Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-pn7tm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-17T01:16:06.245Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Approach to similarity in the pinch-off of a viscous liquid thread

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2025

Marie Corpart*
Affiliation:
Van der Waals-Zeeman Institute, Institute of Physics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1098XH, Netherlands
Miguel Ángel Herrada
Affiliation:
Depto. de Mecánica de Fluidos e Ingeniería Aeroespacial, Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla E-41092, Spain
Antoine Deblais
Affiliation:
Van der Waals-Zeeman Institute, Institute of Physics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1098XH, Netherlands
Daniel Bonn
Affiliation:
Van der Waals-Zeeman Institute, Institute of Physics, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1098XH, Netherlands
*
Corresponding author: Marie Corpart, m.corpart@uva.nl

Abstract

The breakup of viscous liquid threads is governed by a complex interplay of inertial, viscous and capillary stresses. Theoretical predictions near the point of breakup suggest the emergence of a finite-time singularity, leading to universal power laws describing the breakup, characterised by a universal prefactor. Recent stability analyses indicate that, due to the presence of complex eigenvalues, achieving similarity may only be possible through time-damped oscillations, making it unclear when and how self-similar regimes are reached for both visco-inertial and viscous regimes. In this paper, we combine experiments with unprecedented spatio-temporal resolution and highly resolved numerical simulations to investigate the evolution of the liquid free surface during the pinching of a viscous capillary bridge. We experimentally show for the first time that, for viscous fluids the approach to the self-similar solution is composed of a large overshoot of the instantaneous shrinking speed before the system converges to the nonlinear pinch-off similarity solution. In the visco-inertial case, the convergence to the stable solution is oscillatory, whereas in the viscous case, the approach to singularity is monotonic. While our experimental and numerical results are in good agreement in the viscous regime, systematic differences emerge in the visco-inertial regime, potentially because of effects such as polymer polydispersity, which are not incorporated into our numerical model.

Information

Type
JFM Papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press
Figure 0

Figure 1. High-speed image sequence (a) and numerical simulations (b) of the thinning of a viscous thread; the liquid shown here is PDMS with viscosity $\eta = 500\,\textrm {mPa} \boldsymbol{\cdot }\textrm {s}$ initially placed between two plates of diameter $R_0 = 1\,\textrm {mm}$; simulations show two-dimensional cuts through the $z$-axis. The time to pinch-off ($t_c-t$) is indicated at the bottom of the figure.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Minimum neck radius and shrinking speed versus time. (a) Experimental dimensionless neck radius $R_{\textit{min}}/R_0$ versus viscous-scaled time to pinch-off $(t_c - t)/t_v$ for silicone oils with different viscosities $\eta$ and plate radii $R_0$. (b–e) Experimental $(\bigcirc )$ and numerical (solid lines) results for $R_0 = 1\,\textrm{mm}$, Bo = 0.45. (b,c) Dimensionless neck radius $R_{\textit{min}}/R_0$ and (d,e) dimensionless shrinking speed $\tilde {\dot {R}}_{\textit{min}} = - \dot {R}_{\textit{min}} \eta /\gamma$ as functions of $(t_c - t)/t_v$ for $\eta = 500\,\textrm{mPa} \boldsymbol{\cdot }\textrm {s}$ (Oh = 3.5; b,d) and $\eta = 100\,\textrm{mPa} \boldsymbol{\cdot }\textrm {s}$ (Oh = 0.7; c,e). Grey shaded regions mark the time intervals where the shrinking speed approaches the theoretical prefactor $\mathcal A$. Grey dashed lines: viscous regime. Black dash-dotted lines: visco-inertial regime. Arrows indicate shrinking speeds corresponding to the profiles in figure 4: full arrows for numerics (figure 4a,b), dashed for experiments (figure 4c,d).

Figure 2

Figure 3. Influence of $R_0$ on neck dynamics across viscosities. Top row: dimensionless neck radius $R_{\textit{min}}/R_0$ versus dimensionless time $(t_{\textit {c}} - t)/t_{{v}}$. Bottom row: dimensionless shrinking speed $-\dot {R}_{\textit{min}}\eta /\gamma$ versus $R_{\textit{min}}/R_0$. Data are shown for all tested $R_0$ and for each fluid viscosity. Viscosity values: (a,d) $\eta = 100\,\textrm{mPa} \boldsymbol{\cdot }\textrm {s}$, (b,e) $\eta = 500\,\textrm{mPa} \boldsymbol{\cdot }\textrm {s}$, (c, f) $\eta = 1000\,\textrm{mPa} \boldsymbol{\cdot }\textrm {s}$.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Dimensionless profiles of the neck $R(z, t)/R_{\textit{min}}$ as a function of the self-similar variable $\xi$ for different values of the dimensionless time to pinch-off. The left column shows the results for $\eta = 500\,\textrm {mPa} \boldsymbol{\cdot }\textrm {s}$ (Oh = 3.5) and the right column the results for $\eta = 100\,\textrm {mPa} \boldsymbol{\cdot }\textrm {s}$ (Oh = 0.7), in all cases $R_0 = 1$ mm (${\textrm {Bo}} = 0.45$). (a,b) Numerical profiles and (c,d) experimental profiles. The dimensionless times to pinch-off corresponding to the profiles are indicated on figure 2(d,e) by the solid (numerical simulations) and dashed (experiments) arrows. The lighter coloured dots show the typical error in determining the neck profiles in the experiments. The black dashed lines show the universal visco-inertial self-similar solution adapted from Eggers (1993). The grey dashed lines represent the viscous self-similar solution obtained from equation (158) of Eggers (1997) with a normalisation length $\bar {\xi } = 160$.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Image processing methods. (a) Sobel filtered image and (b) raw image of a PDMS bridge during pinching ($R_0 = 2.5\,\textrm {mm}$ and $\eta = 100\,\textrm {mPa} \boldsymbol{\cdot }\textrm {s}$). The grey lines show the detected position of the minimum. (c) Grey values on the Sobel filtered image (a) along the grey line shown on (a) and detection of the left (pink) and right (blue) interface. The detected interfaces are shown with the same colour code in (b). (d) Spatial evolution of the neck radius $R(z)$ measured on the image. The grey plus shows the coordinates ($z_{\textit{min}}$, $R_{\textit{min}}$) of the minimum.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Numerical method. (a,b) Effect of mesh size on time evolution of neck radius (a) and instantaneous velocity (b) for $\eta = 100\,\textrm {mPa} \boldsymbol{\cdot }\textrm {s}$, $R_0 = 1\,\textrm {mm}$, $\textit {Oh} = 0.7$. The mesh size used for each numerical simulation is given in the legend. The data plotted in figure 2(c,d) of the main article are shown in yellow. (c,d) Comparison between JAM and Basilisk for a drop dripping from a needle for $R_0 =1\,\textrm {mm}$ and $\textit {Oh} = 0.16$. (c) Temporal evolution of the neck radius and (d) profiles of the drop corresponding to $R_{\textit{min}}/R_0 = 1\times 10^{-3}$ smallest size resolved with Basilisk.

Figure 6

Figure 7. Validation of our numerical methods. Comparison of our numerical results (solid lines) with the numerical results of Li & Sprittles (2016) in the same geometry (dots) – (a) viscous regime and (b) visco-inertial regime.

Figure 7

Figure 8. Full numerical profiles – $R_0 = 1\,\textrm {mm}$, (a) $\eta = 500\,\textrm {mPa} \boldsymbol{\cdot }\textrm {s}$ and (b) $\eta = 100\,\textrm {mPa} \boldsymbol{\cdot }\textrm {s}$. Top, complete numerical profiles and bottom, direct comparison between experimental and numerical profiles on the same scale.

Figure 8

Figure 9. Instantaneous shrinking speed as a function of the time to pinch-off for different viscosities (increasing from top to bottom) and for different values of the plate radius $R_0$ (increasing from left to right). Experimental data are obtained from different consecutive runs, from which the average values are computed. Error bars represent the dispersion of the data, as shown in figures 2 and 3.

Figure 9

Figure 10. Effect of gravity and inertia on the dimensionless instantaneous shrinking speed $-\eta /\gamma \dot {R}_{\textit{min}}$. In both cases, $R_0 = 1\,\textrm {mm}$ (a) $\eta = 500\,\textrm {mPa} \boldsymbol{\cdot }\textrm {s}$, $\textit{Oh} = 3.5$ (b) $\eta = 100\,\textrm {mPa} \boldsymbol{\cdot }\textrm {s}$, $\textit{Oh} = 0.7$.

Figure 10

Figure 11. Effect of gravity and inertia on the profiles. In all cases $R_0 = 1\,\textrm {mm}$, left column $\eta = 100\,\textrm {mPa} \boldsymbol{\cdot }\textrm {s}$ and right column $\eta = 500\,\textrm {mPa} \boldsymbol{\cdot }\textrm {s}$. Panels show (a,b) $\rho = 970\,\textrm {kg m}^-{^3}$, $g = 9.81\,\textrm {m s}^-{^2}$, (c,d) $\rho = 970\,\textrm {kg m}^-{^3}$, $g = 0$ and (e,f) $\rho = 10\,\textrm {kg m}^-{^3}$, $g = 9.81\,\textrm {m s}^-{^2}$.

Figure 11

Figure 12. Liquid bridge profiles close to break-up for medium-viscosity fluid – $R_0 = 1\,\textrm {mm}$, $\eta = 100\,\textrm {mPa} \boldsymbol{\cdot }\textrm {s}$. (a) Numerical profile of the capillary bridge near the rupture point. The filament ruptures at two points, at the top and bottom of the shaded area. The liquid contained inside the shaded area is the future satellite drop observed after the rupture of the filament. (b) Images of the liquid filament before and after the pinch-off event.