Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-r8qmj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-17T13:59:14.554Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Making sense of music education policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2007

Antonia Forari
Antonia Forari*
Affiliation:
School of Education, Music Department, Intercollege, 46 Makedonitissas Ave., P.O. Box 24005, 1700 Nicosia, Cyprusforari.a@intercollege.ac.cy
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article looks at the way music education policy is realised in three curriculum contexts: the formation of the official music curriculum, its implementation by music teachers and its reception by students. Working from within the field of education policy studies, I have collected data on music education in Cyprus in order to explore what music teachers and students might expect from a music curriculum and have compared this with what the official music curriculum actually prescribes. The findings constitute distinct sets of educational ideologies and indicate areas of fragmentation between the three contexts. I discuss some implications and make suggestions for conceptualising music education policy. I conclude that music education policy needs to be construed as a polydynamic process which is polyglot, polycentric and polymorphic in its nature.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Music Education , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , July 2007 , pp. 135 - 146
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

BALL, S. J. (1990) Policy and Policy Making in Education: Explorations in Policy Sociology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
BALL, S. J. (1994) Education Reform: A Critical and Post-structural Approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
BARRESI, A. L. & OLSON, G. (1992) ‘The nature of policy and music education’, in Colwell, R. (Ed) Handbook of Research on Music Teaching and Learning (pp. 760–72). New York: Schirmer Books.Google Scholar
BARRET, S. & FUDGE, C. (Eds) (1981) Policy and Action. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
BECKHARD, R. & PRITCHARD, W. (1992) Changing the Essence: The Art of Creating and Leading Fundamental Change in Organisations. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
CERYCH, L. & SABATIER, P. (1986) Great Expectations and Mixed Performance. London: Trentham.Google Scholar
COLWELL, R. (2005) ‘Whither programs and arts policy?’ Arts Education Policy Review, 106, 6, 19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COX, G. S. A. (2002) Living Music in Schools 1923–1999: Studies in the History of Music Education in England. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
DEEM, R. & DAVIES, M. (1991) ‘Opting out of local authority control using the Education Reform Act to defend the comprehensive ideal: A case study in educational policy implementation’. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 1, 2, 153–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EISNER, W. E. (1992) ‘Curriculum ideologies’, in Jackson, P. W. (Ed), Handbook of Research on Curriculum: A Project of the American Educational Research Association (pp. 302–26). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
FITZ, J., HALPIN, D. & POWER, S. (1993) Grant-Maintained Schools: Education in the Market Place. London: Kogan Page.Google Scholar
FULLAN, M. (1993) Change Forces. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
FULLAN, M. (1999) Change Forces: the Sequel. London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
GREEN, L. (2001) How Popular Musicians Learn: A Way Ahead for Music Education. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
HALL, G. E. (1995) ‘The local educational change process and policy implementation’, in Carter, D. S. G. & O'Neill, M. H. (Eds), Case Studies in Educational Change: International Perspectives on Educational Reform and Policy Implementation (pp. 101–21). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
HAMMERSLEY, M. (1992) What's Wrong with Ethnography? Methodological Explorations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
HOPE, S. (1992) ‘Professional organizations and influences’, in Colwell, R. (Ed), Handbook of Research on Music Teaching and Learning (pp. 724–34). New York: Schirmer Books.Google Scholar
HOPE, S. (2002) ‘Policy frameworks, research, and K-12 schooling’, in Colwell, R. & Richardson, C. (Eds) The New Handbook of Research on Music Teaching and Learning (pp. 5–16). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
JONES, P. M. (2005) ‘Music education and the knowledge economy: Developing creativity, strengthening communities’. Arts Education Policy Review, 106, 4, 5–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MAGUIRE, M. & BALL, S. J. (1994) ‘Researching politics and the politics of research: recent qualitative studies in the UK’. Qualitative Studies in Education, 7, 3, 269–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MAHLMANN, J. J. (2002) ‘MENC: A case in point’, in Colwell, R. & Richardson, C. (Eds) The New Handbook of Research on Music Teaching and Learning (pp. 17–22). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND CULTURE. (1995) Eniaio Lykeion: Protaseis tis Eidikis Epitropis [Unified Lyceum: Suggestions of the Special Committee]. Nicosia: A' Lykeion Kykkou.Google Scholar
MINISTRY OF EDUCATION AND CULTURE. (2000) Analytika Programmata A' Eniaiou Lykeiou [Curricula of Form A of Eniaio Lykeio]. Nicosia: Ypiresia Anaptyksis Programmaton.Google Scholar
PITTS, S. (2000) A Century of Change in Music Education: Historical Perspectives on Contemporary Practice in British Secondary School Music. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
RICHMOND, J. W. (2002) ‘Law research and music education’, in Colwell, R. & Richardson, C. (Eds) The New Handbook of Research on Music Teaching and Learning (pp. 33–47). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
ROBSON, C. (1993) Real World Research: a Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-researchers. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
ROSS, A. (2000) Curriculum: Construction and Critique. London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
SAUNDERS, M. (1986) ‘Developing a large scale ‘local’ evaluation of TVEI: Aspects of the Lancaster experience’, in Hopkins, D. (Ed) Evaluating TVEI: Some Methodological Issues. Cambridge: Cambridge Institute of Education.Google Scholar
SILCOCK, P. & BRUNDRETT, M. (2002) Achieving Competence, Success, and Excellence in Teaching. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
SMITH, R. A. (1992) ‘Trends and issues in policy-making for arts education’, in Colwell, R. (Ed) Handbook of Research on Music Teaching and Learning (pp. 749–59). New York: Schirmer Books.Google Scholar
SMITH, R. A. (2002) ‘Recent trends and issues in policy making’, in Colwell, R. & Richardson, C. (Eds) The New Handbook of Research on Music Teaching and Learning (pp. 23–32). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
SPRUCE, G. (2002) ‘Ways of thinking about music: political dimensions and educational consequences’, in Spruce, G. (Ed) Teaching Music in Secondary Schools: A Reader (pp. 302–26). London: RoutledgeFalmer and The Open University.Google Scholar
TAYLOR, S., RIZVI, F., LINGARD, B. & HENRY, M. (1997) Educational Policy and the Politics of Change. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
YIN, R. (1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. London: Sage.Google Scholar
WHITTY, G., EDWARDS, T. & GEWIRTZ, G. (1993) Choice and Competition in Education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar