Australia's Indigenous minority (3% of the overall Australian population1) experience distinct health disparities compared with their non-Indigenous counterparts. Life expectancy is at least 10 years shorter,Reference Rosenstock, Mukandi, Zwi and Hill2 and death before 65 years of age is three to four times more prevalent.3 Latest national reports identify that their burden of disease is 2.3-fold higher.4 In addition, almost 65% of Indigenous Australians report a long-term health condition, 29% with a self-reported continuing mental health condition.5 These ongoing health disparities are associated with determinants such as the intergenerational effects of colonisation and forced assimilation, social injustices, economic deprivation (e.g. poverty, unstable housing) and systemic racism experienced by Indigenous Australians.Reference Hunter6,Reference Krieg7 Moreover, these health gaps may also represent differences between Western and Indigenous concepts of health.Reference Raphael and Swan8 Despite these multiple factors that significantly contribute to their health and well-being, there is still a lack of policies and programmes addressing these gaps for Indigenous Australians.
This study measures the associations between the prevalence of common mental disorders (CMDs) and trauma exposure. We used a structured interview that quantified the presence of psychiatric disorders according to diagnostic criteria from the DSM-IV-TR, the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID-I).Reference First, Spitzer, Gibbon and Williams9 Preliminary research indicates that the interview is culturally safe and relevant as a diagnostic tool suitable for the study population, when administered by psychologists with appropriate cultural training.Reference Toombs, Nasir, Kisely, Ranmuthugala, Gill and Beccaria10
Method
Study design
This study is part of a larger cross-sectional prevalence study, for which participant recruitment, involvement and other procedures have been previously reported.Reference Nasir, Toombs, Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan, Kisely, Gill and Black11 Data categories for CMDsReference Nasir, Toombs, Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan, Kisely, Gill and Black11 and traumatic life eventsReference Nasir, Black, Toombs, Kisely, Gill and Beccaria12 have also been previously described. CMD diagnoses were categorised into three major diagnosis classes: mood, anxiety and substance use disorders. Traumas reported were examined and coded into categories consistent with DSM-IV-TR and SCID-I post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) criteria. The data and categories were reviewed by two senior clinical psychologists (G.B., E.B.B.) and a senior consultant psychiatrist (S.K.) during extraction, classification and analyses. Events reported as trauma, but falling short of formal definition, were not included in the analyses.
Ethics approval
The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional committees on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. All procedures involving human patients were approved by The University of Queensland Human Research Ethics Committee (clearance number: 2012001315) and the Boards of Directors of the participating Aboriginal Medical Services. The study was conducted in accordance with the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Guidelines (Values and Ethics: Guidelines for Ethical Conduct in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Research, 2003). The research protocol was established in consultation and using co-designed engagement processes. Permission from Indigenous Elders was obtained before recruiting from reserves and communities. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants before any data collection or analyses.
Data analysis
Descriptive analyses of participant demographics (n = 544) have been previously reported.Reference Nasir, Toombs, Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan, Kisely, Gill and Black11 A significant majority were women (62%), and the age distribution of the cohort was similar to that of Indigenous Australians nationwide.13 Crude and standardised prevalence estimates of the major classes of CMD for those with and without reported trauma were analysed for current (past 30 days), past 12-month and lifetime prevalence. Results were stratified by gender and age groups. We excluded PTSD as a separate category because those with PTSD have had exposure to trauma by definition.
Univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analysis were used to determine the risk of a CMD associated with various trauma categories and other exposures. Separate logistic regressions were fitted for the outcomes of anxiety disorder (excluding PTSD), mood disorder, substance use disorder and any CMD (excluding PTSD). Variables with a P-value ≤0.1 in the univariate analyses were carried forward into the relevant multivariate logistic regressions. Stepwise regression was performed for the multivariate models for each outcome to determine the final model (based on the Akaike information criterion value). Multicollinearity between the explanatory/risk factor variables was assessed with the variance inflation factor. All models were fitted in R (Microsoft Version 3.6.2 for Windows).
Patient involvement
Participants of the study were involved in extensive consultations before the study was designed, implemented and evaluated. Procedures for the involvement of participants have been previously described.Reference Nasir, Toombs, Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan, Kisely, Gill and Black11
Results
Prevalence of CMDs
Crude rates for the 30-day, 12-month and lifetime prevalence of CMDs for those with and without reported trauma is described in Table 1. Overall, those experiencing trauma experienced higher prevalence of all CMDs for all periods of assessment. Of those with trauma exposure (N = 353), the majority were women (62%); although men with trauma exposure had higher rates for 30-day (52.7%), 12-month (61.8%) and lifetime (84.6%) prevalence of any CMD (Table 1). After standardising against the Australian population,14 the incidence of CMDs for those without trauma was low, and so standardised rates using gender stratification was not performed (Appendix 1).
Crude prevalence of common mental disorders in Indigenous Australians reporting trauma exposure
a. Those with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as their only anxiety diagnosis have been excluded as they have trauma by definition; the denominators for those with trauma were as follows: men n = 124, women n = 187, total N = 311 for current anxiety prevalence; men n = 124, women n = 184, total N = 308 for 12-month anxiety prevalence; men n = 116, women n = 179, total N = 295 for lifetime anxiety prevalence. The denominators for those without trauma were unaffected by removal of patients with PTSD only.
b. Those with PTSD as their only diagnosis have been excluded as they have trauma by definition; the denominators for those with trauma were as follows: men n = 131, women n = 216, total N = 347 for current common mental disorder (CMD) prevalence; men n = 131, women n = 215, total N = 346 for past 12-month CMD prevalence; men n = 130, women n = 214, total N = 344 for lifetime CMD prevalence. The denominators for those without trauma were unaffected by removal of patients with PTSD only.
Associations between risk factors and CMDs
The results of univariate logistic regression analyses, examining associations between exposures and a diagnosis of an anxiety disorder, mood disorder, substance use disorder and any CMD in the past 12 months, are presented in Table 2. Variable categories and descriptions have previously been described.Reference Nasir, Black, Toombs, Kisely, Gill and Beccaria12 Additionally, for the purposes of this study, a specific variable with sexual and physical violence event categories was created, using four levels: no sexual or physical violence (reference level), sexual violence only, physical violence only and both physical and sexual violence experienced. Variables with a P-value ≤ 0.1 were carried forward into the multivariate logistic regression analysis (adjusted analyses). Results before and after the stepwise regression are both presented.
Univariate logistic regression analyses for the association of trauma exposure with a diagnosis of a common mental disorder in the past 12 months
Participants with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) only, n = 45.
Separate multiple regression models were used with ‘any’ trauma (Table 3) and trauma subtypes (Table 4) as predictors, to examine associations between a diagnosis of anxiety disorder, mood disorder, substance use disorder and any CMD (in the presence of other predictors) in the past 12 months. Those with any trauma experienced a 4.01-fold (95% CI 2.72–5.97) increased risk of a diagnosis of any CMD (Table 3). Those with any trauma also experienced a 4.38-fold (95% CI 2.73–7.28), 2.65-fold (95% CI 1.64–4.44) and 2.78-fold (95% CI 1.65–4.85) increased risk of a diagnosis of an anxiety disorder, mood disorder or substance use disorder, respectively (Table 3). When investigating trauma exposures, comorbid PTSD was associated with a 4.53-fold (95% CI 2.61–7.92) increased risk of a mood disorder, a 2.47-fold (95% CI 1.38–4.35) increased risk of substance use disorder and a 3.58-fold (95% CI 1.90–7.06) increased risk of any CMD (Table 4). Women were much less likely to experience a substance use disorder (odds ratio 0.34, 95% CI 0.21–0.53) than men, and had an almost halved lower risk of any CMD (odds ratio 0.49, 95% CI 0.33–0.72) (Table 4). History of physical violence, and particularly sexual violence (odds ratio 3.05, 95% CI 1.51–6.41) or both physical and sexual violence (odds ratio 3.14, 95% CI 1.64–6.16), were associated with increased risks of a diagnosis of anxiety disorder, mood disorder or any CMD in the past 12 months (P < 0.001, P = 0.015 and P < 0.001, respectively; Table 4). The unexpected death of a loved one also had a significant effect on the odds of having an anxiety disorder (odds ratio 1.65, 95% CI 1.05–2.56), mood disorder (odds ratio 1.68, 95% CI 1.05–2.67) or any CMD (odds ratio 2.06, 95% CI 1.37–3.13) (Table 4).
Multivariate logistic regression analysis for association of exposures/predictors, including overall trauma, with a diagnosis of a common mental disorder in the past 12 months
Multivariate logistic regression analysis for association of exposures/predictors, including trauma subtypes, with a diagnosis of a common mental disorder in the past 12 months
PTSD, post-traumatic stress disorder.
Discussion
It is largely acknowledged that Indigenous Australians experience more trauma than the general Australian population, because of past and present disadvantages and discrimination. A significant proportion of the trauma experienced by Indigenous Australians is culturally specific, such as forced removal from traditional homeland (‘country’), mass removal of children from parents (‘taken’), systemic racism, discrimination and greater disadvantage than any other population group. Much of this trauma is not captured by Western assessment tools. Currently available data are largely limited to specific populations or are self-reported. For instance, an Australian study conducted with the World Health Organization Composite International Diagnostic Interview identified an average of 2.9 events per person in 331 Indigenous men in custody,Reference Heffernan, Andersen, Davidson and Kinner15 which doubled for those with a diagnosis of PTSD in the same survey. Similarly, a community-based study reported lifetime exposure to a traumatic event among 97.3% of Aboriginal participants from three communities in Western Australia (N = 221).Reference Nadew16 In a representative community sample that used a clinical interview, Indigenous adults reported a 62.6% prevalence of traumatic life events, which is not increased, compared with other populations. The prevalence of four common trauma categories, however, were 1.7- to 3.0-times higher than in the Australian population,Reference Nasir, Black, Toombs, Kisely, Gill and Beccaria12 with the rate doubling in those with PTSD.Reference Nasir, Black, Toombs, Kisely, Gill and Beccaria12
To our knowledge, this is the first study to report on the prevalence of trauma for those with a CMD by using a clinical structured interview in a representative cohort of Indigenous Australians. In this Indigenous Australian cohort, we found that the presence of trauma for those with a lifetime prevalence of CMDs was 64.9%. Among these, 79.1% had a lifetime prevalence of a CMD, compared with 43.5% reporting a CMD but no trauma. The prevalence of any trauma is associated with almost twice the risk, for those with a CMD. Our study has also shown that the presence of harmful traumas increases the risk of having another CMD by 4.01-fold. Sexual assault was shown to increase prevalence of CMDs four-fold. This ratio has been similar to seminal work investigating the effects of sexual assault within marginalised populations.Reference Burnam, Stein, Golding, Siegel, Sorenson and Forsythe17 The high rates of violence and sexual assault within Australian Indigenous populations have been well-documented, and having strong culture and community is purported as a key strategy to mitigate violence.Reference Dudgeon, Milroy and Walker18
Our study found that trauma exposure was associated with a higher prevalence of CMDs in a representative Indigenous Australian population. Trauma exposure was associated with a 4.38-, 2.65- and 2.78-fold increased risk of having an anxiety disorder, mood disorder or substance use disorder, respectively. The presence of comorbid PTSD and trauma exposure was further associated with a 4.53-fold increased risk of a diagnosis of mood disorder in the past 12 months and a 3.58-fold increased risk of a diagnosis of any CMD in the past 12 months. This study also shows that Indigenous Australians who have experienced trauma exposure are 4.01 times more likely to have a diagnosis of any CMD in the past 12 months. In our previous report on this cohort, we identified that there was a stark increased rate of a current CMD compared with a 12-month or lifetime prevalence of a diagnosis.Reference Nasir, Toombs, Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan, Kisely, Gill and Black11 This shows that past events may have a lower recall rate, and that only severe or specific types of traumas are more likely to be remembered.
Despite a general agreement of the high prevalence of mental health disorders among Indigenous populations, nationally representative, mental health surveys that use face-to-face diagnostic interviews have not measured CMD rates in Indigenous populations, although smaller studies have used self-reported symptoms or specific population samples.Reference Black, Ranmuthugala, Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan, Toombs, Nicholson and Kisely19,Reference Almeida, Flicker, Fenner, Smith, Hyde and Atkinson20 Notably, the 2007 National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing, a study considered to be a benchmark prevalence study for mental health in Australia, did not collect data on the Indigenous status of participants.21 Another national prevalence study specifically assessing the mental health of children, the Young Minds Matter study, specifically excluded Indigenous children.Reference Lawrence, Johnson and Hafekost22 As a result, the National Aboriginal Torres Strait Islander Social Survey (NATSISS), conducted in 2014–2015 by the Australian Bureau of Statistics, is the only published nationally representative study.5 However, this study did not use a diagnostic assessment, but asked participants if a doctor or nurse had informed them of having depression, anxiety, substance use disorder, or behavioural or emotional mental health conditions. The NATSISS identified that 29% of Indigenous people aged >15 years reported that they had a mental health condition.
Our previous study used a culturally acceptable diagnostic tool (the SCID-I) to assess the prevalence of CMDsReference Toombs, Nasir, Kisely, Ranmuthugala, Gill and Beccaria23 in 544 Indigenous adults over a wide geographical area. We found that the standardised prevalence rates of mood, anxiety and substance use disorders were 6.7-, 3.8- and 6.9-fold higherReference Nasir, Toombs, Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan, Kisely, Gill and Black11 than the general population. The crude rates of a current, 12-month and lifetime prevalence of PTSD were 13.8%, 15.3% and 20.8%, respectively – the highest prevalence rates for any individual CMD in our study.
In further work investigating the prevalence of traumatic life events and the risk of developing PTSD, we found that 64.9% of participants reported a lifetime trauma.Reference Nasir, Black, Toombs, Kisely, Gill and Beccaria12 The standardised prevalence of a PTSD diagnosis in the past 12 months was 13.3% (95% CI 10.4–16.1) overall, 16.1% (95% CI 12.2–19.9) in women and 8.2% (95% CI 5.3–11.1) in men; three times higher than the Australian reported rates.Reference Nasir, Black, Toombs, Kisely, Gill and Beccaria12 However, this study did not investigate the association of trauma with other CMDs.
Experiencing trauma has been significantly widespread and recurring across generations for Indigenous Australians;Reference Hunter6 the risk of developing a CMD for those having experienced traumatic exposures is considerably exacerbated. As a consequence of social injustices and ongoing systemic disadvantages, the interaction of past and present traumas often present themselves as a collective trauma.Reference Krieg7
Limitations
Although this study incorporates a large broadly representative sample of Indigenous Australians by Indigenous mental health research standards, the study may not be adequately powered to determine accurate associations of CMDs and trauma, or specifically representative of the whole Australian Indigenous population. Likewise, the data does not account for exposures not readily identified with Western assessment tools that are unique to this population; for example, the impacts of disrupted cultural identity development and experiences of direct and institutional racism, which may provide more nuanced views of trauma exposure. Larger more diverse studies of this kind are further required to determine a more accurate and descriptive analysis of the prevalence of trauma and risk of CMDs within this population.
Another limitation is that the diagnoses made in this study were based on assessments that used the DSM-IV-TR criteria for trauma and CMDs, which have been updated in the newer DSM-5 version.24 The DSM-5 includes revisions to the symptom clusters and a more explicit definition of trauma, with specific examples; it is likely that applying the DSM-5 criteria of trauma to the data used in this study may have produced different outcomes. Furthermore, despite the DSM-IV being shown to be culturally acceptable,Reference Toombs, Nasir, Kisely, Ranmuthugala, Gill and Beccaria23 the DSM is a Western classification system and the same constructs and diagnostic criteria may not be applicable for Indigenous Australians.Reference Wright, Lin and O'Connell25 The presence of recall bias may also be present, as the assessments were conducted retrospectively. Similarly, there may also be an influence of the Indigenous concept of ‘shame’Reference Louth, Vanderheiden and Mayer26 on the diagnoses being made; this concept largely stems from historical breaches of confidentiality and trust, and the compounding negative effects of racial disadvantage resulting from past segregation policies, displacement and separation of families.
Findings from this study suggest that the presence of debilitating trauma in this Indigenous cohort greatly increased the risk of developing other CMDs. There needs to be consideration of the underlying social determinants that lead to trauma exposure and risk of CMDs. Without addressing these concerns as a priority, the urgent need to break intergenerational cycles of trauma affecting social and emotional well-being of Indigenous Australians cannot be addressed. It is essential to address these social issues and focus on mitigating trauma, to reduce the burden of disease represented by poor mental health. Closing existing gaps contributing to the mental health of Indigenous Australians is an urgent priority, and there is strong evidence for it to be a specifically targeted national priority.
Data availability
The University of Queensland Human Ethics Committee imposes restrictions on the data. Anonymised data are available to researchers who meet the conditions of the ethics approval and research governance policy that applies to this study via UQ eSpace. Requests for the data may be sent to the lead author, B.F.N.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the participants of this study for their time and contributions toward the study; and staff from the local Aboriginal Medical Services, Indigenous community leaders and participating Master of Psychology students, who all helped facilitate the implementation of this study. The authors also acknowledge the statistical support received through the Research and Statistical Support Service, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland.
Author contributions
B.F.N. was project manager and was responsible for data collection, database maintenance, supervision of the epidemiology and biostatistics, and wrote the manuscript drafts and the final version of the manuscript. E.B.B. was the clinical psychologist responsible for conducting the participant assessments and data collection, and gave final approval of the manuscript. E.G.R. was the senior biostatistician, conducted data analysis and interpretation of data outcomes, contributed to manuscript editing and gave approval of the final manuscript. M.T. was the senior Aboriginal academic and principal chief investigator; was responsible for the study concept and design engagement; and gave final approval of the manuscript. S.K. was the senior clinical psychiatrist, provided assessment supervision and oversight, was responsible for the study concept and design, and gave approval of the final manuscript. N.S.G. was the clinical psychiatrist, provided assessment supervision and oversight, and gave approval of the final manuscript. G.B. was the senior psychologist, provided assessment supervision and oversight, was responsible for the study concept and design, and gave approval of the final manuscript. S.K.-C. was the senior academic, supervised the epidemiology and biostatistics, contributed to manuscript editing and gave approval of the final manuscript. G.C.N. was the senior academic, supervised the epidemiology and biostatistics, contributed to manuscript editing and gave approval of the final manuscript.
Funding
This study was funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia (project grant 1061963). The study funder had no role in the study design, planning, data collection, analysis, interpretation of the data, writing of the manuscript or decision to submit this manuscript for publication.
Declaration of interest
All authors declare no competing interests or financial relationships with commercial interests. M.T. is an Aboriginal woman who is Chair of the Board of one of the participating Aboroginal Medical Service, but played no role in the decision of the Aboriginal Medical Service to participate in the study.
Standardised prevalence of common mental disorders in Indigenous Australians reporting trauma exposure (95% confidence intervals)
Open access
eLetters
No eLetters have been published for this article.