Hostname: page-component-76d6cb85b7-f97m6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-07-16T02:24:43.636Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Carbon aerogel evolution: Allotrope, graphene-inspired, and 3D-printed aerogels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 October 2017

Swetha Chandrasekaran
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94551, USA
Patrick G. Campbell
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94551, USA
Theodore F. Baumann
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94551, USA
Marcus A. Worsley*
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94551, USA
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: worsley1@llnl.gov

Abstract

Carbon aerogels (CAs) are a unique class of high surface area materials derived by sol–gel chemistry. Their high mass-specific surface area and electrical conductivity, environmental compatibility, and chemical inertness make them very promising materials for many applications, such as energy storage, catalysis, sorbents, and desalination. Since the first CAs were made via pyrolysis of resorcinol–formaldehyde (RF)-based organic aerogels in the late 1980s, the field has really grown. Recently, in addition to RF-derived amorphous CAs, several other carbon allotropes have been realized in aerogel form: carbon nanotubes (CNTs), graphene, graphite, and diamond. Furthermore, the popularity of graphene aerogels has inspired research into aerogels made of a host of graphene analog materials (e.g., boron nitride, transition metal dichalcogenides, etc.), with potential for an even wider array of applications. Finally, the development of three-dimensional-printed aerogels provides the potential for CAs to have an even broader impact on energy-related technologies. Here, we will present recent work covering the novel synthesis of RF-derived, CNT, graphene, graphite, diamond, and graphene analog aerogels.

Information

Type
Invited Review
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2017
Figure 0

FIG. 1. Synthesis scheme for resorcinol–formaldehyde sol–gel path to CAs.

Figure 1

FIG. 2. Images of aerogels. (a) Macroscopic pieces of 7.5 mg/mL CNT aerogels. Pristine CNT aerogel (left) appears black, whereas the aerogel reinforced in a 1 wt% PVA bath (right) is slightly gray. (b) Three PVA-reinforced aerogel pillars (total mass = 13.0 mg) supporting 100 g, or approximately 8000 times their weight. (c) This SEM image of a critical-point-dried aerogel reinforced in a 0.5 wt% PVA solution (CNT content = 10 mg/mL) reveals an open, porous structure. (d) This high-magnification TEM image of an unreinforced aerogel reveals small-diameter CNTs arranged in a classic filamentous network. Reproduced by permission from Ref. 8 (John Wiley and Sons).

Figure 2

FIG. 3. Dependence of Young’s modulus on density for monolithic CNT foams compared to carbon, silica, and alumina aerogels. The inset shows the sequence of uniaxial compression of a monolith 30 mg/cm3 and 55 wt% CNT content, illustrating the superelastic behavior with complete strain recovery after compression to strains as large as 76%. Reproduced by permission from Ref. 42 (American Institute of Physics).

Figure 3

FIG. 4. SEM of the GA at low (a) and high (b) magnifications. TEM of the GA at low (c) and high (d) magnifications. Black arrow denotes holey carbon on TEM grid. Reproduced by permission from Ref. 9 (American Chemical Society).

Figure 4

FIG. 5. Diagram of the fast GA preparation process. Reproduced by permission from Ref. 75 (Elsevier).

Figure 5

FIG. 6. Synthesis of diamond aerogel from amorphous CA precursor under high pressure and temperature. (a) Schematic of optical system used to heat the sample contained in the diamond anvil cell and to perform in situ Raman spectroscopy. The CA precursor is laser heated to likely more than 1600 K at several pressures between approximately 21 to 26 GPa to drive the transition to diamond. Dashed lines show path followed by collected light. (b) Optical transmission micrograph of synthesized diamond aerogel above 20 GPa following laser heating. Translucent regions were laser heated while dark regions were not heated as a control. Surrounding material is the rhenium metal gasket. Scale bar: 20 μm. (c) Raman spectrum of amorphous precursor at approximately 22.5 GPa showing both D and G modes consistent with prior reports of amorphous carbon. The intense peak between 1300 and 1400 cm−1 is due to the diamond anvil or anvils. (d) Comparison of the Raman spectrum in (c) with that obtained after heating (note difference in x-axis scale from c). The additional peak is due to newly formed diamond. The peak is resolvable from that of the anvils because of the different stress states and the spatial selection of the instrument. The difference in signal-to-noise is partly attributed to intense fluorescence from the diamond aerogel. Inset: Optical micrograph of fluorescence from diamond aerogel. Scale bar: 50 μm. Reproduced by permission from Ref. 10 (Copyright (2011) National Academy of Science).

Figure 6

FIG. 7. Overview of different aerographite morphologies by controlled derivations of synthesis. (a) Photograph of macroscopic aerographite. (b–d) 3D interconnected structure of closed-shell graphitic aerographite in different magnifications and TEM inset of wall. (e–h) Hierarchical hollow framework configuration of aerographite in different magnifications. (i–l) Other variants of aerographite. (i) Aerographite network in low aspect bubble-like configuration. (j–k) Aerographite with nanoporous graphite filling. (l) Hollow corrugated pipe design of aerographite surface by detailed adoption of template shape. Reproduced by permission from Ref. 107 (Wiley and Sons).

Figure 7

FIG. 8. Photograph of a precursor GA (left) and a converted BN aerogel (right). The color of the aerogel undergoes a significant color change, from pitch black to bright white, indicating a major change in the chemical composition. However, the overall macroscopic geometry of the samples remains unchanged. Samples shown have roughly square cross-sections. Scale bar is 5 mm. Reproduced by permission from Ref. 17 (American Chemical Society).

Figure 8

FIG. 9. (a) Synthesis scheme for MoS2 and WS2 aerogels. SEM images of (b) ATM, (c) ATT, (d and f) MoS2, and (e and g) WS2 aerogels. TEM images of (h) MoS2 and (i) WS2 aerogels. The inset in images (h) and (i) is the magnification of the white box and is 10 nm in width. Reproduced by permission from Ref. 18 (American Chemical Society).

Figure 9

FIG. 10. Morphology and structure of GAs. (a) Optical image of a 3D printed GA microlattice. SEM images of (b) a 3D printed GA microlattice, (c) GA without RF after etching and (d) GA with 4 wt% RF after etching. Optical image of (e) 3D printed GA microlattices with varying thickness and (f) a 3D printed GA honeycomb. Scale bars, 5 mm (a), 200 mm (b), 100 nm (c, d), and 1 cm (f). Reproduced by permission from Ref. 145 (Nature Publishing Group).

Figure 10

FIG. 11. (a) Schematic of the RTFG process. (b, c) SEM images of (b) phenol-based and (c) camphene-based aerogel structures cooled using liquid N2, an ice/water mixture, and at room temperature. Reproduced by permission from Ref. 144 (Wiley and Sons).

Supplementary material: PDF

Chandrasekaran et al. supplementary material

Figures S1-S17

Download Chandrasekaran et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 6.6 MB