Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-shngb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-10T19:58:51.968Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Farm structural change of a different kind: Alternative dairy farms in Wisconsin—graziers, organic and Amish

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 December 2008

Caroline Brock  and
Bradford Barham
Caroline Brock*
Affiliation:
Department of Environment and Resources and Program on Agricultural Technology Studies, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
Bradford Barham
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics and Program on Agricultural Technology Studies, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
*
*Corresponding author: ccbrock@wisc.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although the emergence of large confinement operations out of a system previously dominated by mid-sized confinement has been one major structural trend in Wisconsin dairy farming since the 1990s, a second structural trend has been the significant emergence of moderate-sized dairy farms using alternative management strategies: management-intensive rotational grazing (MIRG) (25% of Wisconsin's dairy farms), organic production (3%) and Amish farm production practices (5–7%). This paper presents the first systematic and representative comparative study on the structure, behavior and performance of multiple pasture-based dairy farm strategies. Wisconsin is an ideal site for this study given the prevalence of pasture-based farms, yet many of the findings here should be relevant for other traditional dairy states where similar types of alternative farm management systems are also emerging. Divergence with respect to farm strategy has implications for structure, technology and management adoption patterns as well as farmer satisfaction levels. Our findings suggest that alternative dairy farming systems are likely to become more prevalent on the agricultural landscape of Wisconsin.

Keywords

dairy structureindustrializationdivergenceAmishorganic farmingpasture dairyintensive grazing

Information

Type
Research Papers
Information
Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 25 - 37
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1Blayney, D. 2002. The changing landscape of U.S. milk production. Statistical Bulletin SB-978. US Department of Agriculture. Economic Research Services, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
2Gilbert, J. and Wher, K. 2003. Dairy industrialization in the first place: urbanization, immigration, and political economy in Los Angeles County, 1920–1970. Rural Sociology 68(4):467–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Geisler, C. and Lyson, T. 1991. The cumulative impact of dairy industry restructuring. BioScience 41(8):560–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Cross, J.A. 2006. Restructuring America's dairy farms. Geographical Review 96(1):1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Cross, J.A. 2007. The expanding role of the Amish in America's dairy industry. Focus on Geography 50(3):7–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Jackson-Smith, D. and Barham, B. 2000. Dynamics of dairy industry restructuring in Wisconsin. In Schwarzweller, H. and Davidson, A. (eds) Dairy Industry Restructuring: Research in Rural Sociology and Development. Elsevier Science, NY. p. 115–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Albrecht, D. 1997. The changing structure of US agriculture: dualism out, industrialism in. Rural Sociology 62(4):474–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Jackson-Smith, D.B. and Buttel, F. 1998. Explaining the uneven penetration of industrialization in the U.S. dairy sector. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food 7:113–150.Google Scholar
9Cross, J.A. 2004. Amish settlements in Wisconsin. Wisconsin Geographer 20:2–9.Google Scholar
10USDA National Agriculture Statistics Services (NASS). 2006. Wisconsin dairy operations by size and quick national statistics [Online]. Available at Web site http://www.nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by_State/Wisconsin/Publications/Dairy/dyopbysizegroup.pdf/ and http://www.nass.usda.gov/QuickStats/PullData_US.jsp/ (verified 4 September 2007).Google Scholar
11Guthey, G.T., Gwin, L., and Fairfax, S. 2003. Creative preservation in California's dairy industry. Geographical Review 93(2):171–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Welsh, R. and Lyson, T. 1997. Farm structure, market structure and agricultural sustainability goals: the case of New York state dairying. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 12(1):14–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Nott, S.B. 2003. Evolution of dairy grazing in the 1990s. Department of Agricultural Economics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.Google Scholar
14Taylor, J. and Foltz, J. 2006. Grazing in the dairy state: the significance of pasture use in the Wisconsin dairy industry 1993–2003. PATS/CIAS Special Report. Center for Integrated Agricultural Systems, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
15Dartt, B., Lloyd, J., Radke, R., Black, J., and Kaneene, J. 1999. A comparison of profitability and economic efficiencies between management-intensive grazing and conventionally managed dairies in Michigan. Journal of Dairy Science 82(11):2412–2420.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Parsons, R.L., Luloff, A., and Hanson, G. 2004. Can we identify key characteristics associated with grazing-management dairy systems from survey data? Journal of Dairy Science 87:2748–2760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Dalton, T.J., Bragga, L.A., Kersbergen, R., Parsons, R., Rogers, G., Kauppilad, D., and Wange, Q. 2005. Cost and returns to organic dairy farming in Maine and Vermont for 2004. Department of Resource Economics and Policy Staff Paper, Department of Resource Economics, University of Maine, Bangor, ME.Google Scholar
18Barham, B., Brock, C., and Foltz, J. 2006. Organic dairy farms in Wisconsin: prosperous, modern, and expansive. PATS Research Report 16. Program on Agricultural Technology Studies, University of Wisconsin—Madison, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
19United States Department of Agriculture-Economic Research Service. 2005. Organic production data set [Online]. Available at Web site http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/Organic/ (verified 1 November 2007).Google Scholar
20Luthy, D. 2003. Amish Settlements Across America. Pathway Publishers, La Grange, IN.Google Scholar
21Hostetler, J. 1993. Amish Society. 4th ed.John Hopkins Press, Baltimore, MD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Cross, J.A. 2004. Expansion of Amish dairy farming in Wisconsin. Journal of Cultural Geography 21(2):77–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Foltz, J. and Lang, G. 2005. The adoption and impact of management intensive rotational grazing (MIRG) on Connecticut dairy farms. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 20(4):261–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Dillman, D.A. 1978. Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method. John Wiley and Sons, NY.Google Scholar
25USDA United States Department of Agriculture. 1987. US Census of Agriculture.Google Scholar
26Hinrichs, C. and Welsh, R. 2003. The effects of the industrialization of US livestock agriculture on promoting sustainable production practices. Agriculture and Human Values 20(2):125–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27Lyson, T.A. and Gillespie, G. 1995. Producing more milk on fewer farms: neoclassical and neostructural explanations of changes in dairy farming. Rural Sociology 60(3):493–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Hassanein, N. 1999. Changing the Way America Farms: Knowledge and Community in the Sustainable Agriculture Movement. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, NE.Google Scholar
29Fales, S.L., McMurry, S.A., and McSweeny, W.T. 1992. The role of pasture in northeastern dairy farming: historical perspectives, trends, and research imperatives for the future. In Sims, T. (ed.). Agricultural Research in the Northeastern United States: Critical Review and Future Perspectives. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI. p. 111–132.Google Scholar
30Voisin, A. 1959. Grass Productivity. Philosophical Library Press, NY.Google Scholar
31Lloyd, S., Bell, M., and Stevenson, G.W. 2007. Milking more than profit: life satisfaction on Wisconsin dairy farms. Center for Integrated Agricultural Systems, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
32DuPuis, M. 2000. Not in my body: BGH and the rise of organic milk. Agriculture and Human Values 17(3):285–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33Guptill, A. 2006. Organic feed and organic dairies in Upstate New York. Paper presented to Place, Taste, and Sustenance: The Social Spaces of Food and Agriculture 7–11 June, Boston University, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
34Kraybill, D. 2001. The Riddle of Amish Culture. Center for American Places, Santa Fe, Mexico.Google Scholar
35Holmes, B., Kammel, D., and Palmer, R. 2005. Transitioning in steps-cost of modernization. University of Wisconsin Biological Systems and Engineering, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
36Kaltoft, P. 2001. Organic farming in late modernity: at the frontier of modernity or opposing modernity? Sociologia Ruralis 41(1):146–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37Stock, P. 2007. ‘Good farmers’ as reflexive producers: an examination of family organic farmers in the US Midwest. Sociologia Ruralis 47(2):83–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38Bell, M. 2004. Farming for Us All: Practical Agriculture and the Cultivation of Sustainability. Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.Google Scholar
39Beck, U. 1995. The conflict of two modernities. In Ecological Enlightenment: Essays on the Politics of the Risk Society. Humanities Press International, Atlantic Highlands, NJ.Google Scholar
40Lockie, S., Lyons, K., Lawrence, G., and Mummery, K. 2002. Eating ‘green’: motivations behind organic food consumption in Australia. Sociologia Ruralis 42(1):23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41Spiewak, R. 2001. Pesticides as a cause of occupational skin diseases in farmers. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine 8(1):1–5.Google ScholarPubMed
42Porter, P., Jaeger, J., and Carlson, I. 1999. Endocrine, immune, and behavorial effects of aldicarb (carbamate), atrazine (triazine) and nitrate (fertilizer) mixtures at groundwater concentrations. Toxicology and Industrial Health 15(1–2): 133–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43Pereira, W. and Hostettler, F. 1993. Nonpoint source contamination of the Mississippi River and its tributaries by herbicides. Environmental Science and Technology 27(8):1542–1552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44Schreinemachers, D. 2000. Cancer mortality in four northern wheat-producing states. Environmental Health Perspectives 108(9):873–881.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45Cassman, K. 1999. Ecological intensification of cereal production systems: Yield potential, soil quality, and precision agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96(11):5952–5959.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46Fox, J., Gulledge, J., Engelhaupt, E., Burow, M., and McLachlan, J. 2007. Pesticides reduce symbiotic efficiency of nitrogen-fixing rhizobia and host plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104(24):10282–10287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
47Smith, K.E., Besser, J., Hedberg, C., Leano, F., Bender, J., Wicklund, J., Johnson, B., Moore, K., and Osterholm, M. 1999. Quinolone-resistant Campylobacter jejuni infections in Minnesota, 1992–1998. New England Journal of Medicine 340(20):1525–1532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
48Gorback, S. 2001. Antimicrobial use in animal feed—time to stop. New England Journal of Medicine 345:1202–1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
49Pretty, J. 2008. Agricultural sustainability: concepts, principles and evidence. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 363(1491):447–465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50Rayburn, E.B. 1993. Potential ecological and environmental effects of pasture and rBGH Technology. In Liebhardt, W.C. (ed.) The Dairy Debate: Consequences of Bovine Growth Hormone and Rotational Grazing Technologies. University of California Sustainable Agriculture Research and Education Program. Davis, CA. p. 247–276.Google Scholar
51Soder, K.J. and Rotz, C.A. 2001. Economic and environmental impact of four levels of concentrate supplementation in grazing dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science 84(11):2560–2572.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
52Johnson, N. and Pfleger, F.L. 1992. Vesicular mycorrhizae and cultural stresses. In Bethlenfalvay, G.J. and Linderman, R.G. (eds). Mycorrhizae in Sustainable Agriculture. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI. p. 71–101.Google Scholar
53Rabatin, S. and Stinner, B. 1989. The significance of vesicular–arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal–soil macroinvertebrate interactions in agrosecosystems. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 27:195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54Martz, F. 1999. Nutrient content, dry matter yield, and species composition of cool-season pasture with management-intensive grazing. Journal of Dairy Science 82:1538–1544.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
55Henning, J., Lacefield, G.D., Rasnake, M., Burris, R., Johns, J., Johnson, K., and Turner, L. 2000. Rotational Grazing. Cooperative Extension Service, University College of Agriculture, University of Kentucky Cooperative Extension Service, Turner, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
56Pratt, A.D. and Davis, R.R. 1962. Rotational grazing and green chopping compared. Ohio Farm and Home Research 47(3):38–39.Google Scholar
57Kuusela, E. and Khalili, H. 2002. Effect of grazing method and herbage allowance on the grazing efficiency of milk production in organic farming. Animal Feed Science and Technology 98(1):87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
58Haas, G., Wetterich, F., and Köpke, U. 2001. Comparing intensive, extensified and organic grassland farming in southern Germany by process life cycle assessment. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 83:43–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
59Pacini, C., Wossink, A., Giesen, G., Vazzana, C., and Huirne, R. 2003. Evaluation of sustainability of organic, integrated and conventional farming systems: a farm and field-scale analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 95(1):273–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
60Rigby, D. and Caceres, D. 2001. Organic farming and the sustainability of agricultural systems. Agricultural Systems 68(1):21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
61Cederberg, C. and Mattsson, B. 2000. Life cycle assessment of milk production—a comparison of conventional and organic farming. Journal of Cleaner Production 8(1):49–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
62Smolik, J.D., Dobbs, T.L., and Rickerl, D.H. 1995. The relative sustainability of alternative, conventional, and reduced-till farming systems. American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 10(1):25–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
63de Boer, I.J.M. 2003. Environmental impact assessment of conventional and organic milk production. Livestock Production Science 80:69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
64Jackson, M. 1988. Amish agriculture and no-till: the hazards of applying the USLE to unusual farms. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 43(6):483–486.Google Scholar
65Barham, B. 2000. The adoption of rBST on Wisconsin dairy farms. AgBioForum 2(2–3):181–187.Google Scholar
66Brannstorm, A. 2006. Wisconsin dairy modernization survey [Online]. Available at Web site http://cdp.wisc.edu/pdf/Dairy%20Modernization%20Survey%202006.pdf (verified 1 October 2007).Google Scholar
67Goldberg, J., Wildman, E., Pankey, J., Kunkel, J., Howard, D., and Murphy, B. 1992. The influence of intensively managed rotational grazing, traditional continuous grazing, and confinement housing on bulk tank milk quality and udder health. Journal of Dairy Science 75:96–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
68McCue, J. 2004. Management of bacterial burden in cattle by TiO2 from grazing. Journal of Dairy Science 87:1579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
69Bennedsgaard, T., Thamsborgb, S., Vaarstc, M., and Enevoldsend, C. 2003. Eleven years of organic dairy production in Denmark: herd health and production related to time of conversion and compared to conventional production. Livestock Production Science 80(1):121–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
70Burton, M., Rigby, D., and Young, T. 1999. Analysis of the determinants of adoption of organic horticultural techniques in the UK. Journal of Agricultural Economics 50(1):47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
71Fulhage, C.D. 1997. Manure management considerations for expanding dairy herds. Journal of Dairy Science 80(8):1872–1879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
72Turnquist, A., Foltz, J., and Roth, C. 2006. Manure management on Wisconsin farms. PATS Research Reports. 15. Program on Agricultural Technology Studies (PATS) Research Report, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
73Powell, M., McCrory, D.F., Jackson-Smith, D.B., and Saam, H. 2005. Manure collection and distribution on Wisconsin Dairy Farms. Journal of Environmental Quality 34:2036–2044.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
74Tavernier, E.M. and Tolomeo, V. 2004. An empirical analysis of producer perceptions of traceability in organic agriculture. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems 19(2):110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
75Bewley, J., Palmer, R.W., and Jackson-Smith, D.B. 2001. An overview of experiences of Wisconsin dairy farmers who modernized their operations. Journal of Dairy Science 84(3):717–729.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
76Barham, B., Chavas, J., and Klemme, R. 1994. Low capital dairy strategies in Wisconsin: lessons from a new approach to measuring profitability. Staff Working Paper. 381. Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
77Anonymous. 2006. Schneeflocken. Plain Connections (Amish Newsletter) 5(2):11.Google Scholar