Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-nlwjb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-11T05:03:46.893Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Toxoplasma gondii seroprevalence, seroconversion rates and genetic variability in humans from Uruguay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 June 2025

Alejandra Valentin-Decuadro
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Apicomplexa Biology, Institut Pasteur Montevideo, Montevideo, Uruguay Academic Unit of Parasitology and Mycology, Hygiene Institute, School of Medicine, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
Leandro Ramiro Tana-Hernandez
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Apicomplexa Biology, Institut Pasteur Montevideo, Montevideo, Uruguay
Paula Faral-Tello
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Apicomplexa Biology, Institut Pasteur Montevideo, Montevideo, Uruguay
Pablo Fresia
Affiliation:
Joint Unit Pasteur + INIA (UMPI), Institut Pasteur of Montevideo, Montevideo, Uruguay Bioinformatics Unit, Institut Pasteur de Montevideo, Montevideo, Uruguay
Mariana Guirado
Affiliation:
Academic Unit of Infectious Diseases, School of Medicine, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
Marianella Rodriguez Rey
Affiliation:
Academic Unit of Neonatology, “Dr. Manuel Quintela” Hospital de Clínicas, School of Medicine, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
Gonzalo Diaz
Affiliation:
Neonatology Department, Centro Hospitalario Pereira Rossell, Montevideo, Uruguay
Valentina Gimenez
Affiliation:
Neonatology Department, Centro Hospitalario Pereira Rossell, Montevideo, Uruguay
Gabriela Greising
Affiliation:
Neonatology Department, Centro Hospitalario Pereira Rossell, Montevideo, Uruguay
Nora Fernandez
Affiliation:
Academic Unit of Parasitology and Mycology, Hygiene Institute, School of Medicine, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay High-Risk Obstetric Clinic, Centro Hospitalario Pereira Rossell, School of Medicine, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
Juan Pablo Gesuele
Affiliation:
Neonatology Department, Centro Hospitalario Pereira Rossell, Montevideo, Uruguay
Maria E. Francia*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Apicomplexa Biology, Institut Pasteur Montevideo, Montevideo, Uruguay Academic Unit of Parasitology and Mycology, Hygiene Institute, School of Medicine, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
*
Corresponding author: Maria E. Francia; Email: mfrancia@pasteur.edu.uy

Abstract

Toxoplasmosis, caused by the obligate intracellular parasite Toxoplasma gondii, is one of the most prevalent zoonotic parasitic infections worldwide. When acquired during pregnancy, T. gondii can be transmitted to the fetus, with clinical outcomes influenced by gestational age at time of infection and the parasite’s genotype. Prenatal screening enables the detection of maternal seroconversion and offers a critical window for intervention. In Uruguay, despite mandatory serological screening during pregnancy, national data on T. gondii seroprevalence and maternal seroconversion have not been updated in two decades. In addition, the genetic diversity of local strains remains poorly characterized. In this study, we analysed publicly available serological data from pregnant individuals attending Uruguay’s largest public maternity hospital between 2019 and 2023. We found that seroprevalence has modestly declined from 50% (reported in 1998) to 45.5%, with a congenital transmission rate of 0.58%. Clinical analysis of affected newborns revealed chorioretinitis as the predominant manifestation. To investigate parasite diversity, we performed genotyping of T. gondii strains using in silico PCR-RFLP following molecular detection. Our findings revealed substantial genetic diversity, including novel allele combinations not previously described in the region. These results highlight both the continued public health burden and the evolving genetic landscape of T. gondii in Uruguay. Our findings underscore the need to strengthen surveillance and prevention strategies for congenital toxoplasmosis in South America.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NC
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press.
Figure 0

Figure 1. Seroprevalence, seroconversion and congenital transmission. (A) Seroprevalence and seroconversion rates are shown as percentages of all serological tests pursued between 2019 and 2023. (B) Seroconversion and CT cases are shown, represented as cases per 1000 births, as indicated. (C). For confirmed congenital cases, the trimester of diagnosis is shown. Grey bars indicate the percentage of cases in which the mother received treatment upon diagnosis. For several cases, the trimester of diagnosed was not registered in the patient’s clinical history and could not be determined (UD). Please note that all data are shown as percentages of the total number of CT cases registered between 2019 and 2023. (D) Quantification of the number of CT cases in which clinical manifestations were observed and its correlation with maternal treatment upon diagnosis. Please note that in most cases in which clinical manifestations were observed, no treatment was indicated. (E). Quantification of the distribution of clinical manifestations, shown as percentages of all CT cases registered between 2019 and 2023.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Diagnostic algorithm and sample processing. (A) Patients recruited into this study corresponded to pregnant women seroconverting during pregnancy. Samples obtained were processed as indicated. Genotyping (GT) was pursued for all PCR positive samples, as indicated. (B) Percentages of PCR positive and genotyped samples per sample type are shown. Sample types received and analysed are indicted in the x-axis. The y-axis corresponds to the percentage of samples which resulted positive for T. gondii DNA detection by PCR. From these, only the indicated percentage (patterned) were of sufficient quality to pursue genotyping by in silico RFLP.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Genotyping of strains circulating in seroconverting pregnant women. (A) Genetic types for each genotyping marker are shown for all indicated samples (‘type’), which resulted from the combination of genetic types obtained per marker, per sample. Note that SAG3 could not be characterized for any of the samples and is hence, not shown. A patterned coloured box indicates that multiple samples were obtained and genotyped for that patient. In all cases in which the block displays a unique colour, the sequence from distinct samples for the same marker matched 100% for those cases in which the same amplified marker from distinct samples resulted in a different genotype, the block is divided in two colours corresponding to the identified genotypes. (B). Quantification of genetic types represented in (A). (C) Sequencing chromatograms. Representative examples of BTUB markers which were deemed undetermined in a and b due to the presence of overlapping peaks in the sequencing chromatogram. Double peaks are indicated by arrows both in the forward and reverse sequences for the indicated samples (tg15 and tg23). (D) The haplotypes obtained for the amplicons sequenced from placental (PL) samples and from newborn blood (NB) are shown in comparison with typical haplotypes (I, II and III) as indicated. Restriction sites, used for haplotype identification in the in silico RFLP analysis, corresponding to regions recognized by the indicated restriction enzymes (taqi and bsie1) are highlighted.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Phylogenetic analysis of circulating strains. Maximum likelihood tree reveals the presence of two phylogenetically distinct groups. Markers used for comparison among strains are indicated as shaded boxes for each sample indicated. Samples which lacked sequence information are indicated by clear boxes. Please note that the apico marker was excluded in this analysis. For all samples in which at least three markers could be amplified and sequenced, PCR-RFLP genotype assignment was pursued in toxodb. NR corresponds to genotypes ‘not reported’ previously. Genetic clades to which reference samples belong are indicated. All accession numbers of all sequences used in these analyses can be found in Supplementary T 4 and 5.

Supplementary material: File

Valentin-Decuadro et al. supplementary material

Valentin-Decuadro et al. supplementary material
Download Valentin-Decuadro et al. supplementary material(File)
File 2.4 MB