Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-vgfm9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-14T20:49:27.648Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparison of dietary quality and nutritional adequacy of popular energy-restricted diets against the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating and the Mediterranean Diet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 June 2021

Ella L. Bracci
Affiliation:
Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, UniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
Jennifer B. Keogh
Affiliation:
Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, UniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
Rachel Milte
Affiliation:
Department of Rehabilitation, Aged and Extended Care, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, School of Health Sciences, Flinders University, SA 5042, Australia Institute for Choice, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
Karen J. Murphy*
Affiliation:
Alliance for Research in Exercise, Nutrition and Activity, UniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
*
*Corresponding author: Karen Murphy, email karen.murphy@unisa.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

There is limited information regarding the nutrition profile and diet quality of meal plans from currently popular weight loss (WL) diets in Australia. This includes the energy content (kilojoules), the macronutrient distribution and the micronutrient composition. Further, these diets have not been compared with current government guidelines and healthy eating principles (HEP) for nutritional adequacy. Popular diets were identified through grey literature, trending searches and relative popularity in Australia. Meal plans for each diet were analysed using Foodworks Dietary Software to determine food group intake, micronutrient and macronutrient distribution. The results indicated that all popular diets assessed deviated from government recommended HEP such as the Australian Guide to Healthy Eating and the Mediterranean diet. In most cases, both popular diets and the HEP had low intakes of multiple food groups, low intakes of essential micronutrients and a distorted macronutrient distribution. Popular diets may not provide adequate nutrition to meet needs, particularly in the long term and potentially resulting in micronutrient deficiency. When energy restricting for WL, meal plans should be highly individualised in conjunction with a qualified nutrition professional to ensure adequate dietary intake.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Nutrition Society
Figure 0

Table 1. Examples of the variations of the Keto diet with different macronutrient ratios and protocols

Figure 1

Table 2. Examples of variations of the Paleo diet

Figure 2

Table 3. Examples of varying types of intermittent fasting diets

Figure 3

Table 4. Overview of the four Optifast protocols depending on energetic intake and number of meal replacements(50,141)

Figure 4

Fig. 1. The Australian Guide to Healthy Eating(2).

Figure 5

Fig. 2. The Mediterranean diet pyramid(55).

Figure 6

Table 5. Macronutrient distribution (%en/g/d) and energy content (kJ/kcal/d) for each dietary pattern and healthy eating principle(Mean values and standard deviations)

Figure 7

Fig. 3. Weekly average energy intake (kJ) across the eight weeks of the 8WW meal plan (Mean ± sd).

Figure 8

Fig. 4. Summary figure of the average number of servings per day of the AGHE food groups for each diet based on their respective meal plans. , Keto; , Paleo; , Intermittent Fasting; , 8 Weeks to Wow; , Optifast; , MedDiet WL; , AGHE WL

Supplementary material: File

Bracci et al. supplementary material

Bracci et al. supplementary material

Download Bracci et al. supplementary material(File)
File 65.1 KB