Hostname: page-component-77f85d65b8-5ngxj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-03-29T02:11:54.147Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Territorial Autonomy in the Shadow of Conflict: Too Little, Too Late?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 April 2015

LARS-ERIK CEDERMAN*
Affiliation:
ETH Zürich
SIMON HUG*
Affiliation:
Université de Genève
ANDREAS SCHÄDEL*
Affiliation:
ETH Zürich
JULIAN WUCHERPFENNIG*
Affiliation:
University College London and ETH Zürich
*
Lars-Erik Cederman is Professor of International Conflict Research at ETH Zürich, Haldeneggsteig 4, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland (lcederman@ethz.ch).
Simon Hug is Professor at Département de science politique, Faculté des sciences économiques et sociales, Université de Genève, 40 Bd du Pont d’Arve, 1211 Genève 4, Switzerland (simon.hug@unige.ch).
Andreas Schädel is Lecturer in International Security at ETH Zürich, Haldeneggsteig 4, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland (schaedel@icr.gess.ethz.ch).
Julian Wucherpfennig, University College London, 29/31 Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9QU, United Kingdom (j.wucherpfennig@ucl.ac.uk).

Abstract

This article evaluates the effect of territorial autonomy on the outbreak of internal conflict by analyzing ethnic groups around the world since WWII. Shedding new light on an ongoing debate, we argue that the critics have overstated the case against autonomy policies. Our evidence indicates that decentralization has a significant conflict-preventing effect where there is no prior conflict history. In postconflict settings, however, granting autonomy can still be helpful in combination with central power sharing arrangements. Yet, on its own, postconflict autonomy concessions may be too little, too late. Accounting for endogeneity, we also instrument for autonomy in postcolonial states by exploiting that French, as opposed to British, colonial rule rarely relied on decentralized governance. This identification strategy suggests that naïve analysis tends to underestimate the pacifying influence of decentralization.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.