Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-9prln Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-08T11:41:33.981Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Potential refugia on the Tibetan Plateau during the last glacial maximum

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2025

Chantelle K. Fuller*
Affiliation:
School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
Daniel J. Hill
Affiliation:
School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
*
Corresponding author: Chantelle K. Fuller; Email: C.K.Fuller@Leeds.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The prehistoric human habitation of the Tibetan Plateau (TP) is well evidenced by the archaeological record, but poorly constrained in time and space. To test the plausibility of in situ survival during the last glacial maximum (LGM) and the coldest periods of the Pleistocene, this paper gauges the effects of LGM conditions and varying local ice coverage on the climate. Three different climate model scenarios are generated, and their outputs are used to drive vegetation simulations. This allows us to evaluate 10 archaeological sites that show evidence of human activity either pre- or post-LGM as possible human refugia. The results show that the higher the level of ice coverage on the plateau, the colder and drier the climate becomes, and barren unproductive land extends farther south. However, there are sites that remain habitable in all scenarios, with the southern and northeastern plateau identified as the areas with the highest likelihood of refugia during the LGM, specifically at the locations of Baishiya Karst Cave and Siling Co. There is a high probability of the TP being habitable during the LGM, as even the scenario with the most ice yields some regions with favourable conditions that are within the habitability criteria.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Quaternary Research Center.
Figure 0

Figure 1. Map of the Tibetan Plateau and evidence of glaciated and non-glaciated regions during the last glacial maximum. (Data from Brantingham et al., 2001b; Owen et al., 2005; Rhode et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2009; Heyman et al., 2011; Zhang et al., 2014; D’Alpoim Guedes and Aldenderfer, 2019; Liu and Zhu, 2022).

Figure 1

Figure 2. Map of 10 archaeological site locations on and near the Tibetan Plateau. (Location data from Brantingham et al., 2001b; Zhang, 2002; Madsen et al., 2006; Brantingham and Xing, 2006; Yuan et al., 2007; Sun et al., 2010; Brantingham et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2014; Zhang et al., 2018; Chen et al., 2019; Li et al., 2019; D’Alpoim Guedes and Aldenderfer, 2019; Liu and Zhu, 2022).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Ice coverage input for the HadCM3 model of Medium ice and Large ice simulations. The area of ice is shown in blue, and the red shows absence of ice.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Change in modelled annual mean surface air temperature (°C) from Pre-industrial in scenarios LGM (last glacial maximum), Medium ice, and Large ice. Data minimum −24.4°C and maximum −1.7°C.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Change in modelled annual mean precipitation (mm/day) from Pre-industrial in scenarios LGM (last glacial maximum), Medium ice, and Large ice. Data minimum −7.8 mm/day and maximum 4.3 mm/day.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Maps of the central Asian biomes, as simulated in BIOME4, for the Pre-industrial, LGM (last glacial maximum), Medium ice, and Large ice scenarios.

Figure 6

Figure 7. Graph showing net primary productivity (NPP) in g C/m2 and main biomes at each archaeological location in each climate scenario.