Hostname: page-component-77c78cf97d-sp94z Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-04-27T21:51:56.370Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Integrated Wild Oat (Avena fatua) Management Affects Spring Barley (Hordeum vulgare) Yield and Economics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 June 2017

David L. Barton ,
Donald C. Thill  and
Bahman Shafii
David L. Barton
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant, Soil, and Entomol. Sci., Univ. Idaho, Moscow, ID 83843
Donald C. Thill
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant, Soil, and Entomol. Sci., Univ. Idaho, Moscow, ID 83843
Bahman Shafii
Affiliation:
Dep. Plant, Soil, and Entomol. Sci., Univ. Idaho, Moscow, ID 83843
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effect of barley seeding rate and row spacing, and triallate, diclofop, and difenzoquat herbicide rate on barley grain yield and quality, and wild oat control were evaluated in field experiments near Bonners Ferry, Idaho, in 1989 and 1990. The purpose of the study was to develop integrated control strategies for wild oat in spring barley. Barley row spacing (9 and 18 cm) did not affect barley grain yield. Barley grain yield was greatest when barley was seeded at 134 or 201 kg ha–1 compared to 67 kg ha–1. Wild oat control increased as wild oat herbicide rate increased and barley grain yield was greatest when wild oat herbicides were applied. However, barley grain yield was similar when wild oat biomass was reduced by either 65 or 85% by applications of half and full herbicide rates, respectively. Net return was greatest when the half rate of herbicide was applied to 100 wild oat plants per m2 and was greatest when half or full herbicide rates were applied to 290 wild oat plants per m2. Net return increased when the seeding rate was increased to 134 or 201 kg ha–1 when no herbicide was applied and when 290 wild oat plants per m2 were present.

Keywords

Diclofop, (±)-2-[4-(2,4-dichlorophenoxy)phenoxy]propanoic aciddifenzoquat, 1,2-dimethyl-3,5-diphenyl-1H-pyrazoliumtriallate, S-(2,3,3-trichloro-2-propenyl) bis(1-methylethyl)carbamothioatespring barley, Hordeum vulgare L. ‘Morex’wild oat, Avena fatua L. ♯ AVEFACultural controlchemical controleconomic analysisdiclofopdifenzoquattriallateAVEFA

Information

Type
Research
Information
Weed Technology , Volume 6 , Issue 1 , March 1992 , pp. 129 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 by the Weed Science Society of America 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

1. Andersson, B. 1986. Influence of crop density and spacing on weed competition and grain yield in wheat and barley. Proc. Eur. Weed Res. Soc. Symp. p. 121–128.Google Scholar
2. Andersson, B. 1988. Seed rates in spring cereals with and without weed control. 29th Swedish Weed Conf. 1:1–10.Google Scholar
3. Anonymous. 1989. Idaho Agricultural Statistics, Idaho Dep. Agric., 2270 Old Penitentiary Rd., Boise, ID 83701.Google Scholar
4. Bate, P. G. 1970. The effect of barley population and row width on the growth of Avena fatua, wild oat. Proc. 10th Br. Weed Control Conf. p. 826–830.Google Scholar
5. Bell, A. R., and Nalewaja, J. D. 1967. Wild oats cost more to keep than to control. N. Dak. Farm Res. 25:7–9.Google Scholar
6. Bell, A. R., and Nalewaja, J. D. 1968. Competition of wild oat in wheat and barley. Weed Sci. 16:505–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Carlson, H. L., and Hill, J. E. 1985. Wild oat (Avena fatua) competition with spring wheat: plant density effects. Weed Sci. 33:176–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Chancellor, R. J., and Peters, N.C.B. 1976. Competition between wild oats and crops. p. 99–112 in Jones, D. P., ed. Wild Oats in World Agriculture. Agricultural Research Council. London.Google Scholar
9. Chow, P.N.P. 1978. Selectivity and site of action in relation to field performance of diclofop. Weed Sci. 26:352–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Coleman-Harrell, M. E. 1978. Influence of densities and exposure durations of wild oat (Avena fatua L.) populations on the yields of spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). M.S. Thesis. Univ. Idaho, Moscow.Google Scholar
11. Cudney, D. W., Jordan, L. S., Holt, J. S., and Reints, J. S. 1989. Competitive interactions of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and wild oats (Avena fatua) grown at different densities. Weed Sci. 37:538–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12 Cussans, G. W., and Wilson, B. J. 1975. Some effects of crop row width and seed rate on competition between spring barley and wild oat, Avena fatua L., or common crouch, Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv. Symp. on Status, Biol. and Control of Grassweeds in Europe. Paris. 1:77–86.Google Scholar
13. Evans, R. M., Thill, D. C., Tapia, L. S., Shafii, B., and Lish, J. M. 1991. Wild oat (Avena fatua) and spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) density affect spring barley grain yield. Weed Technol. 5:33–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Grewal, D. S., and Dhillon, G. S. 1988. Effect of crop geometry on incidence of wild oats (Avena ludoviciana Dar.) in wheat. J. Res. Punjab Agric. Univ. 25:363–367.Google Scholar
15. Harper, J. L. 1977. The population biology of plants. Academic Press, London. 892 p.Google Scholar
16. Holm, L. G., Plucknett, D. L., Pancho, J. V., and Herberger, J. P. 1977. Avena fatua L. and other members of the “wild oats” group. p. 105–113 in World's Worst Weeds, Distribution and Biology. East-West Center, Univ. Hawaii Press, Honolulu.Google Scholar
17. Hucl, P., and Baker, R. J. 1990. Seeding rate effects on low-tillering spring wheat in a semiarid environment. Can. J. Plant Sci. 70:9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Kirkland, K. J., and O'Sullivan, P. A. 1984. Control of wild oats in wheat with barban, diclofop methyl, flamprop methyl and difenzoquat. Can. J. Plant Sci. 64:1019–1021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Konesky, D. W., Siddiqi, M. Y., Glass, A.D.M., and Hsiao, A. I. 1989. Wild oat and barley interactions: varietal differences in competitiveness in relation to phosphorus supply. Can. J. Bot. 67:3366–3371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Koscelny, J. A., Peeper, T. F., Solie, J. B., and Solomon, S. G. Jr. 1990. Effect of wheat (Triticum aestivum) row spacing, seeding rate, and cultivar on yield loss from cheat (Bromus secalinus). Weed Technol. 4:487–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21. Lee, G. A., Thill, D. C., and Schumacher, W. J. 1981. Wild oat cultural control. Bull. 584. Univ. Idaho, Coll. Agric., Moscow. 4 p.Google Scholar
22. Miller, S. D., and Nalewaja, J. D. 1980. Wild oat (Avena fatua) control with fall and spring applied triallate. Weed Sci. 28:416–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Miller, S. D., Nalewaja, J. D., Pudelko, J., and Adamczewski, K. A. 1978. Difenzoquat for wild oat control. Weed Sci. 26:571–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Morishita, D. W., and Thill, D. C. 1988. Factors of wild oat (Avena fatua) interference on spring barley (Hordeum vulgare) growth and yield. Weed Sci. 36:37–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Nalewaja, J. D. 1977. Wild oat: global gloom. Proc. West. Soc. Weed Sci. 30:21.Google Scholar
26. O'Donovan, J. T., de St. Remy, E. A., O'Sullivan, P. A., Dew, D. A., and Sharma, A. K. 1985. Influence of the relative time of emergence of wild oat (Avena fatua) on yield loss of barley (Hordeum vulgare) and wheat (Triticum aestivum). Weed Sci. 33:498–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Peters, N.C.B. 1984. Time of onset of competition and effects of various fractions of an Avena fatua L. population of spring barley. Weed Res. 24:305–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Pfeiffer, R. K., and Holmes, H. M. 1961. A study of the competition between barley and oats as influenced by barley seedrate, nitrogen level and barban treatment. Weed Res. 1:5–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Prakash, A., Sharma, K. C., and Misra, R. D. 1986. Control of Phalaris minor and wild oats in wheat by cultural and chemical methods. Indian J. Agroa 31:411–413.Google Scholar
30. Ross, M. A., and Harper, J. L. 1972. Occupation of biological space during seedling establishment. J. Ecol. 60:77–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31. SAS Institute Inc. 1985. SAS/STAT™ Guide for Personal Computers, Version 6 Ed. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C. 378 p.Google Scholar
32. Siddiqi, M. Y., Glass, A.D.M., Hsiao, A. I., and Minjas, A. N. 1985. Wild oat/barley interactions: Varietal differences in competitiveness in relation to K+ supply. Ann. Bot. 56:1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33. Thurston, J. M. 1962. The effect of competition from cereal crops on the germination of and growth of Avena fatua L. in naturally infested fields. Weed Res. 2:192–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. University of Idaho. 1978. Producing malting barley in Idaho. Coll. Agric. CIS 276, Moscow. 6 p.Google Scholar
35. Wilson, B. J., Cousens, R., and Wright, K. J. 1990. The response of spring barley and winter wheat to Avena fatua population density. Ann. Appl. Biol. 116:601–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36. Wilson, B. J., and Peters, N.C.B. 1982. Some studies of competition between Avena fatua L. and spring barley. I. The influence of A. fatua on yield of barley. Weed Res. 22:143–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar