1 Introduction
It is well known that there is a close analogy between the arithmetic of Drinfeld
$A$
-modules of rank
$2$
over
$K=\mathbb{F}_{q}(T)$
(where
$A=\mathbb{F}_{q}[T]$
and
$\mathbb{F}_{q}$
is a finite field of order
$q$
), and elliptic curves over
$\mathbb{Q}$
, and that considering arithmetical problems from both perspectives enhances our understanding of the intrinsic difficulty of the problems in question. In this paper, we investigate the problem of obtaining explicit large image results for the fields generated by torsion points of Drinfeld modules.
Serre proved in [Reference Serre24] that if
$E$
is an elliptic curve over a number field
$K$
without complex multiplication, then there is a constant
$c_{K,E}$
dependent only on
$K$
and
$E$
such that the Galois representation
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{E,p}$
on the
$p$
-torsion points of
$E$
is surjective for any prime number
$p>c_{K,E}$
. There has been some work on obtaining explicit values for the constants
$c_{K,E}$
when
$K=\mathbb{Q}$
(Serre [Reference Serre26], Kraus [Reference Kraus14], Cojocaru–Hall [Reference Cojocaru and Hall4], Lombardo [Reference Lombardo16]). The assumption of the generalized Riemann hypothesis allows one to considerably improve these bounds [Reference Serre26].
In the case
$K=\mathbb{Q}$
, the analysis normally proceeds by dividing the argument into which type of maximal proper subgroup contains the image of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{E,p}$
. The most difficult case is when the image of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{E,p}$
lies in the normalizer of a Cartan subgroup of
$\operatorname{GL}_{2}(\mathbb{Z}/p\mathbb{Z})$
. In all other cases, one in fact has a uniform bound on
$c_{K,E}$
which is independent of the elliptic curve
$E$
without complex multiplication, by work of Mazur [Reference Mazur17] on rational points on modular curves.
The analogue of Serre’s result [Reference Serre24] for Drinfeld
$A$
-modules of rank
$2$
was proved by Gardeyn [Reference Gardeyn11], using the earlier work of Pink on the Mumford–Tate conjecture for Drinfeld modules [Reference Pink20]. In detail, if
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
is a Drinfeld module of rank
$2$
without complex multiplication over a fixed finite extension of
$K$
, then there are only finitely many primes
${\wp}$
such that the image of the Galois representation
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}$
on the
${\wp}$
-torsion points of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
is not surjective. The case of general rank was recently proven in [Reference Pink and Rütsche21].
In this paper, we obtain an explicit upper bound on the degree of primes
${\wp}$
of
$K$
such that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}$
is not surjective, for any Drinfeld
$A$
-module
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
of rank
$2$
over
$K=\mathbb{F}_{q}(T)$
without complex multiplication, in the case when
$q$
is odd.
The proof is modeled on the strategy of [Reference Serre24] and [Reference Serre26], some parts of which were made effective, though not explicit in [Reference Gardeyn12].
New difficulties arise however in carrying out the strategy of [Reference Serre24, Reference Serre26] in the setting of Drinfeld modules. One of these is obtaining an explicit bound on the degree of the different divisor of division fields of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
, which in the function field case does not follow immediately from algebraic considerations. For this, we rely heavily on the results in [Reference Chen and Lee2, Reference Chen and Lee3] to make explicit the bounds on the different divisor and constant field extensions of torsion fields of Drinfeld
$A$
-modules over
$K$
.
On the other hand, the generalized Riemann hypothesis holds for function fields, so we are entitled to use better effective Chebotarev density theorems, which makes the final results unconditional and stronger when compared to the number field setting. In the Drinfeld module setting, we do not have uniform bounds in the Borel case because Mazur’s method has not yet been successfully adapted to work with Drinfeld modular curves in general. However, there are some partial results in this direction [Reference Armana1, Reference Pál19].
As part of the proof of the Cartan case, we also derive an explicit isogeny theorem for Drinfeld modules of rank
$2$
over
$K$
which uses the explicit bounds on the different divisor and constant field extensions obtained in [Reference Chen and Lee2]. A partially explicit isogeny theorem valid for general rank
$r$
and
$K$
is proven in [Reference Chen and Lee3].
2 Main result
Let
$\mathbb{F}_{q}$
be a finite field of order
$q$
,
$A=\mathbb{F}_{q}[T]$
, and
$K=\mathbb{F}_{q}(T)$
. Throughout the paper, for the sake of simplicity,
$:=$
is denoted to mean “is defined to be”.
Let
$L$
be a finite extension of
$K$
,
${\mathcal{O}}_{L}$
be the maximal order of
$L$
, that is, the integral closure of
$A$
in
$L$
, and
$\mathbb{F}_{L}$
be the constant field of
$L$
. For a prime ideal
$\mathfrak{B}$
of
${\mathcal{O}}_{L}$
, we let
$\deg _{L}\mathfrak{B}$
be the
$\mathbb{F}_{L}$
-dimension of the residue class field
$\mathbb{F}_{L,\mathfrak{B}}:={\mathcal{O}}_{L}/\mathfrak{B}$
of
$\mathfrak{B}$
, extending this to a general ideal
$I$
of
${\mathcal{O}}_{L}$
by additivity on products. For
$a$
in
${\mathcal{O}}_{L}$
, we define the degree of
$a$
by
$\deg _{L}a:=\deg _{L}(a)$
, where
$(a)$
is the principal ideal of
${\mathcal{O}}_{L}$
generated by
$a$
.
By a prime
${\wp}$
(or place) of
$K$
, we mean a discrete valuation ring with field of fractions
$K$
and maximal ideal
${\wp}$
, and
$v$
denotes the discrete valuation associated to a prime
${\wp}$
of
$K$
. Let
$\infty$
be the infinite prime of
$K$
with corresponding discrete valuation
$v_{\infty }(f/g)=\deg _{K}g-\deg _{K}f,$
where
$f,g\in A$
.
Let
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}$
be the map which raises an element to its
$q$
th power. A Drinfeld
$A$
-module
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
over
$K$
is given by an
$\mathbb{F}_{q}$
-algebra homomorphism
$$\begin{eqnarray}\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}:A\rightarrow K\{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}\}\end{eqnarray}$$
such that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}(a)$
has constant term
$a$
for any
$a\in A$
, and the image of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
is not contained in
$K$
.
A Drinfeld
$A$
-module
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
of rank
$r$
over
$K$
is completely determined by
$$\begin{eqnarray}\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}(T)=T+a_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}+a_{2}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}^{2}+\cdots +a_{r}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}^{r},\end{eqnarray}$$
where
$a_{j}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})\in K$
for
$j=1,2,\ldots ,r$
and
$a_{r}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})$
is nonzero. For any monic
$a\in \mathbb{F}_{q}[T]$
, we then have
$$\begin{eqnarray}\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}(a)=a+\mathop{\sum }_{j=1}^{M-1}a_{j}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},a)\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}^{j}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})^{(q^{M}-1)/(q^{r}-1)}\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}^{M},\end{eqnarray}$$
for some
$a_{j}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},a)\in K$
, where
$M=r\deg _{K}a$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}):=a_{r}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})$
.
For any nonzero
$a\in A$
, we define the
$A$
-module of
$a$
-torsion points as
$$\begin{eqnarray}\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}[a]=\{\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}\in \overline{K}\mid \unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{a}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D706})=0\},\end{eqnarray}$$
where
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{a}$
denotes
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}(a)$
and
$\overline{K}$
is a fixed separable algebraic closure of
$K$
. We have that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}[a]\simeq (A/aA)^{r}$
(see for instance, [Reference Rosen23, Proposition 12.4]). If
$I$
is a nonzero ideal of
$A$
, we similarly define the
$A$
-module of
$I$
-torsion points
$$\begin{eqnarray}\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}[I]=\{\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}\in \overline{K}\mid \unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{a}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D706})=0\text{ for every }a\in I\}.\end{eqnarray}$$
Let
$K(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}[a])$
be the field obtained by adjoining
$a$
-torsion points of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
to
$K$
, and let
$K_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},I}:=K(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}[I])$
.
Let
$\mathfrak{L}$
be a finite prime of
$K$
. The
$\mathfrak{L}$
-torsion points of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
in
$\overline{K}$
give rise to a representation
$$\begin{eqnarray}\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},\mathfrak{L}}:G_{K}\rightarrow \operatorname{Aut}_{A/\mathfrak{L}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}[\mathfrak{L}])\cong \operatorname{GL}_{r}(A/\mathfrak{L}A),\end{eqnarray}$$
where
$G_{K}$
is the absolute Galois group of
$K$
. For a prime
${\wp}$
of
$K$
, if
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
has good reduction at
${\wp}$
, then
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},\mathfrak{L}}$
is unramified at
${\wp}$
if
${\wp}\neq \mathfrak{L}$
.
If
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
is a Drinfeld
$A$
-module defined over
$K$
, and all its defining coefficients
$a_{i}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})$
lie in
$A$
, then we say that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
is integral over
$A$
. If
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
is integral over
$A$
, then it has good reduction outside any set of primes
$S$
of
$K$
which includes the prime at
$\infty$
and the primes dividing the discriminant
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6E5}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})$
of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
. In particular, the
$G_{K}$
-modules
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}[\mathfrak{L}^{\infty }]:=\bigcup _{m\geqslant 1}\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}[\mathfrak{L}^{m}]$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}[\mathfrak{L}]$
are unramified outside
$S\cup \{\mathfrak{L}\}$
.
For a prime
${\wp}$
of
$K$
, let
$\operatorname{Frob}_{{\wp}}\in G_{K}$
denote a Frobenius conjugacy class at
${\wp}$
, and let
$T_{\mathfrak{L}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})$
be the
$\mathfrak{L}$
-adic Tate module of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
, which is defined as an inverse limit of the
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}[\mathfrak{L}^{n}]$
, that is,
$\underset{\longleftarrow _{n}}{\lim }\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}[\mathfrak{L}^{n}]$
.
Let
$a_{{\wp}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})$
denote the trace of
$\operatorname{Frob}_{{\wp}}$
on the
$T_{\mathfrak{L}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})$
and
$P_{{\wp}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})(X)$
the characteristic polynomial of
$\operatorname{Frob}_{{\wp}}$
on the
$T_{\mathfrak{L}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})$
(when the Frobenius conjugacy class is unramified in the relevant extensions). It is known that
$a_{{\wp}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})$
and
$P_{{\wp}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})(X)$
are independent of
$\mathfrak{L}$
[Reference Goss9, Theorem 4.12.12].
The ring of
$K$
-isogenies of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
is denoted by
$\operatorname{End}_{K}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})$
, and the ring of
$\overline{K}$
-isogenies is denoted by
$\operatorname{End}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})$
. We have that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}(A)\subseteq \operatorname{End}_{K}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})$
. When
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
is a Drinfeld
$A$
-module of rank
$2$
over
$K$
,
$\operatorname{End}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})$
is either
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}(A)$
or an order
${\mathcal{O}}$
in some quadratic imaginary extension over
$K$
. In the latter case, we say that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
has complex multiplication (by
${\mathcal{O}}$
).
We use the following notation for Theorem 2.1 and throughout the paper.
Notation 1:
$\ln x=$
the natural logarithm of
$x$
,
$\log _{q}x$
= the logarithm of
$x$
to base
$q$
,
$\log _{q}^{\ast }x=\log _{q}\max \left\{x,1\right\}$
,
$c_{0}=9+\log _{q}{\displaystyle \frac{64}{3}}$
,
$s_{q}={\displaystyle \frac{9\ln (qc_{0})}{\ln (qc_{0})-1}}$
,
$C_{q}=c_{0}+9\log _{q}c_{0}+s_{q}\left(\log _{q}4+\log _{q}(1+\log _{q}c_{0})\right)$
,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
is a Drinfeld
$A$
-module over
$K$
,
$S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}$
is the set of primes of bad reduction of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
over
$K$
,
$j(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})={\displaystyle \frac{{a_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})}^{q+1}}{a_{2}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})}}$
,
$m=$
the least positive integer such that
$-v_{\infty }(j(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}))\leqslant q^{m+1}$
,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}=\left\{\begin{array}{@{}ll@{}}{\displaystyle \frac{-v_{\infty }(j(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}))-q^{m}}{q^{m}(q-1)}}+m-1\quad & \text{ if }-v_{\infty }(j(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}))>q,\\ ~~0~\quad & \text{ if }-v_{\infty }(j(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}))\leqslant q,\end{array}\right.$
$s_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})={\displaystyle \frac{v_{\infty }(a_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}))+q}{q-1}},$
$\tilde{s}_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})={\displaystyle \frac{v_{\infty }(a_{2}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}))+q^{2}}{q^{2}-1}},$
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}=$
the (monic) denominator of
$j(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})$
as represented by a fraction in reduced form,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}=$
the product of finite primes
$\mathfrak{p}$
of
$K$
such that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
has bad reduction over
$K_{\mathfrak{p}}$
, where
$K_{\mathfrak{p}}$
is the completion at
$\mathfrak{p}$
of
$K$
.
We state the main result of this paper as follows.
Theorem 2.1. Let
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
be a Drinfeld
$A$
-module of rank
$2$
over
$K$
without complex multiplication with
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}(T)=i(T)+a_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}+a_{2}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}^{2}$
, and let
$q$
be odd. Let
$S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}$
be the set of primes of bad reduction of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
over
$K$
. Let
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}$
be the Galois representation on the
${\wp}$
-torsion points of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
, where
${\wp}$
is a finite prime of
$K$
. Let
$q_{{\wp}}$
be the cardinality of the residue field
$A/{\wp}$
. We use notation given in Notation 1.
If
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}$
is not surjective, then either:
(1)
$q_{{\wp}}\leqslant 5$
or
${\wp}\in S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}$
,(2) or, the image of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}$
lies in the normalizer of a Cartan subgroup of
$\operatorname{GL}_{2}(A/{\wp})$
but not in the Cartan subgroup and where$$\begin{eqnarray}\deg _{K}{\wp}\leqslant 2(C_{q}+\widetilde{W}+s_{q}\log _{q}(c_{0}+\widetilde{W})),\end{eqnarray}$$
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \widetilde{W} & := & \displaystyle \log _{q}^{\ast }2\left(\deg _{K}\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}+\frac{2}{q-1}\deg _{K}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}+1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}\left(q^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}+1}-1\right)\right)\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle +\,\frac{1}{4}((q^{2}-1)(q^{2}-q))^{2}\left(1+\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}}{s_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})}\right)^{2},\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
(3) or, the image of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}$
lies in a Borel subgroup of
$\operatorname{GL}_{2}(A/{\wp})$
and where$$\begin{eqnarray}\deg _{K}{\wp}\leqslant \unicode[STIX]{x1D711}((q-1)(q^{2}-1)n_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}})\deg _{K}P,\end{eqnarray}$$
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}$
denotes the Euler-phi function,
$P$
is the least degree prime of
$K$
at which
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
has good reduction, and
$n_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}\leqslant (q^{2}-1)(q^{2}-q)(1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}/s_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}))$
is a positive integer.
This paper is organized as follows. We establish an explicit isogeny theorem for Drinfeld modules of rank
$2$
in Section 3 which is used in the Cartan case. Some ingredients needed to set up the proof of the main theorem are discussed in Sections 4 and 5. Section 6 (Section 7, respectively) deals with the Cartan case (the Borel case, respectively). The proof of Theorem 2.1 is then given in Section 8.
3 An explicit isogeny theorem for rank
$2$
Let
$L/K$
be a finite extension. Writing divisors in terms of places instead of primes, the different divisor
$\mathfrak{D}(L/K)$
of
$L/K$
is defined as
$$\begin{eqnarray}\mathfrak{D}(L/K)=\mathop{\sum }_{w}w(D(L_{w}/K_{v}))w,\end{eqnarray}$$
and its degree is given by
$$\begin{eqnarray}\deg _{L}\mathfrak{D}(L/K)=\mathop{\sum }_{w}w(D(L_{w}/K_{v}))\deg _{L}w,\end{eqnarray}$$
where
$w$
ranges through all normalized places of
$L$
, and
$D(L_{w}/K_{v})$
is the different ideal of
$L_{w}/K_{v}$
. For convenience, we define the degree with respect to
$K$
of
$\mathfrak{D}(L/K)$
as
$$\begin{eqnarray}\deg _{K}\mathfrak{D}(L/K)=\mathop{\sum }_{v}\max \left\{v(D(L_{w}/K_{v})):w|v\right\}\deg _{K}v,\end{eqnarray}$$
where
$v$
ranges through all normalized places of
$K$
.
The following theorem presents an upper bound on the degree of the different divisor
$\mathfrak{D}(K(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}[a])/K)$
of
$K(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}[a])$
over
$K$
based on work from [Reference Chen and Lee2, Reference Chen and Lee3].
Theorem 3.1. Let
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
be a Drinfeld
$A$
-module of rank
$2$
over
$K$
with
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}(T)=i(T)+a_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}+a_{2}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}^{2}$
and
$a$
be nonzero in
$A$
. Let
$j(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})$
,
$m$
,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}$
,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}$
be the same as given in Notation 1. Let
$\mathfrak{D}(K(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}[a])/K)$
be the different divisor of the torsion field
$K(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}[a])$
over
$K$
. Then
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \deg _{K}\mathfrak{D}(K(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}[a])/K) & {\leqslant} & \displaystyle 2\deg _{K}a+\deg _{K}\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}+\frac{2}{q-1}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \times \deg _{K}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}+1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}(q^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}+1}-1).\end{eqnarray}$$
Proof. See [Reference Chen and Lee2, Reference Chen and Lee3]. ◻
We have an upper bound on the extension degree of the constant field of
$K(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}[a])$
over
$\mathbb{F}_{q}$
as follows.
Theorem 3.2. Let
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
be a Drinfeld
$A$
-module of rank
$2$
over
$K$
with
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}(T)=i(T)+a_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}+a_{2}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}^{2}$
and
$a$
be nonzero in
$A$
. Let
$j(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})$
,
$m$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}$
be the same as given in Notation 1. Let
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},a}:=[\mathbb{F}_{K(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}[a])}:\mathbb{F}_{q}]$
, where
$\mathbb{F}_{K(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}[a])}$
denotes the algebraic closure of
$\mathbb{F}_{q}$
in
$K(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}[a])$
(that is,
$\mathbb{F}_{K(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}[a])}$
is the constant field of
$K(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}[a])$
). Then we have
$$\begin{eqnarray}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},a}\leqslant (q^{2}-1)(q^{2}-q)(1+\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}}{s_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})}),\end{eqnarray}$$
where
$s_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})=(v_{\infty }(a_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}))+q)/(q-1)$
.
Proof. Let
$g_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},\infty }=[K_{\infty }(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},\infty }):K_{\infty }]$
, where
$K_{\infty }$
denotes the completion at
$\infty$
of
$K$
,
$C_{\infty }$
denotes the completion of an algebraic closure of
$K_{\infty }$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},\infty }$
is the lattice associated to the uniformization of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
over
$C_{\infty }$
. As
$K_{\infty }(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},\infty })$
contains
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}[a]$
and
$\mathbb{F}_{K_{\infty }}=\mathbb{F}_{K}$
, we have that
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle [\mathbb{F}_{K(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}[a])}:\mathbb{F}_{K}]\leqslant [\mathbb{F}_{K_{\infty }(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},\infty })}:\mathbb{F}_{K_{\infty }}]\leqslant [K_{\infty }(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},\infty }):K_{\infty }]. & & \displaystyle \nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
Hence,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},a}\leqslant g_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},\infty }$
.
One can bound
$g_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},\infty }$
using knowledge of the successive minima of the lattice
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},\infty }$
associated to
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
[Reference Gardeyn12, Proposition 4(i)]. Concerning the term
$g_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},\infty }$
, we have from [Reference Gardeyn12] that
$$\begin{eqnarray}g_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},\infty }\leqslant (q^{2}-1)(q^{2}-q)\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}_{2,\infty }(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})/\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}_{1,\infty }(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}),\end{eqnarray}$$
where
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}_{i,\infty }(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})$
is the ith successive minima of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
associated to its uniformization over
$C_{\infty }$
. From [Reference Chen and Lee2], an explicit bound for these successive minima
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}_{i,\infty }(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})$
is determined as follows:
Case
$1$
: If
$-v_{\infty }(j(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}))\leqslant q$
, then
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}_{1,\infty }(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})=\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}_{2,\infty }(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})=-\tilde{s}_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})$
,
Case
$2$
: If
$q<-v_{\infty }(j(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}))\leqslant q^{m+1}$
, then
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}_{1,\infty }(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})=-s_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D708}_{2,\infty }(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})=-s_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})-\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}$
, where notations for
$s_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})$
and
$\tilde{s}_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})$
are given in Notation 1.
Combining all these yields the result. ◻
Remark 3.3. Under the assumptions of Theorem 3.2, if
$-v_{\infty }(j(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}))\leqslant q$
, then
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}\leqslant (q^{2}-1)(q^{2}-q)$
, and if
$q<-v_{\infty }(j(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}))\leqslant q^{m+1}$
, then we see that
$$\begin{eqnarray}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},a}\leqslant (q^{2}-1)(q^{2}-q)\left(1+\frac{m(q-1)}{v_{\infty }(a_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}))+q}\right).\end{eqnarray}$$
Recall the isogeny theorem for Drinfeld
$A$
-modules, proven in [Reference Taguchi27, Proposition 3.1].
Theorem 3.4. Let
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }$
be rank
$r$
Drinfeld
$A$
-modules over
$K$
. Then
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }$
are
$K$
-isogenous if and only if
$P_{{\wp}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})(X)=P_{{\wp}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime })(X)$
for all but finitely many primes
${\wp}$
of
$K$
.
The following theorem is an explicit and effective version of the isogeny theorem for rank 2 Drinfeld
$A$
-modules over
$K$
. The proof of Theorem 3.5 is similar to that of [Reference Chen and Lee3, Theorem 1.2], except that it uses more refined and explicit bound on the different divisor and the degree of constant field extensions given in Theorems 3.1 and 3.2. For completeness, we summarize the proof to explain and justify all the new constants, for example,
$c_{0},s_{q},C_{q}$
,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{i}},s_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{i}),\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{i}}$
, which arise.
Theorem 3.5. Let
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1}$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}$
be Drinfeld
$A$
-modules of rank
$2$
over
$K$
which are not
$K$
-isogenous with
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{i}(T)=T+a_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{i})\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}+a_{2}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{i})\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}^{2}$
for
$i=1,2$
. Let
$j(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{i})={a_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{i})}^{q+1}/a_{2}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{i})$
and
$m_{i}$
be the least positive integer such that
$-v_{\infty }(j(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{i}))\leqslant q^{m_{i}+1}$
for
$i=1,2$
. Let
$S=S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1}}\cup S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}}\cup \{\infty \}$
be the set of primes of bad reduction of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1}$
or
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}$
over
$K$
together with the infinite prime
$\infty$
of
$K$
.
Assume that
${\wp}\not \in S$
is a prime of
$K$
of least degree such that
$P_{{\wp}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1})\neq P_{{\wp}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2})$
. Then we have
$$\begin{eqnarray}\deg _{K}{\wp}\leqslant 4\left(C_{q}+W+s_{q}\log _{q}(c_{0}+W)\right),\end{eqnarray}$$
where we let
$c_{0},s_{q},C_{q}$
,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{i}},s_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{i}),\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{i}}$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{i}}$
for each
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{i}$
,
$i=1,2$
be the same as given in Notation 1, and
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle W & = & \displaystyle \log _{q}^{\ast }\bigg(\deg _{K}\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1}}\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}}+\frac{2}{q-1}\deg _{K}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1}}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle +\,2+\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1}}\left(q^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1}}+1}-1\right)+\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}}\left(q^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}}+1}-1\right)\bigg)\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle +\,\frac{1}{4}((q^{2}-1)(q^{2}-q))^{2}\left(1+\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1}}}{s_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1})}\right)\left(1+\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}}}{s_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2})}\right).\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
Proof. Let
${\wp}\not \in S$
be a prime of
$K$
with least degree such that
$P_{{\wp}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1})\not =P_{{\wp}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2})$
(which exists from the hypotheses and Theorem 3.4). Let
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{0}$
be a nonzero coefficient of
$P_{{\wp}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1})-P_{{\wp}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2})$
. It is known that a root
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}$
of
$P_{{\wp}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1})$
or
$P_{{\wp}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2})$
satisfies
$$\begin{eqnarray}v_{\infty }(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE})=-{\textstyle \frac{1}{2}}\deg _{K}{\wp},\end{eqnarray}$$
(cf. [Reference Goss and Goss10, Theorem 3.2.3(c)(d)], [Reference Gardeyn12, Proposition 9]). This implies that each coefficient
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}$
of
$P_{{\wp}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1})$
and
$P_{{\wp}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2})$
satisfies
$\deg _{K}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FD}\leqslant \deg _{K}{\wp}$
, and hence each coefficient
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}$
of
$P_{{\wp}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1})-P_{{\wp}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2})$
also satisfies
$\deg _{K}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}\leqslant \deg _{K}{\wp}$
, in particular
$\deg _{K}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{0}\leqslant \deg _{K}{\wp}$
.
We choose a finite prime
$\mathfrak{L}$
of
$K$
by [Reference Chen and Lee3, Lemma 5.2] such that
$$\begin{eqnarray}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{0}\not \equiv 0\hspace{0.6em}({\rm mod}\hspace{0.2em}\mathfrak{L})\quad \text{and}\quad \deg _{K}\mathfrak{L}\leqslant 1+\log _{q}\deg _{K}{\wp},\end{eqnarray}$$
and write
$\mathfrak{L}=(a)$
, where
$a$
is monic in
$A$
. Note that either
$\deg _{K}{\wp}\leqslant 2$
or
$\mathfrak{L}\neq {\wp}$
by the above inequality.
Suppose we are now in the latter case where
$\mathfrak{L}\neq {\wp}$
. Consider the representation
$$\begin{eqnarray}\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{\mathfrak{L}}:G_{K}\rightarrow \operatorname{Aut}_{A/\mathfrak{L}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1}[\mathfrak{L}])\times \operatorname{Aut}_{A/\mathfrak{L}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}[\mathfrak{L}])\cong \operatorname{GL}_{2}(A/\mathfrak{L})\times \operatorname{GL}_{2}(A/\mathfrak{L}),\end{eqnarray}$$
where
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{\mathfrak{L}}=\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1},\mathfrak{L}}\times \unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2},\mathfrak{L}}$
. Let
$G_{\mathfrak{L}}$
be the image of this homomorphism. Let
$C_{\mathfrak{L}}$
be the subset of
$G_{\mathfrak{L}}$
consisting of pairs
$(\mathfrak{a},\mathfrak{b})$
such that the characteristic polynomials of
$\mathfrak{a}$
and
$\mathfrak{b}$
are not equal. Note that
$C_{\mathfrak{L}}$
is invariant under conjugation, so it is a union of conjugacy classes in
$G_{\mathfrak{L}}$
. Since
$\mathfrak{L}\neq {\wp}$
, we have that
$C_{\mathfrak{L}}\not =\emptyset$
, and in particular, there is some conjugacy class
${\mathcal{C}}\subseteq C_{\mathfrak{L}}$
in
$G_{\mathfrak{L}}$
with
${\mathcal{C}}\not =\emptyset$
.
Let
$S_{\mathfrak{L}}=S\cup \left\{\mathfrak{L}\right\}$
. Then the Galois representation
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{\mathfrak{L}}$
is unramified outside
$S_{\mathfrak{L}}$
. We have that
$A/\mathfrak{L}\cong \mathbb{F}_{\ell }$
where
$\ell =q^{\deg _{K}\mathfrak{L}}$
. Let
$\widetilde{K}/K$
be the field extension associated to
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{\mathfrak{L}}$
, and let
$n$
(resp.
$n^{\prime }$
) be its extension degree (resp. geometric extension degree). By an explicit Chebotarev argument as in [Reference Chen and Lee3, Theorem 1.2], we deduce that there is a prime
$P\not \in S_{\mathfrak{L}}$
such that
$\operatorname{Frob}_{P}={\mathcal{C}}\subseteq C_{\mathfrak{L}}$
and
$$\begin{eqnarray}\deg _{K}P\leqslant 4\log _{q}{\textstyle \frac{4}{3}}(B+3)+m,\end{eqnarray}$$
where
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle & & \unicode[STIX]{x1D6F4}^{\prime }:=\;\mathop{\sum }_{\mathfrak{p}\in S_{\mathfrak{L}}}\mathfrak{p}\geqslant \unicode[STIX]{x1D6F4}:=\;\mathop{\sum }_{\mathfrak{p}\in S}\mathfrak{p},\quad m=[\mathbb{F}_{\widetilde{K}}:\mathbb{F}_{K}],\\ & & \deg _{K}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6F4}^{\prime }\leqslant \deg _{K}\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1}}\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}}+\deg _{K}\mathfrak{L}+1,\\ & & \mathfrak{D}=\mathfrak{D}(\widetilde{K}/K)\text{ is the different divisor }of\widetilde{K}/K,\\ & & B=\max \left\{\deg _{K}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6F4}^{\prime },\deg _{\widetilde{K}}\mathfrak{D},2\right\}. & & \displaystyle\end{eqnarray}$$
By using the explicit bound on the different divisor
$\mathfrak{D}$
in Theorem 3.1, we obtain
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle & & \quad \deg _{\widetilde{K}}\mathfrak{D}\leqslant n^{\prime }\left(4\deg _{K}a+\deg _{K}\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1}}\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}}+\frac{2}{q-1}\deg _{K}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1}}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1},\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}}\right),\\ & & \quad \quad \text{where}\quad \unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1},\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}}:=2+\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1}}\left(q^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1}}+1}-1\right)+\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}}\left(q^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}}+1}-1\right). & & \displaystyle\end{eqnarray}$$
Then from (6) and (7), we note that
$B$
is bounded above by the upper bound of
$\deg _{\widetilde{K}}\mathfrak{D}$
in (8); thus we have that
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \log _{q}\frac{4}{3}B & {\leqslant} & \displaystyle \log _{q}n^{\prime }+\log _{q}\frac{16}{3}+\log _{q}(\log _{q}\ell )+\log _{q}^{\ast }\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \times \,\left(\deg _{K}\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1}}\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}}+\frac{2}{q-1}\deg _{K}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1}}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1},\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}}\right).\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
(We use the inequality
$\log _{q}(x+y)\leqslant \log _{q}x+\log _{q}y$
for
$x,y\geqslant 2$
; in more detail, in (8), both
$4\deg _{K}a$
and the other terms,
$\deg _{K}\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1}}\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}}+(2/(q-1))\deg _{K}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1}}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1},\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}}$
, are greater than 2 since
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1},\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}}>2$
.)
We note that
$n^{\prime }\leqslant n=\left|G_{\mathfrak{L}}\right|<\ell ^{8}$
, so
$\log _{q}n^{\prime }<8\log _{q}\ell$
. Returning to (6), we obtain
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \deg _{K}P & & \displaystyle \leqslant 4\bigg(\log _{q}\frac{64}{3}+\log _{q}(\log _{q}\ell )+8\log _{q}\ell \nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle +\,\log _{q}^{\ast }\left(\deg _{K}\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1}}\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}}+\frac{2}{q-1}\deg _{K}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1}}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1},\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}}\right)\bigg)+m\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \leqslant 4\bigg(\log _{q}\frac{64}{3}+9\log _{q}\ell +\log _{q}^{\ast }\bigg(\deg _{K}\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1}}\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle +\,\frac{2}{q-1}\deg _{K}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1}}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1},\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}}\bigg)\bigg)+m.\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
By construction of
$C_{\mathfrak{L}}$
, we have that
$P_{P}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1})\not \equiv P_{P}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2})\hspace{0.6em}({\rm mod}\hspace{0.2em}\mathfrak{L})$
. Thus, we have
$\deg _{K}{\wp}\leqslant \deg _{K}P$
, and from (5), it follows that
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \deg _{K}{\wp} & {\leqslant} & \displaystyle 4\bigg(\log _{q}\frac{64}{3}+9(1+\log _{q}\deg _{K}{\wp})+\log _{q}^{\ast }\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \times \,\bigg(\deg _{K}\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1}}\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}}+\frac{2}{q-1}\deg _{K}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1}}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1},\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}}\bigg)+\frac{m}{4}\bigg).\end{eqnarray}$$
As
$1+\log _{q}y\geqslant 1$
and
$(\log _{q}y)/y\leqslant 1$
, we have that
$$\begin{eqnarray}\frac{\deg _{K}{\wp}}{1+\log _{q}(\deg _{K}{\wp})}\leqslant 4(c_{0}+W_{0}),\end{eqnarray}$$
where
$c_{0}:=9+\log _{q}(64/3)$
and
$W_{0}:=\log _{q}^{\ast }(\deg _{K}\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1}}\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}}+(2/(q-1))\deg _{K}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1}}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1},\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}})+m/4$
.
Thus, (9) can be written as follows:
$$\begin{eqnarray}\deg _{K}{\wp}\leqslant 4(c_{0}+W_{0}+9\log _{q}\deg _{K}{\wp}).\end{eqnarray}$$
Let
$t^{\ast }=(\ln (qc_{0})-1)/\ln (qc_{0})$
and
$s^{\ast }=1/t^{\ast }=\ln (qc_{0})/(\ln (qc_{0})-1)$
. If
$x:=\deg _{K}{\wp}\geqslant c_{0}$
, then using [Reference Chen and Lee3, Lemma 5.3 and the calculation in (32)] with
$c^{\ast }=c_{0}$
, we see that
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \log _{q}\deg _{K}{\wp}=\log _{q}x & {\leqslant} & \displaystyle \frac{1}{t^{\ast }}\log _{q}\left(4(c_{0}+W_{0})\frac{1+\log _{q}c_{0}}{c_{0}^{1/\ln (qc_{0})}}\right)\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & {\leqslant} & \displaystyle s^{\ast }\left(\log _{q}4+\log _{q}(c_{0}+W_{0})+\log _{q}(1+\log _{q}c_{0})\right)\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle +\,\left(\frac{1}{1-\ln (qc_{0})}\right)\log _{q}c_{0}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & {\leqslant} & \displaystyle s^{\ast }\left(\log _{q}4+\log _{q}(c_{0}+W_{0})+\log _{q}(1+\log _{q}c_{0})\right)\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle +\,\log _{q}c_{0}.\end{eqnarray}$$
Substitution of (11) into (10) yields
$$\begin{eqnarray}{\textstyle \frac{1}{4}}\deg _{K}{\wp}\leqslant C_{q}+W_{0}+9s^{\ast }\log _{q}(c_{0}+W_{0}),\end{eqnarray}$$
where
$C_{q}:=c_{0}+9\log _{q}c_{0}+9s^{\ast }\left(\log _{q}4+\log _{q}(1+\log _{q}c_{0})\right).$
Finally, from Theorem 3.2, it follows that
$m\leqslant \unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1}}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}}$
and
$$\begin{eqnarray}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1}}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FE}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}}\leqslant ((q^{2}-1)(q^{2}-q))^{2}\left(1+\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1}}}{s_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1})}\right)\left(1+\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}}}{s_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2})}\right).\end{eqnarray}$$
Therefore, we either have the above upper bound (12) on
$\deg _{K}{\wp}$
or
$\deg _{K}{\wp}\leqslant c_{0}\leqslant C_{q}$
; so in the end, we get
$$\begin{eqnarray}\deg _{K}{\wp}\leqslant 4\left(C_{q}+W+s_{q}\log _{q}(c_{0}+W)\right),\end{eqnarray}$$
where
$s_{q}=9s^{\ast }$
. The result thus follows as desired.◻
4 Twists of Drinfeld modules
Let
$L/K$
be an extension where
$K=\mathbb{F}_{q}(T)$
. Suppose that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }$
are rank
$r$
Drinfeld
$A$
-modules over
$K$
given by
$$\begin{eqnarray}\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}(T)=\mathop{\sum }_{j=0}^{r}a_{j}\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}^{j}\qquad \text{and}\qquad \unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }(T)=\mathop{\sum }_{j=0}^{r}a_{j}^{\prime }\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}^{j}.\end{eqnarray}$$
Then
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }$
are isomorphic over
$L$
if and only if there is a
$c\in L^{\ast }$
such that
$$\begin{eqnarray}\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }(T)c=\left(\mathop{\sum }_{i=0}^{r}a_{j}^{\prime }\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}^{j}\right)c=c\left(\mathop{\sum }_{j=0}^{r}c^{q^{j}-1}a_{j}^{\prime }\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}^{j}\right)=c\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}(T).\end{eqnarray}$$
Explicitly, this implies that
$a_{j}^{\prime }=a_{j}/c^{q^{j}-1}$
for any
$j=0,1,\ldots ,r$
. Here
$c\in L^{\ast }$
is regarded as an element of
$\operatorname{Hom}_{L}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime })$
and induces a map
$L\rightarrow L$
as Drinfeld
$A$
-modules by
$x\mapsto cx$
, where the first
$L$
is an
$A$
-module under
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
and the second under
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }$
.
Lemma 4.1. Let
$K=\mathbb{F}_{q}(T)$
and
$q$
be odd. For Drinfeld
$A$
-modules
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }$
of rank
$r$
over
$K$
, suppose there is an isomorphism
$f(x)=cx$
from
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
to
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }$
given by
$c\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{a}=\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{a}^{\prime }c$
, where
$c=\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}^{1/(q-1)}$
for some
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}\in K^{\ast }$
. Let
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}:G_{K}\rightarrow \mathbb{F}_{q}^{\times }$
denote the Galois character such that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}(c)=\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E})c$
for
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}\in G_{K}$
. Let
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}[a]$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }[a]$
be the
$A$
-modules of
$a$
-torsion points of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }$
with
$a\in A$
nonzero and let
$$\begin{eqnarray}\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},a}:G_{K}\rightarrow \operatorname{GL}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}[a]),\quad \unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime },a}:G_{K}\rightarrow \operatorname{GL}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }[a])\end{eqnarray}$$
be their associated mod
$a$
representations. Then
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime },a}\cong \unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},a}\otimes \unicode[STIX]{x1D716}$
.
Proof. Let
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}:\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}[a]\rightarrow \unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }[a]$
be the isomorphism induced by
$f$
, namely
$P\mapsto cP$
, where
$P\in \unicode[STIX]{x1D719}[a]$
. For
$P\in \unicode[STIX]{x1D719}[a]$
, we then have that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime },a}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E})(\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}(P))=\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime },a}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E})cP=\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}(cP)=\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}(c)\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}(P)=\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E})c\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}(P)=\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E})\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},a}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E})(P))$
, hence the result follows.◻
In the above lemma, we call the resulting
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }$
the twist of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
by
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}$
.
Lemma 4.2. Let
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }$
be Drinfeld
$A$
-modules of rank
$r$
over
$K=\mathbb{F}_{q}(T)$
, and suppose that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }$
is the twist of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
by a nontrivial character
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}:G_{K}\rightarrow \mathbb{F}_{q}^{\times }$
. Assume that
$\operatorname{End}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})=\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}(A)$
(that is,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
has no complex multiplication). Then
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }$
are not
$K$
-isogenous.
Proof. We note that there is an isomorphism
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}:\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }\rightarrow \unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
defined over
$\overline{K}$
but not over
$K$
. Explicitly, it is given by the element
$c\in \overline{K}^{\ast }$
but not in
$K^{\ast }$
such that
$c\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }(a)=\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}(a)c$
for all
$a\in A$
.
Suppose there is a
$K$
-isogeny
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}:\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}\rightarrow \unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }$
. Explicitly, there is a
$g\in K\left\{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}\right\}$
such that
$g\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}(a)=\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }(a)g$
for all
$a\in A$
. Hence,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}\circ \unicode[STIX]{x1D706}:\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}\rightarrow \unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
is given by
$cg$
so that
$(cg)\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}(a)=\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}(a)(cg)$
for all
$a\in A$
. We may assume now that
$cg\in \unicode[STIX]{x1D719}(A)$
or else
$\operatorname{End}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})$
is strictly bigger than
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}(A)$
. Hence,
$cg=\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}(m)$
for some
$m\in A$
. But this means that
$c\in K\left\{\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}\right\}$
, contradicting the fact that
$c\in \overline{K}^{\ast }$
but not in
$K^{\ast }$
.◻
Lemma 4.3. Let
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1},\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}$
be Drinfeld
$A$
-modules of rank
$2$
over
$K=\mathbb{F}_{q}(T)$
, and suppose
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}$
is the twist of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1}$
by a nontrivial character
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}:G_{K}\rightarrow \mathbb{F}_{q}^{\times }$
which is ramified on a subset of the set of primes of bad reduction of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1}$
. Then the bound on the different divisor for
$K(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}[a])/K$
from Theorem 3.1 can be taken to be the bound on the different divisor for
$K(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1}[a])/K$
from Theorem 3.1.
Proof. This follows from the fact that the dependence of the bounds from Theorem 3.1 on
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
is only through the
$j$
-invariant of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
and the set of primes of bad reduction of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
.◻
5 Semi-stable reduction in rank
$2$
and Weil pairings
Let
$P$
be a finite prime of
$K$
,
$K_{P}$
be the completion at
$P$
of
$K$
and
${\mathcal{O}}_{P}\subseteq K_{P}$
be the valuation ring of
$P$
. We say that a Drinfeld
$A$
-module
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
of rank 2 over
$K$
has stable reduction at
$P$
if there exists a Drinfeld module
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }$
over
$K_{P}$
which is integral over
${\mathcal{O}}_{P}$
such that its reduction modulo
$P$
defines a Drinfeld module over
${\mathcal{O}}_{P}/P$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }$
is isomorphic to
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
over
$K_{P}$
. Furthermore, we say that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
has good reduction at
$P$
if
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
has stable reduction at
$P$
such that
$P\nmid a_{2}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})$
, otherwise we say that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
has bad reduction at
$P$
. If
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
has bad reduction at
$P$
, but has stable reduction over
${\mathcal{O}}_{P}$
such that
$P\nmid a_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})$
, we say that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
has bad Tate reduction at
$P$
. If
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
has good reduction, or bad Tate reduction at
$P$
, we say that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
is semi-stable reduction at
$P$
.
Lemma 5.1. Let
$P$
be a finite prime of
$K$
and
${\mathcal{O}}_{P}\subseteq K_{P}$
be the valuation ring of
$P$
. Let
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
be a Drinfeld
$A$
-module of rank
$2$
over
$K$
, with
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}(T)=i(T)+a_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}+a_{2}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}^{2}$
, and
$a_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}),a_{2}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})\in {\mathcal{O}}_{P}$
. Then there is a finite tamely ramified extension
$K^{\prime }/K_{P}$
such that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
attains semi-stable reduction over
$K^{\prime }$
and the degree of
$K_{P}^{\text{nr}}\cdot K^{\prime }/K_{P}^{\text{nr}}$
divides
$q^{2}-1$
, where
$K_{P}^{\text{nr}}$
is the maximal unramified extension of
$K_{P}$
.
Proof. A twist
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }$
of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
has the form:
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }(T) & = & \displaystyle T+a_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime })\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}+a_{2}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime })\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}^{2}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & = & \displaystyle T+a_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})c^{q-1}\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}+a_{2}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})c^{q^{2}-1}\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}^{2}.\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
Let
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}\in {\mathcal{O}}_{P}$
be a uniformizer, and let
$v$
be the corresponding valuation at
$P$
of
$K$
which we extend to
$\overline{K}$
.
Recall
$j(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})=a_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})^{q+1}/a_{2}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})$
.
Case
$v(j(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}))\geqslant 0$
: Let
$c=1/\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}^{v(a_{2}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}))/(q^{2}-1)}$
. The corresponding twist
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }$
over
$K^{\prime }$
then has
$v(a_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }))=v(a_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})c^{q-1})\geqslant 0$
and
$v(a_{2}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }))=v(a_{2}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})c^{q^{2}-1})=0$
, where
$K^{\prime }=K_{P}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}^{v(a_{2}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}))/(q^{2}-1)})$
. Hence,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }$
has good reduction over
$K^{\prime }$
.
Case
$v(j(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}))<0$
: Let
$c=1/\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}^{v(a_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}))/(q-1)}$
. The corresponding twist
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }$
then has
$v(a_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }))=v(a_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})c^{q-1})=0$
and
$v(a_{2}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }))=v(a_{2}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})c^{q^{2}-1})>0$
, where
$K^{\prime }=K_{P}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}^{v(a_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}))/(q-1)})$
. Hence,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }$
has bad Tate reduction over
$K^{\prime }$
.
In both cases,
$K^{\prime }/K_{P}$
is tamely ramified and the degree of
$K_{P}^{\text{nr}}\cdot K^{\prime }/K_{P}^{\text{nr}}$
divides
$q^{2}-1$
.◻
Theorem 5.2. Let
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
be a Drinfeld
$A$
-module over
$K$
of rank
$2$
with
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}(T)=i(T)+a_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}+a_{2}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}^{2}$
,
$q$
be odd, and let
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}$
be the Drinfeld
$A$
-module over
$K$
of rank
$1$
defined by
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}(T)=T-a_{2}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}$
. If
${\wp}$
is a finite prime of
$K$
, then we have that
$$\begin{eqnarray}\det \unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}=\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D713},{\wp}}.\end{eqnarray}$$
Proof. This follows by combining the second part of [Reference van der Heiden31, Theorem 5.3] and [Reference van der Heiden31, Proposition 7.4], under the assumption that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
has rank
$2$
and
$A=\mathbb{F}_{q}[T]$
. It can also be deduced by showing that
$\det \unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D713},{\wp}}$
coincide on Frobenius elements using [Reference Gekeler8, Theorem 2.11], again under the assumption that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
has rank
$2$
and
$A=\mathbb{F}_{q}[T]$
, so by the Chebotarev density theorem, the two Galois characters are the same.◻
For a definition of the Weil pairing between a Drinfeld
$A$
-module and its dual, see [Reference Poonen22].
We use the convention
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(P):=\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(\operatorname{Frob}_{P})$
for a Galois character
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}:G_{K}\rightarrow (A/{\wp})^{\times }$
.
Proposition 5.3. Under the hypothesis of Theorem 5.2, we have that
$$\begin{eqnarray}\det \unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}(\operatorname{Frob}_{P})=\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D713},{\wp}}(\operatorname{Frob}_{P})\equiv \unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{0}(P)P\hspace{0.6em}({\rm mod}\hspace{0.2em}{\wp}),\end{eqnarray}$$
for all
$P$
not in
$S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}$
and
$P\neq {\wp},\infty$
, where
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{0}:G_{K}\rightarrow \mathbb{F}_{q}^{\times }\subseteq (A/{\wp})^{\times }$
is a Galois character.
Proof. Note that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}$
is isomorphic to the Carlitz module
$C(T)=T+\unicode[STIX]{x1D70F}$
over
$K(c)$
, where
$c=(-a_{2}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}))^{1/(q-1)}$
, that is,
$C\circ f=f\circ \unicode[STIX]{x1D713}$
where
$f(z)=cz$
. Thus, we have that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D713},{\wp}}=\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{C,{\wp}}\otimes \unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{0}$
, where
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{0}:G_{K}\rightarrow \mathbb{F}_{q}^{\times }$
giving the action of
$G_{K}$
on
$c$
.
Now,
$C[P]\cong A/P$
and the elements of
$(A/P)^{\times }$
correspond to the roots of
$C(P)(X)/X$
.
Furthermore, from [Reference Rosen23, Theorem 12.10], we have that
$C(P)(X)/X\in A[X]$
is an Eisenstein polynomial for the prime
$P$
. Hence,
$C(P)(X)\equiv X^{\left|P\right|}\hspace{0.6em}({\rm mod}\hspace{0.2em}P)$
, where
$\left|P\right|=q^{\deg _{K}P}$
.
Let
$\mathfrak{P}$
be a prime of
$K(C[{\wp}])$
lying above
$P$
. We then have that
$C(P)(X)\equiv X^{\left|P\right|}\hspace{0.6em}({\rm mod}\hspace{0.2em}\mathfrak{P})$
.
Let
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}$
be a generator for
$C[{\wp}]$
. Since
$\operatorname{Frob}_{P}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D706})\equiv \unicode[STIX]{x1D706}^{\left|P\right|}\hspace{0.6em}({\rm mod}\hspace{0.2em}\mathfrak{P})$
and
$C(P)(\unicode[STIX]{x1D706})\equiv \unicode[STIX]{x1D706}^{\left|P\right|}\hspace{0.6em}({\rm mod}\hspace{0.2em}\mathfrak{P})$
, we have that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{C,{\wp}}(\operatorname{Frob}_{P})\equiv P\hspace{0.6em}({\rm mod}\hspace{0.2em}{\wp})$
.
Thus, we get that
$\det \unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}(\operatorname{Frob}_{P})=\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D713},{\wp}}(\operatorname{Frob}_{P})=\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{C,{\wp}}\otimes \unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{0}(\operatorname{Frob}_{P})\equiv \unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{0}(P)P\hspace{0.6em}({\rm mod}\hspace{0.2em}{\wp})$
.◻
6 The Cartan case
In this section, we assume throughout that
$q$
is odd.
Let
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
be a Drinfeld
$A$
-module of rank
$2$
over
$K$
without complex multiplication, and let
${\wp}$
be a finite prime of
$K$
. In this section, we suppose throughout that the image of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}$
lies in the normalizer
${\mathcal{N}}$
of a Cartan subgroup
${\mathcal{C}}$
of
$\operatorname{GL}_{2}(A/{\wp})$
but not in
${\mathcal{C}}$
.
Consider the associated character
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{{\wp}}:G_{K}\rightarrow \left\{\pm 1\right\}$
obtained by applying
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}$
and then the quotient map
${\mathcal{N}}/{\mathcal{C}}\cong \left\{\pm 1\right\}$
. Let
$K^{\prime }/K$
be the quadratic extension associated to
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{{\wp}}$
.
Gardeyn studies the image of the inertia group
$I_{K_{{\wp}}}$
of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}$
at the finite prime
${\wp}$
of
$K$
[Reference Gardeyn11, Theorem 2.23, Corollary 2.24]. He shows the following theorem, where we do not need the assumption that the image of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}$
lies in the normalizer
${\mathcal{N}}$
of a Cartan subgroup
${\mathcal{C}}$
of
$\operatorname{GL}_{2}(A/{\wp})$
but not in
${\mathcal{C}}$
.
Theorem 6.1. Let
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
be a Drinfeld
$A$
-module of rank
$2$
over
$K$
with good reduction at
${\wp}$
and
$I_{K_{{\wp}}}$
be the inertia group at
${\wp}$
of
$K$
. Then
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}(I_{K_{{\wp}}})$
is
(1) a nonsplit Cartan subgroup of order
$q_{{\wp}}^{2}-1$
(if
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
has good reduction at
${\wp}$
of height
$2$
);(2) a semisplit Cartan or semisplit Borel subgroup of order divisible by
$q_{{\wp}}-1$
(if
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
has good reduction at
${\wp}$
of height 1),
where
$q_{{\wp}}$
is the size of the residue field
$A/{\wp}$
.
Proof. See [Reference Pink and Rütsche21, Proposition 2.7], [Reference Gardeyn11, Theorem 2.23, Corollary 2.24], [Reference Serre24, Proposition 11, 12, 13]. ◻
Remark 6.2. The elliptic curve analogue of the above theorem is described in [Reference Serre24, Proposition 11, 12, 13]. The reader may be curious about the situation of bad Tate reduction at
${\wp}$
. For elliptic curves, one knows by [Reference Serre24, Proposition 13], that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{E,p}(I_{p})$
lies in a semisplit Borel subgroup if
$E$
has bad multiplicative reduction at
$p$
. However, for Drinfeld modules, we only have that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}(I_{{\wp}})$
lies in a Borel subgroup, for reasons that we explain below.
If
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
has bad Tate reduction at
${\wp}$
, then over
$C_{{\wp}}$
, where
$C_{{\wp}}$
is the completion of an algebraic closure of
$K_{{\wp}}$
, we have a uniformization [Reference Drinfeld6] given by a surjective analytic map
$e_{{\wp}}:C_{{\wp}}\rightarrow C_{{\wp}}$
which relates
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
to a Drinfeld
$A$
-module
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}$
of rank
$1$
with good reduction at
${\wp}$
via the relation
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{a}\circ e_{{\wp}}=e_{{\wp}}\circ \unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{a}$
. Let
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{{\wp}}$
be the set of zeros of
$e_{{\wp}}$
. Then by [Reference Drinfeld6],
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{{\wp}}=A\cdot \unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{1}$
is an
$A$
-lattice in
$C_{{\wp}}$
of rank
$1$
, where the
$A$
-module structure on
$C_{{\wp}}$
is given by
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}\cdot x:=\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}}(x)$
.
Write
${\wp}=(a)$
. The analytic map
$e_{{\wp}}$
is
$G_{K_{{\wp}}}$
-equivariant and induces an isomorphism
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{{\wp}}^{-1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{{\wp}})/\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{{\wp}}\cong \unicode[STIX]{x1D719}[{\wp}]$
. We also have an exact sequence
$$\begin{eqnarray}0\rightarrow \unicode[STIX]{x1D713}[{\wp}]\rightarrow \unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{a}^{-1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{{\wp}})/\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{{\wp}}\rightarrow \unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{{\wp}}/a\cdot \unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{{\wp}}\rightarrow 0.\end{eqnarray}$$
Thus,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}$
has the form
$$\begin{eqnarray}\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}=\left(\begin{array}{@{}cc@{}}\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}^{\prime } & \ast \\ 0 & \unicode[STIX]{x1D712}^{\prime \prime }\end{array}\right),\end{eqnarray}$$
where
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}^{\prime }\cong \unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D713},{\wp}}$
. Since
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}$
is of rank
$1$
and has good reduction at
${\wp}$
, by application of [Reference Pink and Rütsche21, Proposition 2.7], we see that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}_{\mid I_{{\wp}}}^{\prime }$
has image
$\mathbb{F}_{{\wp}}^{\times }=(A/{\wp})^{\times }$
.
Since
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{{\wp}}$
is
$G_{K_{{\wp}}}$
-invariant, we have that
$$\begin{eqnarray}\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{1})=\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}^{\prime \prime }(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E})\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{1},\end{eqnarray}$$
where
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}\in G_{K,{\wp}}$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}^{\prime \prime }(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E})\in A^{\times }=\mathbb{F}_{q}^{\times }$
. This implies that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{1}^{q-1}=c\in K_{{\wp}}^{\ast }$
. Now,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}^{\prime \prime }$
is unramified at
${\wp}$
if and only if
$v_{{\wp}}(c)\equiv 0\hspace{0.6em}({\rm mod}\hspace{0.2em}q-1)$
:
Write
$c=u\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}^{(q-1)k+r}$
, where
$0\leqslant r<q-1$
,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}$
is a uniformizer for
$K_{{\wp}}$
, and
$u$
is a unit in
$K_{{\wp}}$
. Then
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{1}=u^{1/(q-1)}\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}^{k}\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}^{r/(q-1)}$
, which lies in
$K_{{\wp}}^{\text{nr}}$
or
$K_{{\wp}}^{\text{nr}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}^{r/(q-1)})=K_{{\wp}}^{\text{nr}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}^{1/(q-1)})$
accordingly as
$r=0$
or
$r\not =0$
. In the former case,
$K_{{\wp}}^{\text{nr}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{1})=K_{{\wp}}^{\text{nr}}$
is unramified, and in the latter case,
$K_{{\wp}}^{\text{nr}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{1})=K_{{\wp}}^{\text{nr}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}^{1/(q-1)})$
is tamely ramified.
Thus, in general both
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}^{\prime }$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}^{\prime \prime }$
are ramified at
${\wp}$
.
Lemma 6.3. Suppose
${\wp}\notin S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}$
and
$q_{{\wp}}\geqslant 5$
. Then the character
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{{\wp}}$
is unramified at
${\wp}$
.
Proof. Using Theorem 6.1,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}(I_{K_{{\wp}}})$
is a nonsplit Cartan subgroup, semisplit Cartan subgroup, or semisplit Borel subgroup. In the first case, we obtain that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{{\wp}}(I_{K_{{\wp}}})=1$
by definition of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{{\wp}}$
.
Recall we are under the running assumption that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}$
has image contained in the normalizer of a Cartan subgroup
${\mathcal{N}}$
. Hence, the last case does not occur as no semisplit Borel subgroup can be contained in
${\mathcal{N}}$
.
In the second case,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}(I_{K_{{\wp}}})$
is a semisplit Cartan subgroup contained in
${\mathcal{N}}$
. As
$q_{{\wp}}\geqslant 5$
, it follows that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}(I_{K_{{\wp}}})$
is the unique such semisplit Cartan subgroup in
${\mathcal{N}}$
(the proof in [Reference Serre24, Proposition 14] works for general finite fields). Since this semisplit Cartan subgroup is contained in
${\mathcal{C}}$
, we have that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{{\wp}}(I_{K_{{\wp}}})=1$
.◻
Corollary 6.4. Assume the notation and hypotheses of Lemma 6.3. Let
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }$
be the twist of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
by the character
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{{\wp}}$
. Then
$$\begin{eqnarray}\deg _{K}\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }}=\deg _{K}\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}^{2}=2\deg _{K}\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}},\end{eqnarray}$$
and in fact,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}=\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }}$
.
Proof. The character
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{{\wp}}$
is unramified outside the set of primes containing
$\infty$
and the primes which divide
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}$
. Thus,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }}\mid \unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}$
from Lemma 4.1. On the other hand,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
is the twist of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }$
by
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{{\wp}}$
as well, so we obtain
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}\mid \unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }}$
.◻
Let
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }$
be the twist of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
by the character
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{{\wp}}$
, and let
$S$
denote a set of primes outside of which both
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }$
have good reduction. We have that
$$\begin{eqnarray}\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{^{\prime }},{\wp}}\cong \unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}\otimes \unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{{\wp}}\end{eqnarray}$$
by Lemma 4.1 as
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }$
is the twist of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
by
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{{\wp}}$
. Thus,
$a_{P}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime })=a_{P}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{{\wp}}(\operatorname{Frob}_{P})$
, where
$a_{{\wp}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})$
denotes the trace of a Frobenius conjugacy class
$\operatorname{Frob}_{{\wp}}$
at
${\wp}$
on the Tate module
$T_{\mathfrak{L}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})$
, and similarly for
$a_{P}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime })$
. Also,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime },{\wp}}\mid _{G_{K^{\prime }}}\cong \unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}\mid _{G_{K^{\prime }}}\cong \unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}$
for a
$1$
-dimensional representation
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}:G_{K^{\prime }}\rightarrow \overline{\mathbb{F}}_{q}^{\times }$
, so we have
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime },{\wp}}\cong \operatorname{Ind}_{G_{K^{\prime }}}^{G_{K}}\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}\cong \unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}$
. Hence, we have
$a_{P}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime })\equiv a_{P}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})\hspace{0.6em}({\rm mod}\hspace{0.2em}{\wp})$
for all primes
$P\not \in S$
. Now, if
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{{\wp}}(\operatorname{Frob}_{P})=-1$
, we get that
$$\begin{eqnarray}{\wp}\mid 2a_{P}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})\end{eqnarray}$$
by the relationship between
$a_{P}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{^{\prime }})$
and
$a_{P}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})$
following (14). Since
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
does not have complex multiplication and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{{\wp}}$
is nontrivial, by Lemma 4.2 we have that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }$
are not
$K$
-isogenous. Hence, by the isogeny theorem [Reference Taguchi27, Proposition 3.1], there are only finitely many
$P\not \in S$
such that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{{\wp}}(\operatorname{Frob}_{P})=-1$
and
$a_{P}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})=0$
.
We now use Theorem 3.5 with
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }$
being the twist of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
by
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{{\wp}}$
to obtain the following result.
Theorem 6.5. Assume that
$q$
is odd,
${\wp}\notin S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}$
, and
$q_{{\wp}}\geqslant 5$
. Let
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
be a Drinfeld
$A$
-module of rank
$2$
over
$K$
without complex multiplication, and let
${\wp}$
be a finite prime of
$K$
. Suppose that the image of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}$
lies in the normalizer of a Cartan subgroup of
$\operatorname{GL}_{2}(A/{\wp})$
but not in the Cartan subgroup. Let
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{{\wp}}:G_{K}\rightarrow \mathbb{F}_{q}^{\times }$
be the associated Galois character as before.
Let
$\mathfrak{p}\not \in S=S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}\cup \{\infty \}$
be a prime of least degree such that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{{\wp}}(\operatorname{Frob}_{\mathfrak{p}})=-1$
and
$a_{\mathfrak{p}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})\neq 0$
; such a prime exists since
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
has no complex multiplication. Then
$$\begin{eqnarray}\deg _{K}\mathfrak{p}\leqslant 4(C_{q}+\widetilde{W}+s_{q}\log _{q}(c_{0}+\widetilde{W})),\end{eqnarray}$$
where
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \widetilde{W} & := & \displaystyle \log _{q}^{\ast }2\left(\deg _{K}\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}+\frac{2}{q-1}\deg _{K}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}+1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}\left(q^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}+1}-1\right)\right)\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle +\,\frac{1}{4}((q^{2}-1)(q^{2}-q))^{2}\left(1+\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}}{s_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})}\right)^{2},\end{eqnarray}$$
and the notation is taken from Notation 1.
Proof. Let
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }$
be the twist of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
by
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{{\wp}}$
over
$K$
given explicitly by
$c\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{a}=\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{a}^{\prime }c$
, where
$c=\sqrt{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}}$
for some
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}\in K^{\ast }$
with
$v_{\infty }(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF})\leqslant 0$
.
We note that if
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{{\wp}}(\operatorname{Frob}_{\mathfrak{p}})=1$
then
$a_{\mathfrak{p}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})=a_{\mathfrak{p}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime })$
. Therefore, if
$a_{\mathfrak{p}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})\not =a_{\mathfrak{p}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime })$
, we have that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{{\wp}}(\operatorname{Frob}_{\mathfrak{p}})=-1$
and
$a_{\mathfrak{p}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})\neq 0$
.
Since
${\wp}\notin S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}$
and
$q_{{\wp}}\geqslant 5$
, by Corollary 6.4, we have that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}=\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }}$
. Furthermore, as
$j(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})=j(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime })$
, we have that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}=\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }}$
. We thus have
$s_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime })=s_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})-\frac{1}{2}v_{\infty }(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF})$
since
$a_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime })=a_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})/c^{q-1}$
.
By taking
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{2}=\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }$
to be the twist of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{1}=\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
by
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{{\wp}}$
and
$S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}\cup S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }}\cup \{\infty \}=S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}\cup \{\infty \}=S$
, we deduce from Theorem 3.5 that
$$\begin{eqnarray}\deg _{K}\mathfrak{p}\leqslant 4\left(C_{q}+W+s_{q}\log _{q}(c_{0}+W)\right),\end{eqnarray}$$
where
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle W & = & \displaystyle \log _{q}^{\ast }2\left(\deg _{K}\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}+\frac{2}{q-1}\deg _{K}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}+1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}\left(q^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}+1}-1\right)\right)\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle +\,\frac{1}{4}((q^{2}-1)(q^{2}-q))^{2}\left(1+\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}}{s_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})}\right)\left(1+\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}}{s_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})-\frac{1}{2}v_{\infty }(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF})}\right).\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
Since
$1/(s_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})-\frac{1}{2}v_{\infty }(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}))\leqslant 1/s_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})$
, the result follows.◻
The above theorem implies the following bound on the degree of
${\wp}$
in the Cartan case:
Theorem 6.6. Assume that
$q$
is odd. Let
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
be a Drinfeld
$A$
-module of rank
$2$
over
$K$
without complex multiplication, and let
${\wp}$
be a finite prime of
$K$
. Suppose that the image of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}$
lies in the normalizer of a Cartan subgroup of
$\operatorname{GL}_{2}(A/{\wp})$
but not in the Cartan subgroup.
Then either
${\wp}\in S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}$
, or
$$\begin{eqnarray}\deg _{K}{\wp}\leqslant 2\left(C_{q}+\widetilde{W}+s_{q}\log _{q}(c_{0}+\widetilde{W})\right),\end{eqnarray}$$
where
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle \widetilde{W} & := & \displaystyle \log _{q}^{\ast }2\left(\deg _{K}\unicode[STIX]{x1D702}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}+\frac{2}{q-1}\deg _{K}\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FF}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}+1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}\left(q^{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}+1}-1\right)\right)\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle +\,\frac{1}{4}((q^{2}-1)(q^{2}-q))^{2}\left(1+\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}}{s_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})}\right)^{2},\end{eqnarray}$$
and the quantities in the above formula are as given in Notation 1.
Proof. Note that if
$q_{{\wp}}<5$
, then the conclusion follows as the bounds on
${\wp}$
are larger than
$1$
, so we may assume without generality from now on that
${\wp}\notin S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}$
and
$q_{{\wp}}\geqslant 5$
.
As
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
has no complex multiplication, there exists a prime
$\mathfrak{p}\not \in S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}\cup \{\infty \}$
of least degree such that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{{\wp}}(\operatorname{Frob}_{\mathfrak{p}})=-1$
and
$a_{\mathfrak{p}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})\not =0$
. Then applying Theorem 6.5, it follows that
$$\begin{eqnarray}\deg _{K}\mathfrak{p}\leqslant 4\left(C_{q}+\widetilde{W}+s_{q}\log _{q}(c_{0}+\widetilde{W})\right),\end{eqnarray}$$
where the quantities in the above formula are as given in Notation 1.
Then
${\wp}\mid 2a_{\mathfrak{p}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})$
by (15). Since the analogue of Hasse’s Theorem [Reference Gekeler7] gives
$$\begin{eqnarray}\deg _{K}a_{\mathfrak{p}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})\leqslant {\textstyle \frac{1}{2}}\deg _{K}\mathfrak{p},\end{eqnarray}$$
we obtain
$$\begin{eqnarray}\deg _{K}{\wp}\leqslant 2\left(C_{q}+\widetilde{W}+s_{q}\log _{q}(c_{0}+\widetilde{W})\right).\end{eqnarray}$$
Hence, the assertion follows. ◻
7 The Borel case
The arguments in this section are Drinfeld module analogues of the arguments in [Reference Serre24, Section 5.6] for elliptic curves.
In this section, let
$K=\mathbb{F}_{q}(T)$
. Let
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
be a Drinfeld
$A$
-module of rank
$2$
over
$K$
without complex multiplication, and let
${\wp}$
be a finite prime of
$K$
such that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}$
is not surjective.
We also suppose that the image of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}$
lies in a Borel subgroup of
$\operatorname{GL}_{2}(A/{\wp})$
.
Let
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}^{\prime },\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}^{\prime \prime }:G_{K}\rightarrow (A/{\wp})^{\times }$
be the characters of
$G_{K}$
such that
$$\begin{eqnarray}\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}(g)=\left(\begin{array}{@{}cc@{}}\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}^{\prime }(g) & \ast \\ 0 & \unicode[STIX]{x1D712}^{\prime \prime }(g)\end{array}\right).\end{eqnarray}$$
We use the convention
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(P):=\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}(\operatorname{Frob}_{P})$
for a Galois character
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}:G_{K}\rightarrow (A/{\wp})^{\times }$
.
We fix
$\overline{K}\subseteq \overline{K}_{P}$
for each prime
$P$
of
$K$
.
Recall we let
$S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}$
be the set of primes of bad reduction of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
over
$K$
. Let
$S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}^{\prime }$
be the subset of
$S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}$
of primes where
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
does not have bad Tate reduction.
Proposition 7.1. We assume that the image of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}$
lies in a Borel subgroup of
$\operatorname{GL}_{2}(A/{\wp})$
.
(1) The characters
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}^{\prime }$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}^{\prime \prime }$
are unramified outside
$S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}\cup \{{\wp},\infty \}$
.(2) For all primes
$P\notin S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}\cup \{{\wp},\infty \}$
, we have that where$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle a_{P}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})\equiv \unicode[STIX]{x1D712}^{\prime }(P)+\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}^{\prime \prime }(P) & & \displaystyle \hspace{0.6em}({\rm mod}\hspace{0.2em}{\wp})\;\;\text{and}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle \unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{0}(P)P\equiv \unicode[STIX]{x1D712}^{\prime }(P)\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}^{\prime \prime }(P) & & \displaystyle \hspace{0.6em}({\rm mod}\hspace{0.2em}{\wp}),\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
$a_{P}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})$
is the trace of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}(\operatorname{Frob}_{P})$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{0}:G_{K}\rightarrow (A/{\wp})^{\times }$
is some character.(3) Suppose
${\wp}\notin S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}$
. Then one of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}^{\prime }$
or
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}^{\prime \prime }$
is unramified at
${\wp}$
. Denoting this by
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{{\wp}}$
, we have that for all primes$$\begin{eqnarray}a_{P}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})\equiv \unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{{\wp}}(P)+\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{0}(P)P\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{{\wp}}(P)^{-1}\hspace{0.6em}({\rm mod}\hspace{0.2em}{\wp}),\end{eqnarray}$$
$P\notin S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}\cup \{\infty \}$
.(4) Suppose
${\wp}\notin S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}$
. Then we have that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{{\wp}}^{(q-1)(q^{2}-1)n_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}}=1,$
where
$n_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}\leqslant (q^{2}-1)(q^{2}-q)(1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}/s_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}))$
is a positive integer, and
$s_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}$
are the same as given in Notation 1.
Proof. Since
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},P}$
is unramified for
$P\notin S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}\cup \{{\wp},\infty \}$
, the same is true for
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}^{\prime }$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}^{\prime \prime }$
; hence, the part (1) follows.
If
$P\not \in S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}\cup \{{\wp},\infty \}$
, then from Proposition 5.3, we obtain that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{0}(P)P\equiv \unicode[STIX]{x1D712}^{\prime }(P)\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}^{\prime \prime }(P)\hspace{0.6em}({\rm mod}\hspace{0.2em}{\wp})$
, and hence
$$\begin{eqnarray}a_{P}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})\equiv \unicode[STIX]{x1D712}^{\prime }(P)+\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}^{\prime \prime }(P)\hspace{0.6em}({\rm mod}\hspace{0.2em}{\wp}).\end{eqnarray}$$
Suppose
${\wp}\notin S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}$
. Then
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}(I_{K_{{\wp}}})$
is a semisplit Cartan or semisplit Borel subgroup from Theorem 6.1 (the image of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}$
is assumed to lie in a Borel subgroup, which does not contain any nonsplit Cartan subgroup, so the case of a nonsplit Cartan subgroup in Theorem 6.1 does not occur under the hypotheses of this proposition). From Theorem 6.1, we also know that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}^{\prime }$
can be assumed to be unramified at
${\wp}$
, which we now denote by
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{{\wp}}$
. Thus, we have
$$\begin{eqnarray}a_{P}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})\equiv \unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{{\wp}}(P)+\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{0}(P)P\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{{\wp}}(P)^{-1}\hspace{0.6em}({\rm mod}\hspace{0.2em}{\wp}),\end{eqnarray}$$
for all
$P\notin S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}\cup \{{\wp},\infty \}$
.
Now, if
$P={\wp}$
, then we still have
$$\begin{eqnarray}a_{P}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})=a_{{\wp}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})\equiv \unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{{\wp}}({\wp})\hspace{0.6em}({\rm mod}\hspace{0.2em}{\wp})\end{eqnarray}$$
by the following argument. Note that we now define
$a_{{\wp}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})$
as the trace of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}(\operatorname{Frob}_{{\wp}})$
on inertial invariants. The inertial invariants under
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}$
are spanned by the vector
$\text{}^{T}(1,0)$
. Then we have that
$\operatorname{Frob}_{{\wp}}$
acts on the vector
$\text{}^{T}(1,0)$
via
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{{\wp}}$
, hence
$a_{{\wp}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})\equiv \unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{{\wp}}({\wp})\hspace{0.6em}({\rm mod}\hspace{0.2em}{\wp})$
.
Thus, parts (2) and (3) follow.
For the part (4), suppose that
${\wp}\notin S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}$
, so as before
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{{\wp}}$
is unramified at
${\wp}$
.
We show that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{{\wp}}^{(q-1)(q^{2}-1)}$
is unramified at every prime
$P\not ={\wp}$
. This will be done according to each of the following cases:
(i)
$P\in S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}\setminus S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}^{\prime }$
with
$P\neq {\wp}$
,(ii)
$P\in S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}^{\prime }$
.
In the case (i),
$P$
is a prime of bad Tate reduction of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
over
$K$
and
$P\not ={\wp}$
. Then over
$C_{P}$
, where
$C_{P}$
is the completion of an algebraic closure of
$K_{P}$
, we have a uniformization [Reference Drinfeld6] given by a surjective analytic map
$e_{P}:C_{P}\rightarrow C_{P}$
which relates
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
to a Drinfeld
$A$
-module
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}$
of rank
$1$
via the relation
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{a}\circ e_{P}=e_{P}\circ \unicode[STIX]{x1D719}_{a}$
. Let
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{P}$
be the set of zeros of
$e_{P}$
. Then by [Reference Drinfeld6],
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{P}=A\cdot \unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{1}$
is an
$A$
-lattice in
$C_{P}$
of rank
$1$
, where the
$A$
-module structure on
$C_{P}$
is given by
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}\cdot x:=\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}}(x)$
.
Let
$K_{P}^{0}=K_{P}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{P},\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}[{\wp}])$
. Then Gardeyn [Reference Gardeyn12, pp. 247–248] shows that:
(1)
$K_{P}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}[{\wp}])\subseteq K_{P}^{0}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{P}^{-1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{P}))=K_{P}^{0}(s_{1})$
, where
$s_{1}\in \unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{P}^{-1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{1})$
;(2) the conjugates of
$s_{1}$
over
$K_{P}^{0}$
lie in
$s_{1}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}[{\wp}]$
.
The equality
$K_{P}^{0}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{P}^{-1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{P}))=K_{P}^{0}(s_{1})$
can be seen as follows. Pick a
$s_{1}\in C_{P}$
such that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{P}(s_{1})=\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{1}$
. Then if
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}\in A$
,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}\cdot s_{1}:=\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}}(s_{1})$
so that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{P}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}\cdot s_{1})=\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{P}\circ \unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}}(s_{1})=\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}}\circ \unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{P}(s_{1})=\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{1})=\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}\cdot \unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{1}$
. Hence,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{P}^{-1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{P})\supseteq A\cdot s_{1}$
. If
$x\in \unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{P}^{-1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{P})$
, then
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{P}(x)=\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}\cdot \unicode[STIX]{x1D706}_{1}=\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{P}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}\cdot s_{1})$
for some
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}\in A$
. Hence,
$x\in A\cdot s_{1}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{P}$
. Since
$K_{P}^{0}\supseteq \unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{P}$
, we have
$K_{P}^{0}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}_{P}^{-1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{P}))=K_{P}^{0}(s_{1})$
.
The above properties yield a representation
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}:\operatorname{Gal}(K_{P}^{0}(s_{1})/K_{P}^{0})\rightarrow \unicode[STIX]{x1D713}[{\wp}]$
from the formula
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E}(s_{1})=s_{1}+\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D70E})$
. Hence, the image of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}$
consists only of elements of order a power of
$p$
when
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}$
is restricted to
$G_{K_{P}^{0}}$
.
Finally, since
$P\neq {\wp}$
, we have that
$K_{P}^{0}/K_{P}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{P})$
is unramified, so the inertia subgroup
$I_{K_{P}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{P})}$
of
$K_{P}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{P})$
is contained in
$G_{K_{P}^{0}}$
. Hence, the image
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}(I_{K_{P}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{P})})$
consists only of elements of order a power of
$p$
. It follows that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}^{\prime },\unicode[STIX]{x1D712}^{\prime \prime }$
are unramified when restricted to
$G_{K_{P}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{P})}$
.
Since
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
has bad Tate reduction at the finite prime
$P$
, by [Reference Gardeyn12, Proposition 4(i)], we have that
$[K_{P}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{P}):K_{P}]$
is bounded above by
$g_{P}=\#\operatorname{GL}(1,\mathbb{F}_{q})=q-1$
. In fact, the proof in [Reference Gardeyn12, Proposition 4(i)] shows that
$[K_{P}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D6EC}_{P}):K_{P}]\mid q-1$
. Thus,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{{\wp}}^{q-1}$
is unramified when restricted to
$G_{K_{P}}$
.
In the case (ii),
$P\in S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}$
(we then have that
$P\not ={\wp}$
because
${\wp}\notin S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}\supseteq S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}^{\prime }$
). We know that there exists an extension
$K^{\prime }$
of
$K_{P}$
such that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
attains semi-stable reduction over
$K^{\prime }$
by Lemma 5.1, and the extension degree [
$K_{P}^{\text{nr}}\cdot K^{\prime }:K_{P}^{\text{nr}}$
] divides
$q^{2}-1$
.
Let
$P^{\prime }$
denote the prime of
$K^{\prime }$
above the prime
$P$
. If
$P^{\prime }$
is a bad Tate reduction prime of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
over
$K^{\prime }$
, we thus have
$P^{\prime }\neq {\wp}^{\prime }$
, where
${\wp}^{\prime }$
is a prime of
$K^{\prime }$
lying above
${\wp}$
, so the same argument as above shows (by replacing
$K$
by
$K^{\prime }$
,
$P$
by
$P^{\prime }$
) that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{{\wp}}^{q-1}$
is unramified when restricted to
$G_{K_{P^{\prime }}^{\prime }}$
(the results from [Reference Gardeyn12] used above apply equally well over the extension
$K_{P^{\prime }}^{\prime }$
).
Now
$K_{P}^{\text{nr}}\cdot K^{\prime }$
is Galois over
$K_{P}^{\text{nr}}$
of degree dividing
$q^{2}-1$
, where
$K_{P}^{\text{nr}}$
is the maximal unramified extension of
$K_{P}$
. Also,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{{\wp}}^{(q-1)(q^{2}-1)}$
is unramified when restricted to
$G_{K_{P}}$
if and only if
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{{\wp}}^{(q-1)(q^{2}-1)}$
is unramified when restricted to
$G_{K_{P}^{\text{nr}}}$
, which is the case.
Finally,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{{\wp}}^{(q-1)(q^{2}-1)}$
is unramified at every finite prime of
$K$
.
Furthermore, we claim that as a character of
$G_{K}$
, we have that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{{\wp}}^{(q-1)(q^{2}-1)n_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}}=1$
, where
$n_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}\leqslant (q^{2}-1)(q^{2}-q)(1+\frac{\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}}{s_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})})$
is a positive integer.
Let
$L$
be a finite, separable, tamely ramified, and geometric extension of
$K$
(recall
$L$
is a geometric extension of
$K$
if and only if the algebraic closure of
$\mathbb{F}_{K}$
in
$L$
is
$\mathbb{F}_{K}$
itself). Suppose that
$M$
is a field with
$K\subset M\subset L$
and
$L/M$
is unramified except possibly at the primes
$\infty _{i}$
lying above a prime
$\infty$
of
$M$
. From Riemann–Hurwitz, since
$L/K$
is tamely ramified, we have the following equality:
$$\begin{eqnarray}2g_{L}-2=m(2g_{K}-2)+\mathop{\sum }_{i=1}^{t}(e_{i}-1)f_{i},\end{eqnarray}$$
where
$m:=[L:K]$
,
$g_{L}$
(resp.
$g_{M}$
) is the genus of
$L$
(resp.
$M$
), and
$e_{i}$
(resp.
$f_{i}$
) denotes the ramification index (resp. the inertial degree) of
$\infty _{i}$
over
$\infty$
. This implies that
$2g_{L}=2-m-\sum _{i=1}^{t}f_{i}$
since
$g_{M}=0$
and
$\sum _{i=1}^{t}e_{i}f_{i}=m$
. Thus, we have
$m\leqslant 2-\sum _{i=1}^{t}f_{i}\leqslant 1$
as
$g_{L}\geqslant 0$
, and hence
$m=1$
, that is,
$L=M$
.
Suppose that a Galois character
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}:G_{K}\rightarrow \mathbb{F}_{{\wp}}^{\times }$
is unramified at every finite prime of
$K$
. Let
$L$
be the field cut out by
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}$
and
$M=\mathbb{F}_{L}\cdot K=\mathbb{F}_{q^{n}}\cdot K$
(where
$\mathbb{F}_{L}=\mathbb{F}_{q^{n}}$
is the algebraic closure of
$\mathbb{F}_{K}=\mathbb{F}_{q}$
in
$L$
) so
$L/M$
is a geometric extension. Applying the previous paragraph, we deduce that
$L=M$
. It thus follows that a Galois character
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}:G_{K}\rightarrow \mathbb{F}_{{\wp}}^{\times }$
which is unramified at every finite prime of
$K$
must factor through the Galois group of a finite constant field extension
$\mathbb{F}_{q^{n}}K/K$
for some positive integer
$n$
, where
$n=[\mathbb{F}_{L}:\mathbb{F}_{K}]$
.
Applying the above to the character
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{{\wp}}^{(q-1)(q^{2}-1)}$
(which is unramified at every finite prime of
$K$
) and using Theorem 3.2, we get
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D6FC}_{{\wp}}^{(q-1)(q^{2}-1)n_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}}=1$
, where
$n_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}\leqslant (q^{2}-1)(q^{2}-q)(1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}/s_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}))$
is a positive integer as claimed. ◻
Theorem 7.2. Let
$K=\mathbb{F}_{q}(T)$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
be a Drinfeld
$A$
-module of rank
$2$
over
$K$
without complex multiplication and
${\wp}$
be a finite prime of
$K$
. Let
$P$
be the least degree prime of
$K$
where
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
has good reduction.
Suppose that the image of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}$
lies in a Borel subgroup of
$\operatorname{GL}_{2}(A/{\wp})$
.
Then either
$$\begin{eqnarray}{\wp}\in S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}\quad \text{or}\quad \deg _{K}{\wp}\leqslant \;\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}((q-1)(q^{2}-1)n_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}})\;\deg _{K}P,\end{eqnarray}$$
where
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}$
is the Euler-phi function,
$s_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}$
are the same as given in Notation 1, and
$n_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}\leqslant (q^{2}-1)(q^{2}-q)(1+\unicode[STIX]{x1D705}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}/s_{1}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}))$
is a positive integer.
Proof. Suppose
${\wp}\notin S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}$
. From Proposition 7.1, we have that
$$\begin{eqnarray}a_{P}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})\equiv z+\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{0}(P)Pz^{-1}\hspace{0.6em}({\rm mod}\hspace{0.2em}{\wp}),\end{eqnarray}$$
where
$z$
is a
$(q-1)(q^{2}-1)n_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}$
th root of unity in
$A/{\wp}$
.
Let
$d$
be the order of
$z$
,
$S_{d}(X)$
the
$d$
th cyclotomic polynomial, and
$F_{P}(X)=X^{2}-a_{P}(\unicode[STIX]{x1D719})X+\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{0}(P)P$
.
The congruence in (22) implies that
$S_{d}$
and
$F_{P}$
have a common root mod
${\wp}$
, hence their resultant
$R\in A$
is divisible by
${\wp}$
. The resultant
$R$
is given by
$$\begin{eqnarray}R=\prod (x-\unicode[STIX]{x1D701})(x^{\prime }-\unicode[STIX]{x1D701}),\end{eqnarray}$$
where
$x$
and
$x^{\prime }$
are the two roots of
$F_{P}(X)$
and
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D701}$
runs through the set of primitive
$d$
th roots of unity.
Let
$\left|x\right|=q^{-v_{\infty }(x)}$
denote the absolute value of
$x$
associated to the prime
$\infty$
. Then we have that
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle & & \displaystyle \left|x\right|=\left|x^{\prime }\right|=q^{(1/2)\deg _{K}P}~~\text{and}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & & \displaystyle \left|\unicode[STIX]{x1D701}\right|=1.\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
Hence, we have that
$$\begin{eqnarray}\displaystyle 0<\left|R\right| & {\leqslant} & \displaystyle \max \{q^{(1/2)\deg _{K}P},1\}^{2n}\nonumber\\ \displaystyle & = & \displaystyle q^{n\deg _{K}P},\nonumber\end{eqnarray}$$
where
$n=\deg S_{d}(X)=\unicode[STIX]{x1D711}(d)$
. Since
$d$
divides
$(q-1)(q^{2}-1)n_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}$
, we have that
$n\leqslant \unicode[STIX]{x1D711}((q-1)(q^{2}-1)n_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}})$
.
Now,
${\wp}$
divides
$R$
, so we get that
$$\begin{eqnarray}\deg _{K}{\wp}\leqslant \unicode[STIX]{x1D711}((q-1)(q^{2}-1)n_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}})\deg _{K}P.\end{eqnarray}$$
The result thus follows. ◻
8 Proof of Theorem 2.1
Let
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
be a Drinfeld
$A$
-module of rank
$2$
over
$K=\mathbb{F}_{q}(T)$
without complex multiplication, and
${\wp}$
be a finite prime of
$K$
such that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}$
is not surjective.
We first recall a classification of the proper maximal subgroups of
$\operatorname{PGL}_{2}(k)$
, where
$k$
is a finite field of characteristic
$p$
.
Theorem 8.1. The maximal proper subgroups of
$\operatorname{PGL}_{2}(k)$
, where
$k$
is a finite field of characteristic
$p$
, are:
(i) the projective image of a Borel subgroup of
$\operatorname{GL}_{2}(k)$
;(ii) the projective image of the normalizer of a Cartan subgroup of
$\operatorname{GL}_{2}(k)$
;(iii)
$\operatorname{PSL}_{2}(k)$
;(iv) isomorphic to the subgroup
$\operatorname{PGL}_{2}(k^{\prime })$
for some proper subfield
$k^{\prime }$
of
$k$
;(v) isomorphic to one of the groups
$A_{4}$
,
$S_{4}$
, or
$A_{5}$
.
Proof. This result is stated in [Reference Gardeyn11, Proposition 3.12] as being deduced from the version of Dickson’s classification of the subgroups of
$\operatorname{PSL}_{2}(k)$
proven in [Reference Huppert13, Theorem 8.27, Chapter II]. For completeness, we explain how to deduce the above classification. In order to shorten the arguments, we also rely on [Reference Serre24, Proposition 16] (or [Reference Lang15, Chapter XI, §2, Theorem 2.3]).
Let
$K$
be a finite field of order
$p^{f}$
. From [Reference Huppert13, Theorem 8.27], a subgroup of
$\operatorname{PSL}_{2}(K)$
is one of:
(1) an elementary abelian
$p$
-group;(2) a cyclic group of order
$n\mid (p^{f}\pm 1)/w$
where
$w=(p^{f}-1,2)$
;(3) a dihedral group of order
$2n$
with
$n$
as in (2);(4) isomorphic to
$A_{4}$
;(5) isomorphic to
$S_{4}$
;(6) isomorphic to
$A_{5}$
;(7) a semidirect product of an elementary abelian
$p$
-group of order
$p^{m}$
with a cyclic subgroup of order
$t$
with
$t\mid (p^{m}-1,p^{f}-1)$
;(8) isomorphic to
$\operatorname{PSL}_{2}(K^{\prime })$
, where
$K^{\prime }$
is a subfield of
$K$
, or
$\operatorname{PGL}_{2}(K^{\prime })$
, where a quadratic extension of
$K^{\prime }$
is a subfield of
$K$
.
We note that the proof of [Reference Huppert13, Theorem 8.27] shows that the subgroups in the case (8) are in fact
$\operatorname{PGL}_{2}(K)$
-conjugate to
$\operatorname{PSL}_{2}(K^{\prime })$
or
$\operatorname{PGL}_{2}(K^{\prime })$
. However, since we do not need this additional information for the proof of our results, we omit further discussion of this point.
Let
$\bar{H}$
be a maximal proper subgroup of
$\operatorname{PGL}_{2}(k)$
. If
$p\nmid \left|\bar{H}\right|$
, then we have that
$\bar{H}$
is
(1) the projective image of the normalizer of a Cartan subgroup of
$\operatorname{GL}_{2}(k)$
;(2) isomorphic to
$A_{4}$
,
$S_{4}$
, or
$A_{5}$
by [Reference Serre24, Proposition 16]. Thus, let us now assume that we are in the case
$p\mid \left|\bar{H}\right|$
.
If
$p=2$
, then
$\operatorname{PGL}_{2}(k)=\operatorname{PSL}_{2}(k)$
. If
$p$
is odd, then
$\operatorname{PGL}_{2}(k)$
is a subgroup of
$\operatorname{PSL}_{2}(K)$
where
$[K:k]=2$
. Hence, applying [Reference Huppert13, Theorem 8.27] to
$\operatorname{PSL}_{2}(K)$
,
$\bar{H}$
is isomorphic to one of the eight types of subgroups listed above.
Cases (2) and (3): The condition
$p\mid \left|\bar{H}\right|$
implies that we are not in the case (2). If
$\bar{H}$
is in the case (3), then
$p=2$
. Consider the cyclic subgroup
$\bar{Z}$
of order
$n$
of
$\bar{H}$
. If
$n=1$
, then
$\bar{H}$
is generated by a unipotent element of order
$2$
and hence lies in a Borel subgroup of
$\operatorname{GL}_{2}(k)$
.
Assume now that
$n>1$
. Since
$p\nmid n$
, we have that
$\bar{Z}$
is contained in the projective image of a Cartan subgroup
$\bar{C}$
of
$\operatorname{GL}_{2}(k)$
by [Reference Serre24, Proposition 16]. An element of
$\operatorname{GL}_{2}(k)$
which conjugates a nontrivial element of
$\bar{C}$
to another nontrivial element of
$\bar{C}$
must in fact normalize all of
$\bar{C}$
. Hence
$\bar{H}$
is contained in the projective image of the normalizer of a Cartan subgroup of
$\operatorname{GL}_{2}(k)$
.
Cases (1) and (7): We show here that
$\bar{H}$
is contained in the projective image of a Borel subgroup of
$\operatorname{GL}_{2}(k)$
. Let
$\bar{E}$
be the elementary abelian
$p$
-subgroup of the case (1) or the case (7). Let
$E$
be the inverse image of
$\bar{E}$
under the homomorphism
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}:\operatorname{SL}_{2}(K)\rightarrow \operatorname{PSL}_{2}(K)$
. Note that
$E$
is abelian and
$E=E_{0}\times E^{\prime }$
for a unique elementary abelian
$p$
-group
$E_{0}$
which is isomorphic to
$\bar{E}$
under
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}$
and an abelian group
$E^{\prime }$
of order coprime to
$p$
. Since every element in
$E_{0}$
has order dividing
$p$
and
$E_{0}$
is abelian, it follows that
$E_{0}$
up to conjugation is contained in the subgroup
$$\begin{eqnarray}U=\left\{\left(\begin{array}{@{}cc@{}}1 & \ast \\ 0 & 1\end{array}\right)\right\}\end{eqnarray}$$
of
$\operatorname{SL}_{2}(K)$
which has order
$p^{f}$
.
An element of
$\operatorname{SL}_{2}(K)$
which conjugates a nontrivial element of
$U$
to another nontrivial element of
$U$
must in fact normalize
$U$
. Let
$H$
be the inverse image of
$\bar{H}$
under
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70B}$
. Then
$H$
is contained in the normalizer of
$U$
in
$\operatorname{SL}_{2}(K)$
which is given by
$$\begin{eqnarray}\left\{\left(\begin{array}{@{}cc@{}}a & b\\ 0 & a^{-1}\end{array}\right):a\in K^{\ast },b\in K\right\}.\end{eqnarray}$$
It follows that the line that is fixed by
$E$
is also fixed by all of
$H$
. Hence,
$\bar{H}$
is contained in the projective image of a Borel subgroup of
$\operatorname{GL}_{2}(k)$
.
Case (8): Here,
$\bar{H}$
is isomorphic to
$\operatorname{PGL}_{2}(k^{\prime })$
for some proper subfield
$k^{\prime }$
of
$k$
, or
$\operatorname{PSL}_{2}(k)$
.◻
Assume that
$q_{{\wp}}>5$
. Suppose also that
${\wp}\notin S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}$
, so that
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{{\wp}}(I_{K_{{\wp}}})$
contains a nonsplit Cartan subgroup or a semisplit Cartan subgroup by Theorem 6.1. The projective image of a nonsplit Cartan subgroup and of a semisplit Cartan subgroup has a cyclic subgroup of order at least
$q_{{\wp}}\pm 1>5$
, which rules out the case
$(v)$
. On the other hand, the order of the projective image of a nonsplit Cartan subgroup or of a semisplit Cartan subgroup does not divide the order of
$\operatorname{PGL}_{2}(k^{\prime })$
for a proper subfield
$k^{\prime }$
of
$k$
, ruling out the case (iv). Since the image of the determinant map on a nonsplit Cartan and semisplit Cartan subgroup is
$(A/{\wp})^{\times }$
, the case (iii) is ruled out.
Thus, we are in one of the following cases:
(1) Image of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}$
is contained in the normalizer
${\mathcal{N}}$
of a Cartan subgroup
${\mathcal{C}}$
, but not in
${\mathcal{C}}$
;(2) Image of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}$
is contained in a Borel subgroup;(3) Image of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}$
is contained in a nonsplit Cartan subgroup.
Proposition 8.2. Assume
$q$
is odd. The representation
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}$
cannot have image contained in a nonsplit Cartan subgroup.
Proof. Let
$\bar{c}$
be an element of
$G(K(C[{\wp}])/K)\cong (A/{\wp})^{\times }$
of order
$q_{{\wp}}-1$
, where
$q_{{\wp}}=q^{\deg _{K}{\wp}}$
and
$C$
is the Carlitz module as in Proposition 5.3. Extend
$\bar{c}$
to an element
$c\in G_{K}$
of order
$q_{{\wp}}-1$
.
From Proposition 5.3, there is a Galois character
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{0}:G_{K}\rightarrow \mathbb{F}_{q}^{\times }$
and a rank
$1$
Drinfeld
$A$
-module
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D713}$
such that
$\det \unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}(\operatorname{Frob}_{P})=\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D713},{\wp}}(\operatorname{Frob}_{P})\equiv \unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{0}(P)P\hspace{0.6em}({\rm mod}\hspace{0.2em}{\wp})$
for all primes
$P$
of
$K$
such that
$P\notin S_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}}$
and
$P\not ={\wp},\infty$
.
Let
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime }$
be the twist of
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}$
by
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D716}_{0}^{-1}$
. From the proof of Proposition 5.3, we have that
$\det \unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime },{\wp}}=\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{C,{\wp}}$
. If
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719},{\wp}}$
has image lying in a nonsplit Cartan subgroup, then
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime },{\wp}}$
also has image in a nonsplit Cartan subgroup. Therefore,
$\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime },{\wp}}(c)$
is contained in the scalars, and hence
$\det \unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime },{\wp}}(c)$
is a square; thus, the order of
$\det \unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime },{\wp}}(c)$
divides
$(q_{{\wp}}-1)/2$
. But
$\det \unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{\unicode[STIX]{x1D719}^{\prime },{\wp}}(c)=\unicode[STIX]{x1D70C}_{C,{\wp}}(c)=\bar{c}$
has order
$q_{{\wp}}-1$
, yielding a contradiction.◻
Thus, Case (3) is ruled out. We dealt with Case (1) in Section 6, and with Case (2) in Section 7. Combining all the results together, we obtain Theorem 2.1.
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank C. David and A. Cojocaru for useful initial discussions pertaining to the subject of this paper. We also thank the referee for a careful reading, which improved this paper greatly.
