Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-v2srd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-18T00:38:37.254Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Serenity Integrated Mentoring and the High Intensity Network: A scheme that raises serious questions for practice and governance in UK psychiatry – CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2022

Allan House
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Keywords

Suicidecrisis servicesstigma and discriminationservice userspsychiatry and law

Information

Type
Corrigendum
Information
BJPsych Bulletin , Volume 47 , Issue 1 , February 2023 , pp. 62
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

The author would like to correct two errors in the above articleReference House1. There was an incorrect word published in the title and abstract:

‘Serenity Integrated Monitoring’ should be ‘Serenity Integrated Mentoring’. This has since been updated in the online PDF and HTML versions.

The first heading ‘What is Serenity Integrated Monitoring (SIM)’ should also read ‘What is Serenity Integrated Mentoring (SIM)’.

There is a spelling error in a name in the Acknowledgments section. This should read Alex Thomson, not Alex Thompson. The author apologises for these errors.

References

House, A. Serenity Integrated Mentoring and the High Intensity Network: a scheme that raises serious questions for practice and governance in UK psychiatry. BJPsych Bulletin, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2022.6Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.