Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-j4x9h Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-12T15:40:04.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Flavonoid intake and risk of CVD: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 August 2013

Xia Wang*
Affiliation:
Department of Maternal and Child Health Care, School of Public Health, Shandong University, Jinan, People's Republic of China Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China
Ying Y. Ouyang
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China
Jun Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Nutrition and Food Hygiene, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China
Gang Zhao*
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, People's Republic of China
*
* Corresponding authors: X. Wang, fax +86 531 88382134, email wangxiaes@yahoo.com.cn; G. Zhao, fax +86 531 87938911, E-mail: zg000507@163.com
* Corresponding authors: X. Wang, fax +86 531 88382134, email wangxiaes@yahoo.com.cn; G. Zhao, fax +86 531 87938911, E-mail: zg000507@163.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Observational studies have suggested that the intake of flavonoids is associated with a decreased risk of CVD. However, the results of these studies remain controversial. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association between dietary flavonoid intake and CVD risk by conducting a systematic review of prospective cohort studies. Electronic reference databases were searched to identify studies that met the pre-stated inclusion criteria. The studies were assessed for eligibility and data were extracted by two authors independently. For each study, relative risks (RR) and 95 % CI were extracted and pooled using either a fixed-effects or a random-effects model. Generalised least-squares trend estimation analysis was used to evaluate dose–response relationships. The inclusion criteria were met by fourteen prospective cohort studies. The intakes of anthocyanidins (RR 0·89, 95 % CI 0·83, 0·96), proanthocyanidins (RR 0·90, 95 % CI 0·82, 0·98), flavones (RR 0·88, 95 % CI 0·82, 0·96), flavanones (RR 0·88, 95 % CI 0·82, 0·96) and flavan-3-ols (RR 0·87, 95 % CI 0·80, 0·95) were inversely associated with the risk of CVD when comparing the highest and lowest categories of intake. A similar association was observed for flavonol intake and CVD risk. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses further supported this association. The summary RR for CVD for every 10 mg/d increment in flavonol intake was 0·95 (95 % CI 0·91, 0·99). The present systematic review suggests that the dietary intakes of six classes of flavonoids, namely flavonols, anthocyanidins, proanthocyanidins, flavones, flavanones and flavan-3-ols, significantly decrease the risk of CVD.

Information

Type
Systematic review with meta-analysis
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2013 
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Flow chart showing the literature search for prospective cohort studies of flavonoid intake in relation to CVD risk. RR, relative risk.

Figure 1

Table 1 Characteristics of the fourteen prospective cohort studies on flavonoid intake and CVD risk

Figure 2

Fig. 2 Forest plot showing the association between flavonol intake and CVD risk. RR, relative risk. (A colour version of this figure can be found online at http://www.journals.cambridge.org/bjn).

Figure 3

Fig. 3 Analyses of subgroups relating flavonol intake to CVD risk. RR, relative risk.

Figure 4

Fig. 4 Forest plots showing the associations between the intakes of anthocyanidins, proanthocyanidins, flavones, flavanones and flavan-3-ols and the risk of CVD. RR, relative risk.

Figure 5

Fig. 5 Contour-enhanced funnel plots for flavonol intake and CVD risk. The plot indicates that most studies were in the non-significant area (the area between the two ), while few studies were in the significant areas where P< 0·01 () and where P= 0·01 to < 0·05 (). The large studies at the top of the plot were somewhat more symmetrically distributed than the small studies at the bottom. ● refers to the included studies. RR, relative risk; log (RR), logarithm of the RR.