Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-smskv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-25T12:52:19.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Variants in CHRNB2 and CHRNA4 Identified in Patients with Insular Epilepsy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2020

Maxime Cadieux-Dion
Affiliation:
Center for Pediatric Genomic Medicine, Children’s Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA
Simone Meneghini
Affiliation:
Department of Biotechnology and Biosciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy
Chiara Villa
Affiliation:
School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
Dènahin Hinnoutondji Toffa
Affiliation:
Neurology Division, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
Ronny Wickstrom
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatric Neurology, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
Alain Bouthillier
Affiliation:
Division of Neurosurgery, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
Ulrika Sandvik
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
Bengt Gustavsson
Affiliation:
Department of Neurosurgery, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
Ismail Mohamed
Affiliation:
Division of Neurology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Alabama, Birmingham, AL, USA
Patrick Cossette
Affiliation:
Neurology Division, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
Romina Combi
Affiliation:
School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
Andrea Becchetti
Affiliation:
Department of Biotechnology and Biosciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milano, Italy
Dang Khoa Nguyen*
Affiliation:
Neurology Division, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Canada
*
Correspondence to: Dang Khoa Nguyen, MD, PhD, Department of Neurosciences, CR-CHUM, 900 Saint-Denis, Montreal, Quebec H2X 0A9, Canada. Email: d.nguyen@umontreal.ca
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract:

Purpose:

Our purpose was to determine the role of CHRNA4 and CHRNB2 in insular epilepsy.

Method:

We identified two patients with drug-resistant predominantly sleep-related hypermotor seizures, one harboring a heterozygous missense variant (c.77C>T; p. Thr26Met) in the CHRNB2 gene and the other a heterozygous missense variant (c.1079G>A; p. Arg360Gln) in the CHRNA4 gene. The patients underwent electrophysiological and neuroimaging studies, and we performed functional characterization of the p. Thr26Met (c.77C>T) in the CHRNB2 gene.

Results:

We localized the epileptic foci to the left insula in the first case (now seizure-free following epilepsy surgery) and to both insulae in the second case. Based on tools predicting the possible impact of amino acid substitutions on the structure and function of proteins (sorting intolerant from tolerant and PolyPhen-2), variants identified in this report could be deleterious. Functional expression in human cell lines of α4β2 (wild-type), α4β2-Thr26Met (homozygote), and α4β2/β2-Thr26Met (heterozygote) nicotinic acetylcholine receptors revealed that the mutant subunit led to significantly higher whole-cell nicotinic currents. This feature was observed in both homo- and heterozygous conditions and was not accompanied by major alterations of the current reversal potential or the shape of the concentration-response relation.

Conclusions:

This study suggests that variants in CHRNB2 and CHRNA4, initially linked to autosomal dominant nocturnal frontal lobe epilepsy, are also found in patients with predominantly sleep-related insular epilepsy. Although the reported variants should be considered of unknown clinical significance for the moment, identification of additional similar cases and further functional studies could eventually strengthen this association.

Résumé :

RÉSUMÉ :

Des variantes des gènes CHRNB2 et CHRNA4 identifiées chez des patients atteints d’épilepsie insulaire.

But :

Notre but était de déterminer le rôle des gènes CHRNA4 et CHRNB2 dans l’épilepsie insulaire.

Méthode :

Nous avons identifié deux patients présentant des crises hypermotrices morphéiques pharmacorésistantes. Un de ces patients était porteur d’une variante hétérozygote faux-sens (c.77C>T ; p.Thr26Met) dans le gène CHRNB2 tandis que l’autre était porteur d’une variante hétérozygote faux-sens (c.1079G>A ; p.Arg360Gln) dans le gène CHRNA4. Ces patients ont fait l’objet d’examens électrophysiologiques et d’examens de neuroimagerie. Nous avons aussi effectué une caractérisation fonctionnelle de la variante p.Thr26Met (c.77C>T) dans le cas du gène CHRNB2.

Résultats :

En ce qui a trait au premier patient, nous avons localisé le foyer épileptique du côté gauche du cortex insulaire. Fait notable, ce patient n’a plus souffert de crises convulsives à la suite d’une chirurgie. En ce qui concerne le deuxième patient, nous avons identifié une localisation épileptogène insulaire bilatérale. En nous fondant sur des outils à même de prédire l’impact possible des substitutions d’acides aminés sur la structure et sur la fonction de protéines (SIFT et PolyPhen-2), il apparaît que les variantes génétiques identifiées pourraient être pathogènes. L’expression fonctionnelle des récepteurs nicotiniques (nAChRs) de types α4β2 (type sauvage, sans mutations), α4β2-Thr26Met (variante homozygote) et α4β2/β2-Thr26Met (variante hétérozygote) dans les lignées cellulaires humaines a révélé que les sous-unités mutantes entrainaient des courants nicotiniques globaux plus élevés dans les cellules. Cette caractéristique a été observée tant dans le cas des conditions homozygotes que des conditions hétérozygotes et n'était pas associée à des modifications majeures du potentiel d’inversion du courant nicotinique ou de la relation concentration-réponse.

Conclusions :

Cette étude suggère donc que certaines variantes des gènes CHRNB2 et CHRNA4, précédemment uniquement associée à l'épilepsie autosomique dominante du lobe frontal, peuvent également être observées chez des patients atteints d’épilepsie insulaire prédominant au sommeil. Bien que la valeur clinique de ces variantes demeure inconnue pour le moment, le fait d’identifier des cas additionnels similaires et de mener d’autres études fonctionnelles pourrait à terme renforcer cette association.

Information

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences Inc.
Figure 0

Figure 1: Epileptic focus localization and surgery of patient 1. (A) Surface EEG recorded active interictal epileptiform discharges over the right centro-temporal regions [filters HFF (high filter frequency) = 35 Hz, LFF (low filter frequency) = 1 Hz; 30 mm/s; 10 µV/mm]. (B & C) Ictal single photon emission computed tomography coronal and axial images demonstrated right operculoinsular hyperperfusion. (D & E) Source localization of interictal and ictal epileptiform discharges overlaid onto coronal and axial MRI images. One electroclinical seizure was captured during magnetoencephalography with onset of repetitive discharges over the right central, parietal, and temporal channels. Ictal (red) and interictal (yellow) dipole clusters localized over the posterior third of the right Sylvian fissure (posterior insula and parietal operculum more than temporal operculum). (F) Surgical resection of the parietal more than temporal operculum and subsequent subpial removal of the posterior insula.

Figure 1

Figure 2: Whole-cell current traces elicited by nicotine at −70 mV. (A) Representative whole-cell current traces elicited by the indicated concentration of nicotine in HEK cells expressing a4β2 (WT) nAChRs; Vm was −70 mV. (B) Same as A, for mutant α4β2Thr26Met (Homozygote) nAChRs. The continuous lines above the current traces mark the time of nicotine application. (C) Concentration-response relations obtained by applying different nicotine concentrations to WT (circles), heterozygous (squares), and homozygous (triangles) receptors. The applied nicotine concentrations were 0.1, 1, 10, and 100 µM. Vm was −70 mV. Data points are average peak currents normalized to the maximal value and plotted as a function of ligand concentration. Data summarize the results obtained from 65 cells, in 10 runs of transfection.

Figure 2

Figure 3: Comparison of elicited currents in wild, homozygote, and heterozygote types. (A) Average peak current densities, for the indicated nAChR types, at increasing concentrations of nicotine (0.1, 1, 10, and 100 µM). Currents were measured as illustrated in Fig. 2 and divided for the cell capacitance. The statistical comparison between the currents obtained at 100 µM nicotine is given in the main text. (B) I/V relationships for WT and heterozygous receptors, as indicated. Currents were elicited by applying voltage ramps from −60 to +10 mV (duration was 1 s). The current flowing through nAChRs was isolated by subtracting the background current from the current recorded in the presence of 100 µM nicotine. The illustrated currents are averages of three trials, applied consecutively (interval between trials was 1 s). Vrev was generally between −10 and 0 mV. Full statistics are given in the main text. (C) The distribution of individual whole-cell current amplitudes elicited by 100 µM nicotine is shown for cells expressing WT (black circles) and homozygous (red triangles) receptors. The superimposed Tukey box plots include the central 50% of data points, with horizontal lines denoting median values. Whiskers’ length is 1.5 times the interquartile range. Open squares denote mean values. (D) Same as C, but showing the distribution of current densities (pA/pF).

Figure 3

Figure 4: β2 nAChRs subunit levels of expression detected by real-time quantitative PCR in HEK cells transfected with either WT or mutant β2 (p. Thr26Met) constructs. Data represent the mean ± SEM and are expressed as fold increase of mRNA levels normalized to a housekeeping control gene (β-actin) and to non-transfected HEK cells (NT). No significant differences in β2 transcription levels were observed between the WT and mutant β2 constructs (214.31 ± 87.10 versus 271.08 ± 63.95, p > 0.050 with unpaired t-test; n = 3).

Figure 4

Figure 5: Epileptic focus localization of patient 2. (A) Surface EEG recorded frequent spikes over the left fronto–parieto–temporal (A1 and A2) and right fronto–temporal leads (A2) [filters HFF (high filter frequency) = 70 Hz, LFF (low filter frequency) = 1 Hz; 30 mm/s; 7, 5 µV/mm]. (B) Source localization of interictal epileptiform discharges overlaid onto axial (B1), coronal (B2), and sagittal (B3). MRI images showing dipole clusters localized over the right (upper panel) and left (lower panel) insulo-orbitofrontal regions.

Supplementary material: File

Cadieux-Dion et al. supplementary material

Cadieux-Dion et al. supplementary material

Download Cadieux-Dion et al. supplementary material(File)
File 9.6 KB