Hostname: page-component-89b8bd64d-dvtzq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-05-09T02:08:24.486Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aligning Virtual Care in Canada with the Needs of Older Adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2022

Hilary Y. M. Pang ,
Grace Zhao Open the ORCID record for Grace Zhao [Opens in a new window] ,
Natasha Kithulegoda Open the ORCID record for Natasha Kithulegoda [Opens in a new window] ,
Payal Agarwal  and
Noah M. Ivers
Hilary Y. M. Pang
Affiliation:
Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada Women’s College Institute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
Grace Zhao
Affiliation:
Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada Women’s College Institute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
Natasha Kithulegoda*
Affiliation:
Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada Women’s College Institute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
Payal Agarwal
Affiliation:
Women’s College Institute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
Noah M. Ivers
Affiliation:
Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada Women’s College Institute for Health Systems Solutions and Virtual Care, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
*
Corresponding author: La correspondance et les demandes de tirés-à-part doivent être adressées à: / Correspondence and requests for offprints should be sent to: Natasha Kithulegoda, Women’s College Hospital, 76 Grenville Street, Rm. 6426, Toronto, ON M5S 1B2 (natasha.kithulegoda@wchospital.ca).
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Public health measures associated with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) have accelerated the adoption of virtual health care across Canada. We explore the opportunities that virtual care presents in achieving the Quadruple Aim and challenges to navigate, through the lens of care for older adults. In particular, we recommend virtual care-related policies related to older adults that address (a) limited uptake among the socio-economically disadvantaged, (b) user-centered design of virtual care technologies, and (c) integration of iterative evaluations to ensure equitable and efficient achievement of desired outcomes. As virtual care accelerates forward, we must not leave older Canadians behind.

Résumé

Résumé

Les mesures de santé publique associées à la COVID-19 ont accéléré l’adoption des soins de santé virtuels au Canada. Nous explorons les possibilités offertes par la virtualisation des soins pour l’atteinte de quatre objectifs, ainsi que les défis qui se posent dans le cadre des soins aux personnes âgées. En particulier, nous recommandons que les politiques relatives aux soins virtuels pour les personnes âgées tiennent compte i) de leur adoption limitée chez les individus défavorisés sur le plan socioéconomique, ii) de la conception centrée sur l’utilisateur de technologies de soins virtuels et iii) de l’intégration d’évaluations itératives pour une atteinte des résultats souhaités qui soit équitable et efficient. À mesure que les soins virtuels progressent, nous devons nous assurer de ne pas laisser de côté les Canadiens plus âgés.

Keywords

agingolder adultsvirtual caredigital healthpolicyvieillissementpersonnes âgéessoins par voie virtuellesanté numériquepolitique

Information

Type
Policy and Practice Note/Note de politique et practique
Information
Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement , Volume 41 , Issue 4 , December 2022 , pp. 641 - 646
Check for updates
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
© Canadian Association on Gerontology 2022

Introduction

Public health measures associated with the disease (COVID-19) caused by the coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 have accelerated the adoption of virtual health care interactions across Canada. As nationwide uptake of virtual care grows, implementation must thoughtfully incorporate the unique needs of older adults (Colwill, Cultice, & Kruse, Reference Colwill, Cultice and Kruse2008; Ivers, Brown, & Detsky, Reference Ivers, Brown and Detsky2018; Petterson, Liaw, Tran, & Bazemore, Reference Petterson, Liaw, Tran and Bazemore2015) – a group that is expected to grow by 68 per cent over the next 20 years (Canadian Institute of Health Information, 2019). Currently, policy documents that inform the development of health services for older adults, such as the 2016 Canadian National Seniors Strategy, do not mention virtual care (nor the use of technology to enable such care) in this population (Sinha et al., Reference Sinha, Griffin, Ringer, Reppas-Rindlisbacher, Stewart and Wong2016).

We have seen during the COVID-19 pandemic how quickly virtual care services can be implemented. For example, self-screening tools have been launched at the institutional, provincial, and federal levels to reduce in-person visits to assessment centres (Government of Canada, 2020; Government of Ontario, 2020; Women’s College Hospital, 2020). In a further example, Renfrew County, ON set up a 24/7 virtual care service to deliver accessible primary care across its expansive rural region (Arnprior Regional Health, 2020). Additionally, telecritical care in hospitals has allowed providers to monitor patients remotely, thus reducing the need for patient transfers, preserving personal protective equipment, and reducing the risk of exposure (Hollander & Carr, Reference Hollander and Carr2020; Scott et al., Reference Scott, Miller, Fonda, Yeaw, Gaudaen and Pavliscsak2020). Ultimately, the key driver of increased virtual care is that selected virtual care services are now covered under various provincial health insurance plans (Doctors of BC, 2020; Moore, Reference Moore2020).

We discuss the opportunities and challenges of virtual care as it relates to care for older adults in Canada. As most of the work on implementing virtual care has been done in the absence of a national framework, there exists a meaningful opportunity for policy makers to address this gap by developing a national digital health framework that is inclusive of older adults (Virtual Care Task Force, 2020).

The Promise of Virtual Care

Over the last decade, the increasing availability of digital health tools has empowered older adults to participate in their own health care and provided an opportunity to achieve the Quadruple Aim: improved patient and caregiver experiences, reduced costs, and better outcomes (Bashshur et al., Reference Bashshur, Howell, Krupinski, Harms, Bashshur and Doarn2016; Bodenheimer & Sinsky, Reference Bodenheimer and Sinsky2014; Canadian Medical Association, 2020; Virtual Care Task Force, 2020).

For select patient populations and clinical scenarios, several studies have demonstrated that virtual care is at least as effective as in-person care for older adults with the added benefit of convenience and cost-savings (Bashshur et al., Reference Bashshur, Howell, Krupinski, Harms, Bashshur and Doarn2016; Leveille et al., Reference Leveille, Huang, Tsai, Allen, Weingart and Iezzoni2009; Liddy et al., Reference Liddy, Dusseault, Dahrouge, Hogg, Lemelin and Humber2008; Marcolino & Alkmim, Reference Marcolino and Alkmim2015; Piette, Mendoza-Avelares, Milton, Lange, & Fajardo, Reference Piette, Mendoza-Avelares, Milton, Lange and Fajardo2010; Shah et al., Reference Shah, Wasserman, Gillespie, Wood, Wang and Noyes2015; Teunissen et al., Reference Teunissen, Verhagen, Brink, van der Linden, Voest and de Graeff2007). For example, telehome care monitoring services were particularly beneficial for housebound patients and for end-of-life care (Liddy et al., Reference Liddy, Dusseault, Dahrouge, Hogg, Lemelin and Humber2008; Teunissen et al., Reference Teunissen, Verhagen, Brink, van der Linden, Voest and de Graeff2007). Virtual care can reduce the need for in-person visits for patients with chronic illnesses who require outpatient monitoring, while improving patient and physician satisfaction (Dixon & Stahl, Reference Dixon and Stahl2009; Liddy et al., Reference Liddy, Dusseault, Dahrouge, Hogg, Lemelin and Humber2008). Technology that facilitates asynchronous access to health professionals and to personal health records can enable self-management, simplify administrative tasks (i.e., booking appointments), and potentially improve health outcomes (Greene & Hibbard, Reference Greene and Hibbard2011). Virtual care can cost-effectively improve access to care (Pinnock, McKenzie, Price, & Sheikh, Reference Pinnock, McKenzie, Price and Sheikh2005). Virtual care also has the potential to facilitate population-wide screening for issues arising in older adults who are amenable to early intervention (Agarwal et al., Reference Agarwal, Kithulegoda, Bouck, Bosiak, Birnbaum and Reddeman2020; Giansanti & Aprile, Reference Giansanti and Aprile2020). A large retrospective cohort study in the U.K. found that a telephone-based case management program for patients with chronic conditions led to a 22 per cent reduction in cost of care compared with eligible patients who did not enrol in the program (Nymark, Davies, Shabestari, & McNeil, Reference Nymark, Davies, Shabestari and McNeil2013).

Although virtual care has the potential to reduce costs, with respect to fewer hospitalizations and reduced hospital stays, there is the possibility of cost-escalation if improved access leads to new services provided to those who were previously under-served (Ashwood, Mehrotra, Cowling, & Uscher-Pines, Reference Ashwood, Mehrotra, Cowling and Uscher-Pines2017; Hernandez et al., Reference Hernandez, Alonso, Garcia-Aymerich, Grimsmo, Vontetsianos and García Cuyàs2015). In addition, it is possible that virtual care may lead to additional costs from increased ordering of investigations, prescription medications, and software licensing fees (Ray et al., Reference Ray, Shi, Gidengil, Poon, Uscher-Pines and Mehrotra2019; University of British Columbia Digital Emergency Medicine Evaluation Team, 2018). Still, the opportunity for cost-savings associated with reduced travel, for improved patient experience, along with the potential for better outcomes demonstrate clear value propositions, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Challenges of Implementing Virtual Care for Older Adults

Equitable Access for All Older Adults

Older adults from ethnic minorities, lower-income neighbourhoods, lower educational backgrounds, and rural communities are disproportionately less likely to use digital health tools (Anderson, Perrin, Jiang, & Kumar, Reference Anderson, Perrin, Jiang and Kumar2019; Choi & Dinitto, Reference Choi and DiNitto2013; Yoon, Jang, Vaughan, & Garcia, Reference Yoon, Jang, Vaughan and Garcia2020; Zibrik et al., Reference Zibrik, Khan, Bangar, Stacy, Novak Lauscher and Ho2015). Despite a narrowing “digital divide” for other populations, digital uptake among certain older adults continue to lag, limiting their ability to fully reap the benefits of virtual care. The Senior Technology Acceptance Model has shown that lower rates of adoption may be due to a combination of inexperience, perception of complexity, ease of trialling the technology, and socio-economic status (Berkowsky, Sharit, & Czaja, Reference Berkowsky, Sharit and Czaja2018; Harte et al., Reference Harte, Glynn, Broderick, Rodriguez-Molinero, Baker and McGuiness2014; Kim, Reference Kim2012; Renaud & van Biljon, Reference Renaud and Biljon2008). As assessments moved virtually during the COVID-19 pandemic, 38 per cent of older adults reported feeling unready to attend video-based visits, mostly due to inexperience with technology as well as physical disability (Lam, Lu, Shi, & Covinsky, Reference Lam, Lu, Shi and Covinsky2020).

Designing digital services that consider the needs and expectations of older adults is essential to reducing systemic barriers that exclude their active participation in the digital world. Community-centred programs that allow older adults to share learning and do it on their own terms can effectively increase technology use (Chiu et al., Reference Chiu, Hu, Lin, Chang, Chang and Lai2016). The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted challenges faced by older adults in equitably accessing virtual care. Outpatient providers have reported increased numbers of no-shows after shifting appointments to a virtual format due to older patients struggling with accessing and using telemedicine technology (Triana, Gusdork, Shah, & Horst, Reference Triana, Gusdork, Shah and Horst2020). Older adults, including those who do not use a computer, frail, or lack a caregiver, are less likely to choose a video visit than a phone visit (Joy et al., Reference Joy, McGagh, Jones, Liyanage, Sherlock and Parimalanathan2020; Liu et al., Reference Liu, Goodarzi, Jones, Posno, Straus and Watt2021). Phone visits may improve access to older adults unfamiliar with the technology or with visual impairments, but it is inadequate for care requiring visual assessment, such as for musculoskeletal, dermatological, and neurological physical exams.

For older adults from low socio-economic backgrounds, removing financial barriers by implementing waivers to purchase essential devices and Internet access as well as outreach educational programs serve a vital role in extending the reach of telemedicine (Zhai, Reference Zhai2020). Building educational infrastructure is important as well. A medical student-led volunteer initiative was able to address digital literacy barriers by guiding patients over the phone on how to download the telemedicine software in preparation for their appointments (Triana et al., Reference Triana, Gusdork, Shah and Horst2020). In addition, Canada’s Minister of Innovation, Science, and Economic Development recently announced a Digital Literacy Exchange Program to teach fundamental digital literacy skills free-of-charge (Innovation, Science, and Economic Development Canada, 2019). Although few details have been disclosed regarding this program, this is one step forward towards further narrowing the digital divide and ensuring equitable access to virtual care amongst older Canadians.

Maintaining Patient-Centred Care

Almost 80 per cent of Canadians are reasonably concerned with the diminishment of human connection with virtual platforms (Canadian Medical Association & Ipsos, 2019). Although virtual care is not a replacement for in-person encounters, as virtual care expands, strategies need to be in place to maintain patient-centred care in a virtual setting. Further, as some patients may struggle to find a private space to discuss confidential issues, systems should be constructed to allow patients to choose the type of interaction they prefer at any given time, regardless of their access or abilities. For older adults who may experience a lack of social connectedness, adopting explicit humanistic practices in virtual care is especially important. Existing communication frameworks can be reconceptualized into a virtual setting to foster meaningful interactions between patient and provider (Frankel & Stein, Reference Frankel and Stein2001; Shankar et al., Reference Shankar, Fischer, Brown-Johnson, Safaeinili, Haverfield and Shaw2020). For example, the Four Habits Model emphasizes the importance of creating rapport early in the encounter. This can be manifested by asking patients whether they are comfortable with discussing their health concerns via the virtual modality in order to reinforce a protected and safe space, as well as orient the visits so that they put patient priorities first (Frankel & Stein, Reference Frankel and Stein2001; Shankar et al., Reference Shankar, Fischer, Brown-Johnson, Safaeinili, Haverfield and Shaw2020).

For patients who do not use digital technology, patient portals should have a “proxy” portal that allow selected caregivers to access patient health information using the caregivers’ own credentials. Allowing patients to choose who may interact with the health system on their behalf – known as granular role-based access control – and what specific privileges they are granted can facilitate beneficial information access, compensate for deficiencies in functional performance, enhance self-management, and improve communication between providers and supports (Wolff, Darer, & Larsen, Reference Wolff, Darer and Larsen2016). Caregivers, who may reside in other jurisdictions, could then coordinate patient care remotely and help address barriers related to digital literacy. This could be particularly important in end-of-life care, where having knowledge of patient–provider discussions can better prepare family members to act as surrogate decision makers.

Need for User-Centred Design

Virtual care interfaces must consider the physical, functional, and psychological effects of aging. For example, older adults may face difficulty using touchscreen technology, as aging may be correlated with a decline in psychomotor functionality, cognitive performance, and sensory impairment (Harte et al., Reference Harte, Glynn, Broderick, Rodriguez-Molinero, Baker and McGuiness2014). Some older adults may have trouble pinching and swiping or have difficulty reaching with the thumb across an interface while holding the device in one hand. Many digital health tools focus on single-disease populations, but most older adults have multiple interacting causes of chronic disease and disability (Becker et al., Reference Becker, Miron-Shatz, Schumacher, Krocza, Diamantidis and Albrecht2014; Steele Gray, Mercer, Palen, McKinstry, & Hendry, Reference Steele Gray, Mercer, Palen, McKinstry and Hendry2016). Virtual care for older Canadians represents an (as yet unfilled) opportunity to integrate oft-siloed health services. However, effective design and implementation of this sort of virtual care would require a culture change, collective compromise, and continual adaptation to achieve the Quadruple Aim (Affleck, Reference Affleck2019).

User-centred design starts with empathy and understanding; to this end, older Canadians and their caregivers should be involved in the design and implementation process for virtual care. For example, the Community Care Coordination Service of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs showed that matching patients to technology that was compatible with their level of digital literacy, vision, manual dexterity, willingness to use technology, and adherence to medical regime improved clinical outcomes in older adults with chronic illnesses (Ryan, Kobb, & Hilsen, Reference Ryan, Kobb and Hilsen2003). By seeking the active participation of a diverse group of older adults, designers will have a better understanding of the diverse capabilities and needs for this population.

In addition, caregivers are fundamental in the care of older adults (Gosse, Kassardjian, Masellis, & Mitchell, Reference Gosse, Kassardjian, Masellis and Mitchell2021; Lindauer et al., Reference Lindauer, Seelye, Lyons, Dodge, Mattek and Mincks2017). However, several studies have shown that caregivers experience impairments in their own psychological and physical health (Marzorati, Renzi, Russell-Edu, & Pravettoni, Reference Marzorati, Renzi, Russell-Edu and Pravettoni2018; Schulz et al., Reference Schulz, Mendelsohn, Haley, Mahoney, Allen and Zhang2003). A telemedicine-based psychosocial intervention for caregivers of advanced heart failure showed little to no improvement in caregiver quality of life, suggesting that virtual care interventions should address practical challenges, including knowledge, instrumental, and decisional difficulties, and be flexibly delivered around caregivers’ schedules (Dionne-Odom et al., Reference Dionne-Odom, Ejem, Wells, Azuero, Stockdill and Keebler2020). Empowering caregivers using virtual care can take various forms, including training them on using the technology, enabling participation during care conversations even if they are in a different locale (such as through a three-way call), providing clinical educational tools targeted for caregivers, and including remote-monitoring features that make room for caregiver observations. When designing a virtual care tool, designers may ask themselves whether the value, design, and implementation process not only addresses the older adults’ attitudinal, functional, and physical demands but also their caregivers’ needs.

Iterative Evaluation of Virtual Care Is Needed

To adapt to the evolving needs of the patient and health system, rigorous evaluation frameworks must be implemented at the outset. Validated frameworks have been widely used to assess digital excellence in international health systems, such as the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society (HIMSS). An alternative “Evolve in Context” model has been recently proposed which, unlike the HIMSS, allows for an iterative process for defining digital excellence that tailors to the needs of local populations and builds upon existing infrastructures (Cresswell et al., Reference Cresswell, Sheikh, Krasuska, Heeney, Franklin and Lane2019). Given that many digital health innovations fail, the ability to learn and adapt quickly is vital. Implementation approaches such as the nonadoption, abandonment, scale-up, spread, and sustainability framework can be used to explain failures, identify contextual challenges, and systematically inform innovations that have the potential to achieve scale (Greenhalgh et al., Reference Greenhalgh, Wherton, Papoutsi, Lynch, Hughes and A’Court2017).

What Can Canada Learn from International Health Systems?

Denmark is recognized as the international leader in eHealth (Lluch & Abadie, Reference Lluch and Abadie2013; Zamora Talaya, Reference Zamora Talaya2012). Like Canada, Denmark has a universal and publicly financed health care system with a similar proportion of the population who are older adults (Statistics Canada, 2019; Vrangbaek, Reference Vrangbaek2020; The World Bank, 2019). However, health system administration and governance in Denmark primarily takes place at the national level, unlike Canada’s decentralized provincial and territorial model (Vrangbaek, Reference Vrangbaek2020). Nevertheless, each of Canada’s provinces and territories could learn from Denmark’s ability to invest in interoperable systems to create a collaborative digital ecosystem (Danish Ministry of Health, 2012).

Most significantly, Denmark has realized that end-user involvement in virtual care deployment is a key factor for success (Høstgaard, Bertelsen, & Nøhr, Reference Høstgaard, Bertelsen and Nøhr2017). For example, the success of TeleCare Nord – a regional telerehabilitation program for older patients – was credited to the active partnership with patients, their caregivers, and health providers who contributed to the design workflow and program implementation (WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2016). This project resulted in reduced hospital readmission rates by 50 per cent, improved patient empowerment and quality of life, and increased cost-effectiveness. Patients with both high and low digital literacy experienced similar patient-related outcomes (Lilholt et al., Reference Lilholt, Witt Udsen, Ehlers and Hejlesen2017). It has now been scaled up to enable older adults to live as independently as possible in their own homes (WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2016).

How Can Canada Ensure that Virtual Care Is Inclusive to Older Canadians?

Organizations have come together to address the current dearth of a national digital health strategy. Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada (ISEDC) has stressed the need for a national digital health strategy that is inclusive to older adults, with an emphasis on interoperability (Innovation Science Economic Development Canada, 2018). Canada Health Infoway, the national body for digital health innovations, can utilize existing systematic frameworks to evaluate the reach, relevance, and quality of available virtual care tools and services (Canada Health Infoway, 2019; Cresswell et al., Reference Cresswell, Sheikh, Krasuska, Heeney, Franklin and Lane2019; Greenhalgh et al., Reference Greenhalgh, Wherton, Papoutsi, Lynch, Hughes and A’Court2017). Thoughtful strategic implementation must also consider the wide diversity of technological uptake among older Canadians, where some may be highly proficient in using virtual care tools while others may not be or choose to not use videoconferencing platforms, despite being independent with using computers (Liu et al., Reference Liu, Goodarzi, Jones, Posno, Straus and Watt2021). The Canadian Medical Association Virtual Care Task Force specifically recommended the development of a pan-Canadian Charter of Patient Health Information Rights and Responsibilities, which can be based off of existing efforts from Canada Health Infoway’s work on ACCESS 2022 (Virtual Care Task Force, 2020).

Objectives for these new policies should also integrate virtual care policies that address inequities of limited virtual care uptake among socio-economically disadvantaged older adults, implement virtual care that upholds user-centred design as a core principle, and integrate iterative evaluative mechanisms so that innovations will match the changing technological, political, and social landscape. This requires interdisciplinary collaboration between the technology and health sectors, federal ISEDC ministers, provincial and territorial health ministers, health care providers, and community and patient partners.

Conclusion

Increased uptake of virtual care will undoubtedly be a health system legacy of COVID-19. Canada must expedite its efforts to tackle equitable virtual care policies for older adults and learn from leading jurisdictions in the virtual care arena. Through purposeful engagement with end-users and additional stakeholders, we can develop virtual care frameworks that embrace the needs of older adults, empower their engagement, and ultimately achieve the Quadruple Aim to optimize health care outcomes, patient and provider experience, and costs. As virtual care accelerates forward, we must not leave our older Canadians behind.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge Dr. Abi Sriharan and Dr. Nathan Stall for their guidance and expertise.

References

Affleck, E. (2019). Interoperability of electronic medical records requires more than just technical understanding. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 191(19), E541–E541. doi:10.1503/cmaj.71818CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agarwal, P., Kithulegoda, N., Bouck, Z., Bosiak, B., Birnbaum, I., & Reddeman, L., et al. (2020). Feasibility of an electronic health tool to promote physical activity in primary care: Pilot cluster randomized controlled trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(2), e15424. doi:10.2196/15424CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, M., Perrin, A., Jiang, J., & Kumar, M. (2019). 10% of Americans don’t use the internet. Who are they? Pew Research Center. Retrieved 24 July 2021 from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/04/22/some-americans-dont-use-the-internet-who-are-they/.Google Scholar
Arnprior Regional Health. (2020). Renfrew county virtual triage and assessment centre: New 24/7 pandemic health-care service for residents. Arnprior Regional Health. Retrieved 24 July 2021 from https://www.arnpriorregionalhealth.ca/renfrew-county-virtual-triage-and-assessment-centre-new-health-care-service-for-residents-without-access-to-family-doctor/.Google Scholar
Ashwood, J., Mehrotra, A., Cowling, D., & Uscher-Pines, L. (2017). Direct-to-consumer telehealth may increase access to care but does not decrease spending. Health Affairs, 36(3), 485–491. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bashshur, R., Howell, J., Krupinski, E., Harms, K., Bashshur, N., & Doarn, C. (2016). The empirical foundations of telemedicine interventions in primary care. Telemedicine and E-Health, 22(5), 342–375. doi:10.1089/tmj.2016.0045CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becker, S., Miron-Shatz, T., Schumacher, N., Krocza, J., Diamantidis, C., & Albrecht, U. (2014). mHealth 2.0: Experiences, possibilities, and perspectives. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2(2), e24. doi:10.2196/mhealth.3328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkowsky, R., Sharit, J., & Czaja, S. (2018). Factors predicting decisions about technology adoption among older adults. Innovation in Aging, 1(3), igy002. doi:10.1093/geroni/igy002Google Scholar
Bodenheimer, T., & Sinsky, C. (2014). From triple to quadruple aim: Care of the patient requires care of the provider. The Annals of Family Medicine, 12(6), 573–576. doi:10.1370/afm.1713CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canada Health Infoway. (2019). Summary corporate plan (2019–2020). Retrieved 24 July 2021 from https://www.infoway-inforoute.ca/en/component/edocman/3654-summary-corporate-plan-2019-2020/view-document?Itemid=0.Google Scholar
Canadian Institute of Health Information. (2019). CIHI’s annual report, 2018–2019: 25 years of CIHI. Ottawa, ON: CIHI. Retrieved 24 July 2021 from https://www.cihi.ca/sites/default/files/document/cihi-annual-report-2018-2019-en-web.pdf.Google Scholar
Canadian Medical Association. (2020). What Canadians think about virtual health care. Canadian Medical Association. Retrieved 24 July 2021 from https://www.cma.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/virtual-care/cma-virtual-care-public-poll-june-2020-e.pdf.Google Scholar
Canadian Medical Association & Ipsos. (2019). The future of connected health care: Reporting Canadians’ perspective on the health care system. Retrieved 24 July 2021 from https://www.cma.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/Media-Releases/The-Future-of-Connected-Healthcare-e.pdf.Google Scholar
Chiu, C., Hu, Y., Lin, D., Chang, F., Chang, C., & Lai, C. (2016). The attitudes, impact, and learning needs of older adults using apps on touchscreen mobile devices: Results from a pilot study. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 189–197. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Choi, N., & DiNitto, D. (2013). The digital divide among low-income homebound older adults: Internet use patterns, eHealth literacy, and attitudes toward computer/internet use. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15(5), e93. doi:10.2196/jmir.2645CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colwill, J., Cultice, J., & Kruse, R. (2008). Will generalist physician supply meet demands of an increasing and aging population? Health Affairs, 27(Suppl 1), w232–w241. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.27.3.w232CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cresswell, K., Sheikh, A., Krasuska, M., Heeney, C., Franklin, B., & Lane, W., et al. (2019). Reconceptualising the digital maturity of health systems. The Lancet Digital Health, 1(5), e200–e201. doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(19)30083-4CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Danish Ministry of Health. (2012). eHealth in Denmark: eHealth as part of a coherent Danish health care system. Retrieved 24 July 2021 from https://www.medcom.dk/media/1211/ehealth-in-denmark-ehealth-as-a-part-of-a-coherent-danish-health-care-system.pdf.Google Scholar
Dionne-Odom, J., Ejem, D., Wells, R., Azuero, A., Stockdill, M., & Keebler, K., et al. (2020). Effects of a telehealth early palliative care intervention for family caregivers of persons with advanced heart failure. JAMA Network Open, 3(4), e202583. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.2583CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dixon, R., & Stahl, J. (2009). A randomized trial of virtual visits in a general medicine practice. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 15(3), 115–117. doi:10.1258/jtt.2009.003003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doctors of BC. (2020). Billing changes – COVID-19. Doctors of BC. Retrieved 24 July 2021 from https://www.doctorsofbc.ca/news/COVID-19-temporary-billing-changes.Google Scholar
Frankel, R. M., & Stein, T. (2001). Getting the most out of the clinical encounter: The four habits model. The Journal of Medical Practice Management: MPM, 16(4), 184–191.Google ScholarPubMed
Giansanti, D., & Aprile, I. (2020). Letter to the editor: Is the COVID-19 pandemic an opportunity to enlarge the telemedicine boundaries?. Telemedicine and E-Health, 26(9), 1123–1125. doi:10.1089/tmj.2020.0159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gosse, P., Kassardjian, C., Masellis, M., & Mitchell, S. (2021). Virtual care for patients with Alzheimer disease and related dementias during the COVID-19 era and beyond. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 193(11), E371–E377. doi:10.1503/cmaj.201938CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Government of Canada. (2020). COVID-19 self-assessment tool. Government of Canada.Google Scholar
Government of Ontario. (2020). COVID-19 self-assessment. Government of Ontario. Retrieved 24 July 2021 from https://COVID-19.ontario.ca/self-assessment/.Google Scholar
Greene, J., & Hibbard, J. (2011). Why does patient activation matter? An examination of the relationships between patient activation and health-related outcomes. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 27(5), 520–526. doi:10.1007/s11606-011-1931-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenhalgh, T., Wherton, J., Papoutsi, C., Lynch, J., Hughes, G., & A’Court, C., et al. (2017). Beyond adoption: A new framework for theorizing and evaluating nonadoption, abandonment, and challenges to the scale-up, spread, and sustainability of health and care technologies. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(11), e367. doi:10.2196/jmir.8775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harte, R., Glynn, L., Broderick, B., Rodriguez-Molinero, A., Baker, P., & McGuiness, B., et al. (2014). Human centred design considerations for connected health devices for the older adult. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 4(2), 245–281. doi:10.3390/jpm4020245CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hernandez, C., Alonso, A., Garcia-Aymerich, J., Grimsmo, A., Vontetsianos, T., & García Cuyàs, F., et al. (2015). Integrated care services: Lessons learned from the deployment of the NEXES project. International Journal of Integrated Care, 15(1), e006. doi:10.5334/ijic.2018CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hollander, J., & Carr, B. (2020). Virtually perfect? Telemedicine for COVID-19. New England Journal of Medicine, 382(18), 1679–1681. doi:10.1056/nejmp2003539CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Høstgaard, A., Bertelsen, P., & Nøhr, C. (2017). Constructive eHealth evaluation: Lessons from evaluation of EHR development in 4 Danish hospitals. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 17(1), 45. doi:10.1186/s12911-017-0444-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Innovation, Science, and Economic Development Canada. (2019). Digital literacy exchange program. Retrieved 24 July 2021 from http://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/102.nsf/eng/home.Google Scholar
Innovation Science Economic Development Canada. (2018). Canada’s economic strategy tables: Health and biosciences. Retrieved 24 July 2021 from https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/098.nsf/eng/00025.html.Google Scholar
Ivers, N., Brown, A., & Detsky, A. (2018). Lessons from the Canadian experience with single-payer health insurance. JAMA Internal Medicine, 178(9), 1250. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3568.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joy, M., McGagh, D., Jones, N., Liyanage, H., Sherlock, J., & Parimalanathan, V., et al. (2020). Reorganisation of primary care for older adults during COVID-19: A cross-sectional database study in the UK. British Journal of General Practice, 70(697), e540–e547. doi:10.3399/bjgp20x710933CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, K. (2012). The emotional responses of older adults to new technology. Retrieved 24 July 2021 from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/10208632.pdf.Google Scholar
Lam, K., Lu, A., Shi, Y., & Covinsky, K. (2020). Assessing telemedicine unreadiness among older adults in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Internal Medicine, 180(10), 1389. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.2671.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leveille, S., Huang, A., Tsai, S., Allen, M., Weingart, S., & Iezzoni, L. (2009). Health coaching via an internet portal for primary care patients with chronic conditions. Medical Care, 47(1), 41–47. doi:10.1097/mlr.0b013e3181844dd0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liddy, C., Dusseault, J. J., Dahrouge, S., Hogg, W., Lemelin, J., & Humber, J. (2008). Telehomecare for patients with multiple chronic illnesses: Pilot study. Canadian Family Physician, 54(1), 58–65.Google ScholarPubMed
Lilholt, P. H., Witt Udsen, F., Ehlers, L., & Hejlesen, O. K. (2017). Telehealthcare for patients suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Effects on health-related quality of life: Results from the Danish ‘TeleCare North’ cluster-randomised trial. BMJ Open, 7(5), e014587. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014587CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindauer, A., Seelye, A., Lyons, B., Dodge, H., Mattek, N., & Mincks, K., et al. (2017). Dementia care comes home: Patient and caregiver assessment via telemedicine. The Gerontologist, 57(5), e85–e93. doi:10.1093/geront/gnw206CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, L., Goodarzi, Z., Jones, A., Posno, R., Straus, S., & Watt, J. (2021). Factors associated with virtual care access in older adults: A cross-sectional study. Age and Ageing, 50(4), 1412–1415. doi:10.1093/ageing/afab021CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lluch, M., & Abadie, F. (2013). Exploring the role of ICT in the provision of integrated care—Evidence from eight countries. Health Policy, 111, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcolino, M. S., & Alkmim, M. B. (2015). Teleconsultations to provide support for primary care practitioners and improve quality of care—The experience of a large scale telehealth service in Brazil. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 216, 987–987.Google ScholarPubMed
Marzorati, C., Renzi, C., Russell-Edu, S., & Pravettoni, G. (2018). Telemedicine use among caregivers of cancer patients: Systematic review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(6), e223. doi:10.2196/jmir.9812CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moore, O. (2020). Ontario insurance to cover some forms of virtual medical care to reduce virus spread. The Globe and Mail, 1–4. Retrieved 24 July 2021 from https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-ontario-insurance-to-cover-some-forms-of-virtual-medical-care-to/.Google Scholar
Nymark, L., Davies, P., Shabestari, O., & McNeil, I. (2013). Analysis of the impact of the Birmingham ownhealth program on secondary care utilization and cost: A retrospective cohort study. Telemedicine and E-Health, 19(12), 949–955. doi:10.1089/tmj.2013.0011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petterson, S., Liaw, W., Tran, C., & Bazemore, A. (2015). Estimating the residency expansion required to avoid projected primary care physician shortages by 2035. The Annals of Family Medicine, 13(2), 107–114. doi:10.1370/afm.1760CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piette, J., Mendoza-Avelares, M., Milton, E., Lange, I., & Fajardo, R. (2010). Access to mobile communication technology and willingness to participate in automated telemedicine calls among chronically ill patients in Honduras. Telemedicine and E-Health, 16(10), 1030–1041. doi:10.1089/tmj.2010.0074CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pinnock, H., McKenzie, L., Price, D., & Sheikh, A. (2005). Cost-effectiveness of telephone or surgery asthma reviews: Economic analysis of a randomised controlled trial. British Journal of General Practice, 55(511), 119–124.Google ScholarPubMed
Ray, K., Shi, Z., Gidengil, C., Poon, S., Uscher-Pines, L., & Mehrotra, A. (2019). Antibiotic prescribing during pediatric direct-to-consumer telemedicine visits. Pediatrics, 143(5), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renaud, K., & Biljon, J. v. (2008 ). Predicting technology acceptance and adoption by the elderly: A qualitative study. Proceedings of the 2008 annual research conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists on IT research in developing countries: Riding the wave of technology, Wilderness, South Africa. https://doi.org/10.1145/1456659.1456684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, P., Kobb, R., & Hilsen, P. (2003). Making the right connection: Matching patients to technology. Telemedicine Journal and E-Health, 9(1), 81–88. doi:10.1089/153056203763317684CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schulz, R., Mendelsohn, A., Haley, W., Mahoney, D., Allen, R., & Zhang, S., et al. (2003). End-of-life care and the effects of bereavement on family caregivers of persons with dementia. New England Journal Of Medicine, 349(20), 1936–1942. doi:10.1056/nejmsa035373CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, B., Miller, G., Fonda, S., Yeaw, R., Gaudaen, J., & Pavliscsak, H., et al. (2020). Advanced digital health technologies for COVID-19 and future emergencies. Telemedicine and E-Health, 26(10), 1226–1233. doi:10.1089/tmj.2020.0140CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shah, M., Wasserman, E., Gillespie, S., Wood, N., Wang, H., & Noyes, K., et al. (2015). High-intensity telemedicine decreases emergency department use for ambulatory care sensitive conditions by older adult senior living community residents. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 16(12), 1077–1081. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2015.07.009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shankar, M., Fischer, M., Brown-Johnson, C. G., Safaeinili, N., Haverfield, M. C., Shaw, J. G., et al. (2020). Humanism in telemedicine: Connecting through virtual visits during the COVID-19 pandemic. Annals of Family Medicine: COVID-19 Collection, 1–10.Google Scholar
Sinha, S. K., Griffin, B., Ringer, T., Reppas-Rindlisbacher, C., Stewart, E., Wong, I., et al. (2016). An evidence-informed national seniors strategy for Canada (2nd ed.). Toronto, ON: Alliance for a National Seniors Strategy. Retrieved 24 July 2021 from http://nationalseniorsstrategy.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/National-Seniors-Strategy-Second-Edition.pdf.Google Scholar
Statistics Canada. (2019). Population Estimates on July 1st, by Age and Sex. Statistics Canada. Retrieved 24 July 2021 from https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1710000501.Google Scholar
Steele Gray, C., Mercer, S., Palen, T., McKinstry, B., & Hendry, A. (2016). eHealth advances in support of people with complex care needs: Case examples from Canada, Scotland and the US. Healthcare Quarterly, 19(2), 29–37. doi:10.12927/hcq.2016.24696CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teunissen, S., Verhagen, E., Brink, M., van der Linden, B., Voest, E., & de Graeff, A. (2007). Telephone consultation in palliative care for cancer patients: 5 years of experience in The Netherlands. Supportive Care in Cancer, 15(6), 577–582. doi:10.1007/s00520-006-0202-yCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The World Bank. (2019). Population ages 65 and above (% of total population): Denmark. World Bank Group. Retrieved 24 July 2021 from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.POP.65UP.TO.ZS?locations=DK.Google Scholar
Triana, A., Gusdork, R., Shah, K., & Horst, S. (2020). Technology literacy as a barrier to telehealth during COVID-19. Telemedicine and E-Health, 26, 1118–1119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
University of British Columbia Digital Emergency Medicine Evaluation Team. (2018). Robson valley virtual care pilot evaluation report.Google Scholar
Virtual Care Task Force. (2020). Virtual care: Recommendations for scaling up virtual medical services. Canadian Medical Association. Retrieved 24 July 2021 from https://www.cma.ca/sites/default/files/pdf/virtual-care/ReportoftheVirtualCareTaskForce.pdf.Google Scholar
Vrangbaek, K. (2020). International health care system profiles: Denmark. The Commonwealth Fund. Retrieved 24 July 2021 from https://www.commonwealthfund.org/international-health-policy-center/countries/denmark.Google Scholar
WHO Regional Office for Europe. (2016). Lessons from transforming health services delivery: Compendium of initiatives in the WHO European Region. Retrieved 24 July 2021 from http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0014/303026/Compendium-of-initiatives-in-the-WHO-European-Region-rev1.pdf?ua=1.Google Scholar
Wolff, J. L., Darer, J. D., & Larsen, K. L. (2016). Family caregivers and consumer health information technology. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 31(1), 117–121. doi:10.1007/s11606-015-3494-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Women’s College Hospital. (2020). COVID-19 self-assessment. Women’s College Hospital. Retrieved 24 July 2021 from https://www.womenscollegehospital.ca/COVID19-tool/.Google Scholar
Yoon, H., Jang, Y., Vaughan, P., & Garcia, M. (2020). Older adults’ internet use for health information: Digital divide by race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status. Journal of Applied Gerontology, 39(1), 105–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zamora Talaya, B. (2012). Strategic intelligence monitor on personal health systems, phase 2. Impact assessment final report (No. JRC71183). Joint Research Centre (Seville site).Google Scholar
Zhai, Y.(2020). A call for addressing barriers to telemedicine: Health disparities during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 90(1), 64–66. doi:10.1159/000509000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zibrik, L., Khan, S., Bangar, N., Stacy, E., Novak Lauscher, H., & Ho, K. (2015). Patient and community centered ehealth: Exploring eHealth barriers and facilitators for chronic disease self-management within British Columbia’s immigrant Chinese and Punjabi seniors. Health Policy and Technology, 4, 348–356. doi:10.1016/j.hlpt.2015.08.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar