Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-7zcd7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-10T13:01:39.521Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Did TARP Banks Get Competitive Advantages?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 February 2016

Allen N. Berger*
Affiliation:
aberger@moore.sc.edu, University of South Carolina, Moore School of Business, Columbia, SC 29208, Wharton Financial Institutions Center, and European Banking Center
Raluca A. Roman
Affiliation:
raluca.roman@grad.moore.sc.edu, University of South Carolina, Moore School of Business, Columbia, SC 29208.
*
*Corresponding author: aberger@moore.sc.edu

Abstract

We investigate whether the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP) gave recipients competitive advantages. Using a difference-in-difference (DID) approach, we find that: i) TARP recipients received competitive advantages and increased both their market shares and market power; ii) results may be driven primarily by the safety channel (TARP banks may be perceived as safer), which is partially offset by the cost-disadvantage channel (TARP funds may be relatively expensive); and iii) these competitive advantages are primarily or entirely due to TARP banks that repaid early. These results may help explain other findings in the literature, and yield important policy implications.

Information

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Michael G. Foster School of Business, University of Washington 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Supplementary material: PDF

Berger and Roman supplementary material

Internet Appendices

Download Berger and Roman supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 164.1 KB