Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-jnbmb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-31T11:02:34.177Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Endozoochorous seed dispersal potential of five major southern U.S. weeds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2025

Akashdeep Singh
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
Brandon Smith
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Animal Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
David Russell
Affiliation:
Assistant Extension Professor, Department of Crop, Soil and Environmental Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
Andrew J. Price
Affiliation:
Plant Physiologist, USDA-ARS National Soil Dynamics Lab, Auburn, AL, USA
J. Scott McElroy
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
Aniruddha Maity*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA
*
Corresponding author: Aniruddha Maity; Email: a.maity@auburn.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Cattle (Bos spp.) grazing on weed–mixed forage biomass may potentially spread weed seeds, leading to plant invasions across pasturelands. Understanding the possibility and intensity of this spread is crucial for developing effective weed control methods in grazed areas. This research undertook an in vitro experiment to evaluate the germination and survival of five dominant weed species in the southern United States [Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson), yellow foxtail [Setaria pumila (Poir.) Roem. & Schult.], johnsongrass [Sorghum halepense (L.) Pers.], field bindweed (Convolvulus arvensis L.) and pitted morningglory (Ipomoea lacunosa L.)] upon incubation in rumen fluid for eight time periods (0, 4, 8, 12, 24, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h). For the 96-h treatment, a full Tilley and Terry procedure was applied after 48 h for stopping fermentation, followed by incubation for another 48 h simulating abomasum digestion. Seed germination, upon incubation, varied significantly among weed species, with I. lacunosa reaching zero germination after only 24 h of incubation, whereas A. palmeri and S. halepense retained up to 3% germination even after 96 h of incubation. The hard seed coats of A. palmeri and S. halepense likely made them highly resistant, whereas the I. lacunosa seed coat became easily permeable and ruptured under rumen fluid incubation. This suggests that cattle grazing can selectively affect seed distribution and invasiveness of weeds in grazed grasslands and rangelands, including the designated invasive and noxious weed species. As grazing is a significant component in animal husbandry, a major economic sector in the U.S. South, our research provides important insights into the potential role of grazing as a dispersal mechanism for some of the troublesome arable weeds in the United States. The results offer opportunities for devising customized feeding and grazing practices combined with timely removal of weeds in grazeable lands at the pre-flowering stage for effective containment of weeds.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that no alterations are made and the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use and/or adaptation of the article.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Weed Science Society of America
Figure 0

Figure 1. Flowchart illustrating the endozoochorous seed dispersal by cattle (modified from Mouissie et al. 2005). Boxes represent quantitative units, circles denote seed parameters, and triangles signify the spatial units essential for seed dispersal.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Seeds of five weed species that underwent the rumen digestion experiment, arranged in the order of increasing seed size. From left to right: (A) Amaranthus palmeri, (B) Setaria pumila, (C) Sorghum halepense, (D) Convolvulus arvensis, and (E) Ipomoea lacunosa.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Effects of different duration of rumen fluid incubation on seed germination of five weed species. Bars with different letters indicate significant difference among the individual species across durations at P < 0.05. Errors bars indicate standard error of the mean (SEM).

Figure 3

Table 1. Percent final germination, number of days to first germination, and the mean time to germination (MTG) of the weed seeds after various durations of incubation in rumen fluid (hours).

Figure 4

Figure 4. Effect of different duration of rumen fluid incubation on seed viability (germinated + dormant but viable seeds) of five weed species. Letters on the data points indicate significant difference (P < 0.05) among the species within each observation timing. Asterisks (*) indicate significant difference (P < 0.05) between two consecutive observation timings for an individual species. Errors bars indicate standard error of the mean (SEM).

Figure 5

Figure 5. (A) Viable and (B) dead seed of Amaranthus palmeri; (C) viable and (D) dead seed of Setaria pumila, after a tetrazolium test under a Leica EZ4 Stereo Microscope at 35× magnification.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Percent germination response curve for five weed species over the incubation period at 3 wk after treatment with rumen fluid. The horizontal red dashed line in the plot represents 50% of the relative germination percentage. Data normalized to 100% according to control.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Membrane integrity test to examine damage to seed coat due to incubation in rumen fluid. Letters on the data points indicate significant difference (P < 0.05) among the species within each observation timing. There was no significant difference between two consecutive observation timings for an individual species. Errors bars indicate standard error of the mean (SEM).

Figure 8

Figure 8. Seed morphology after incubation in rumen fluid at different time intervals under a Leica EZ4 Stereo Microscope at 35× magnification. Red arrows show the damage and cracks on seed coats with increasing duration of rumen fluid incubation.

Figure 9

Figure 9. Effect of different durations of rumen fluid incubation on (A) seedling length and (B) seedling weight of five weed species. (A) Letters on the data points indicate significant difference (P < 0.05) among the species within each observation timing. There was no significant difference between two consecutive observation timings for an individual species. (B) Letters on the data points indicate significant difference (P < 0.05) between two consecutive observation timings for an individual species. There was no significant difference (P < 0.05) among the species within each observation timing. Errors bars indicate standard error of the mean (SEM).

Figure 10

Figure 10. Effect of different duration of rumen fluid incubation on seedling vigor index I of five weed species. Bars with different letters indicate significant difference (P < 0.05) between two consecutive observation timings for an individual species. Errors bars indicate standard error of the mean (SEM).

Figure 11

Figure 11. Effect of different duration of rumen fluid incubation on seedling vigor index II of five weed species. Bars with different letters indicate significant difference (P < 0.05) between two consecutive observation timings for an individual species. Errors bars indicate standard error of the mean (SEM).