Hostname: page-component-6766d58669-7fx5l Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-17T16:31:38.945Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ranking Political Science Journals: Reputational andCitational Approaches

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2007

Micheal W. Giles  and
James C. Garand
Micheal W. Giles
Affiliation:
Emory University
James C. Garand
Affiliation:
Louisiana State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Academic journals play a key role in the dissemination of scholarlyknowledge in the social sciences. Hence, publication in journals iscritical evidence of scholarly performance for both individuals andthe departments that they populate. While in the best of worlds eachscholar's performance would be evaluated based on a close reading ofhis/her published journal articles, in the actual practices ofhiring, tenure and promotion review, and departmental evaluationsthis ideal is often honored only in the breach. Instead, evaluatorscommonly base their judgments of the importance and quality ofpublished articles, at least in part, on the journals in which theyappear. The higher the status accorded a journal, the greater theweight attached to publications appearing in it.

Information

Type
THE PROFESSION
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 40 , Issue 4 , October 2007 , pp. 741 - 751
Copyright
© 2007 The American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Adam, David. 2002. “Citation Analysis: The Counting House.” Nature 415 (February): 726–9.Google Scholar
Baumgartner, Hans, and Rik Pieters. 2003. “The Structural Influence of Marketing Journals: A Citation Analysis of the Discipline and its Sub-Areas over Time.” Journal of Marketing 67 (April): 123–39.Google Scholar
Bodenhorn, Howard, and William Walstad. 2003. “Economic Scholarship at Elite Liberal Arts Colleges: A Citation Analysis with Rankings.” Journal of Economic Education 34 (fall): 341–59.Google Scholar
Burton, M. P., and E. Phimister. 1995. “Core Journals: A Reappraisal of the Diamond List.” Economic Journal 105 (March): 361–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crewe, Ivor, and Pippa Norris. 1991. “British and American Journal Evaluation: Divergence or Convergence.” PS: Political Science and Politics 24 (September): 524–31.Google Scholar
Davis, John B. 1998. “Problems in Using the Social Sciences Citation Index to Rank Economics Journals.” American Economist 42 (fall): 59–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Arthur. 1989. “The Core Journals in Economics.” Current Contents (January): 4–11.Google Scholar
Donohue, J, and J. Fox. 2000. “A Multi-Method Evaluation of Journals in the Decision and Management Sciences by U.S. Academics.” Omega 28 (February): 17–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DuBois, Frank, and David Reeb. 2000. “Ranking International Business Journals.” Journal of International Business Studies 31 (4): 689–704.Google Scholar
Extejt, Marian M., and Jonathan E. Smith. 1990. “The Behavioral Sciences and Management: An Evaluation of Relevant Journals.” Journal of Management 16 (3): 539–51.Google Scholar
Garand, James C. 1990. “An Alternative Interpretation of Recent Political Science Journal Evaluations.” PS: Political Science and Politics 23 (September): 448–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garand, James C., and Micheal W. Giles. 2003. “Journals in the Discipline: A Report on a New Survey of American Political Scientists.” PS: Political Science and Politics 39 (April): 293–308.Google Scholar
Garfield, Eugene. 1986. “The 250 Most-cited Authors in the Arts and Humanities Citation Index, 1976–1983.” Current Contents 48 (December): 3–10.Google Scholar
Garfield, Eugene. 1996. “How Can Impact Factors be Improved?” British Medical Journal 313: 411–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giles, Micheal, Francie Mizell, and David Patterson. 1989. “Political Scientists' Journal Evaluation Revisited.” PS: Political Science and Politics 22 (September): 613–7.Google Scholar
Giles, Micheal, and Gerald Wright. 1975. “Political Scientists' Evaluations of Sixty-Three Journals.” PS: Political Science and Politics 8 (summer): 254–7.Google Scholar
Hantula, D. 2005. “The Impact of JOBM: ISI Impact Factor Places the Journal of Organizational Behavior Management Third in Applied Psychology.” Journal of Organizational Behavior Management 25 (3): 1–15.Google Scholar
Hendry, David F. 2006. “Research Assessment Exercises.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Hix, Simon. 2004. “A Global Ranking of Political Science Departments.” Political Studies Review 2 (3): 293–313.Google Scholar
Kalaitzidakis, Pantelis, Thanasis Stengos, and Theofanis P. Mamuneas. 2003. “Rankings of Academic Journals and Institutions in Economics.” Journal of the European Economic Association 1 (December): 1346–66.Google Scholar
Laband, David, and Michael J. Piette. 1994. “The Relative Impacts of Economics Journals: 1970–1990.” Journal of Economic Literature 32 (June): 640–66.Google Scholar
Leimu, Roosa, and Julia Koricheva. 2005. “What Determines the Citation Frequency of Ecological Papers?” Trends in Ecology and Evolutions 20 (January): 28–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebowitz, Stanley J., and John C. Palmer. 1984. “Assessing the Relative Impacts of Economics Journals.” Journal of Economic Literature 22 (March): 77–88.Google Scholar
Moed, Henk. 2005. Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation. Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
Nederhof, A. J., and A. F. J. van Raan. 1993. “A Bibliometric Analysis of Six Economics Research Groups: A Comparison with Peer Review.” Research Policy 22 (5–6): 353–68.Google Scholar
Stahl, Michael, Terry Leap, and Zhu Wei. 1988. “Publication in Leading Management Journals as a Measure of Institutional Research Productivity.” Academy of Management Journal 31 (3): 707–20.Google Scholar
Van Dalen, Hendrik, and Kene Henkens. 2001. “What Makes a Scientific Article Influential? The Case of Demographers.” Scientometrics 50 (January): 455–82.Google Scholar
Vokurka, Robert. 1996. “The Relative Importance of Journals Used in Operations Management Research: A Citation Analysis.” Journal of Operations Management 14 (November): 345–55.Google Scholar