Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-pkds5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-29T16:25:43.491Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Salinity decreases transpiration of sorghum plants

Subject: Life Science and Biomedicine

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2020

Miguel Julio Machado Guimarães*
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Engenharia Agrícola, Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco, Juazeiro, BA, Brazil.
Welson Lima Simões
Affiliation:
Embrapa Semiárido, Petrolina, PE, Brazil.
Juliane Rafaele Alves Barros
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Recursos Genéticos Vegetais, Universidade Estadual da Bahia, Feira de Santana, Bahia, Brazil.
Lilia Gomes Willadino
Affiliation:
Departamento de Biologia, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife, PE, Brazil.
*
*Corresponding author: Email: mjmguimaraes@hotmail.com

Abstract

Growing in a saline environment causes changes in important physiological processes that are directly related to plant growth and development. In this study we evaluated the effect of salinity on transpiration of sorghum plants in semi-arid conditions and found that the highest rates of transpiration were observed in the hottest hours of the day, between 10 a.m. and 3 p.m., with plants subjected to the saline environment having their transpiration reduced by up to 70% when compared to the non-saline environment. This behavior can be reflected in reductions in plant growth and development due to reduced water absorption by the roots, consequently causing an imbalance of nutrients in the plant due to low absorption rate and competition between nutrients and salts in the preferred routes of absorption in the roots.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Result type: Novel result, Supplementary result
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. Total leaf area (A) and plant-specific transpiration (B) of sorghum submitted to salinity levels. Error bars with standard deviation. (**) Significant regression coefficient with p < 0.01.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Daily variation of transpiration of sorghum submitted to salinity levels.

Supplementary material: PDF

Guimarães et al. supplementary material

Guimarães et al. supplementary material

Download Guimarães et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 74.9 KB
Reviewing editor:  Richard Erickson [Opens in a new window] US Geological Survey, Upper Midwest Environmental Sciences Center, 2630 Fanta Reed Rd, La Crosse, Wisconsin, United States, 54603
This article has been accepted because it is deemed to be scientifically sound, has the correct controls, has appropriate methodology and is statistically valid, and met required revisions.

Review 1: Salinity decreases transpiration of sorghum plants

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Comments to the Author: Dear all The text is clearly written and well-designed. Also the the data is valid, presented clearly and ready to be published. I would like to offer just some simple suggestions:1. Figure 1: Insert identification (e.g. A and B).2. References with three or more authors should be quoted with the first author followed by et al. in italic.

Presentation

Overall score 5 out of 5
Is the article written in clear and proper English? (30%)
5 out of 5
Is the data presented in the most useful manner? (40%)
5 out of 5
Does the paper cite relevant and related articles appropriately? (30%)
5 out of 5

Context

Overall score 4.8 out of 5
Does the title suitably represent the article? (25%)
5 out of 5
Does the abstract correctly embody the content of the article? (25%)
5 out of 5
Does the introduction give appropriate context? (25%)
4 out of 5
Is the objective of the experiment clearly defined? (25%)
5 out of 5

Analysis

Overall score 4.6 out of 5
Does the discussion adequately interpret the results presented? (40%)
4 out of 5
Is the conclusion consistent with the results and discussion? (40%)
5 out of 5
Are the limitations of the experiment as well as the contributions of the experiment clearly outlined? (20%)
5 out of 5

Review 2: Salinity decreases transpiration of sorghum plants

Conflict of interest statement

None.

Comments

Comments to the Author: The manuscript has international relevance, as agricultural culture is widely used and there are large regions that present soil salinity problems. Corrections must be made for the purpose of presenting numerical and statistical results. Once these corrections have been made, the article has potential for publication.The article presents a good discussion and has scientific merit. The article must be accepted after corrections.

Presentation

Overall score 3.9 out of 5
Is the article written in clear and proper English? (30%)
4 out of 5
Is the data presented in the most useful manner? (40%)
3 out of 5
Does the paper cite relevant and related articles appropriately? (30%)
5 out of 5

Context

Overall score 4.5 out of 5
Does the title suitably represent the article? (25%)
5 out of 5
Does the abstract correctly embody the content of the article? (25%)
4 out of 5
Does the introduction give appropriate context? (25%)
4 out of 5
Is the objective of the experiment clearly defined? (25%)
5 out of 5

Analysis

Overall score 3.6 out of 5
Does the discussion adequately interpret the results presented? (40%)
4 out of 5
Is the conclusion consistent with the results and discussion? (40%)
3 out of 5
Are the limitations of the experiment as well as the contributions of the experiment clearly outlined? (20%)
4 out of 5

Review 3: Salinity decreases transpiration of sorghum plants

Conflict of interest statement

Reviewer declares none.

Comments

Comments to the Author: Artigo de grande relevância cientifica.

Presentation

Overall score 4.7 out of 5
Is the article written in clear and proper English? (30%)
4 out of 5
Is the data presented in the most useful manner? (40%)
5 out of 5
Does the paper cite relevant and related articles appropriately? (30%)
5 out of 5

Context

Overall score 5 out of 5
Does the title suitably represent the article? (25%)
5 out of 5
Does the abstract correctly embody the content of the article? (25%)
5 out of 5
Does the introduction give appropriate context? (25%)
5 out of 5
Is the objective of the experiment clearly defined? (25%)
5 out of 5

Analysis

Overall score 5 out of 5
Does the discussion adequately interpret the results presented? (40%)
5 out of 5
Is the conclusion consistent with the results and discussion? (40%)
5 out of 5
Are the limitations of the experiment as well as the contributions of the experiment clearly outlined? (20%)
5 out of 5