Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-45ctf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-23T03:32:39.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

That All Children Should Be Free: Beauvoir, Rousseau, and Childhood

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2020

Sally J. Scholz
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Simone de Beauvoir offers one of the most interesting philosophical accounts of childhood, and, as numerous scholars have argued, it is one of the most important contributions that she made to existentialism. Beauvoir stressed the importance of childhood on one's ability to assume one's freedom. This radically changed how freedom was construed for existentialism. Rather than positing an adult subjectivity that tries to flee freedom through bad faith, Beauvoir's account forces a recognition of a situated freedom that itself is also developmentally achieved. In this article, I explore the influence of Jean-Jacques Rousseau on Beauvoir's discussion of childhood. By reading Beauvoir through Rousseau—who was one of her favorite authors—we see not just one but two accounts of childhood in Beauvoir's philosophical work. On the one hand is the idealistic childhood wherein the child is an apprentice to freedom. On the other is the constrained childhood whose product is apprenticed to the serious. I begin with a brief summary of Rousseau's Emile. Next, I offer some justification for reading Beauvoir alongside Rousseau before offering an account of Beauvoir's discussion of childhood. I end by exploring some of the implications of my reading for freedom.

Information

Type
Original Articles
Information
Hypatia , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , Spring 2010 , pp. 394 - 411
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Arp, Kristana. 2001. The bonds of freedom. Chicago: Open Court Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, Nancy. 2001. Simone de Beauvoir, philosophy, and feminism. New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beauvoir, Simone de. 1948. The ethics of ambiguity. Trans. Bernard Frechtman. Secaucus, N.J.: Citadel Press.Google Scholar
Beauvoir, Simone de. 1952. The second sex. Trans. H. M. Parshley. New York: Bantam Books (reprinted 1989. New York: Vintage Books).Google Scholar
Bergoffen, Debra. 1997. The philosophy of Simone de Beauvoir. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Busch, Thomas. 2005. Simone de Beauvoir on achieving subjectivity. In The contradictions of freedom, ed. Scholz, Sally and Mussett, Shannon. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 177–88.Google Scholar
Cottrell, Robert. 1975. Simone de Beauvoir. New York: Frederick Ungar Publishing.Google Scholar
Kruks, Sonia. 1995. Simone de Beauvoir: Teaching Sartre about freedom. In Feminist interpretations of Simone de Beauvoir, ed. Simon, Margaret. University Park, Pa.: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Langer, Monika. 2003. Beauvoir and Merleau‐Ponty on ambiguity. In The Cambridge companion to Simone de Beauvoir, ed. Card, Claudia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 87–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mussett, Shannon M. 2005. Personal choice and the seduction of the absolute in The Mandarins. In The contradictions of freedom, ed. Scholz, Sally and Mussett, Shannon. Albany: State University of New York Press, pp. 135–56.Google Scholar
Nichols, Mary. 1985. Rousseau's novel education in the Emile. Political Theory 13 (4): 535–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseau, Jean‐Jacques. 1762/1993. Émile. Trans. Barbara Foxley. London: J. M. Dent.Google Scholar
Scarth, Fredrika. 2004. The other within. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Scholz, Sally. 2000. On de Beauvoir. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Simons, Margaret. 1999. Beauvoir and The Second Sex. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Tidd, Ursula. 1999. Simone de Beauvoir. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vintges, Karen. 1996. Philosophy as passion. Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar