, the moveable finger (VMNH 129168) is a clear indicator that the new species possessed combs and therefore is assignable to Cyrtoctenus (Størmer and Waterston, Reference Waterston1968; Waterston et al., Reference Waterston, Oelofsen and Oosthuizen1985). The combination of traits in the new species further suggests that the genera Hibbertopterus and Cyrtoctenus may be synonyms (Jeram and Selden, Reference Jeram and Selden1994; Lamsdell et al., Reference Lamsdell, Braddy and Tetlie2010; Lamsdell, Reference Lamsdell2013), although the current material is too sparse to warrant a full reassessment of the genera.

Despite being known from only a handful of fragmentary specimens, Cyrtoctenus bambachi n. sp. can be differentiated from other currently known Cyrtoctenus species based on the morphology of the moveable finger. The moveable fingers of Cyrtoctenus peachi and Cyrtoctenus dewalqui (Fraipont, Reference Fraipont1889) are curved, narrow distally, and have pointed terminations (Størmer and Waterston, Reference Waterston1968), quite unlike those of Cyrtoctenus bambachi n. sp. Cyrtoctenus wittebergensis possesses moveable fingers that are straight, as in Cyrtoctenus bambachi n. sp., but narrow distally and terminate in a point. The moveable finger of Cyrtoctenus bambachi n. sp. is therefore unique among known Cyrtoctenus species in broadening distally and having a rounded termination. The lack of crenulations on the appendage podomere distal margins is also unique among Cyrtoctenus species.

Stylonurina incertae sedis
 Figure 2

Occurrence

Price Formation (Mississippian age) at Pond Lick Hollow Road (Co. Rt. 674), west of Pulaski, Virginia in gray shale with abundant plant fragments.

Figure 2.

Stylonurina incertae sedis. Price Formation, Lower Mississippian, Pond Lick Hollow Road near Pulaski, Virginia. NCUPC 135A. Segments numbered 1–8. Scale 10 mm.

Description

Seven, possibly eight, opisthosomal segments preserved with some relief. Anterior and posterior broken and incomplete. A large crack runs through the posterior of the specimen; the portion posterior to this can be removed. No discernable ornamentation, trilobation, or division into preabdomen and postabdomen. Segment 1 is short. Indication of a marginal rim on some segments (left side segments 3–5; Fig. 2). Total length is 67 mm, maximum width is 29 mm.

Material

NCUPC 135A.

Remarks

The specimen lacks sufficient characters to confidently assign it to a taxon within the eurypterids. The lack of ornamentation on the segments, as well as no clear indication of a division into pre- and postabdomen, argues against inclusion within the Adelophthalmidae, the surviving clade of the Eurypterina (Lamsdell and Selden, Reference Lamsdell and Selden2017). The overall shape, smooth texture, and marginal rim resemble members of the Stylonurina, such as the Upper Devonian Stylonurella(?) beecheri Hall and Clarke, Reference Hall and Clarke1888 (Plotnick, Reference Plotnick2022, fig. 8). Pending additional specimens, we place it as incertae sedis within the Stylonurina.

Discussion

Although eurypterids are relatively common in both Late Devonian and Pennsylvanian terrestrial settings, they are by comparison extraordinarily rare in the Mississippian (Tetlie, Reference Tetlie2007; Lamsdell and Selden, Reference Lamsdell and Selden2017). No members of the clade have been documented previously from North America. These specimens thus fill a key break in our understanding of the later history of this group.

Ward et al. (Reference Ward, Labandeira, Laurin and Berner2006) suggested that terrestrial arthropods showed a chronological gap during the Visean equivalent to Romer's gap for vertebrates, which they attributed to low atmospheric oxygen levels. On the face of it, the record of Carboniferous eurypterids supports the existence of an arthropod gap. The forms reported here support the contention by Smithson et al. (Reference Smithson, Wood, Marshall and Clack2012) that the gap is an artifact of collection failure, with additional eurypterid material from this interval awaiting future discoveries.

Acknowledgments

We are deeply thankful to R. Bambach for introducing us to the specimens from Coal Bank Hollow and allowing us to borrow them for an interminable amount of time. P. Gensel is similarly thanked for her loan of the specimen from Pond Lick Hollow and for her comments on its provenance and environment. J. Dunlop and an anonymous reviewer made useful comments which notably improved the manuscript.

Declaration of competing interests

The authors declare none.

References

Baily, W.H., 1870, On fossils obtained at Kiltorcan Quarry, Co. Kilkenny: Report of the Thirty-ninth Meeting of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, p. 73–75.Google Scholar
Bjerstedt, T.W., and Kammer, T.W., 1988, Genetic stratigraphy and depositional systems of the Upper Devonian–Lower Mississippian Price-Rockwell Deltaic Complex in the Central Appalachians, U.S.A.: Sedimentary Geology, v. 54, p. 265–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braddy, S.J., Lerner, A.J., and Lucas, S.G., 2022, A new species of the eurypterid Hibbertopterus from the Carboniferous of New Mexico, and a review of the Hibbertopteridae, Historical Biology. https://doi.org/10.1080/08912963.2022.2032690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briggs, D.E.G., and Rolfe, W.D.I., 1983, A giant arthropod trackway from the Lower Mississippian of Pennsylvania: Journal of Paleontology, v. 57, p. 377–390.Google Scholar
Brown, K.E., 1983., Stratigraphy and Deposition of the Price Formation Coals in Montgomery and Pulaski Counties, Virginia [M.S. thesis]: Blacksburg, VA, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.Google Scholar
Burmeister, H., 1843, Die Organisation der Trilobiten, aus ihren Lebenden Verwandten Entwickelt; nebst Systematischen Uebersicht aller Zeither Beschriben Arten: Berlin, G. Reimer, 148 p.Google Scholar
Chernyshev, B.F., 1948, New representative of merostomata from the Lower Carboniferous: Kievski Gos., Universitet Insititutim T. G. Shevchenko, Geologicheskii Sbornik, v. 2, p. 119–130.Google Scholar
Diener, C., 1924, Eurypterida, in Diener, C., ed., Fossilium Catalogus I: Animalia: Berlin, W. Junk, v. 25, p. 1–26.Google Scholar
Dunlop, J.A., Penney, D., and Jekel, D., 2020, A summary list of fossil spiders and their relatives (https://wsc.nmbe.ch/resources/fossils/Fossils20.5.pdf), in Platnick, N.I., ed., The World Spider Catalog, version 23.5: Natural History Museum Bern. https://doi.org/10.24436/2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etheridge, R. Jr., 1877, On the remains of a large Crustacean, probably indicative of a new species of Eurypterus, or allied Genus (Eurypterus? stevensoni), from the Lower Carboniferous Series (Cementstone Group) of Berwickshire: Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London, v. 33, p. 223–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraipont, J., 1889, Euryptérides nouveaux du Dévonien supérieur de Belgique (Psammites du Condroz): Annales de la Société Géologique de Belgique, v. 17, p. 53–62.Google Scholar
Gensel, P.G., 1988, On Neuropteris brongniart and Cardiopteridium nathorst from the early Carboniferous Price Formation, southwestern Virginia, U.S.A: Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, v. 54, p. 105–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gensel, P.G., and Pigg, K.B., 2010, An arborescent lycopsid from the lower Carboniferous Price Formation, southwestern Virginia, USA and the problem of species delimitation: International Journal of Coal Geology, v. 83, p. 132–145.Google Scholar
Hall, J., and Clarke, J.M., 1888, Descriptions of the trilobites and other crustacea of the Oriskany, Upper Helderberg, Hamilton, Portage, Chemung, and Catskill groups, Palæontology of New York, Volume 7: Albany, NY, Geological Survey of the State of New York, 236 p.Google Scholar
Hibbert, S., 1836, On the fresh-water limestone of Burdiehouse in the neighbourhood of Edinburgh, belonging to the Carboniferous group of rocks. With supplementary notes on other fresh-water limestones: Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, v. 13, p. 169–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, E., 1990, New palynological data on the age of the Kiltorcan Flora of Co. Kilkenny, Ireland: Journal of Micropalaeontology, v. 9, p. 87–94.Google Scholar
Jennings, J.R., 1975, Protostigmaria, a new plant organ from the lower Mississippian of Virginia: Palaeontology, v. 18, p. 19–24.Google Scholar
Jeram, A.J., and Selden, P.A., 1994, Eurypterids from the Visean of East Kirkton, West-Lothian, Scotland: Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh–Earth Sciences, v. 84, p. 301–308.Google Scholar
Jongmans, W.J., Gothan, W., and Darrah, W.C., 1937, Beitrage zur Kenntnis der Flora der Pocono-Schichten aus Pennsylvanien und Virginia: Compte Rendus du Deuxième Congrés pour l'avancement des études de Stratigraphie Carbonifère, Heerlen, Netherlands, p. 423–444.Google Scholar
Kammer, T.W., and Bjerstedt, T.W., 1986, Stratigraphic framework of the Price Formation (Upper Devonian–Lower Mississippian) in West Virginia: Southeastern Geology, v. 27, p. 13–33.Google Scholar
Kjellesvig-Waering, E.N., 1959, A taxonomic review of some late Paleozoic Eurypterida: Journal of Paleontology, v. 33, p. 251–256.Google Scholar
Kreisa, R.D., and Bambach, R.K., 1973, Environments of deposition of Price Formation (Lower Mississippian) in its type area, Southwestern Virginia: American Journal of Science, v. 273-A, p. 326–342.Google Scholar
Lamsdell, J.C., 2013, Redescription of Drepanopterus pentlandicus Laurie, 1892, the earliest known mycteropoid (Chelicerata: Eurypterida) from the early Silurian (Llandovery) of the Pentland Hills, Scotland: Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, v. 103, p. 77–103.Google Scholar
Lamsdell, J.C., and Selden, P.A., 2017, From success to persistence: identifying an evolutionary regime shift in the diverse Paleozoic aquatic arthropod group Eurypterida, driven by the Devonian biotic crisis: Evolution, v. 71, p. 95–110.Google ScholarPubMed
Lamsdell, J.C., Braddy, S.J., and Tetlie, O.E., 2010, The systematics and phylogeny of the Stylonurina (Arthropoda: Chelicerata: Eurypterida): Journal of Systematic Palaeontology, v. 8, p. 49–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meek, F.B., 1880, Descriptions of new species of fossil plants from Allegheny County, VA: Philosophical Society of Washington Bulletin, v. 2, appendix 8, p. 26–44.Google Scholar
Nolde, J.E., 1994, Devonian to Pennsylvanian stratigraphy and coal beds of the Appalachian plateaus province: geology and mineral resources of the southwest Virginia coalfield: Virginia Division of Mineral Resources Publication, v. 131, p. 1–85.Google Scholar
Peach, B.N., 1882, Further researches among Crustacea and Arachnida: Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, v. 30, p. 511–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plotnick, R.E., 2022, Devonian eurypterids from Indiana and Pennsylvania: Contributions from the Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, v. 34, p. 5–16.Google Scholar
Salter, J.W., 1863, The geology of eastern Berwickshire. Appendix—list of fossils—description of new cycadeous plant: Memoirs of the Geological Survey of Great Britain and of the Museum of Practical Geology, map 32, p. 58.Google Scholar
Scheckler, S.E., 1978, Outcrops of the Price Formation (Lower Mississippian): Fieldtrip Guidebook, Paleobotany Section of the Botanical Society of America, Department of Biology, Virginia Polytechnical Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA, 10 p.Google Scholar
Shpinev, E.S., 2006, A new species of Adelophthalmus (Eurypterida) from the lower Carboniferous of the Krasnoyarsk region: Paleontological Journal, v. 40, p. 431–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smithson, T.R., Wood, S.P., Marshall, J.E.A., and Clack, J.A., 2012, Earliest Carboniferous tetrapod and arthropod faunas from Scotland populate Romer's Gap: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 109, p. 4532–4537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Størmer, L., and Waterston, C.D., 1968, Cyrtoctenus gen. nov., a large late Palaeozoic arthropod with pectinate appendages: Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, v. 68, p. 63–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stur, D., 1877, Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Flora der Vorwelt. Die Culm Flora. Part 1. Die Culm-flora des Marisch-Schlesischen Dachschiefer: Abhandlung der Königliche Geologische Reichanstalt, v. 8, p. 1–106.Google Scholar
Tetlie, O.E., 2007, Distribution and dispersal history of Eurypterida (Chelicerata): Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, v. 252, p. 557–574.Google Scholar
Tetlie, O.E., and Van Roy, P., 2006, A reappraisal of Eurypterus dumonti Stainier, 1917 and its position within the Adelophthalmidae Tollerton, 1989: Bulletin de l'Institut Royal des Sciences Naturelles de Belgique, Sciences de la Terre, v. 76, p. 79–90.Google Scholar
Ward, P., Labandeira, C., Laurin, M., and Berner, R.A., 2006, Confirmation of Romer's Gap as a low oxygen interval constraining the timing of initial arthropod and vertebrate terrestrialization: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 103, p. 16818–16822.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Waterston, C.D., 1957, The Scottish Carboniferous Eurypterida: Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, v. 63, p. 265–288.Google Scholar
Waterston, C.D., 1968, Further observations on the Scottish Carboniferous eurypterids: Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, v. 68, p. 1–20.Google Scholar
Waterston, C., Oelofsen, B., and Oosthuizen, R., 1985, Cyrtoctenus wittebergensis sp. nov. (Chelicerata: Eurypterida), a large sweep-feeder from the Carboniferous of South Africa: Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, v. 76, p. 339–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, H., 1887, On a new species of Eurypterus from the Lower Carboniferous shales of Glencartholm, Eskdale, Scotland: Geological Magazine, v. 4, p. 481–484.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Mississippian Eurypterids. Classification of Dunlop et al. (2020). Within genera, given in stratigraphic order (oldest to youngest). Note: Hibbertopterus(?) hibernicus from Kiltorcan, Ireland, may be latest Upper Devonian, rather than Tournaisian in age (Jarvis, 1990).

Figure 1

Figure 1. Cyrtoctenus bambachi n. sp. Price Formation, Lower Mississippian, Coal Bank Hollow, Virginia. (1, 2) VMNH 129166, opisthosomal tergite (paratype, part and counterpart). (3) Holotype: VMNH 129168, isolated free finger of prosomal appendage armature. (4) Camera lucida drawing of VMNH 129168. (5) VMNH 129169, cuticle and ornamentation (paratype). All scales 10 mm.

Figure 2

Figure 2. Stylonurina incertae sedis. Price Formation, Lower Mississippian, Pond Lick Hollow Road near Pulaski, Virginia. NCUPC 135A. Segments numbered 1–8. Scale 10 mm.