Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-hqrjx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-17T22:07:38.583Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How are words felt in a second language: Norms for 2,628 English words for valence and arousal by L2 speakers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2020

Constance Imbault*
Affiliation:
McMaster University
Debra Titone
Affiliation:
McGill University
Amy Beth Warriner
Affiliation:
McMaster University
Victor Kuperman
Affiliation:
University of Waterloo
*
Address for correspondence: Constance Imbault, imbaulcl@mcmaster.ca

Abstract

The topic of non-native language processing has been of steady interest in past decades. Yet, conclusions about the emotional responses in L2 have been highly variable. We conducted a large-scale rating study to explicitly measure how non-native readers of English respond to the valence and arousal of 2,628 English words. We investigated how the effect of a rater's L2 proficiency, length of time in Canada, and the semantic category of the word affects how L2 readers experience and rate that word. L2 speakers who had lived a longer time in Canada, and reported higher English proficiency, showed emotional responses that were more similar to those of L1 speakers of English. Additionally, valence differences between L1 and L2 raters were greater in words that L2 raters do not typically use in English. These findings highlight the importance of behavioural ecology in language learning, particularly as it applies to emotional word processing.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Supplementary material: File

Imbault et al. supplementary material

Imbault et al. supplementary material

Download Imbault et al. supplementary material(File)
File 227.1 KB
Supplementary material: PDF

Imbault et al. supplementary material

Figures S1-S3

Download Imbault et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 143.3 KB