Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-vdhp9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-17T23:56:21.936Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Validation of a semi-quantitative food-frequency questionnaire for use among adults in Guatemala

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2006

Monica M Rodríguez ,
Humberto Méndez ,
Benjamín Torún ,
Dirk Schroeder  and
Aryeh D Stein
Monica M Rodríguez
Affiliation:
Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama (INCAP), Guatemala City, Guatemala
Humberto Méndez
Affiliation:
Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama (INCAP), Guatemala City, Guatemala
Benjamín Torún
Affiliation:
Institute of Nutrition of Central America and Panama (INCAP), Guatemala City, Guatemala
Dirk Schroeder
Affiliation:
Department of International Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
Aryeh D Stein*
Affiliation:
Department of International Health, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
*
*Corresponding author: Email astein2@sph.emory.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the 'Save PDF' action button.
Objective:

The purpose of the study was to assess the validity of a 52-item semiquantitative food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ) by comparing it with multiple 24-hour dietary recalls.

Design:

Three non-consecutive 24-hour dietary recalls and one FFQ were administered over a one-month period.

Setting:

Four communities of El Progreso, Guatemala.

Subjects:

Seventy-three individuals aged 22–55 years.

Results:

Intakes of energy and other nutrients as measured by the FFQ were higher than intakes measured by 24-hour recalls. Energy was overestimated by 361 kcal, and nutrient overestimates were particularly great for vitamin C and iron. Pearson correlation coefficients for crude energy and nutrients intakes ranged from 0.64 for energy to 0.12 for vitamin C. Exact agreement for both methods (measured by the concordance correlation coefficient) ranged from 0.59 (fat) to 0.06 (vitamin C). Pearson correlation coefficients for energy-adjusted nutrients ranged from 0.59 (carbohydrates) to 0.11 (thiamin). Pearson correlation coefficients for the proportion of total energy derived from specific foods ranged from 0.59 (tortillas) to 0.01 (sugared beverages). Cross-classification of quartiles of crude nutrient intakes for both methods indicated that <11% were grossly misclassified; after adjusting for energy intake, <13% were grossly misclassified.

Conclusions:

This FFQ provides good measures of energy and macronutrient intakes and a reasonably reliable measure of micronutrient intake, indicating its suitability for comparing exposures within a study population in reference to heath-related endpoints. Our results highlight the need to adapt any FFQ to specific cultural needs – in this case, the Guatemalan ‘core foods’ (tortilla, bread and beans), for which inter-individual variability in intake is high.

Keywords

ConcordanceCorrelationDietary assessmentFood frequencyTwenty-four-hour dietary recallsValidity

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Public Health Nutrition , Volume 5 , Issue 5 , December 2002 , pp. 691 - 698
Copyright
Copyright © CABI Publishing 2002

References

1Willett, W. Nutritional Epidemiology, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
2Hernandez-Avila, M, Romieu, I, Parra, S, Hernandez-Avila, J, Madrigal, H, Willett, W. Validity and reproducibility of a food frequency questionnaire to assess dietary intake of women living in Mexico City. Salud Publica Mex. 1998; 40: 133–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Bingham, SA, Gill, C, Welch, A, et al. Comparison of dietary assessment methods in nutritional epidemiology: weighed records v. 24h recalls, food-frequency questionnaires and estimated-diet records. Br. J. Nutr. 1994; 72: 619–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Bingham, SA. Dietary assessments in the European prospective study of diet and cancer (EPIC). Eur. J. Cancer Prev. 1997; 6: 118–24.Google Scholar
5Egami, I, Wakai, K, Kato, K, et al. A simple food frequency questionnaire for Japanese diet – Part II. Reproducibility and validity for nutrient intakes. J. Epidemiol. 1999; 9: 227–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Forman, MR, Zhang, J, Nebeling, L, et al. Relative validity of a food frequency questionnaire among tin miners in China: 1992/93 and 1995/96 diet validation studies. Public Health Nutr. 1999; 2: 301–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Hebert, JR, Gupta, PC, Bhonsle, RB, et al. Development and testing of a quantitative food frequency questionnaire for use in Kerala, India. Public Health Nutr. 1999; 2: 39–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Klipstein-Groubusch, K, den Breeijen, JH, Goldbohm, RA, Geleijnse, JM, Hofman, A, Grobbee, DE, Witteman, JCM. Dietary assessment in the elderly: validation of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1998; 52: 588–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Lemaitre, RN, King, IB, Patterson, RE, Psaty, BM, Kestin, M, Heckbert, SR. Assessment of trans-fatty acid intake with a food frequency questionnaire and validation with adipose tissue levels of trans-fatty acids. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1998; 148: 1085–93.Google Scholar
10Wei, ED, Gardner, J, Fiel, AE, Rosner, BA, Colditz, GA, Suitor, CW. Validity of a food frequency questionnaire in assessing nutrient intakes of low-income pregnant women. Matern. Child Health. J. 1999; 3: 241–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Willett, WC, Sampson, L, Stampfer, MJ, et al. Reproducibility and validity of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1985; 122: 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Willett, WC, Reynolds, RD, Cottrell-Hoehners, S, Sampson, L, Brown, ML. Validation of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire: comparison with a 2-year diet record. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1987; 87: 43–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Green, T, Allen, OB, O'Connor, D. A three-day weighed food record and a semiquantitative food-frequency questionnaire are valid measures for assessing the folate and vitamin B-12 intakes of women aged 16 to 19 years. J. Nutr. 1998; 128: 1665–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Cassidy, CM. Walk a mile in my shoes: culturally sensitive food-habit research. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1994; 59(Suppl.): 190S–7S.Google Scholar
15Torheim, LE, Barikmo, I, Hatløy, A, Diakité, M, Solvoll, K, Diarra, M, Oshaug, A. Validation of a quantitative food frequency questionnaire for use in Western Mali. Public Health Nutr. 2001; 4(6):1267–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Romieu, I, Parra, S, Hernandez, JF, Madrigal, H, Willett, W, Hernandez, M. Questionnaire assessment of antioxidants and retinol intakes in Mexican women. Arch. Med. Res. 1999; 30: 224–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17INE–CADESCA–SEGEPLAN. Encuesta Nacional de Consumo Aparente de Alimentos, 1991. Guatemala: INE–CADESCA–SEGEPLAN, 1992;62 pp.Google Scholar
18Tucker, KL, Bianchi, L, Maras, J, Bermudez, O. Adaptation of a food frequency questionnaire to assess diets of Puerto Rican and non-Hispanic adults. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1998; 148: 507–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
19Menchú, MT. Guía Metodológica para realizar Encuestas Familiares de Consumo de Alimentos. Guatemala: Instituto de Centro América y Panamá, 1990;92 pp.Google Scholar
20Menchu, MT, Mendez, H, Barrera, MA, Ortega, L. Tabla de Composicion de Alimentos de Centro America – Primera Seccion. Guatemala: INCAP/OPS, 1996.Google Scholar
21Lin, LI. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics 1989; 45: 255–68.Google Scholar
22Bland, JM, Altman, DG. Comparing methods of measurement: why plotting difference against standard method is misleading. Lancet 1995; 346: 1085–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Rodríguez, MM. Evaluación dietética de grupos de escolares de diferentes establecimientos educativos mediante la aplicación de dos métodos de consumo de alimentos. Thesis, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas y Farmacia, Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala, 1992.Google Scholar
24Block, G, Hartman, AM, Dresser, CM, Carroll, MD, Gannon, J, Gardner, L. A data based approach to diet questionnaire design and testing. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1986; 24: 453–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Black, AE, Goldberg, GR, Jebb, SA, Livingstone, MB, Cole, TJ, Prentice, AM. Critical evaluation of energy intake data using fundamental principles of energy physiology. 2. Evaluating the results of published surveys. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1991; 45: 583–99.Google ScholarPubMed
26Kroke, A, Klipstein-Grobusch, K, Voss, S, Moseneder, J, Thielecke, F, Noack, R, Boeing, H. Validation of a self-administered food-frequency questionnaire administered in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) Study: comparison of energy, protein, and macronutrient intakes estimated with the double labeled water, urinary nitrogen, and repeated 24-h dietary recall methods. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1999; 70: 439–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar