Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-jhrpq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-13T07:25:12.458Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Healthy eating in Ukraine: attitudes, barriers and information sources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 September 2007

OO Biloukha  and
V Utermohlen
OO Biloukha
Affiliation:
Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
V Utermohlen*
Affiliation:
Division of Nutritional Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
*
*Corresponding author: Email vu10@cornell.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.
Objective

To identify the major perceived influences on food choice, to examine the use of and trust in information sources concerning healthy eating, and to assess attitudes towards and barriers to adopting healthy eating practices in a post-USSR country (Ukraine).

Design

A survey of an urban adult population. The questions were adopted from the Pan-European Union (EU) Survey of Consumer Attitudes to Food, Nutrition and Health (1995–1996).

Setting

Lviv city, Ukraine.

Subjects

The survey included 296 adults (84 males, 212 females) aged 18–55 years; they were primarily college students and subjects with tertiary education – the groups most likely to be both interested in healthy eating and affected by current socioeconomic downturns.

Results

The major factors in food choice were: ‘quality/freshness’ (cited by 80%), ‘price’ (58%) and ‘taste’ (47%); only 34% cited ‘trying to eat healthily’. More older people cited ‘price’ than ‘quality/freshness’, and men were more likely than women to cite ‘taste’. Sources of healthy eating information included: ‘relatives/friends’ (cited by 65%, trusted by 85%) and health professionals (trusted by 92%, but used by only 35%); while advertising was the least trusted source (cited by 28%). Fifty-three per cent of respondents considered their diet to be healthy enough without further changes; 50% thought of the nutritional aspects of the food they ate; fewer women than men considered their diet healthy, and more women than men thought about nutrition. Barriers to healthy eating included: ‘cost’ (cited by 65%), ‘lack of time’ (55%), ‘self-control’ (54%), ‘selection influences’ (41%), ‘lack of knowledge’ (32%), ‘unpleasant foods’ and ‘resistance to change’ (both 30%).

Conclusions

Strategies to encourage healthy eating in this population should involve word-of-mouth nutrition education concerning low-cost healthy alternatives.

Keywords

UkraineFood choiceInfluencesBarriersAttitudesInformation sources

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , April 2001 , pp. 207 - 215
Copyright
Copyright © CABI Publishing 2001

References

1Shkolnikov, VM, Mesle, F, Vallin, J. Recent trends in life expectancy and causes of death in Russia, 1970–1993. Premature Death in the New Independent States. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1997; 34–65.Google Scholar
2Leon, DA, Chenet, L, Shkolnikov, VM, et al. Huge variation in Russian mortality rates 1984–94: artefact, alcohol or what? Lancet 1997; 350: 383–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Cockerham, WC. The social determinants of the decline of life expectancy in Russia and Eastern Europe: a lifestyle explanation. J. Health Soc. Behav. 1997; 38: 117–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Popkin, B, Zohoori, N, Kohlmeier, L, Baturin, A, Martinchik, A, Deev, A. Nutritional risk factors in the former Soviet Union. Premature Death in the New Independent States. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1997: 314–34.Google Scholar
5Ministry of Health Care of the USSR. Normy fiziologicheskih potrebnostei v pischevykh veschestvakh i energii dlia razlichnykh grup naselenia SSSR [Norms of Physiologic Requirements in Nutrients and Energy for the Different Population Groups of the USSR]. Moscow: Ministry of Health Care of the USSR, 1991.Google Scholar
6National Research Council, Food and Nutrition Board. Recommended Daily Allowances, 10th edn. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1989.Google Scholar
7Kromhout, D, Bloemberg, B, Doornbos, G.Reversibility of the rise in Russian mortality rates. Lancet 1997; 350: 378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Gibney, MJ, Kearney, M, Kearney, JM. Introduction: IEFS pan-EU survey of consumer attitudes to food, nutrition and health. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997; 51(Suppl. 2): S2.Google Scholar
9Statistical Yearbook of Ukraine. Kyiv, Ukraine: Ukrainian Encyclopedia, 1997.Google Scholar
10OECD. Purchasing Power Parities and Real Expenditure, Vol. 2. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 1996.Google Scholar
11Popkin, BM. The nutrition transition and its health implications in lower-income countries. Public Health Nutr. 1998; 1: 5–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Kearney, M, Kearney, JM, Gibney, MJ. Methods used to conduct a survey on consumer attitudes to food, nutrition and health on nationally-representative samples of adults from each member state of the European Union. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997; 51(Suppl. 2): S3–7.Google ScholarPubMed
13Lennernas, M, Fjellstrom, C, Becker, W, et al. Influences on food choice perceived to be important by nationally-representative samples of adults in the European Union. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997; 51(Suppl. 2): S8–15.Google ScholarPubMed
14De Almeida, MDV, Graca, P, Lappalainen, R, et al. Sources used and trusted by nationally-representative adults in the European Union for information on healthy eating. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997; 51(Suppl. 2): S16–22.Google ScholarPubMed
15American Dietetic Association. Survey of American Dietary Habits, 1993 Executive Summary. Chicago, IL: American Dietetic Association, 1993.Google Scholar
16Engel, JF, Blackwell, RD, Miniard, PW. Consumer Behavior, 7th edn. Fort Worth: Dryden Press, 1993.Google Scholar
17Krinke, UB. Nutrition information topic and format preferences of older adults. J. Nutr. Educ. 1990; 22: 292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Kearney, M, Gibney, M, Martinez, JA, et al. Perceived need to alter food intake among representative samples of adults from all member states of the European Union. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997; 51(Suppl. 2): S30–5.Google ScholarPubMed
19Brug, J, van Assema, P, Kok, G, Lenderink, P, Glanz, K.Self-rated dietary intake: association with objective assessment of fat, psychological factors and intention to change. J. Nutr. Educ. 1994; 26: 218–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Hayes, D, Ross, CE. Concern with appearance, health beliefs and eating habits. J. Health Soc. Beh. 1987; 28: 120–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Shepherd, R, Stockley, L.Nutrition knowledge, attitudes, and fat consumption. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1987; 87: 615–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Towler, G, Shepherd, R.Application of Fishbein and Ajzen's expectancy value model to understanding fat intake. Appetite 1992; 18: 15–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Rappoport, LH, Peters, GP, Downey, RG, McCann, T, Huff-Corsine, L.Gender and age differences in food cognition. Appetite 1993; 20: 33–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Lappalainen, R, Saba, A, Holm, L, Mykkanen, H, Gibney, MJ. Difficulties in trying to eat healthier: descriptive analysis of perceived barriers for healthy eating. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997; 51(Suppl. 2): S36–40.Google ScholarPubMed