Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-ksp62 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-11T10:33:00.942Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Morphological disparity and systematic revision of the eocrinoid genus Rhopalocystis (Echinodermata, Blastozoa) from the Lower Ordovician of the central Anti-Atlas (Morocco)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Ninon Allaire
Affiliation:
Université de Lille, CNRS, UMR 8198 Evo-Eco-Paleo, F-59000 Lille, France 〈ninon.allaire@univ-lille1.fr〉 Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, ENS de Lyon, CNRS, UMR 5276 LGL-TPE, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France 〈bertrand.lefebvre@univ-lyon1.fr〉, 〈emmanuel.martin@univ-lyon1.fr〉, 〈romain.vaucher@univ-lyon1.fr〉
Bertrand Lefebvre
Affiliation:
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, ENS de Lyon, CNRS, UMR 5276 LGL-TPE, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France 〈bertrand.lefebvre@univ-lyon1.fr〉, 〈emmanuel.martin@univ-lyon1.fr〉, 〈romain.vaucher@univ-lyon1.fr〉
Elise Nardin
Affiliation:
Géosciences Environnement Toulouse, Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées, CNRS/UPS/IRD, 14 avenue Edouard Belin, 31400 Toulouse, France 〈elise.nardin@get.omp.eu〉
Emmanuel L.O. Martin
Affiliation:
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, ENS de Lyon, CNRS, UMR 5276 LGL-TPE, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France 〈bertrand.lefebvre@univ-lyon1.fr〉, 〈emmanuel.martin@univ-lyon1.fr〉, 〈romain.vaucher@univ-lyon1.fr〉
Romain Vaucher
Affiliation:
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, ENS de Lyon, CNRS, UMR 5276 LGL-TPE, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France 〈bertrand.lefebvre@univ-lyon1.fr〉, 〈emmanuel.martin@univ-lyon1.fr〉, 〈romain.vaucher@univ-lyon1.fr〉
Gilles Escarguel
Affiliation:
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, CNRS, ENTPE, UMR 5023 LEHNA, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France 〈gilles.escarguel@univ-lyon1.fr〉

Abstract

The genus Rhopalocystis (Eocrinoidea, Blastozoa) is characterized by both a short stratigraphic range (Fezouata Shale, middle Tremadocian to middle Floian, Lower Ordovician) and a reduced geographic extension (Agdz-Zagora area, central Anti-Atlas, Morocco). Since the original description of its type species (R. destombesi Ubaghs, 1963), three successive revisions of the genus Rhopalocystis have led to the erection of nine additional species. The morphological disparity within this genus is here critically reassessed on the basis of both historical material and new recently collected samples. The detailed examination of all specimens, coupled with morphometric and cladistic analyses, points toward a relatively strong support for five morphotypes. A systematic revision of Rhopalocystis is thus suggested, with only five valid taxa: R. destombesi, R. fraga Chauvel, 1971, R. grandis Chauvel, 1971, R. havliceki Chauvel, 1978, and R. zagoraensis Chauvel, 1971. The five others are considered as junior synonyms (R. dehirensis Chauvel and Régnault, 1986, R. lehmani Chauvel and Régnault, 1986, R. sp. A, R. sp. B, and R. sp. C).

Information

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2017, The Paleontological Society 
Figure 0

Figure 1 Locality maps of the Rhopalocystis sites (modified after Lefebvre et al., 2016b). (1) Location of the Anti-Atlas range in northwestern Africa. (2) Simplified geological map of the Anti-Atlas showing the Ordovician outcrops and the location of the Zagora area and of localities 1773 and 2082 (Agdz area, Destombes localities). (3) Landsat view (Google Earth 2016) of the Zagora area showing the location sites 809 (=1157=1725), 1750 (=1737=1738), 2367 (Destombes localities); Z-F1, Z-F12c, and Z-F25 (new localities recently discovered).

Figure 1

Figure 2 Rhopalocystis destombesi Ubaghs, 1963. (1, 2) Morphological features of R. destombesi, holotype (A29134 and A29120, part and counterpart); drawings modified from Ubaghs (1963, text-fig. 2.2, 2.3); locality 809 (=1157=1725), late Tremadocian (A. murrayi Zone). (1) Theca showing the posterior interradial area (between the radius C and D), which contains the anal protuberances and the periproct. (2) Oral surface of the theca showing the five ambulacra (each consisted of four brachioliferous plates), the oral plates (six), and the peristomial area covered with very small plates. p.=periproct; an. p.=anal protuberance; br.=brachioliferous plates; o.=oral plates. (3) Presentation of the six variables used in the morphometric analysis, R. destombesi (ML 20.269.380a). L(ab)=aboral thecal length; L(ad)=adoral thecal length; W(B)=basal width; W(IL)=infralateral width; W(L)=lateral width; W(R)=radial width. (4) Reconstitution of R. destombesi, based on the holotype (A29134 and A29120) and on a specimen coming from the sample A29122; drawing modified from Ubaghs (1963, text-fig. 1); locality 809 (=1157=1725), late Tremadocian (A. murrayi Zone). The theca is shown in anterior aspect (radius A); the brachioles are not entirely represented; the small brachiole located on the ambulacra A is considered in development. (5) Artistic reconstruction of a Rhopalocystis destombesi meadow, with other typical organisms of the Fezouata Shale (Lower Ordovician, central Anti-Atlas, Morocco): conulariids (Eoconularia sp.), demosponges (Pirania auraeum and Hamptonia christi), stylophorans (Thoralicystis sp.), hyolithids (Elegantilites sp.), and arthropods (xiphosurid and basal chelicerate). The stem of Rhopalocystis seemed to be flexible; they could probably be attached by winding it around sufficiently solid elements. Illustration by mad meg. Scale bars=1 cm.

Figure 2

Figure 3 Synthetic stratigraphic log of the Lower Ordovician succession (modified after Lefebvre et al., 2016b, fig. 2) of the Zagora area (central Anti-Atlas, Morocco) showing the stratigraphic position of the localities 809 (=1157=1725), 1750 (=1737=1738), 2367, Z-F1, Z-F12c, and Z-F25 and the distribution of the five species of Rhopalocystis. The sites 2082 and 1773 could not be placed because they are located in a geographically distant area (Agdz). Biostratigraphic data (left columns) are based on graptolite biozones identified by Gutiérrez-Marco and Martin (2016).

Figure 3

Figure 4 Different types of preservation of Rhopalocystis-dominated assemblages, Lower Ordovician, Zagora area. All photographs show original samples, with the exception of (1) which corresponds to latex cast dusted with ammonium chloride. (1, 2, 5) Type 1 preservation, accumulation of Rhopalocystis spp. within lenses of bioclastic sandstones. (1) R. destombesi (ML 20.269.380), accumulation of thecae, locality Z-F25, middle Floian (?B. jacksoni Zone). (2) R. destombesi (UCBL-FSL 711.650), accumulation of thecae, locality Z-F25, middle Floian (?B. jacksoni Zone). (5) Partially disarticulated thecae, portions of stem, and isolated skeletal elements (basal plates) of Rhopalocystis spp. associated with large isolated pieces of trilobites (AA-TISa-OI-10), locality Z-F12c, late Tremadocian (A. murrayi Zone). (3, 4, 6) Type 2 preservation, Rhopalocystis spp. preserved in fine siltstones, locality Z-F1, late Tremadocian (A. murrayi Zone). (3) Complete to slightly disarticulated thecae of Rhopalocystis zagoraensis Chauvel, 1971 (AA-TAM-OI-2). (4) Isolated plates of Rhopalocystis sp. and large theca of Rhopalocystis havliceki Chauvel, 1978 (AA-TAM-OI-21). (6) Large theca of R. havliceki (AA-TAM-OI-13). Scale bars=1 cm.

Figure 4

Figure 5 Illustration of the different states associated with the characters used for the cladistic analysis (see Table 1). (1–13) Drawings realized under a stereomicroscope with a camera lucida; (14–20) photographs of latex casts dusted with ammonium chloride. (1) Rhopalocystis grandis Chauvel, 1971 (holotype 1725a), large-sized theca partially complete, a radius including three globular-shaped radials is visible. (2) R. havliceki (AA-TISa-OI-22j), large-sized well-preserved theca; two radii are visible; the radials are spine-shaped; the infralaterals and some laterals have a spine-shaped umbo more or less elongated. (3) R. zagoraensis (holotype 1725g), elongated theca with three circlets of additional secondary plates between infralaterals and laterals and one incomplete circlet between laterals and radials. (4) R. zagoraensis (AA-TISa-OI-13a), theca with two irregular circlets of additional plates between infralaterals and laterals; the suture between the two visible infralaterals is not vertical, probably as a result of a growth abnormality. (5) R. zagoraensis (2367d1), theca showing one circlet of small secondary plates between infralaterals and laterals; a row of these additional plates is also visible between the laterals. (6) R. zagoraensis (AA-TISa-OI-20a), small theca with an incomplete circlet of additional secondary plates between infralaterals and laterals. (7) R. zagoraensis (AA-TISa-OI-21b), small theca with isolated small secondary plates inserted between infralaterals and laterals; the globular shape of the radials is clearly visible. (8) R. zagoraensis (AA-TISa-OI-16c), small theca with one complete circlet of additional plates between infralaterals and laterals; the basal is dislocated. (9) R. destombesi (ML 20.269.380a); theca constituted of seven well-organized circlets, no additional secondary plate, conical radials. (10) R. destombesi (2367a1), theca showing two additional circlets of secondary plates, one located between infralaterals and laterals, and another one between laterals and infralaterals, conical radials. (11) R. destombesi (2367 SR5), theca with one circlet of small secondary plates between infralaterals and laterals. (12) R. zagoraensis (2367c2), aboral part of theca with one complete circlet of additional plates between infralaterals and laterals, and a row of additional plates inserted between laterals; three radii can be observed, each composed of one column of four globular-shaped radials. (13) Rhopalocystis fraga Chauvel, 1971 (1725g'1), theca composed of six circlets of plates including three circlets of convex radials. (14) R. destombesi (1157e1, right side, and 1157e2, left side), specimens having nipple-shaped umbos centered in the middle of most of their thecal plates. (15) R. grandis (AA-TISa-OI-5), fragment of theca constituted of irregular plates covered with small granulations. (16) R. havliceki (AA-TAM-OI-9), large-sized theca; the aboral extremity is missing; numerous laterals exhibit a spine-shaped relatively elongated umbo. (17) R. destombesi (2367b1), unornamented specimen with smooth thecal plates. (18–20) R. zagoraensis, thecae showing more or less continuous ornamentation folds, basals with vermiculated folds. (18) UCBL-FSL 712.044a. (19) AA-TISa-OI-16a. (20) AA-TISa-OI-17e. (1, 3, 13, 14) Locality 809 (=1157=1725), late Tremadocian (A. murrayi Zone); (2, 4, 6–8, 15, 18–20) locality Z-F12c, late Tremadocian (A. murrayi Zone); (9) locality Z-F25, middle Floian (?B. jacksoni Zone); (5, 10–12, 17) locality 2367, late Tremadocian (H. copiosus Zone); (16) locality Z-F1, late Tremadocian (A. murrayi Zone). Scale bars=1 cm.

Figure 5

Table 1 Discrete morphological characters and related character states used for the cladistic analysis. The third column refers to specimens illustrated in Figure 5.

Figure 6

Figure 6 (1) Unrooted most parsimonious tree (based on Wagner parsimony) separating the five morphotypes identified within the genus Rhopalocystis: R. destombesi, R. fraga, R. zagoraensis, R. havliceki, and R. grandis. Length=41; consistency index=0.536; retention index=0.906; rescaled consistency index=0.486. (2) Multivariate interindividual variability in the thecal geometry of Rhopalocystis. First principal plane (showing 82.9% of the total interindividual variance) of the morphospace resulting from the principal component analysis. (3) Multivariate interspecies variability in the thecal geometry of Rhopalocystis. First discriminant plane (showing 91.0% of the total among-group variance) of the morphospace resulting from the linear discriminant analysis.

Figure 7

Table 2 Results of the contrast analysis (pairwise comparisons, using Hotelling’s T² tests coupled with a sequential Bonferroni’s correction for multiple testing) associated with the MANOVA.

Figure 8

Figure 7 Rhopalocystis destombesi, drawings realized under a stereomicroscope with a camera lucida. (1) 1157q1; (2) 2367h; (3) 1157e1; (4) 1750a1; (5) 2367b1; (6) holotype (A29134 and A29120, part and counterpart), drawing modified from Ubaghs (1963, text-fig. 2.2); (7) ML 20.269.380a; (8) 2367f1; (9) AA-TISa-OI-9a; (10) oral surface of the theca showing the conical radials, the five ambulacra, the brachioliferous plates, the peristomial area, and the anal region containing the periproct, (holotype A29134 and A29120, part and counterpart), drawing modified from Ubaghs (1963, text-fig. 2.3); (11) 1157b1; (12) 2367 SR5; (13) 2367a1; (14) 2367 SR1; (15) 2367 SR6; (16) 2367a3. (1, 11–16) Specimens showing seven primary circlets of plates and additional secondary plates, as isolated plates or forming one complete or incomplete circlet, which can be inserted between infralaterals and laterals, and between laterals and radials; (2–9) specimens possessing only the seven primary circlets of plates that characterize the species, without additional secondary plates. (1, 3, 6, 10, 11) Locality 809 (=1157=1725), late Tremadocian (A. murrayi Zone); (2, 5, 8, 12–16) locality 2367, late Tremadocian (H. copiosus Zone); (4) locality 1750 (=1737=1738), late Tremadocian (A. murrayi Zone); (7) locality Z-F25, middle Floian (?B. jacksoni Zone); (9) locality Z-F12c, late Tremadocian (A. murrayi Zone). p.=periproct; an. p.=anal protuberance; br.=brachioliferous plates; o.=oral plates. (1–9, 11–16) Scale bar=1 cm; (10) scale bar=5 mm.

Figure 9

Figure 8 Rhopalocystis destombesi, photographs of latex casts dusted with ammonium chloride. (1) ML 20.268.381b; (2) 2367b1; (3) 2367 SR1; (4) 2367a1; (5) 2367 SR5; (6) 2367 SR6; (7) three specimens, 1157q1 (right side), 1157q2 (middle), and 1157q3 (left side); (8) two partially preserved thecae showing proximal parts of brachioles still in connection with the theca; the specimen 2367i (right side) is particularly large; (9) two specimens (1750a, b) with a theca almost entirely preserved (only the basal is missing); long parts of brachioles are preserved in connection with the theca; the brachioles of the specimen 1750a (left side) are remarkably well preserved: they seem to be at least twice as long as the theca, but certainly more because their distal extremities are missing; (10) two specimens, 1157e1 (right side) and 1157e2 (left side), exhibiting nipple-shaped umbos located in the middle of their plates; they are particularly pronounced in the specimen 1157e1. (1) Locality Z-F25, middle Floian (?B. jacksoni Zone); (2–6, 8) locality 2367, late Tremadocian (H. copiosus Zone); (7, 10) locality 809 (=1157=1725), late Tremadocian (A. murrayi Zone); (9) locality 1750 (=1737=1738), late Tremadocian (A. murrayi Zone). Scale bars=1 cm.

Figure 10

Figure 9 (1–4) Rhopalocystis fraga, small strawberry-shaped thecae partially complete; drawings realized under a stereomicroscope with a camera lucida. (1) 1725g'1; (2) 1725d'1; (3) 1773b; (4) 1773a (holotype). (1, 2) locality 809 (=1157=1725), late Tremadocian (A. murrayi Zone); (3, 4) drawings modified from Chauvel (1971, pl. 1, figs. 7, 8), locality 1773 (Agdz area), Lower Ordovician. (5–7) R. grandis, locality 809 (=1157=1725), late Tremadocian (A. murrayi Zone), drawings realized under a stereomicroscope with a camera lucida. (5) 1725a (holotype), large theca almost entirely preserved; a radius composed of three radials is visible; numerous epispires can be observed in the interradial area; (6) 1725c, adoral fragment of theca; few proximal columnals are conserved in connection with theca; (7) 1725b, large theca composed of numerous irregular plates; the aboral part is poorly preserved. Scale bars=1 cm.

Figure 11

Figure 10 (1, 3–5) Rhopalocystis grandis, photographs of latex casts dusted with ammonium chloride. (1, 3) AA-TISa-OI-5, fragment of theca corresponding to a part of the lateral area, showing the ornamentation diagnostic of R. grandis (plate surfaces covered with granulations); locality Z-F12, late Tremadocian (A. murrayi Zone). (5) Three specimens: 1725a (holotype, specimen reversed horizontally at the bottom of the picture), a radius composed of three globular radials can be observed; 1725b (left side) theca partially complete; and 1725c (in the center)—the proximal part of its stem and its basal are above the theca of 1725a; locality 809 (=1157=1725), late Tremadocian (A. murrayi Zone). (2, 4) R. fraga, photographs of the holotype (1773a), latex casts dusted with ammonium chloride; locality 1773 (Agdz area), Lower Ordovician. Theca entirely preserved; all thecal plates are covered with small granulations that might correspond to ornamentation folds. (1, 2, 5) Scale bars=1 cm; (3, 4) scale bars=2.5 mm.

Figure 12

Figure 11 Rhopalocystis havliceki from the locality Z-F1, late Tremadocian (A. murrayi Zone), drawings realized under a stereomicroscope with a camera lucida. (1) AA-TAM-OI-22; (2) AA-TAM-OI-9; (3) AA-TAM-OI-67; (4) AA-TAM-OI-21a; (5) AA-TAM-OI-79; (6) AA-TAM-OI-78b; (7) AA-TAM-OI-73; (8) AA-TAM-OI-7; (9) AA-TAM-OI-11. (1–5, 7) Large partially complete thecae, infralaterals, and some laterals have spine-shaped protuberances or are totally spine-shaped; (6, 9) adoral part of thecae with proximal part of stem preserved in connection with the theca; the infralaterals are spine-shaped, in (9) their extremities are particularly sharp; (8) aboral part of theca, with two preserved radii; the two first radials are spine-shaped; the third one is convex. Scale bar=1 cm.

Figure 13

Figure 12 Rhopalocystis havliceki from the locality Z-F12c, late Tremadocian (A. murrayi Zone), drawings realized under a stereomicroscope with a camera lucida. (1) AA-TISa-OI-22j; (2) AA-TISa-OI-22h. (1, 2) Large thecae; several spine-shaped radials are preserved; some laterals exhibit a spine-shaped umbo more or less rounded; the infralaterals seem to have several rounded protuberances (three in (2)). (3) AA-TISa-OI-23a, relatively small theca; a radius is partially exposed; the first radial is missing; the second one is spine-shaped; the third one is convex; the infralaterals and the largest laterals have a small umbo. (4) AA-TISa-OI-22g, aboral fragment of theca; a part of the oral surface is preserved; some spine-shaped radials are visible; the ambulacra seem to have eight brachioliferous plates; numerous epispires are located within the interradial area, which has been preserved. (5) AA-TISa-OI-22i, large theca partially complete; some laterals exhibit a small umbo; infralaterals have two or three protuberances; some ambulacra are preserved; they seem constituted of eight brachioliferous plates; a radial with a small umbo can be observed. (6) AA-TISa-OI-22l, large fragment of theca; one radius is partially preserved; the first radial is spine-shaped; the second one seems to be split in two plates also spine-shaped; some laterals exhibit a small protuberance. (7) AA-TISa-OI-22a, theca partially complete; two disconnected radials can be observed; they are spine-shaped. (8) AA-TISa-OI-22e, adoral part of theca with a relatively large portion of stem conserved in connection with the theca; it is constituted of columnals of different sizes; one of them is particularly swollen (nodal-shaped); the infralaterals possess several rounded protuberances, and some laterals have a small umbo. Scale bar=1 cm.

Figure 14

Figure 13 Rhopalocystis havliceki, photographs of latex casts dusted with ammonium chloride. (1, 2, 6, 8–10) Locality Z-F1, late Tremadocian; (3–5, 7) locality Z-F12c; late Tremadocian (A. murrayi Zone); (11) locality 2082, Lower Ordovician. (1) Aboral part of theca, two radii are visible (AA-TAM-OI-7). (2) Fragment of a theca (lateral area), with both extremities missing (AA-TAM-OI-79). (3) Aboral part of theca; a part of the oral surface is preserved; two ambulacra are visible; each possesses eight brachioliferous plates (AA-TISa-OI-22g). (4) Theca with the aboral part missing; the ornamentation is clearly visible; some plates exhibit a central umbo; all plates possess small ornamentation folds that can be continuous from plate to plate (AA-TISa-OI-27a); an aboral fragment of theca belonging to another individual (AA-TISa-OI-27b, right side) is preserved above the theca of AA-TISa-OI-27a; two spine-shaped radials are visible. (5) AA-TISa-OI-26; (6) AA-TAM-OI-6a; (7) AA-TISa-OI-22e; (5–7) adoral part of thecae with the proximal part of stem preserved in connection with theca. (8) AA-TAM-OI-21a; (9) AA-TAM-OI-22; (10) AA-TAM-OI-9; (11) 2082a (specimen initially assigned to Rhopalocystis sp. C and figured by Chauvel, 1978, text-fig. 11o, p, pl. 5 fig. 4); (8–11) thecae partially complete; the aboral part is missing; the spine shape of some laterals is clearly visible; these plates seem particularly robust. Scale bar=1 cm.

Figure 15

Figure 14 Rhopalocystis zagoraensis, drawings realized under a stereomicroscope with a camera lucida. (1) Holotype (1725g), figured by Chauvel (1971, pl. 1 fig. 6, pl. 2 fig. 2) and Chauvel and Régnault (1986, text-fig. 3O); (2) UCBL-FSL 712.044b; (3) 2367c3; (4) AA-TISa-OI-17a; (5) AA-TISa-OI-21c; (6) 2367d2; (7) AA-TISa-OI-13a; (8) 2367c1; (9) AA-TISa-OI-16a, theca without additional secondary plates, constituted of five circlets of plates (one basal, one infralateral, one lateral, and two radial circlets); (10) 1725h’; (11) 2367d1; (12) AA-TISa-OI- 12a; (13) AA-TISa-OI-21a; (14) 2367c2; (15) AA-TISa-OI-21b; (16) AA-TISa-OI-11a; (17) AA-TISa-OI-20a; (18) AA-TISa-OI-16b; (19) AA-TISa-OI-12b; (20) 1725c'1; (21) AA-TISa-OI-16c; (22) AA-TISa-OI-16d, oral surface of the theca showing globular radials, the five ambulacra, the brachioliferous plates, the peristomial area, and the anal region containing the periproct. (1–5, 7, 8, 10) Thecae having several circlets of secondary plates between infralaterals and laterals; some additional plates can also be observed between laterals and radials (as isolated elements or forming a complete circlet). (6, 9, 11–14, 20, 21) Thecae with one complete circlet of secondary plates between infralaterals and laterals. (15–17, 19) Thecae with additional secondary plates, as isolated elements or forming an incomplete circlet, between infralaterals and radials. (1–3, 8, 10, 11, 14) Thecae exhibiting rows of additional secondary plates between laterals. (3, 4, 8–10, 12, 18, 20) The posterior interradial area can be observed: it is larger than other interradial areas and contains the anal protuberance and the periproct. (19, 20) The basal plate seems to be split in two elements; the smaller one might be considered as a first proximal columnal that would be particularly large. (1, 10) Locality 809 (=1157=1725), late Tremadocian (A. murrayi Zone); (2, 4, 5, 7, 9, 12, 13, 15–19, 21, 22) locality Z-F12c, late Tremadocian (A. murrayi Zone); (3, 6, 8, 11, 14) locality 2367, late Tremadocian (H. copiosus Zone). The main ornamentation folds are illustrated. (1–21) Scale bar=1 cm; (22) scale bar=5 mm.

Figure 16

Figure 15 Rhopalocystis zagoraensis, photographs of latex casts dusted with ammonium chloride, thecae particularly well preserved; the characteristic ornamentation folds are clearly visible; this ornamentation can be more or less accentuated; all specimens possess additional secondary platelets in addition to the six primary circlets of plates constituting their theca. (1) Holotype 1725g; (2) AA-TISa-OI-17b; (3) UCBL-FSL 712.044a; (4) 2367c3; (5) AA-TISa-OI-17a; (6) AA-TISa-OI-13a; (7) AA-TISa-OI-21c; (8) 2367d1 (left side) and 2367dE, a small-sized individual, which might correspond to a juvenile of Rhopalocystis sp. (right side); (9) AA-TISa-OI-16a; (10) AA-TISa-OI-17e; (11) AA-TISa-OI-21a; (12) AA-TISa-OI-21d (right side) and AA-TISa-OI-21e (left side); (13) 1725h’; (14) AA-TISa-OI-17d; (15) AA-TISa-OI-12a; (16) AA-TISa-OI-16d, oral surface particularly well preserved, showing the globular-shaped radials, the five ambulacra, the brachioliferous plates, the peristomial area, and the anal region containing the periproct. (1–3, 5, 10, 14) Specimens having a strong ornamentation, consisting of both small and vermiculated, and long and continuous ornamentation folds; the longest ones are joining at the center of the largest plates, producing a characteristic pattern corresponding to vermiculated radiating ridges. (4, 6–9, 11–13, 15) Specimens with a fainter ornamentation, consisting only of small vermiculated folds. (1, 13) Locality 809 (=1157=1725), late Tremadocian (A. murrayi Zone); (2, 3, 5–7, 9–12, 14–16) locality Z-F12c, late Tremadocian (A. murrayi Zone); (4, 8) locality 2367, late Tremadocian (H. copiosus Zone). (1–15) Scale bar=1 cm; (16) scale bar=5 mm.