Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-4ws75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-07T09:48:51.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Molecular characterization of Moniezia denticulata (Rudolphi, 1810) and its distinction from M. expansa infecting sheep and goats raised in the north and north-western regions of India

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2023

Susheel Kumar
Affiliation:
Parasitology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India
Harpreet Kaur*
Affiliation:
Parasitology Laboratory, Department of Zoology, Panjab University, Chandigarh, India
*
Corresponding author: Harpreet Kaur; Email: harpreetbimbra@gmail.com

Abstract

The tapeworms of Moniezia spp. are heteroxenous parasites and their adult forms occur in ruminants' alimentary tract. They steal a significant portion of hosts' nourishment initiating monieziasis, thereby inflicting economic losses in animal rearing. Despite their high economic importance, the molecular characterization and taxonomic status of these parasites have remained poorly understood. In the present study, cestodes were isolated from the sheep and goats' intestines and were stained with Gower's carmine. Upon careful evaluation of morphological characters, 2 species Moniezia denticulata and Moniezia expansa were identified. The genomic DNA was extracted and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplified targeting regions of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (cox1), small subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) and internal transcribed spacer 1–5.8S rRNA (ITS1–5.8S rRNA) genes followed by sequencing. The partial sequences of cox1, SSU rRNA and ITS1–5.8S rRNA genes of M. denticulata generated in the present study revealed that even though they share high similarities with M. benedeni (93.2% cox1; 92.6% SSU rRNA; 84.70% ITS1–5.8S rRNA) and M. expansa (88.85% cox1; 92.27% SSU rRNA; 81.70% ITS1–5.8S rRNA), they are not identical to them. In the maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees, M. denticulata and M. expansa consistently appeared as distinct species from each other. The high values of pairwise divergence between these 2 species collected in the present study confirmed their separate identity. The present study reports the first molecular characterization of M. denticulata with reference to M. expansa infecting sheep and goats in India.

Information

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Photomicrograph of Moniezia denticulata. (A) Scolex, (B) mature proglottids, (C) magnified portion of a mature proglottid showing morphological details, (D) eggs.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Line drawings of Moniezia denticulata. (A) Scolex, (B) mature proglottid, (C) gravid proglottid, (D) egg. O, ovary; T, testis; EX, excretory canal; GN, gonopore; SC, sucker; C, cirrus; V, vagina; RS, receptaculum seminis; GA, genital atrium; VD, vas deference; H, hooks; ONC, onchosphere; OM, onchosphere membrane; CAP, capsule; PA, pyriform apparatus; OE, outer envelope; IE, inner envelope.

Figure 2

Table 1. Morphometric comparison of Moniezia denticulata and Moniezia expansa

Figure 3

Figure 3. Stained whole mount of Moniezia expansa. (A) Scolex, (B) mature proglottids, (C) magnified view showing morphological details of a mature proglottid, (D) eggs.

Figure 4

Figure 4. Line diagrams showing the morphological details of Moniezia expansa. (A) Scolex, (B) mature proglottid, (C) gravid proglottid, (D) egg. O, ovary; T, testis; EX, excretory canal; GN, gonopore; SC, sucker; C, cirrus; V, vagina; RS, receptaculum seminis; GA, genital atrium; ING, interproglottidal glands; VD, vas deference; H, hooks; ONC, onchosphere; OM, onchosphere membrane; CAP, capsule; PA, pyriform apparatus; OE, outer envelope; IE, inner envelope.

Figure 5

Figure 5. Agarose gel electrophoresis showing the PCR amplifications. (A) SSU rRNA gene (lanes 1–4: M. denticulata; lanes 5–7: M. expansa). (B) cox1 gene (lanes 2, 5 and 6: M. denticulata; lanes 8–11: M. expansa). (C) ITS1–5.8S rRNA gene (lanes 4 and 7: M. denticulata; lane 10: M. expansa). Letter ‘L’ represents DNA ladder, i.e. size marker.

Figure 6

Figure 6. Phylogenetic tree of Moniezia spp. using cox1 gene sequences and generated by using the maximum likelihood (ML) method. Numbers preceding the generic name are accession numbers in the GenBank database and the values of each node are bootstrap percentages (bootstrap percentages above 50% are displayed). **Out-group; *species isolated in the present study.

Figure 7

Figure 7. Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogenetic tree of Moniezia spp. built using SSU rRNA gene sequences. Numbers preceding the generic name are accession numbers in the GenBank database and the values of each node are bootstrap percentages (bootstrap percentages above 50% are displayed). **Out-group; *species isolated in the present study.

Figure 8

Figure 8. ITS1–5.8S rRNA gene sequence-based phylogenetic tree of Moniezia spp. generated by the maximum likelihood (ML) method. Numbers preceding the generic name are accession numbers in the GenBank database and the values of each node are bootstrap percentages (bootstrap percentages above 50% are displayed). **Out-group; *species isolated in the present study.

Figure 9

Figure 9. ML phylogenetic tree of anoplocephalid tapeworms showing evolutionary relationship of Moniezia spp. with other related genera. The tree was built using cox1 gene sequences. Numbers preceding the generic name are accession numbers in the GenBank database and the values of each node are bootstrap percentages (bootstrap percentages above 50% are displayed). **Out-group; *species isolated in the present study.